NBC: We're not a 'shoot-'em-up' network
PASADENA, Calif. (AP) - NBC executives said Sunday they are conscious about the amount of violence they air in the wake of real-life tragedies like the Connecticut school shooting, but have made no changes in what has gone on the air or what is planned.
NBC isn't a "shoot-'em-up" network, said network entertainment President Jennifer Salke.
The level of violence on television, in movies and video games has been looked at as a contributing factor - along with the availability of guns and a lack of mental health services - in incidents such as the Dec. 14 attack in a Newtown, Conn., school where 20 first-graders and six educators were killed.
Like many in Hollywood, NBC questioned a link between what is put on the air and what is happening in society.
"It weighs on all of us," said NBC Entertainment Chairman Robert Greenblatt. "Most of the people at this network have children and really care about the shows that we're putting out there. It's always something that's been on our mind but this brought it to the forefront."
NBC hasn't needed to take any tangible steps like minimizing violence in its programming or deemphasizing guns, Salke said, because NBC didn't have much violence on the air. It might be different "if we were the 'shoot-'em-up' network, she said.
She didn't name such a network, but said violence might be an issue on a network that airs many crime procedural shows. That's a staple of CBS' lineup. Greenblatt, who was head of Showtime when the "Dexter" series about a serial killer was developed, said CBS' "Criminal Minds" is "worse than 'Dexter' ever was."
Within an hour after both executives spoke, NBC showed reporters at a news conference highlights of its show "Revolution" that included a swordfight, a standoff between two men with guns, a bloodied man, a building blown up with a flying body and a gunfight.
Later clips of the upcoming series "Deception" featured several shots of a bloodied, dead body.
NBC also is developing a drama, "Hannibal," based on one of fiction's most indelible serial killers, Hannibal Lecter. An airtime for the show hasn't been scheduled, but it could come this spring or summer.
Salke said there is more violence in Fox's upcoming drama "The Following," also about a serial killer, than there will be in "Hannibal." Much of the violence in the upcoming NBC show, created by former "Heroes" producer Bryan Fuller, is implied and not gratuitous.
"We respect the talent and like what he is doing, so we are standing behind him," Salke said. She said there's been a spate of programs about creepy killers because they've been such indelible characters.
Greenblatt said he wasn't trying to be glib, but one of the best tonics for people upset about real-life violence is to watch an episode of NBC's "Parenthood." He said it's a great example of a family that loves each other and grapples with many issues.
"Ultimately, I think you feel good at the end of the day," he said.
NBC isn't a "shoot-'em-up" network, said network entertainment President Jennifer Salke.
The level of violence on television, in movies and video games has been looked at as a contributing factor - along with the availability of guns and a lack of mental health services - in incidents such as the Dec. 14 attack in a Newtown, Conn., school where 20 first-graders and six educators were killed.
Like many in Hollywood, NBC questioned a link between what is put on the air and what is happening in society.
"It weighs on all of us," said NBC Entertainment Chairman Robert Greenblatt. "Most of the people at this network have children and really care about the shows that we're putting out there. It's always something that's been on our mind but this brought it to the forefront."
NBC hasn't needed to take any tangible steps like minimizing violence in its programming or deemphasizing guns, Salke said, because NBC didn't have much violence on the air. It might be different "if we were the 'shoot-'em-up' network, she said.
She didn't name such a network, but said violence might be an issue on a network that airs many crime procedural shows. That's a staple of CBS' lineup. Greenblatt, who was head of Showtime when the "Dexter" series about a serial killer was developed, said CBS' "Criminal Minds" is "worse than 'Dexter' ever was."
Within an hour after both executives spoke, NBC showed reporters at a news conference highlights of its show "Revolution" that included a swordfight, a standoff between two men with guns, a bloodied man, a building blown up with a flying body and a gunfight.
Later clips of the upcoming series "Deception" featured several shots of a bloodied, dead body.
