Despite rise of HPV-caused cancers, many still not vaccinating

Lee Haugen, a 65-year-old Olympia resident, was startled last March when he discovered a lump on his neck. He soon learned that he had tongue cancer which had spread to his lymph nodes.
"I had no idea I had cancer," Haugen says. "I felt fine."
But what surprised Haugen the most was that his cancer was caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Before he was diagnosed, Haugen had believed HPV could only lead to cancer in women.
"I had only heard of it causing cervical cancer," Haugen says.
Haugen’s is just one of a growing number of cancer cases believed to be caused by HPV. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended the HPV vaccine for all children starting at age 11 to prevent them from developing cancers like Haugen’s later in life. But the majority of parents in this country are not getting their children vaccinated while HPV-related cancers continue to rise, the CDC reports.
Dr. Denise Galloway, interim director of the Human Biology Division at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, has been studying HPV for 35 years. She believes many parents aren’t vaccinating their kids for HPV during early adolescence because they don’t know that the vaccine is most effective when given before a patient has had sex.
"Parents say 'My child is not sexually active,' or believe they are a long way away from that," Galloway says.
Other parents are concerned about the cost of the vaccine, Galloway says. While it is covered by many insurance plans, the CDC reported in July 2012 that the retail price of the vaccine is about $130 per dose, or $390 for the full series. The CDC reports that vaccination rates tend to be lower among those living in poverty.
Galloway has also spoken to parents who believe vaccinations are not safe, despite the fact that the HPV vaccine has been proven not to be harmful.
The HPV vaccine has received criticism from parents who believe it will encourage sexual behavior, though Galloway says there is no research to back up this claim.
"If you have a cholera vaccine it doesn’t make you more likely to drink from the sewer," Dr. Galloway says.
The CDC reports only 40 percent of girls in Washington State, ages 13 to 17, received all three recommended doses of the vaccine in 2011. While Washington is one of the most vaccinated states in the country, it falls short of the U.S. Government’s Healthy People 2020 target of 80 percent for complete vaccination among girls ages 13 through 15.
National vaccination rates are also much lower than those reported in Canada (50-85 percent) and the United Kingdom and Australia combined (greater than 70 percent), according to ACS.
Some adolescents (26 percent of girls, ages 13 to 17, in Washington in 2011) receive at least one injection of the HPV vaccine but do not get all three of the recommended does.
"You need multiple doses so that your immune system can better recognize and respond to the virus," Galloway says.
Vaccination rates are especially low among boys. The CDC initially recommended the HPV vaccine only to girls in 2006, but included boys in 2009. Still, only 8.9 percent of males in Washington, ages 13 to 17, received the HPV vaccine in 2011, according to the CDC.
"The uptake of the vaccine in this country is very disappointing, especially among boys," Galloway says. "What parent wouldn’t want to protect their child against a cancer?"
Marianne Wood, a Seattle mother of five, had her four daughters vaccinated for HPV when they were in their teens and early 20s.
"It was a pretty easy decision," Wood said. "I was going to do anything that I could to protect them."
But when a doctor recommended Wood vaccinate her teenage son she decide against it.
"I just didn’t feel it was necessary," she said.
Galloway says boys should get vaccinated to decrease the spread of HPV to others and to protect themselves. Of the nearly 35,000 cases of HPV-related cancer reported in the United States in 2009, 39 percent were men. While it is most commonly associated with cervical cancer, HPV can also lead to cancers of the throat, tongue, tonsils, anus, penis, vagina and vulva.
After six weeks of radiation therapy and seven weeks of chemotherapy, Haugen is now cancer free. Though he never thought about getting an HPV vaccine before, he urges young people to do so.
"I would say get it, because you don’t know what kind of cancer you can end up with."
The CDC recommends the HPV vaccine for women through age 26 and men through age 21 who did not get all three doses of the vaccine when they were younger. The vaccine is also recommended for gay and bisexual men and men with compromised immune systems through age 26.
While Dr. Galloway says it is not likely be cost-effective to vaccinate all ages, all patients should talk to their doctor about getting vaccinated and be judged on a case by case basis. Even for patients who have been sexually active, the virus can still offer some protection, Galloway says.
It will take decades to determine if this will prevent cancer in those injected. Hopefully it will.
