Apple paid less than 2 percent tax on earnings outside U.S.

Apple Inc. paid an income tax rate of only 1.9 percent on its earnings outside the U.S. in its latest fiscal year, a regulatory filing by the company shows.
The world's most valuable company paid $713 million in tax on foreign earnings of $36.8 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 29, according to the financial statement filed on Oct. 31. The foreign earnings were up 53 percent from fiscal 2011, when Apple earned $24 billion outside the U.S. and paid income tax of 2.5 percent on it.
The tech giant's foreign tax rate compares with the general U.S. corporate tax rate of 35 percent.
Apple may pay some income taxes on its profit to the country in which it sells its products, but it minimizes them by using various accounting moves to shift profits to countries with low tax rates. For example the strategy known as "Double Irish With a Dutch Sandwich," routes profits through Irish and Dutch subsidiaries and then to the Caribbean.
Other multinational corporations also use such tax techniques, which are legal.
Like other big companies, Apple leaves cash overseas. If it brought it home to the U.S., it would have to pay U.S. corporate taxes on the money. The cash that Apple has left overseas as of Sept. 29 has mounted to a stunning $82.6 billion, up from $74 billion as of June 30.
Where Apple does differ from other companies is that it sets aside a portion of the foreign profits, marking them as subject to U.S. taxes sometime in the future.
When Apple reports quarterly results, it records that portion of the taxes as a liability, which is subtracted from its profits even though it hasn't actually paid the taxes.
Tax experts say the company could easily eliminate these "phantom" tax obligations. That would boost Apple's profits for the past three years by as much $10.5 billion, according to calculations by The Associated Press reported in July.
While investors might rejoice if Apple suddenly added $10.5 billion to its profits, unilaterally erasing a massive U.S. tax obligation could tarnish its reputation as a relatively responsible payer of U.S. taxes. Instead, the company is lobbying to change U.S. law so that it can erase its liabilities in a less conspicuous fashion.
Overall Cupertino, Calif.-based Apple had net income of $41.7 billion, or $44.15 per share, in fiscal 2012. That was up 61 percent from $25.9 billion, or $27.68 per share, in fiscal 2011.
The world's most valuable company paid $713 million in tax on foreign earnings of $36.8 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 29, according to the financial statement filed on Oct. 31. The foreign earnings were up 53 percent from fiscal 2011, when Apple earned $24 billion outside the U.S. and paid income tax of 2.5 percent on it.
The tech giant's foreign tax rate compares with the general U.S. corporate tax rate of 35 percent.
Apple may pay some income taxes on its profit to the country in which it sells its products, but it minimizes them by using various accounting moves to shift profits to countries with low tax rates. For example the strategy known as "Double Irish With a Dutch Sandwich," routes profits through Irish and Dutch subsidiaries and then to the Caribbean.
Other multinational corporations also use such tax techniques, which are legal.
Like other big companies, Apple leaves cash overseas. If it brought it home to the U.S., it would have to pay U.S. corporate taxes on the money. The cash that Apple has left overseas as of Sept. 29 has mounted to a stunning $82.6 billion, up from $74 billion as of June 30.
Where Apple does differ from other companies is that it sets aside a portion of the foreign profits, marking them as subject to U.S. taxes sometime in the future.
When Apple reports quarterly results, it records that portion of the taxes as a liability, which is subtracted from its profits even though it hasn't actually paid the taxes.
Tax experts say the company could easily eliminate these "phantom" tax obligations. That would boost Apple's profits for the past three years by as much $10.5 billion, according to calculations by The Associated Press reported in July.
While investors might rejoice if Apple suddenly added $10.5 billion to its profits, unilaterally erasing a massive U.S. tax obligation could tarnish its reputation as a relatively responsible payer of U.S. taxes. Instead, the company is lobbying to change U.S. law so that it can erase its liabilities in a less conspicuous fashion.
