Eastwood: 'When I saw the stool sitting there, it gave me the idea'

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Clint Eastwood said the idea to use an empty seat as a prop at the Republican National Convention was a spur-of-the-moment decision when someone backstage asked him if he wanted to sit down.
In his first interview since he attended the convention to pledge his support for Mitt Romney, Eastwood told the Carmel Pine Cone, a small California weekly newspaper, that his speech was not only unscripted, it was pretty much spontaneous.
"There was a stool there, and some fella kept asking me if I wanted to sit down," Eastwood told the newspaper, which published the article Friday. "When I saw the stool sitting there, it gave me the idea. I'll just put the stool out there and I'll talk to Mr. Obama and ask him why he didn't keep all of the promises he made to everybody."
Eastwood's peculiar, sometimes rambling conversation with an imaginary President Barack Obama in an empty chair set the blogosphere and social media ablaze. His appearance was intended to be a ringing endorsement for Romney, but the esteemed 82-year-old actor and director opened himself up to ridicule.
Eastwood said he achieved what he set out to do and got across three points.
"That not everybody in Hollywood is on the left, that Obama has broken a lot of the promises he made when he took office, and that the people should feel free to get rid of any politician who's not doing a good job," Eastwood said. "But I didn't make up my mind exactly what I was going to say until I said it."
Eastwood's longtime manager, Leonard Hirshan, told The Associated Press he was not aware of the Pine Cone newspaper article. "You're telling me something for the first time," he said. Hirshan stressed that as a manager, he wouldn't necessarily know about Eastwood's dealings with the media. The actor has no publicist.
While Eastwood said his presentation was "very unorthodox," that was his intent from the outset and he had plenty of people giving him advice on what to say.
"Everybody had advice for me, except the janitor," Eastwood said.
Eastwood said he was told to speak for five minutes but he said it was difficult to gauge time and there weren't any signals or cues telling him to wrap up.
Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, later came backstage to thank him.
"They were very enthusiastic, and we were all laughing," Eastwood said.
Eastwood, who stars in the upcoming movie "Trouble with the Curve," maintains Obama doesn't deserve a second term as president.
"President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people," Eastwood said. "Romney and Ryan would do a much better job running the country, and that's what everybody needs to know. I may have irritated a lot of the lefties, but I was aiming for people in the middle."
In his first interview since he attended the convention to pledge his support for Mitt Romney, Eastwood told the Carmel Pine Cone, a small California weekly newspaper, that his speech was not only unscripted, it was pretty much spontaneous.
"There was a stool there, and some fella kept asking me if I wanted to sit down," Eastwood told the newspaper, which published the article Friday. "When I saw the stool sitting there, it gave me the idea. I'll just put the stool out there and I'll talk to Mr. Obama and ask him why he didn't keep all of the promises he made to everybody."
Eastwood's peculiar, sometimes rambling conversation with an imaginary President Barack Obama in an empty chair set the blogosphere and social media ablaze. His appearance was intended to be a ringing endorsement for Romney, but the esteemed 82-year-old actor and director opened himself up to ridicule.
Eastwood said he achieved what he set out to do and got across three points.
"That not everybody in Hollywood is on the left, that Obama has broken a lot of the promises he made when he took office, and that the people should feel free to get rid of any politician who's not doing a good job," Eastwood said. "But I didn't make up my mind exactly what I was going to say until I said it."
Eastwood's longtime manager, Leonard Hirshan, told The Associated Press he was not aware of the Pine Cone newspaper article. "You're telling me something for the first time," he said. Hirshan stressed that as a manager, he wouldn't necessarily know about Eastwood's dealings with the media. The actor has no publicist.
While Eastwood said his presentation was "very unorthodox," that was his intent from the outset and he had plenty of people giving him advice on what to say.
"Everybody had advice for me, except the janitor," Eastwood said.
Eastwood said he was told to speak for five minutes but he said it was difficult to gauge time and there weren't any signals or cues telling him to wrap up.
Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, later came backstage to thank him.
"They were very enthusiastic, and we were all laughing," Eastwood said.
Eastwood, who stars in the upcoming movie "Trouble with the Curve," maintains Obama doesn't deserve a second term as president.
"President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people," Eastwood said. "Romney and Ryan would do a much better job running the country, and that's what everybody needs to know. I may have irritated a lot of the lefties, but I was aiming for people in the middle."
