Story Published:
Jun 25, 2002 at 9:50 AM PDT
Story Updated:
Aug 31, 2006 at 12:43 AM PDT
SEATTLE - The National Marine Fisheries Service will not
list Puget Sound orcas for protection under the Endangered Species
Act, despite years of decline and a chance the killer whales could
vanish over the next century.
But the agency said it will take other steps to increase federal
protection for the "southern resident" pods of killer whales,
which summer in Puget Sound.
"We are taking the decline of these killer whales seriously and
we will work to sustain and support this population," said Bob
Lohn, head of the fisheries service's regional office.
By the end of last year, only 78 killer whales remained in the
three pods - down from 98 in 1995, a 20 percent drop in six years.
The population is believed to have peaked at around 120 whales in
the early 1960s, when dozens were captured for marine aquariums
across the country - a practice that stopped in the 1970s.
"They're not quite dead enough yet for the National Marine
Fisheries Service to act," said Fred Felleman of the Orca
Conservancy and Ocean Advocates, two of 10 groups that petitioned
last year for the endangered-species listing.
An 11-member team of biologists reviewed the case and determined
that the southern residents, while in danger of extinction, do not
qualify as a geographically and genetically distinct subpopulation
of orcas - one requirement for protection under the Endangered
Species Act.
No one is sure exactly what is causing the decline, but Lohn
said stress from pollution, parasites and vessel traffic including
whale-watching boats are all possible factors, as well as declining
salmon runs. While most killer whales feed on fish and seals, the
southern residents - and their northern counterparts in Canada's
inland waters - feed on fish alone.
"The bottom line on causes is we don't know the answer," Lohn
said.
The agency plans to begin the process of having the orcas
designated as "depleted" under the Marine Mammal Protection Act,
which would allow allow increased attention to the population, Lohn
said.
"It allows more focused attention and certainly means we will
write a conservancy plan, which is the equivalent of a recovery
plan under an ESA listing," NMFS spokesman Brian Gorman said.
"And we will list in pretty clear terms what we think the problems
with the population are, and the things that we think would lead
to a solution."
He said he did not know whether the agency had funds on hand for
more focused killer-whale work. "I think it's a little too early
to tell."
The agency will solicit public comment about other ways to help
the population and, in conjunction with Canadian authorities,
improve whale-watching guidelines, Lohn said.
Brent Plater, attorney for the Berkeley, Calif.-based Center for
Biological Diversity and the petition's lead author, contended the
southern residents are a distinct population and said the findings
are inconsistent with determinations on other populations.
"Today's decision is a new low in the annals of the fisheries
service," Plater said. "They've completely abdicated their
responsibilities to protect this population."
Lohn said he took the advice of some of the world's top
scientists, and "I'll stand by that."
The whales' status will be reviewed again in four years, he
said.
"If they wait another four years it is just to suggest they
think the status quo is acceptable," Felleman said. "To wait four
more years is a recipe for disaster."
Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., issued a statement saying NMFS
"should account for its decision by providing all available
information to the public and local experts in order to allow a
thoughtful examination of the merits." And she noted that the
"depleted" designation "allows us to take advantage of
additional research and recovery resources."
"The call to action has been sounded and our regional leaders
must act now to preserve this icon of our Northwest waters," she
said.
Tuesday's decision came in response to a petition brought by
several conservation groups. They argued that the Marine Mammal
Protection Act only prevents direct harming of orcas, while an
endangered-species listing would also protect their environment.
Other groups pressing for an endangered listing include the
Center for Whale Research in Friday Harbor, the Washington Toxics
Coalition, the American Cetacean Society, the Sierra Club, Friends
of the San Juans, People for Puget Sound, Project Sea Wolf and
former Washington Secretary of State Ralph Munro.