Overall Cupertino, Calif.-based Apple had net income of $41.7 billion, or $44.15 per share, in fiscal 2012. That was up 61 percent from $25.9 billion, or $27.68 per share, in fiscal 2011.
I think it's called tax evasion or some crap like that
Is this the 'corporate citizens' I keep hearing about?
double whammy... not only do they keep the majority of profits abroad, they lower their domestic tax burden by taking credit now for taxes they intend to pay in the future? Those 10b$ in the meantime are working for free overseas. it is ingenious and I would not blame Apple, but maybe it's time to wake up and restructure our tax system... how about lowering US corporate income taxes but close some of these loop holes.
 @Komo Dragon In my utopia ethical business practices come first over profit.... Ha!
I'd love to see all of the whiners if Apple paid what we pay as "private" earners. Their macbooks, iPhones and iPods would cost them double.Â
Â
It's not fair. I shouldn't have to pay this much for my mac..whine whine whine.......
 @Gino I would fair just fine as I don't own Apple anything, but I will point out many companies enjoy profit over ethical business practices.
Personally, I can't wait to pay 44.8% on capital gains next year if Congress doesn't act.Â
Â
Apple is lucky, they remain at 35%....or 2% whatever...
Wait... why should they pay ANYTHING to the U.S. on profits from product built overseas and sold overseas, that never made it to the U.S.?
 @TCat When I worked out of the US as an ExPat, I had a limit on how much I could earn before paying US income tax. Anything over and I had to pay taxes. It should be the same for companies that call themselves US based, or like me, if I did not like it I could have always given up my US citizenship. And without these companies hiding behind the protections the US brings them in patent and innovation laws along with the powers of the US State Department these companies would not survive without these powers behind them. Asking them to pay more taxes is only fair.
 @TCat So why do the US citizens have to pay taxes on what they earned on projects in other countries even though none of that money is being remitted back to US?
 @Jack Daniels Ding ding! Doesn't quite seem fair does it?Â
So.. why not just lower the corporate tax rate to say... ZERO? Then all those companies come home, declare their income HERE and pay out dividends to shareholders (including retirement systems, ya mopes). You can then tax individuals when they get their dividends.
Â
Of course, it doesn't FEEL good...
 @Sid Vishess So who's going to pay for all those public services like, perhaps, metro bus drivers?Â
Â
Maybe we can all pay zero tax rates, eh! Sounds like a great idea!
This comment has been deleted
 @caphillkid  @Sid VishessÂ
Â
As Sid so well stated, corporate profits paid out as dividends would be taxable. Â That would mean more taxable income at the state and local levels, rather having that money skimmed off by the federal government. Â Â
 @Sid Vishess  @Opus8no5  @caphillkid That's not what I said at all. You should be a politician. You advocated for lowering the tax rate to ZERO for corporations. And in your own words said "Then all those companies come home...". That would not happen. Do you really think Apple would bring the manufacturing of its products to the United States when they can get cheap labor in China, and the facilities are already set up and running? Sure, maybe a new product line might come to the US, but if you think that "all those companies would come home", then you are dreaming.
Â
Logic, no?
 @SusieQ  @Opus8no5  @caphillkid Susie, I love your argument which is essentially;"Tax rates have no effect on business decisions."
Wharton School, no?
 @Opus8no5  @caphillkid  @Sid Vishess What kind of fantasy land are you living in that you think that reducing the corporate tax rate to zero would make "all those companies come home"? The cost of labor is still so much higher here than in developing countries that it would not make sense for most of these companies to close foreign operations and bring those jobs back here.
 @Opus8no5 Funny responses all around. Once we put the corporate rate at zero, everything will magically work itself out. All those investors paying 15% on their 10 cents a share dividend will pay for everything, including trillions more in Romney defense spending. Oh boy...
 @caphillkid Uh... the taxes would be paid by the individual when they receive dividends and since dividends would be substantially higher and more corporations would be insourced or onshored,-as it were- revenues should increase.Â
 @caphillkid  You are an idiot. The taxes would be collected by alternate means. Also Metro buses are funded by local sales tax not federal income tax .