Hide your lawn chairs people  Dirty Harry is in town.Â
Â
I understand he was giving a speech to a formal dining set just yesterday.Â
Â
 @Andrew Bush I figured Mr. Eastwood knows a fair bit more about acting and reaching a target audience than I, or anyone else commenting on these fora would. I said as much in Ken's Schrammie post about him here: http://www.komonews.com/opinion/kenschram/168172676.html on the about 2 Sept. Here is an interview with him from 7 Sept : http://www.pineconearchive.com/120907-1.html
You didn't get it, because he wasn't talking to you, and your mind was made up the other way. He wasn't taking to me, either. Just remember your ridicule in the future.
I was a Clint Eastwood fan until his performance(?) at the republican convention, since I have thrown out all my Eastwood tapes.
 @bmac736 Also tapes??!?!?! How old are you bruh?
 @bmac736 Lol no you haven't bruh
I am an Eastwood fan. Unlike republicans, I know they are actors playing and really weren't the characters. Republicans at time need to be reminded, Charleton Heston was not Moses and John Wayne was not a Green beret.
Â
With that being said, Eastwood is pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, pro-environmental protection and anti-war. So what idiot republican would book an actor that is  a RINO to upstage thier main man? This just show how superficial and how out of touch republicans are.
@snoopy84
Â
 "Unlike republicans, I know they are actors playing and really weren't the characters"
Â
Feeling quite proud of yourself there snoopy? What a clever boy!
 @snoopy84 Well, the Repubs keep thinking they had such good luck with "Rex" Reagan. "Course, for the rest of us we saw it led directly to Death Valley Days!
Your argument is a straw man. By Including a moderate like Eastwood I would expect the net result would be a broader appeal. That's how I saw it. Of course it all depends on where you are coming from, I guess.....
 @Rick4001CS The "broad appeal" is the real straw man - to be burned to ashes immediately after a victory just as George W. burned a budget surplus.
God help us if Romney actually wins: the Constitution really WOULD then "hang by a thread"!
Yay! We can make T-shirts:
Â
"Keep your Mitts off the Whitehouse and your Magic Underwear in your drawers."
Â
LOL!
 @Smokin Bear  This one.........
Â
"Agreed - If Romney wins, the Constitution will be hanging by a thread of his magic underwear, er, "temple garments" as he floats off to Kolob after baptising a bunch of dead people...........yeow."Â
Â
I have to make this comment known.... Its too good to. Â
Â
I will add Smokin Bear. Â
Â
And I will send you a list of all the others things you have now agreed to let me use. Â : )
Â
Â
@Andrew Bush - Wait, use what?
Â
:-)
Â
Okay. Go ahead. Please send royalties to ........
 @Smokin Bear LOL!!!!!  Can I use that?  OMG it hurts!!!
There ya go. You've made excellent points that I agree with. Its so tragic that the "Big" religions are draconian to the point of excluding people they don't approve of from worshipping and back in the day, was the basis for widespread massacre and subjugation, for profit. Not much has changed over the centuries. How many wars have been fought where the basis involved religious conflict?
Â
Whether its blatant or insidiously cloaked through the use of lobbying, religious groups imposing their faith on others is unconscionable and contradicts the tenets of faith.Â
Â
I understand - believe me, I do. In viewing the construct of varying faiths, I question religious instruction and practices that create division and elitism.  Many people view Scientology as a pseudo-religion but its not that dissimilar to Mormonism. Both have all of the earmarks of fanaticism and fierce devotion to elitist entitlement, secrecy and dominance over their followers.Â
Â
I have family members who are Mormon and they have absolutely no reservations about lying to, as well as stealing, from 'infidels.'
Â
I am no bigot. Religious bigotry lies with any organized religion's facet of prejudice that condones mistreatment of non-members or non-believers.
Â
If Romney was a Taliban member, would there have been as much opposition to my commentary? His faith is one of extremes and it is something that will have a profound effect on the presidency if he is elected.
Â
Â
 @Smokin Bear  @JLS1950 We may not disagree quite so much as you imagine. Our Bill of Rights was designed to protect religious freedom from government much more than to protect government from religion. The idea was that followers of one doctrine should not be able to force their views and standards upon any other group or groups.
At the same time, the Bill of Rights guarantees the rights of individuals to exercise the requirements of their faith insofar as that does not violate the rights of others who believe differently. In politics, we would expect elected officials to live according to their faith - tempered by respect for those of other belief.