Over ten years go, at the age of 43, I was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, a form of skin cancer not restricted to the skin. It appeared in the form of a sore under my tongue and grew rapidly. Scans disclosed the cancer had spread from my tongue to a saliva gland and into the lymph nodes in my neck. Surgery was recommended as soon as possible. But 1st I had to have a feeding tube inserted from inside out through my stomach in order to survive on a liquid diet for 6-8 months, and then get tattooed with a marker & fitted with a mask for radiation treatments post surgery. The ensuing 10 1/2 hour surgery resulted in the removal of almost 1/3rd of my tongue (from tip to throat), a saliva gland, and 20 lymph nodes (ear to ear). Skin grafted from my right thigh was used to patch up my tongue and surrounding soft tissue. The operating surgeon accessed the cancer in my tongue through my neck & stapled me closed while the plastic surgeon patched it up on the inside. I was released from the hospital 5 days later, once the tracheotomy (breathing) device, the feeding tube down my nose, as well as the 2 other drain tubes in my neck were removed, but only after I could prove to hospital staff that I had relearned how to swallow (lovely blue die test). I considered the surgery as being the easy part. The follow-on 7 weeks of daily radiation treatments and low doses of chemo were pure hell. A pill an hour before each radiation treatment to offset the affects of the 2 shots in my tummy meant to offset the affects of the radiation & chemo. Twenty minutes pinned to a table wearing a locked down face mask to stabilize my head while being fried to a crisp was not my idea of fun. Having to sleep sitting up for a couple of months because youâre burned inside & out, swollen, and with no saliva to swallow. I went from 230 lbs down to 168 lbs but was kept alive from the wonderful liquid diet, although I couldnât taste it because my taste buds were gone. I have since slowly lost most of my teeth (lovely jaw infections), and more recently my thyroid system quit on me (radiation damage), but still am truly thankful to be alive.
Â
- All of this caused by.......... HPV.
Â
And yes, the details above were in an attempt to scare the crap out of you.
Â
Please, Iâm not looking for sympathy or a pat on the back. I only ask all you parents out there to do right by your children (boys & girls) and get them vaccinated. Increase their chances for long term survival and/or living happy & healthy!
Â
http://healthmap.org/news/hpv-vaccine-controversy-and-solution#comment_section
What they don't mention is that the HPV vaccine only helps protect against 3 or 6 strains of HPV, while there are close to 100 strains of HPV. Â (I'm forgetting exact numbers, so just choosing numbers that I think are close from my memory).
Â
However, HPV is one of the most common diseases. Â In fact, I believe more than half the male population in the U.S. will get it at some point in their lives.
 @Landshark Those 6 are by far the most common though. There are tons of rare ones that you barely see but if you can formulate a vaccine that protects you from the most common, why not?
 @quidproquo My Wife received all of the recommended HPV vaccines when she was younger, yet she still got a dangerous strain of HPV which had to be removed. Â
Â
This is one of those diseases that nobody talks about but just about everybody has. Â It's important to know what it is and what it can do to you (cancer causing, etc). Â But also important to know that the HPV vaccine isn't as effective as they claim it to be.
 @Landshark I've never seen them claim it was a be all end all. Just like birth control pills - they tell you to always wear a condom, regardless.
"The HPV vaccine is NOT harmless like it is being promoted and has not been proven to actually prevent cervical cancer The HPV vaccine only protects against TWO strains of HPV associated with cancer but there are MORE THAN 100 different strains of HPV in all. Dr. Diane Harper, one of the lead researchers for Gardasil blew the whistle on the vaccine, saying the available data suggests the HPV vaccine's protective effects do not last beyond five years."http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/11/29/hpv-vaccine-risks.aspx
Not saying this is true, but I've read a lot of negative info about this vaccine. I won't give it to my daughter until I see more conclusive studies that it's necessasry, and it's not because I'm uptight about sex, it's because I don't trust the drug makers. Possible conflict of interest here.
 @Iffyon Conspiracy theorist website. give me a peer reviewed article and I will read it in a heart beat.
There are a lot of assumptions being made about the effectiveness of the vaccine, the safety of the vaccine, and the economic viability of the vaccine. Meanwhile, nobody bothers to wonder if it's necessary. Even IF it does work preventing some HPV infection, and that's a huge IF, there isn't ANY proof it prevents cervical cancer.  Our current system of early detection with Pap and early treatment has an almost 100% success rate. Cervical cancer deaths account for .71% of all cancer deaths. Are you telling me we can't do better with the over $500 per child to improve healthcare. It would be interesting to see if giving a child $500 worth of vegetables would have bigger impact (I'm kidding....of course kids don't eat veggies.)
