Welding sparks started Taylor Bridge Fire
SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) - An August wildfire that destroyed 61 homes and cost $11.1 million to suppress was likely caused by sparks from welding or cutting work on a bridge project southeast of Cle Elum in the Cascade Range, the state Department of Natural Resources said Monday.
The agency released the results of its investigation into the Taylor Bridge Fire that blackened 36 square miles.
"I determine that the fire was human caused and was most likely caused by errant sparks and/or slag from the construction activity that was occurring on the bridge immediately prior to the fire's start," the report concluded.
The fire started Aug. 13 as a contractor and subcontractor were working on a Transportation Department project on the Highway 10 Bridge. Investigators found the fire started about 30 feet from where one worker was cutting rebar with a power saw on the bridge deck, while a second worker was welding under the bridge.
The work was taking place while industrial activity was supposed to be shut down because of the high fire danger in the area, the report said.
In addition to the 61 homes, the fire destroyed hundreds of outbuildings.
"This was a dramatic fire that was most dangerous in terms of its impact to home owners and property," said Bryan Flint, a spokesman for the agency, in a conference call with reporters
The report said work on the bridge was being performed for the Department of Transportation by bridge contractor Conway Construction Co., of Ridgefield, Wash., and subcontractor Rainier Steel, of Normandy Park, Wash.
But the DNR report did not issue any fines. And Flint said anyone looking to recover damages from the fire will likely have to go to court.
Flint said the DNR is required to seek recovery of its costs to battle the fire, which total around $5.5 million.
"We are working with the attorney general's office to determine who to seek the funds from," Flint said.
Flint said the fire started sometime between 1 p.m. and 1:20 p.m. on Aug. 13. Because of hazardous fire conditions that day, the DNR's Industrial Fire Protection Level required that the use of power saws and welding in the forest be concluded by 1 p.m., Flint said. But witnesses reported both activities occurred after 1 p.m., Flint said.
There was a water truck at the site being used to keep dust down, and it was driven to the fire, Flint said. But the person who drove the truck there did not know how to activate the water jets, the report found.
Workers at the construction site tried to extinguish the fire, also did not have the proper equipment and training to do so, the report found.
"The fire grew beyond their capacity to fight with shovels and one fire extinguisher," Flint said.
On the day the fire started, the humidity was a dry 14 percent, the temperature was 82 degrees and wind speed was 6 mph. That put the IFP Level at a 3, while the most dangerous level for fire potential is 4, Flint said.
It is relatively rare for a destructive wildfire to be started by industrial activity, Flint said. Most fires are started by lightning or untended campfires, he said.
The agency released the results of its investigation into the Taylor Bridge Fire that blackened 36 square miles.
"I determine that the fire was human caused and was most likely caused by errant sparks and/or slag from the construction activity that was occurring on the bridge immediately prior to the fire's start," the report concluded.
The fire started Aug. 13 as a contractor and subcontractor were working on a Transportation Department project on the Highway 10 Bridge. Investigators found the fire started about 30 feet from where one worker was cutting rebar with a power saw on the bridge deck, while a second worker was welding under the bridge.
The work was taking place while industrial activity was supposed to be shut down because of the high fire danger in the area, the report said.
In addition to the 61 homes, the fire destroyed hundreds of outbuildings.
"This was a dramatic fire that was most dangerous in terms of its impact to home owners and property," said Bryan Flint, a spokesman for the agency, in a conference call with reporters
The report said work on the bridge was being performed for the Department of Transportation by bridge contractor Conway Construction Co., of Ridgefield, Wash., and subcontractor Rainier Steel, of Normandy Park, Wash.
But the DNR report did not issue any fines. And Flint said anyone looking to recover damages from the fire will likely have to go to court.
Flint said the DNR is required to seek recovery of its costs to battle the fire, which total around $5.5 million.
"We are working with the attorney general's office to determine who to seek the funds from," Flint said.
Flint said the fire started sometime between 1 p.m. and 1:20 p.m. on Aug. 13. Because of hazardous fire conditions that day, the DNR's Industrial Fire Protection Level required that the use of power saws and welding in the forest be concluded by 1 p.m., Flint said. But witnesses reported both activities occurred after 1 p.m., Flint said.
There was a water truck at the site being used to keep dust down, and it was driven to the fire, Flint said. But the person who drove the truck there did not know how to activate the water jets, the report found.
Workers at the construction site tried to extinguish the fire, also did not have the proper equipment and training to do so, the report found.
"The fire grew beyond their capacity to fight with shovels and one fire extinguisher," Flint said.
On the day the fire started, the humidity was a dry 14 percent, the temperature was 82 degrees and wind speed was 6 mph. That put the IFP Level at a 3, while the most dangerous level for fire potential is 4, Flint said.
It is relatively rare for a destructive wildfire to be started by industrial activity, Flint said. Most fires are started by lightning or untended campfires, he said.
idiot company should pay through the nose...very careless, thoughtless, etc. over 60 people lost their homes over this little oversight.
The company's will file bankruptcy and then the homeowners will sue the Dept. of Transportation which is the state and the bottom line the taxpayers will pay the costs and were all back on first..
Here comes another bankruptcy.
Yeah we kind of knew this already. At least they finally confirmed it. Man, that dry stretch seemed so long ago now. ;)
Wow. We knew back when it happened it was started by the construction company that was welding on the bridge. But of course there had to be a report done on it.
 @godawgs You'd prefer there was no report or transparency? Weren't you folks demanding that? That's kind of how they let you see the process to ensure the fire was investigated properly... not to mention the report intends to explain what happened so that (a) it may be avoided in the future, and (b) so that lessons learned may be shared between all agencies/partners involved. But hey... next time... they'll avoid all reports... you know... cause you don't like 'em.
 @godawgs and of course that report will be pretty darn important in the legal case to come as well... You sure you went to the UW?
I can hear the lawyers salivating right now. There should be zero question about who is responsibility, but I feel that this litigation we almost surely will see is going to cost the state a lot more.
Woopsi! I can hear the sounds of insurance companies sharpening their pencils right about now...