This is where the "Religious Right" gets into problems: it is trying to force its own "beliefs" upon others by "legal" means. Notice I do not say "Christian" right, because (1) there are clearly more than Christians involved here, and (2) Christians actually have no authority either under the Constitution or even more importantly in the Bible to do this. The New Testament does not authorize this, Torah only applies to Israel, and Acts 15 prohibits enforcing Torah against even Christian believers - not even to mention gentile unbelievers. Christians have certain work to do - largely set forth in Matthew 25 & 28 - and are cautioned several times NOT to try to substitute "good works" of their own choosing. When Christians have overstepped their scriptural instructions, the result has not been pleasant.
For Romney, the big mistake IMHO is imagining that he is a Christian. By an accident of "love" I have been related to Mormons (by the marriage of a sibling) some 46 years. What you say about Mormon elitism may in fact be true: certainly they seemed deeply troubled when a born-again Christian cropped up in their midst and began to point out errors in their understanding of the bible! They seem to like to cuddle up to every other faith - with an apparent eye to making converts - but they seem quite put off by real Christians.
Which is yet another reason I am troubled when I see Christians flock to Romney and declare him a "christian" based on his stated "values" without challenging him on known issues of doctrine. This is not about being an anti-Mormon bigot: it is about affirming the core tenets and beliefs which make one a Christian in accordance with the New Testament - and knowing that Mormons simply do not share those tenets. It is not the Mormons which trouble me: it is the Christians acting in wholesale ignorance of our own faith!
@JLS1950 - Understood.Â
Â
Not being a fan of any organized religion, we'll likely disagree on the nature of religion in government.Â
Â
Romney's business performance is a direct reflection of the Mormon elitist code. Non-mormons are considered lesser beings, who do not deserve respect or consideration by the Mormon faithful which justifies taking advantage of 'infidels.' Mormon missionaries posture themselves as 'authorities' on theological teachings, outright rejecting anyone who dares question or offers a different point of view.  These same individuals, while not allowing non-mormons to enter their temple, feel entitled to appear on my porch uninvited, which is posted private property, to aggressively prosthelytize to someone they know nothing about.Â
Â
I firmly believe that religion has no place in establishing foreign policy, economics or determining the value of human lives sacrificed to war.Â
Â
In my opinion, even if it is not specifically guaranteed in the Constitution, the notion of separation of church and state will be absolutely necessary if our country is to survive.Â
 @Smokin Bear My main problem with Romney is that - based on his performance at Bain Capital; taking over and bankrupting viable businesses and kicking good and loyal workers to the curb for the sake of personal gain - his presidency could easily turn out to make the economic excesses of the Bush administration (tax cuts for the very rich accompanied by massive spending beneficial mainly to those same very rich) look like two bullies taking lunch money from a kindergartener by comparison!
As far as Romney's Mormon beliefs, he has as much right to them as any person has to his religious views. My only problem there is that I cannot understand how my evangelical brothers and sisters can flock to a man whose religious doctrine recapitulates Isaiah 14:12-14 (the rebellion of Lucifer/Satan) all for the sake of "traditional values" after the warnings of Jesus in Matthew 15:3-9, Mark 7:3-13. My fellow Christians have turned from strict obedience to the Lord and unto alliances of convenience with idolators and those in rebellion against the Most High. That should only be of meaning to bible-believing Christians: others should just vote as they will.
I agree with your statement.Â
Â
I was commenting on the issue that evidently ruffled a few feathers - I don't like Mormons based on the elitist cult nature of the 'religion' - Our Commander in Chief has a mandate to keep his personal religious beliefs from clouding his ability to represent and administer for the benefit of the nation. The Mormon doctrine does not condone or encourage independent thought. THAT is a huge issue, having nothing to do with bigotry and everything to do with patriotism.
I don't care what people choose to believe - that's their business. Keep it off my porch. Just sayin'...
 @NorthEnd How is the comment bigoted?
 @Smokin Bear The article is about or related to the Presidential campaign and Romney is a candidate. And Romney's character is well established in his history with Bain: he is an economic predator. Additionally, his statements on Iran indicate that he is an ideologue warmonger.
We already endured 8 years of a low-level economic predator and warmonger named Bush- who abandoned the search of ObL to pursue a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein. We endured 4 years of Bush's daddy, who made personal agreements with both ObL and Saddam, allowing these pirates to pursue certain "treasure" so long as it benefited the Bush investment portfolio and did not raise unacceptable waves as in Kuwait.