Â
Proponents of the vaccine use fear mongering in place of science. They like to assert that Michelle Bachman and Jenny McCarthy speak for everyone that thinks this system is farce.  The truth is that the people refusing or questioning vaccines for their children have a higher level of education than those who are not. It's not a bunch of uneducated parents with foil caps.
Â
Do a google search for Gardasil and any combination of evidence based science/fraud/safety/injury. Go ahead and write off the research because it wasn't funded by a drug company. Dismiss it because it wasn't your child that was injured by a vaccine. There is no way a huge government bureaucracy like the FDA might have some holes in their game right?
Â
If you don't believe that drugs and vaccines are big time industry filling a lot of pockets (research/production/distribution/advertising/doctor visits/etc) and want to line up for the shot go ahead. I just suggest you do a little research on your own and don't take my word, Komo's word, a drug company's word, or any of these other ill informed message board comments as fact. Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
@Kevin
I'm on your side Kevin. Â People fail to do their own research on effectiveness and side-effects of modern vaccines. Â Most people have no clue what is really being injected into their body and the side effects and long-term issues that they could cause. Â I wonder how many reading this know that many of the vaccines contain monkey and cow blood or other animal tissue. Â And some of those animal tissues have been found to contain even worse diseases (which weren't apparent at first) so had to be modified. Â Even modern vaccines are still untested for any length of time (past maybe a few months to a couple years, max) so the long-term affects are widely unknown.
Â
In the case of babies, between birth and 18 months, if you follow the recommended vaccine schedule, will receive 39 vaccines. Â 39!! Â Many of those vaccines were originally created only for high risk babies (of whatever they were designed to prevent) and are not needed. Â Some of them have side-effects that are worse than the disease itself, etc. Â And a lot of them don't protect for more than a few years anyway, where just getting the disease can give you life-time immunity and cause less health problems than the vaccine does.
Â
So, people need to do their own research. Â
Â
 @KevinÂ
"The truth is that the people refusing or questioning vaccines for their children have a higher level of education than those who are not. It's not a bunch of uneducated parents with foil caps."
Â
Â
And who are you to insinuate that the parents who decide to vaccinate are uneducated or don't research and weigh the risks?Â
Â
I'm assuming that based on the comment I quoted above, you don't possess a higher level of education.
Â
 @countyclerk You can feel free to search the archives of the US National Institute of Health for the demographics of vaccine refusers. BioMed Central is an open access site.Â
 @countyclerk It wasn't my intent to classify everyone who vaccinates an uneducated person who has not given any thought or put forth any effort to research. I was simply pointing out that the growing group of people who think this is a slippery slope we are headed down possess a higher than normal education level. Don't create a strawman argument out of what I said and act like I was personally attacking you.
Â
People on these message boards like to insinuate that anyone who questions injecting viruses and a slew of chemicals into babies is a "conspiracy nut" and resort to name calling. (see above)
 @Kevin It is actually an ad hominem, not a straw man. FYI.
@Kevin Michelle Bachmann, is that you?
@Kevin -- ok, let's drop the conspiracy nut talk.
Â
There is massive proof that certian forms of HPV progresses to cancer.
Â
There is no proof that this vaccine has any problems. There's LOTS of false science and phony associations between vaccines and 'problems' out there on the internet. However, little of it stands to actual scientific scrutiny.
Â
People on the internet can do whatever they want to sound scientific and play on your emotional heartstrings, but that doesn't make it factual information.
Â
The fact is that this vaccine prevents harm and death.
Â
And people screaming about how 'dangerous' it is are causing more harm than they are preventing.
Â
Â
 @FormerMarineSgt Why is it that when anyone disagrees with you, you immediately go straight to insults. That is a form of logical fallacy. Attacking your opponent with names (ad hominem) attempts to set you opponent on a lower logical footing. Can't you just explain your opposition to their points, or do you feel that your own positions are so weak that you have to strengthen them with ad hominem attacks? I for one agree with you, vaccines are far more effective than the alternative, even with the side effects. We gave our daughter the HPV vaccine as a tweenie because we are just as worried about the indiscretions of some future husband/ lover that she might meet ten years down the road.
