Victoria's Secret apologizes for use of headdress

FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. (AP) - Victoria's Secret has apologized for putting a Native American-style headdress on a model for its annual fashion show, after the outfit was criticized as a display of ignorance toward tribal culture and history.
The company responded to the complaints over the weekend by saying it was sorry to have upset anyone and that it wouldn't include the outfit in the show's television broadcast next month, or in any marketing materials.
"We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone," the company said.
Headdresses historically are a symbol of respect, worn by Native American war chiefs and warriors. For many Plains tribes, for example, each feather placed on a headdress has significance and had to be earned through an act of compassion or bravery. Some modern-day Native American leaders have been gifted war bonnets in ceremonies accompanied by prayers and songs.
"When you see a Lakota chief wearing a full headdress, you know that he was a very honorable man. He was a leader. He did a lot of honorable things for his people," said Michelle Spotted Elk, a Santa Cruz, Calif., woman of mixed heritage whose husband is Lakota. "It also has religious significance. With them, there's not a division between spirituality and their leadership."
Victoria's Secret model Karlie Kloss walked onto the runway last week wearing the floor-length feathered headdress, leopard-print underwear and high heels. She also was adorned with fringe and turquoise jewelry during a segment meant to represent the 12 months of the year - fireworks in July, rain gear for April and a headdress for November.
Kloss herself posted on Twitter that she was "deeply sorry if what I wore during the VS Show offended anyone."
Thousands of people have commented about the outfit on the company's Facebook page. Some praised Kloss' attire as artistic and urged those offended by it to "get over it." Some expressed appreciation to Victoria's Secret for halting its marketing approach for the clothing, and others reached back in history to explain their feelings.
"We have gone through the atrocities to survive and ensure our way of life continues," Navajo Nation spokesman Erny Zah said in an interview Monday. "Any mockery, whether it's Halloween, Victoria's Secret - they are spitting on us. They are spitting on our culture, and it's upsetting."
The Victoria's Secret stir follows a string of similar incidents. Recently, Paul Frank Industries Inc. and the band No Doubt each ran into criticism for their use of headdresses in clothing and parties, and in a cowboys-and-Indians-themed video, respectively. They offered apologies as well.
Last year, Urban Outfitters set off a firestorm of criticism with its line of Navajo-branded clothing and accessories - particularly underwear and a liquor flask, which the tribe said was "derogatory and scandalous."
Abaki Beck was among a handful of Native students who hosted a discussion last week at a private liberal arts college in St. Paul, Minn., on Native culture in fashion and sports. She said companies first must learn from the mistake of ignoring Native American history and then make an effort to engage with Indian Country.
She wanted more than a short apology from Victoria's Secret instead of what she said sounded like an automated response.
"But perhaps that is an unrealistic hope," said the 19-year-old member of the Blackfeet Nation of Montana. "It is all about business, after all."
Jennie Luna, who is Chicana and Caxcan, said society largely is ignorant toward indigenous spirituality and doesn't understand what should not be marketed commercially. She and others say more education about Native American cultures is needed.
"We are people; we're not a fashion statement," Luna said. "We are people who are facing serious issues, and for them to further perpetuate the type of stereotypes and disregard for a community's way of life is unacceptable."
ReGina Zuni's advice to companies looking to market Native American culture is to hire Native Americans who have knowledge of tribal traditions, cultures and customs.
However, her reaction to hearing about the Victoria's Secret headdress wasn't outrage about the clothing itself, but about the lack of attention on health care, education, housing and other issues in Indian Country.
The company responded to the complaints over the weekend by saying it was sorry to have upset anyone and that it wouldn't include the outfit in the show's television broadcast next month, or in any marketing materials.
"We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone," the company said.
Headdresses historically are a symbol of respect, worn by Native American war chiefs and warriors. For many Plains tribes, for example, each feather placed on a headdress has significance and had to be earned through an act of compassion or bravery. Some modern-day Native American leaders have been gifted war bonnets in ceremonies accompanied by prayers and songs.
"When you see a Lakota chief wearing a full headdress, you know that he was a very honorable man. He was a leader. He did a lot of honorable things for his people," said Michelle Spotted Elk, a Santa Cruz, Calif., woman of mixed heritage whose husband is Lakota. "It also has religious significance. With them, there's not a division between spirituality and their leadership."
Victoria's Secret model Karlie Kloss walked onto the runway last week wearing the floor-length feathered headdress, leopard-print underwear and high heels. She also was adorned with fringe and turquoise jewelry during a segment meant to represent the 12 months of the year - fireworks in July, rain gear for April and a headdress for November.
Kloss herself posted on Twitter that she was "deeply sorry if what I wore during the VS Show offended anyone."
Thousands of people have commented about the outfit on the company's Facebook page. Some praised Kloss' attire as artistic and urged those offended by it to "get over it." Some expressed appreciation to Victoria's Secret for halting its marketing approach for the clothing, and others reached back in history to explain their feelings.