We simply do not need another administration run by an amoral economic predator harboring delusions of grandeur and megalomania. With all the accumulated economic damage from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II, we are in no position to endure yet another round of "tinkle-down" economics and neocon warmongering.
LOL....too bad we can't all be perfect like you, huh? Talk about bigotry, you can't resist writing some snarky remark to anyone who doesn't fit the model of your 'perfect world' - LOL
Â
I have a right to my opinion, so get over yourself. LOL
 @Smokin Bear Glad religious bigotry is alive and well
Agreed - If Romney wins, the Constitution will be hanging by a thread of his magic underwear, er, "temple garments" as he floats off to Kolob after baptising a bunch of dead people...........yeow.
The Constitution would not survive another four years with obama and one more asinine appointment to the SCotUS.  It is a wash either way then.
Harry's thinking pretty highly of himself these days. In the very least, he did a nice job of showcasing how nutter-butters he is.
Ummmm. Yeah, Clint, that's one of those ideas you should have kept to yourself.
My theory is that Clint is secretly an Obama supporter and it was all an act to embarrass the GOP and distract the electorate from Mitt's speech.
Â
Though Mitt's speech was so average, perhaps Clint's disruption was unnecessary.
 @albion His views on gay marriage, the environment and abortion would support that theory...
A brilliant performance from a most worthy actor.
Â
I't comical to see the left get so twisted up about the whole idea. It realy brings out the hate in them.
As they say, the truth will set you free, but first, it will pi$$ you off.
Â
Well played Mr Eastwood. Bravo!
 @bobalouie You're kidding, right? It was an awkward and ill planned speech. And "hate" from the left? I think this speech just gave them comedic relief from the campaign trail. If you want "hate", just look at the conservatives' view on homosexuality and the Muslim religion. Check. Mate.Â
 @ur 1 pea short of a pod  @bobalouie I am going to take my cousin D*** on a trip to gay bars in Arab countries. My treat. I have been told that the Muslims are rather open minded about his sexual preference.  Should be fun.
 @ur 1 pea short of a pod  @bobalouie For the record, his name is not short for Richard.Â
Sexuality? hmmm.....................and Islam is of course, the religion of peace.Â
 @bobalouie Only republicans can watch a shaky confused old white rich guy lose a debate with a debate a chair then celebrate it as some great victory.Â
Â
That is when they aren't getting all exited defending torture and deciding what is legitimate rape. Â
Â
Republicans have proven themselves to be so out of touch with society its embarrassing at times. Â
Â
Â
 @Andrew Bush Based on your statement, "Republicans have proven themselves to be so out of touch with society its embarrassing at times," Mitt Romney is the perfect candidate for Republicans, he couldn't be more out of touch with society if he left the planet.
Â
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/377759_345076515581817_1587213364_n.jpg
 Sid, you can doubt all you want, but it is a moot point since you can't prove or disprove what you are saying. I would venture to guess that if you went to the Harvard Law School website you could get a fairly good idea of the required core classes. I bet there is a Business or Economics class in there somewhere.
 @alaska_dreamin I doubt the President has ever cracked a book on Economics or Business. Unless it was by that bearded German lawyer that hated the middle classes.
For sure, he has never read this one (a summary linked below);
Â
http://political-economy.com/road-to-serfdom/
Â
Â
 @Sid Vishess You didn't ask for grades, you said no one could place him at Columbia University.
Â
However in response to your request, no I cannot get to links to his grades.
Â
Via factcheck.org
Â
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/07/obamas-sealed-records/
Â
"It would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to give any former studentâs records to reporters or members of the public without that personâs specific, written permission. Obama hasnât released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released their college records. George W. Bushâs grades at Yale eventually became public, but only becausesomebody leaked them to the New Yorker magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999 profile in the Washington Post."
Â
Â
 @alaska_dreamin And don't call me seriously
 @alaska_dreamin Boerner: I remember often eating breakfast with Barack at Tomâs Restaurant on Broadway. Occasionally we went to The West End for beers. We enjoyed exploring museums such as the Guggenheim, the Met and the American Museum of Natural History, and browsing in bookstores such as the Strand and the Barnes & Noble opposite Columbia. We both liked taking long walks down Broadway on a Sunday afternoon, and listening to the silence of Central Park after a big snow. I also remember jogging the loop around Central Park with Barack.