 @quidproquo Yes, and 200 years ago people who objected to bleeding people were also nuts. Calling someone a "nut" does nothing to make your argument stronger, it just makes you appear desperate. This has NOTHING to do with religion. This tactic you are using is more common with liberals and atheists than with the religious. If you can't explain your position in a logical way, you jump to ad hominem attacks (which you just did by attempting to tie opposition to vaccines to the religious).  If your position stands scientifically then there is no reason for ad hominem attacks. All kinds of supposed scientific and medical "facts" have been overturned by more science. Keep an open mind and research all sides. Personally I believe that the good of vaccines outway all the side effects. I will take the risk of side effects over the real disease any day, I just don't need to call people nuts to get it done!
 @sometimesright  @FormerMarineSgt  I can understand why he called him a nut. There's so many people out there that no matter how much evidence you give them, no matter how many peer reviewed study, no matter how much historical precedence there is, they will stand their ground on BS beliefs. I once had someone refuse to believe that we eradicated smallpox using vaccines. Â
Â
There's a great psychology paper out there that hits on these points too - people who hold very strong, religious like beliefs will actually dig in deeper the more evidence provided against their cause.
 @FormerMarineSgt Ah yes... the "nut" talk. Always classy and never stale. See you in the swine flu line Sgt.
Â
This comment has been deleted
 @deadcandance  Because gay and bisexual men not only spread the disease at higher rates, but they are at an increased risk for other STDs such as HIV/AIDS.  Â
It certainly doesn't help when Republicans like Michelle Bachmann tell people that the HPV vaccine causes mental retardation.Â
Â
And you have no shortage of other Bible thumping GOPers running around equating the vaccine with sex and other "sins."
Â
Â
 @lakeview That rant pretty much took away any credibility that you have on your above comments. Ad hominems do not become you!
"Marianne Wood, a Seattle mother of five, had her four daughters vaccinated for HPV when they were in their teens and early 20s.
"It was a pretty easy decision," Wood said. "I was going to do anything that I could to protect them."
But when a doctor recommended Wood vaccinate her teenage son she decide against it.
"I just didnât feel it was necessary," she said."
Â
Sorry, son, mom would rather do anything that she can to protect......your sisters!
Ouch, that's gotta hurt.
Â
I had my daughter vaccinated a few years ago when she was 10, and I'll have my young son vaccinated when he hits the appropriate age range. I care about protecting both my kids. Equally. :-)
you know I wish they had this vaccine out a decade ago. I dated a girl that ended up having cervical cancer years ago, and then a few years later I picked up HPV caused warts down on my thingee. Doctor said its almost impossible to determine where I contracted them from, but the chance that they were caused by the HPV that caused my ex-g/f's cancer were very strong he said. Had the vaccine been out before that and I had received it, I wouldnt have gotten them. I'm not embarrassed about it, tons of people get them and they are hard to treat but eventually go away. But I'll still have to worry about cancer someday.
 @northwestsurfer agreed, this is why BOTH my son and daughter got this as tweens. Even though I am (so far) not worried about them sleeping around, I am still worried that some future lover/ spouse might currently be having a little wild time and they might meet them 10 years from now when they have settled down. Even though they could marry and live happily ever after, what they did with others than my children before they met them, could give them HPV later on!
 @sometimesright  @northwestsurfer This is definitely the right attitude. Even if you don't think your kid should have sex until marriage, there's nothing stopping their partner from having had sex previously. I think it is completely nonsensical to avoid vaccination.  Like all vaccines (and everything in the whole dang world) there is a .0001 chance you can have a bad reaction. I became deathly allergic to resin (good bye using bandaids and anything else with adhesives) and pineapple just this year.  Allergies are ever present and it fear of a reaction is not a good reason vaccinate (unless you already know you are allergic to the ingredients)
Take it seriously, people: HPV Causes Cancer And It Doesn't Discriminate. I too had only heard it causes cervical cancer and vaccines were encouraged for young women. At the time I was mad because per my doctor, women over 25 or 30 weren't considered candidates. What, we're too old to matter too? Then at a gyno visit I tested positive for HPV and my Dr talked to me about being at high risk for cervical cancer. Great. Now a male friend in his late 40's has undergone thoat surgery for a cancer the doctors said was caused by HPV. They couldn't "find" the tumor to remove it so he's facing the decision of radiation. As long as we don't have a cure for cancer, you WANT to get vaccinated. We have a known cancer-causer on our hands. Next Wednesday I'm going to a friend's funeral caused by breast cancer. Not everyone survives, people. Get the vaccine.