Â
 @caphillkid Throw a stick Kid and maybe they will go away!
 @caphillkid  @Keysontheright admire your restraint
 @Keysontheright Only 61% actually from sales tax. But you are right, there is probably nothing that the federal tax dollars support here in Washington....lol
Apple isn't doing anything wrong - they're abiding by the existing laws.
Â
If you were given the option of paying 2% or 35% in taxes, which would you choose? Â Duh.
Â
The fact is, our tax burden here in the US has gotten completely out of control. Â It's forcing businesses to resort to fancy maneuvering to keep their books looking healthy. Â And no, this doesn't just apply to Apple. Â There are plenty of small businesses that use tax-saving tactics in order to stay in business.
More US rich Corporate dirt bags.
This comment has been deleted
 @Funky-Munky Lol.  Sorry life just sucks for you
Apple isn't the only dirt-bag in the bunch....... Welcome to capitalism where if you can't get it done in the USA cheaply take it to another country. Why pay living wages in the USA? It's easier to exploit others in foreign countries due to poverty, lack of education and the fact their government allows U.S. businesses to continue with the rape, pillage and plundering as long as their palms get greased. If you're a peasant and are hungry enough long hours with little pay sounds good. Good luck in Hell Apple and others raping, pillaging and plundering others less fortunate.
 @Funky-Munky I'll be alright regardless. So will the upper classes. Those you speak of will have to work for each other in the end. I look forward to their business savvy once they've stolen & destroyed all they could.
 @Romey-Rome And by logic such as yours along with others the division of the social classes will continue to deepen until the boiling point. You thought the Occupiers were a pain just wait a little bit longer...... :D)
 @Funky-Munky Because not every job deserves a living wage. If I can stick my head out the back door, pull in and train a dozen people to do your job in a week, then you do not deserve a "living" wage. In that case, you frankly are disposable & easily replaceable, and there is no reason for anyone to pay you more when there is a back door in every business. The more you try to extort said wage through legislation, the more things will go over seas.
Â
Loopholes are available to everyone. It just doesn't make financial sense to most people. I'm not going to pay $20k/yr to a top-dog accountant to save me $15k in taxes. I have considered it though. If I can break even, I'll do it just out of spite. But I'm bad at keeping records to make it happen.
Â
Listen to your parents kids. Don't have kids young. Learn all you can. Don't ever get too comfortable. And if you go to college, PLEASE make sure it's not feel-good degree which will never re-pay you. That's the condition I set on my 2 kids. I'll pay for college if it'll make you money. If you want to major in art history, well then, you'll need 2 or more sub living wage jobs. Everything else will fall in place.
 @cyclops If I threw a stick would you go away?
 @cyclops If you're unable to understand the simplicity of my point(s) there isn't any point in conversing with me. I am an American peasant nothing more, nothing less! It's in your mind that I am something other than what I claim such as an Occupier or something. When your mom dropped you off at the school, she got a ticket for littering. (just a thought) Have a day... :D)
 @Funky-Munky  If these companies paid "USA living wages" no one would be able to afford anything and you to would be a peasant. Oh but wait, you're an American....you ARE entitled to everything in the world. Get a clue.
No surprise. How much did Halliburton pay? Oh wait... Cheney and Co moved operations to Dubai. Good business move, or shifty tax avoidance? You decide.
I can hardly wait for the trickledown.
 @IslandAtheist Trickeup mediocracy?
 @Romey-Rome I highly doubt you're in the pay grade that you're implying by sticking up for the companies a.k.a lets say 15% that pay little taxes. (food for thought) :D)
 @Funky-Munky Right. So I should I enjoy seeing them get shafted? It'll kick you in the arse in the end. All good by me.
The trickle is gone by the time it gets to me.
I wish I only had to pay 2% on what I made.
 @IslandAtheist This comes to mind "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche" in French.... (just a thought)