NBC also is developing a drama, "Hannibal," based on one of fiction's most indelible serial killers, Hannibal Lecter. An airtime for the show hasn't been scheduled, but it could come this spring or summer.
Salke said there is more violence in Fox's upcoming drama "The Following," also about a serial killer, than there will be in "Hannibal." Much of the violence in the upcoming NBC show, created by former "Heroes" producer Bryan Fuller, is implied and not gratuitous.
"We respect the talent and like what he is doing, so we are standing behind him," Salke said. She said there's been a spate of programs about creepy killers because they've been such indelible characters.
Greenblatt said he wasn't trying to be glib, but one of the best tonics for people upset about real-life violence is to watch an episode of NBC's "Parenthood." He said it's a great example of a family that loves each other and grapples with many issues.
"Ultimately, I think you feel good at the end of the day," he said.
The article states the violence comes from video games and movies. Then why does NBC and other media constantly  blame guns. More people are killed with hammers and clubs,than guns.
One of my hubby's favorite shows is on NBC. It's a show about a renegade sub that has nuclear capabilities. There's plenty of death and mayhem.
It's TV!!! nannys get over it
Focusing your news network on violence and crime 24/7/365 is far more detrimental to the mental health of our nation than violent TV shows or movies
Quit showboating and go back to airing your tv shows. Â
The news makes the most violent people into historical monsters by covering them. Of all the people who died in the Columbine massacre, which two people does anyone remember the most? Eric and Dylan, the two villains. Movies, documentaries, books, tv specials, all covering those two monsters the most and why they did it.
Â
Its not a network airing violence, its the news outlets giving evil men fame.
 @Dredd57 Yep, exactly right!
Â
Let's say I'm a depressed individual and I have some other mental health issues. Â I am feeling closed in and ignored, nobody seems to like me.
Â
I turn on the news and see this years mass murderer's face pasted all over the place, I see movies and books being made about them, I hear their name being mentioned in passing conversation on the street. Â I then see the government blame everyone and everything other than the actual murderer.
Â
Then what? Â Then I start thinking, "Hey, if I was to copy what that guy did, I'll be remembered for something and people will know about me!".
Â
Bam, another mass murder rampage occurs, and yet this country gets none the wiser, because NOBODY WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY or are even willing to point the finger of responsibility in the right direction.
Oh please! Last time I checked, the problem is how people are raised, raised to learn what is right and wrong. If you really are making your choices based on the entertainment industry, then you clearly already not raised properly. Good luck on that one NBC!
 @Zoso True...if you are raising your kids to sit in front of a tv and watch nothing but violence and play nothing but fantasy violent games then you are going to get what you get.Â
Last time I checked 19 was considered an adult in this country. Short of being found legally incompetent, this adult man knew right from wrong. There is only one person to blame for the death of 27 people on December 14, and that person is the shooter. We can blame guns, video games, and violent tv shows/movies, but the fact remains, an adult man committed these crimes, not the guns he used, the games he played or the tv shows/movies he watched. I think it's time to start discussing the actual problem instead of finding a scapegoat.
Good Lord, it's a damn shame what happened with the shootings, but let's not hold the entertainment industry at fault...next thing you know, they'll have nothing but television shows and movies about butterflies and kittens.
@Lee Erickson
Except that there is overwhelming evidence that the entertainment industry actually IS at fault. There are so many studies that confirm it, that there is no denying it. Just Google it, for Pete's sake. I don't everything should be "about butterflies and kittens," but I do think we as a society have let it go way too far. This particular article from the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry pretty much sums it up:
Â
"Over the past 30 years there has been extensive research on the relationship between televised violence and violent behavior among youth. Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and experimental studies have all confirmed this correlation."Â http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/developmentor/the_impact_of_media_violence_on_children_and_adolescents_opportunities_for_clinical_interventionsÂ
Â
 @here_I_go_again  @Lee Erickson The article you cited is an editorial, not an abstract. Correlation does not equal causation.