@dontneedheels What if you already have HPV? What will the vaccine do for you then?
@Superman_1967 - if you already HPV, nothing happens - you still will have HPV.   BUT it does prevent you from getting other strains of HPV (there is more than 1 'type' of HPV and the vaccine covers the most dangerous ones).
Â
That's why it's soo important to get kids vaccinated for this BEFORE they become sexually active.Â
Â
Getting the shot after your infected is a lot like a woman trying to wish herself un-pregnant by taking the morning after pill after it's way too late and she's pregnant. Nothing changes. if she's pregnant, she's pregnant.
Â
Except that with this, if the HPV becomes cancer, and it's not caught in time - you die.
Â
So any parent not willing to get thier child vaccinated against this - before the children are of sexually active age - is risking thier child's death because of thier own irrational fear.
Â
Yeah, I'm a bit dramatic with this, but I'm a colon cancer survivor of 9 years. My Chemo-buddy died from it because his had advanced too far before it was caught.Â
Â
Why would ANY parent put thier child at risk of going through that hell?
Â
IÂ just don't get it.Â
Â
A simple shot well before the child knows what sex is saves them from this hell.Â
Yes I had a guy friend develop cancer on his tongue..... Never smoked or chewed but the doctors said it was because of HPV. Men have problems too!
Do your own research on this vaccine and come to your own conclusions. Like anything else there are risks associated with getting this vaccine. Gardasil is made by Merck. The same company that made Vioxx and lied about its effectiveness and side-effects even after it was pulled from the market.
@Rider -- while one should always be wise in thier choices, ignoring the continuingly positive data -from people and organizations other than the manufacturer- is just plain stupid. Within a matter of a few years the truth about Vioxx came out.  So far, the only negatives about this vaccine are blatant lies generated by those with an agenda ("It causes mental retardation" is the most famous lie).
Â
To all:
NOT getting your child this vaccine is the equivelant of putting a gun to your child's head to play a real game of russian roulete. MAYBE you will be lucky, MAYBE you won't.
Â
But who are you to risk a great harm or death upon your child because of a blind belief that 'she's not sexually active yet'? How long are you going to deny that your children are going to be just like you or I and have sex a lot earlier than we should have?????
Â
Who are you to be so uptight about your child having sex that you can't face the honest truth that they -might- be having sex far, far younger than you're willing to admit could be possible?
Â
You get your child vaccinated against the flu, whooping cough, measles, mumps and alot of other things - on the odd chance that this will protect them against something potentially deadly.... (a 'few' people die from these diseases)
Â
YET when something that is potentially far, far deadlier - CANCER (a LOT of people die from this) - you folks shy away because you're too hung up on it being something transmitted by sexual contact... Â
Â
If you don't get this vaccination for your child, you are risking a gruesome death for your child.
But that's ok - no one's child EVER has sex before the parents are willing to admit that thier children are.....  You are sentencing them to a possible death sentence because of your own hangups and your inability to deal with actual reality.  You are a PATHETIC parent if you don't get them this vaccine because you chose to ignore the reality that they will most likely be sexually active long before you are willing to admit it.
Â
If my kids weren't already well, well past that, shall we say -Â 'tender age of innocence', they would have been some of the first in line to get it.
Â
I'm a colon cancer survivor. I would never allow my children to be at risk simply because of my own issues with them doing what you and I did when we were their age.
Â
 @FormerMarineSgt While I once again agree with a lot of what you say here, you make yourself come off as pompous and arrogant. Many people who object to this are not "putting a gun to their kids head". Frankly if I was against this, you just drove me farther away. I would come away more scared of people like you making these decisions for me, than the REAL danger of HPV. A better way to aproach this is pointing out to parents that it may not be THEIR kid that they have to worry about, but some future lover or spouse of their kids who is currenly living the wild life with no thought about their future spouse/ lover. Your kid can remain abstinant until they are 30 and meet their life partner, if that future life partner is currently srewing their whole 9th grade class, then 10-20 years down the road when they meet your child who kept their virginity, that future life partner can then give your child HPV. This is the reasoning I used when getting it for both my kids. I personally believe that many kids won't have sex until adulthood, but many others are and might hook up with my kids at some future date.
 @FormerMarineSgt  @Rider Sarge, I'm glad to hear you survived cancer. But there is another option: Teach your kids morals and not to go whoring around and your chances of hpv would be close to 0%. If you don't trust your kids or how you have raised them, then its probably a good idea but the vaccine isn't the only solution.