Â
If I didn't know better... roommates...long walks.. listening to the silence...
 @alaska_dreamin http://www.politico.com/static/PPM116_obamaessay.html
Â
An article "written" by Obama for the college paper which is disjointed, rambling and far too long.
Like his career decades later...
 @alaska_dreamin His roommate remembers him? Conceded. Now, how were his grades? Can you get me those links?Â
"And after attending Columbia although no one can seem to place him there."
Â
Good Lord, Sid, how on earth do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you post blatantly false comments like that?
Â
A simple Google search can prove your statement wrong so can going to factcheck.org. But you keep right on drinking that kool-aid or tea in this case.
Â
http://www.factcheck.org/2010/02/obama-at-columbia-university/
Â
http://www.college.columbia.edu/news/barack-obama-83-becomes-first-college-alumnus-to-win-presidency
Â
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/recollections-of-obamas-ex-roommate/
Â
http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan05/cover.php
Â
Â
 @JLS1950  @alaska_dreamin Law school, of course. Good point. Exactly WHY was he admitted into the most prestigious law school in the country with little academic achievement? And after attending Columbia although no one can seem to place him there. I was just a goofy Poli Sci major at the UW but I bet if  I suddenly  became famous there would be at least a half dozen students that would remember me. Not so with O. And He graduated HLS in 1991. Tell me HOW an editor of the Law Review is not IMMEDIATELY offered a job at any  top law  firm in the country? He wasn't. Probably for the same reason Pelosi and Reid put him on mute during  conference calls.
Â
Â
 @Sid Vishess  @alaska_dreamin "And that gap of five years? Wassup with that?"
Uhhh... does the term "Harvard Law School" ring any bells in your head maybe?
 @alaska_dreamin Yes. They can't confiscate the weather...yet ;)
 @alaska_dreamin And that gap of five years? Wassup with that?
 @Sid Vishess Clearly you and I disagree about whether trickle down economics work. I am going to go enjoy this beautiful weather while it is here with my husband, I hope you have a good day too.
 @alaska_dreamin Yeah, OK. Mail room clerk, food stamp agitator and  second-rate lawyer. I'll concede that.
Â
Funny thing is, he can go off on the rich all he wants. The ones who are gonna get stuck with $16,000,000,000,000 debt is the middle-class. Not enough rich people to make a dent.
 @Sid Vishess Wrong again, Sid. He took loans and had summer jobs to get through college and his work history is as follows:
Â
Â
Â
â Â A stint in 1983-84 as a research assistant at Business International Corp. in New York City, where he helped write a newsletter.
Â
â Â Working from 1985 to 1988 as a community organizer for the Developing Communities Project in Chicago;
Â
â Working from 1993 to 2004 as an associate, and then a partner, at the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, where his work included employment-discrimination and voting-rights cases. The job also overlapped with his time in the Illinois Legislature.
Â
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/oct/18/mitt-romney/romney-says-barack-obama-has-no-private-sector-exp/
 @alaska_dreamin OK, how about Obama? Never worked a day in his life at a real job. Had crap handed to him from day one. Prep school. Rich grandaprents raising him.  Didn't even have to attend Columbia and somehow got into Harvard. Never actually accomplished ANYTHING other than getting elected. He's sooo  empathetic, his half brother lives in squalor. Brother's keeper, my (backside).
Mitt is the choice? I wish it was someone else but it ain't. We got big problems and Obama had his shot. Four more years of him whining about Bush  and with a Republican House spells disaster.Â
Â
Obama is far more of a pathetic choice then Kerry was.
Â
 @Sid Vishess Is that supposed to be a comeback? John Kerry? Really? Most Democrats thought he was a pathetic choice and voted for him simply because he got the Democratic nomination, much the same way Republicans will vote for Romney this year even though they don't like him just because he is their only choice. Your comment still doesn't change the fact that Mitt Romney is completely out of touch with the reality in which most people live. Nice try though, Sid.
 @alaska_dreamin  @Andrew Bush J
Â
How soon they forget:
Â
John Kerry-Heinz For President!Â
Â
A man who never worked an honest day's work in his life, gigoloed himself into riches and  the Left couldn't praise him enough.Â
Â
Yeah, tell me about out of touch.
Â
. And can the Dems nominate someone other than a lawyer for President someday?
The hate is strong with this one.