Story Published:
Jan 30, 2006 at 12:15 PM PDT
Story Updated:
Aug 31, 2006 at 2:11 AM PDT
OLYMPIA - Saying the passage of a gay civil rights
bill was an example of the arrogance of lawmakers, initiative
promoter Tim Eyman filed two ballot measures Monday, seeking to put
the issue before the state's voters.
Eyman's referendum would give voters the option of voting down
the measure that adds "sexual orientation" to a state law that
bans discrimination in housing, employment, insurance and credit.
The amendment to current law, passed out of the Legislature on
Friday, makes Washington the 17th state passing such laws covering
gays and lesbians, and the seventh to protect transgender people.
Gov. Chris Gregoire was expected to sign the bill Tuesday. The
law will take effect in June, 90 days after the end of session, but
if Eyman is able to get enough signatures by the June deadline, the
law will be frozen until a November vote.
Eyman is also pushing an initiative that would, in addition to
removing "sexual orientation" from the law, prohibit state
government from requiring quotas or other preferential treatment
for any person or group "based on sexual orientation or sexual
preference."
"Should this decision be made in Olympia, or should it be made
by the people?" Eyman asked at a news conference at the secretary
of state's office. "The voters want to have the final say."
To get the referendum on the November ballot, Eyman will need to
collect 112,440 valid voter signatures by June 7. An initiative
requires double the amount of signatures, nearly 225,000, by July
7.
Dr. Joseph Fuiten, a Bothell pastor who is chairman of Faith &
Freedom Network, an organization that opposed the bill, said he
wasn't sure the referendum was the best way to go.
"I'm not opposed to it, but I'm not in favor of it," he said.
"I'm not entirely certain it's the best strategy."
Fuiten, who said he's working with a team of pastors and other
community leaders, said he wants to wait and see how the state
Supreme Court rules on gay marriage - a decision expected any week
now - before deciding how to move forward.
Gregoire said Monday that she would speak out against any
attempt to overturn the law.
"It's just unbelievable to me that we would now turn our backs
and say it's OK to discriminate. It's just wrong in my opinion,"
she said.
But Eyman cited a previous gay rights initiative that voters
rejected in 1997 as proof that lawmakers were out of touch with
their constituents.
"At the end of the day, it should be the citizens and not the
politicians having a chance to decide this issue," he said.
The measure passed the Senate last Friday on a 25-23 vote, a
major victory for gay rights activists who have watched the measure
fail in the Legislature for nearly 30 years.
Sen. Bill Finkbeiner, R-Kirkland, was the sole Senate Republican
to endorse the measure, a year after it lost by just one vote in
the Senate. Two Senate Democrats voted against the measure. One
Republican was not present.
Fran Dunaway, executive director of Equal Rights Washington,
said a statewide coalition of groups would actively campaign
against the initiative and referendum.
"The vast majority of people in Washington state support this
legislation," she said. "The simple truth of it is they don't
want to see their friends, family, or neighbors fired or denied
housing simply because of who they are."
Eyman also cited the voters' passage of Initiative 200 in 1998,
which barred government preferences for women and minorities in
education, hiring and contracting as indicative of the will of the
people. He said the initiative adding sexual orientation to that
law is needed, to pre-empt any future actions that lawmakers may
try to take.
"The people do not support preferential treatment because the
people do not want it to be used as a basis for requiring the
legalization of same-sex marriage," the initiative reads.
But Rep. Ed Murray, sponsor of the gay civil rights bill and one
of four openly gay lawmakers in the Legislature, said that
affirmative action and laws banning discrimination are not the same
thing.
Eyman's "confusing two issues that are not related," he said.
Murray, D-Seattle, said he did not think the rights of
minorities should be open to a vote, but remained hopeful that if
the measures made it to the ballot, voters would echo lawmakers'
decision.
"Moderate voters are not going to turn down the right of gay
and lesbian people to have equal rights," he said.
---
The gay civil rights bill is House Bill 2661.