"We have gone through the atrocities to survive and ensure our way of life continues," Navajo Nation spokesman Erny Zah said in an interview Monday. "Any mockery, whether it's Halloween, Victoria's Secret - they are spitting on us. They are spitting on our culture, and it's upsetting."
The Victoria's Secret stir follows a string of similar incidents. Recently, Paul Frank Industries Inc. and the band No Doubt each ran into criticism for their use of headdresses in clothing and parties, and in a cowboys-and-Indians-themed video, respectively. They offered apologies as well.
Last year, Urban Outfitters set off a firestorm of criticism with its line of Navajo-branded clothing and accessories - particularly underwear and a liquor flask, which the tribe said was "derogatory and scandalous."
Abaki Beck was among a handful of Native students who hosted a discussion last week at a private liberal arts college in St. Paul, Minn., on Native culture in fashion and sports. She said companies first must learn from the mistake of ignoring Native American history and then make an effort to engage with Indian Country.
She wanted more than a short apology from Victoria's Secret instead of what she said sounded like an automated response.
"But perhaps that is an unrealistic hope," said the 19-year-old member of the Blackfeet Nation of Montana. "It is all about business, after all."
Jennie Luna, who is Chicana and Caxcan, said society largely is ignorant toward indigenous spirituality and doesn't understand what should not be marketed commercially. She and others say more education about Native American cultures is needed.
"We are people; we're not a fashion statement," Luna said. "We are people who are facing serious issues, and for them to further perpetuate the type of stereotypes and disregard for a community's way of life is unacceptable."
ReGina Zuni's advice to companies looking to market Native American culture is to hire Native Americans who have knowledge of tribal traditions, cultures and customs.
However, her reaction to hearing about the Victoria's Secret headdress wasn't outrage about the clothing itself, but about the lack of attention on health care, education, housing and other issues in Indian Country.
Casinos are not mocking to tribal culture aye? ... that is convenient ...Pocahontas rawr!
Some people just have no class, therefore have to complain.
 Big Chief no care-um if hot,  mostly naked squaw wear-um head dress. Big Chief get massive totem pole.
Was anyone even looking at it?
What is to apologize for? It isobvious that there was no Indian ceremony taking place. Some folks are too sensitive.
Oh wha, wha, wha,....good lord, some people need to get a life.....if they spent as much time with crap like this, on real things, think what could get done.
Â
I think it is very interesting and very cool.....sorry VS that some people so much ..
Oh boo hoo hoo, that looks a lot better than the other pictures of the headdress being worn.
 "the outfit was criticized as a display of ignorance toward tribal culture and history."
And Casinos aren't?
Like to the gajillionth power...
Â
No kidding.
Big deal.Â
I am usually the person that says, "did they really just do that?" But in this case, I think folks have gone overboard. Showing native americans as mascots is probably out of line, but in this case, nobody was intending any ill will. If they came out with a chinese dragon outfit, would folks be upset? Ditto with a woman wearing giant angel wings? Or perhaps an outfit derived from what pilgrims wore. At some point, you have to ask, is this making fun of the culture or incorporating the culture into the wider pop culture. But I willing to admit I maybe wrong if someone can state what was offensive. Meaning, if wearing feathers by a white person is like collecting scalps.
It's probably getting more publicity for VS than any other piece in their line.
Â
Take away all the offensive stuff, like the head dress and the nasty leopard spots, and what do you have.
;-) , :-) , :-) , :-) , ...    Â
A lot of happy faces.Â
Just give one "GOOD" reason (the key word here is GOOD) why anybody need to apologize for anything. This PC crap has gone way to far.
Really? People are offended by this?!
They should have had a male model the head dress. For future events?
She was wearing a head dress? Hmm. Guess my eyes never made it up to her head.
You could sit a bar stool on a rock and it would offend someone. I think people actually go out of their way to look for things to be offended by. Lighten up, Francis.
And why do they need to be apologizing? If you natives are really upset by something like that, then you really are pathetic. Looked fine to me. Head dresses are always a good look, and quite frankly, I would appreciate the fact that people are still interested in their heriatage if i were them.
 @Zoso You have to figure that at least some of the people who claim offense are college professors/activists who would claim to be offended by anything. I would propose that the diversity of opinion across the Native American community is there but is hidden by activists like it doesn't exist.Â
apology? for what?! the model is absolutely beautiful and so is the head thing! what is your problem, indians?!
I am willing to bet there are a number of Native American males who are not offended.Â
I think it's a beautiful Head Piece - and I also find it hard to believe that VS meant any disrespect.
Yes, I understand why they (Native Americans) wouldn't want it used for a Lingerie show, but I DO NOT believe there was any malice in it.Â
It is an epic fail of an outfit. Not that I would kick her out of the bedroom, but I would definitely have to struggle to hide my snickers - the leopard skin panties?
Â
How 1970's can you get?
 @Howard Beale I'm sure we'll be hearing from PETA next about the panties... faux or not...Â
Who was actually looking at the headdress?
 @Fred Mulligan Obviously someone with "delicate sensitivities." Our country is WAY too P.C. lately.
 @Wolfen Yeah, "CeLEbRaTe DiVeRSiTy".... OR ELSE.