 @SeattleJoe @MP @FormerMarineSgt @Rider This has nothing to do with your kid being a perfect virgin. This has to do with what happens if that future lover/ spouse of your kid isn't! Even if you can keep your kid morally perfect and they don't have sex until they are married, how are you going to gaurantee that their future spouse/ lover is being raised with those same morals? That is the real question. I have so far not had to worry about my own kids, but I am not ignorant enough to believe that their chances of finding another virgin are very high! You can raise your kids right, that doesn't mean they won't fall in love with the Casinova of another high school ten years from now.
 @FormerMarineSgt  @SeattleJoe  @Rider Answered above in my other post. I'm not trying to be a preacher, and I don't expect kids to go off and be perfect but you cannot in any way shape or form deny that if they live a lifestyle where they are not sleeping around then this risk is virtually 0. I'm very aware of the world and reality but reality is what we make it whether what we have now or otherwise. Kids can be raised virtuous but not perfect as we all fail. But our kids will never have a chance if we don't even try. I know plenty of couples that were virgins when they got married. Why do we have to treat it like its impossible?
 @MP  @SeattleJoe  @FormerMarineSgt  @Rider No the point is if people lived lives where they weren't spreading disease then this and many other diseases wouldn't be an issue. I'm not judging anyone but the fact remains, if two virgins got married their risk of this and countless STDs is virtually 0. You can't make every decision for your kids or any after they are out of your home but you can raise them in a manner that would substantially reduce this kind of risk.
@MP -- people like that live a false reality where today's children don't do exactly the same thing as they did when they were young....
Â
It's sad that people like that can't see the real world around them.
@SeattleJoe @Rider -- give the preacher speak a rest Seattle Joe.
Â
Not everyone is as righteous as you (or at least as righteous as you want them to be).
Â
AND more people are smarter about this than you as well. Your lcosed minded response completely avoids the facts here.
Â
The fact is that a vaccination at an early age (before they know what sexual relations are) protects them FOR LIFE.   Raise them whatever way you want. If the parents want to decieve themselves that they can 'raise the child perfectly so that they child won't have sex until whenever the parent can accept it', so be it. But that's no guarantee that the child won't end up sexually active. Only an idiot would think that they can guarantee that they can keep a child from becoming sexually active.
Â
How many things did your parents teach you not to do that you did anyway? Hmmm?  If your parent's aren't a good example, then how about your friends and thier parents?   How many kids end up doing the opposite of what they were taught?  WAY TOO MANY.Â
Â
This is nothing more than a preventative of danger and death to your child IF they chose to have sexual relations AT SOME UNDETERMINED AGE IN THE FUTURE. ----- OR Choosing to allow them to have an unneccesary risk of harm or death simply because you think you can prevent them from having sex outside of what you think is 'perfect'.
Â
The attitude you have on this is guaranteeing that children will have thier parent's playing a game of russian roulete with the child's life.
Â
The only way that your 'blind to reality' method works is if you can guarantee that the child will never, ever have sex with anyone who's ever had sex with anyone else. Ever. Even as an adult with only thier married partner.
Â
And that's as false a reality as I've ever heard.
@SeattleJoe @FormerMarineSgt @Rider Not true, SeattleJoe. What if one of your virginal kids marries a girl who was "whoring around"? What then? Also, wow, judgmental much? Finally, raising your kids "right" is far from a guarantee that they'll listen to what you have said once they are out on their own.
 @FormerMarineSgt Well Sgt congrats on surviving colon cancer. I am a survivor of NET and Thyroid cancers myself. My children are at the age that they can do the research and come to their own conclusions.
Â
I am not advocating or decrying vaccinations. I do advocate people doing their own research to make an informed decision.
Guys, do take this seriously. I myself was diagnosed with a form of skin cancer, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, last year and had to have roughly a silver dollars worth of skin removed. It was caused by HPV. And until that point, I was unaware it could cause cancer in men as well.
@TheJaxx -- Good luck on your continued recovery from cancer.  I didn't know that HPV can cause skin cancers - but cancer is a devious bastard.
Â
Believe me - I know. I'm a 9 year colon cancer survivor. I don't want anyone to have to go through anything even remotely like what I did simply because thier parents are too incapable of dealing with reality to get thier kids vaccinated.