Â
I agree than very young children who "are unable to distinguish between fact and fantasy" should not watch violent television or movies. For everyone else, the science is not nearly as conclusive as you claim.
Â
For the sake of argument, let's assume that TV and movie violence causes violent behavior. What would be your solution? To ban televised violence?
 @Melissa Angevine You have a good point, but people who are sensoring their kids are not the kids you have to worry about. We put the parental controls on our tvs (based on our children's ages), but it is not my kids that are out taking an AK to a school and killing everyone. The problem isn't the parents who are using the parental controls, the problem is the parents who are not. Just like the problem is not the gun owners who keep their guns locked up and are responsible, the problem is the gun owners who don't (such as the Sandy Hook mom). I think it is impossible to regulate other people's behavior. I see no problem cutting out the most gruesome parts of these violent shows from tv and if you want to see that part then go watch it on Netflix or on HBO. It shouldn't be shown where any kid with bad parents can see it. Of course if you are a bad enough parent and don't keep track of what your kids are watching, they are probably also able to get on Netflix or HBO anyway.Â
 @here_I_go_again   "Movies that aired on TV used to be "cut" to remove the violence. These days, just slap a rating on it and assume that will keep kids from watching it."
Â
Yeah, because I am not responsible for what your child watches. I want to watch the violence, I watched it growing up and am able to distinguish right from wrong.
Â
Televisions are equipped with parental controls, it is the job of the PARENTS to monitor what they watch and how they process it.
Â
Why the hell should my world be censored?
 @Sutekh  @Lee Erickson Well then, let me just get up on my soapbox for a minute.
First of all, I never said the article was anything other than an article. I could have posted the links to many studies - that particular one just happened to be a good overview.  Also, "I" am not the one making the claim the violence in the entertainment industry contributes to violence in the real world. It has been documented over and over and over again in many scientific studies. Since you apparently didn't appreciate my suggestion that you simply Google it, I have taken the liberty of posting info on some actual studies below. And this...
"At this time, well over 1000 studies - including reports from the Surgeon General's office, the National Institute of Mental Health, and numerous studies conducted by leading figures within our medical and public health organizations - our own members - point overwhelmingly to a causal connection between media violence and aggressive behavior in some children. The conclusion of the public health community, based on over 30 years of research, is that viewing entertainment violence can lead to increases in aggressive attitudes, values and behavior, particularly in children." -Â Joint Statement on the Impact of Entertainment Violence on Children Congressional Public Health Summit July 26, 2000.
Â
And YES! I do think television violence should be banned, or at least scaled back to what it was 20 years ago. They banned cigarette ads in the 70s  and hard alcohol ads in the 80s  (which I see are slowly coming back now) from TV because they were proven to contribute to increased smoking and alcohol abuse, which put our health at risk. Movies that aired on TV used to be "cut" to remove the violence. These days, just slap a rating on it and assume that will keep kids from watching it.  I see no reason for people killing people on Television. If people want to see that, they can buy/rent a movie.
Video games are another topic, and I won't even touch that one.
http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2003/03/media-violence.aspx
http://swacj.org/swjcj/archives/5.1/4%20Slotsve.pdf
http://www2.aap.org/advocacy/releases/jstmtevc.htm
http://www.psych.org/public_info/media_violence.cfm
Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space of the Senate Comm. On Commerce, Neurobiological Research and the Impact of Media on Children, 108th Cong., 1st sess., 10 March, 2003.Â
Huston, A.C. et al. Big World, Small Screen: The Role of Television in American Society. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1992.
Jeffrey Johnson et al. "Television Viewing and Aggressive Behavior During Adolescence and Adulthood,"Â Science 295Â (March 29, 2002): 2468â2471.
Committee on Public Education. "Media Violence."Â Â Pediatrics. 108. 5 (2001): 1222-26.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â