Story Published:
May 14, 2003 at 4:32 AM PST
Story Updated:
Aug 31, 2006 at 12:02 AM PST
WASHINGTON - Commercial fishing has emptied the world's
oceans of 90 percent of the populations of large prized tuna,
swordfish, marlin and other fish species that flourished a
half-century ago, two marine scientists reported.
The new research based on nearly 50 years of data offers a bleak
outlook for some of the most commercially valuable trophy fish
species and further debunks a notion that oceans are limitless blue
frontiers teeming with boundless life.
"Although it is now widely accepted that single populations can
be fished to low levels, this is the first analysis to show
general, pronounced declines of entire communities across widely
varying ecosystems," scientists Ransom A. Myers and Boris Worm
report in Thursday's issue of Nature magazine. "Most scientists
and managers may not be aware of the true magnitude of change in
marine ecosystems."
Myers, a marine biology professor at Dalhousie University in
Canada, and Dalhousie research fellow Worm found it generally takes
less than 15 years for giant commercial fishing operations to kill
80 percent of a new fishing ground's abundance.
They also found marine life can recover from such commercial
operations if smaller, fast-growing species are given a chance to
fill in for the overfished predators, whose average weights also
are declining sharply.
Myers began work on the report a decade ago, collecting data
only for commercial fish that could be put into cans.
The data cover Japanese fishing between 1952 and 1999 for the
most widespread type of fishing gear - longlines - used on the open
oceans to catch tuna, marlin and swordfish. Longlines float for
miles with baited hooks dangling vertically below, causing lots of
other unintended catches.
Just after World II, as large-scale fishing fleets began
spreading globally, no marine fish stocks were known to be
overfished and the Japanese caught 10 fish per 100 hooks.
Now, they are lucky to catch one per 100, Myers said. The report
uses other research to verify the results and expand them to other
species.
Michael Sissenwine, head of fisheries science at the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said he agrees fishing can
cause big reductions in populations quickly, but cautioned against
drawing larger conclusions.
"There's nothing that assures us that the data they are using
is representative of all populations in the world," he said,
adding that fishing typically reduces a species' population by at
least 50 percent.
"We shouldn't on the other hand conclude that a substantial
reduction is a problem," he said. "The point is we shouldn't be
thinking we can have fisheries and leave the ecosystem in a
pristine state."
One recent success story is the rebuilding of North Atlantic
swordfish populations to 94 percent of what they should be, up from
65 percent, because of stricter management since 1999, according to
the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic
Tunas.
Daniel Pauly, a leading fisheries expert based in Canada, said
the report is significant, however, for its unusually comprehensive
data illustrating the shortcomings of fisheries management.
"We always regulate the closing of barns after the horses have
already left," he said. "What it means is that the high seas
fisheries that are opened up in the deep seas, they are a
completely law-free environment like the Old West."
The trends outlined in the report echo a 1994 estimate by the
U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization that almost 70 percent of
marine fish stocks were overfished or fully exploited. A
U.N.-sponsored world summit in South Africa called for restoration
of global fisheries by 2015.
Myers and Worm hope their data serves as a guide for those
efforts.
Barbara Block, a Stanford University marine biologist and one of
the world's leading tuna researchers, likened the losses of big
fish to the devastating population declines of great whales in the
past century.
"What the paper is doing is bringing to the public the reality
of what's happening in our seas," she said. "We're systematically
removing the large carnivores from the seas."
Block said "some of the most magnificent creatures on Earth"
are being eliminated before researchers fully understand them.
"Do we want a world without white sharks and giant tunas?" she
asked. "Do we want a world without mako sharks? Industrial
large-scale fishing is making that choice for all of humankind."
For More Information:
www.nature.com/nature