Activists push Legislature to grant more rights for immigrants

SEATTLE (AP) - Emboldened by the critical role minorities played in the November elections, immigrant rights advocates in Olympia want to play offense this year.
Activists are pushing lawmakers to provide state college financial aid for young immigrants who've won temporary resident status, and they're seeking to overhaul local elections to ensure better representation for minorities.
However, the power play by Democratic Sen. Rodney Tom that gave Republicans a ruling majority in the Senate may stifle those efforts.
Already, Republican Sen. Don Benton of Vancouver has filed a bill that would bring back the often-debated issue of requiring proof of legal U.S. residency when obtaining a driver's license.
Also, Benton and Democrat Sen. Tim Sheldon, who defected with Tom, are sponsoring a measure that would bar all illegal immigrants from in-state tuition and financial aid for college.
It's not new that Republicans have tried to pass the proof of U.S. residency rule, which Benton has included in a bill about a voter database. In 2011, Senate Republicans attempted to bring a vote through a procedural move while they were still in the minority - at least one former senior Democratic senator also backed them. Proponents of such measures say failing to ask for proof of U.S. residency invites identity fraud and could end up putting noncitizens in the state's voter rolls.
Senate Republican Leader Mark Schoesler of Ritzville said he hadn't yet seen the driver's license bill, but said there was a problem with the way people obtain driver's licenses here.
"Unfortunately, we couldn't get a vote on it in the past," he said. "We'll probably be looking at it again this year. We're in a minority of states that has a driver's license system like this."
Washington and New Mexico had been the only states without a proof of U.S. residency requirement until last month when Illinois changed its law in a move that will allow immigrants who can't prove their status to get a license. Utah has a two-tier license model that allows illegal immigrants to drive, but they can't use the permit as identification.
It remains to be seen whether either of Benton's measures will get a hearing in committee or if they will advance in their current form through the Senate.
"We're keeping an open mind," said Toby Guevin of OneAmerica, an immigrant rights advocacy group, of what he expects of the Senate this year.
Benton did not respond to interview requests, neither did Republican leadership. Democrats in the Senate minority also did not return interview requests, nor did Democratic Gov. Inslee's office.
There were no sweeping exit polls conducted in Washington, but analyst Matt Barreto of polling outfit Latino Decisions estimated that Latinos in the state broke similarly for Inslee as they did for President Barack Obama, supporting each candidate by about at 3 to 1 margin.
Asian-American voters, which at 7 percent of the voting pool have a bigger share than Latinos in Washington, are also thought to have supported Inslee similarly in the state, Barreto said.
Nationally, Obama gained more than 70 percent of the votes among Latinos and Asians. Just a few years ago, those two voting blocs were up for grabs. President George W. Bush took 40 percent of Latino votes, compared to Romney's 23 percent. The dreary results from November prompted national Republican leaders to rethink their stance on immigration, and have helped fuel support for immigration reform, including a bipartisan plan in the U.S. Senate.
So far this legislative session, activists have worked to leverage that influence by pushing for college financial aid for young immigrants under the Obama Administration's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which grants temporary resident status to young people brought to this country by their parents. These immigrants already qualify for in-state tuition.
"You have a number of students who live here and are able to access work permits," Guevin said. "We have a state that values hard work, and rewards hard work with opportunity."
The last time the issue was considered was in 2009. Back then, state analysts assumed the change in law would add about 1,000 students statewide and cost about $7 million in a two-year budget cycle. The analysts, however, stressed that it was a rough estimate because it's not known how many of these students live in Washington and how many would enroll in college.
U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Services did not have data on how many people have applied for the temporary status program in Washington state.
Advocates are also pushing to overhaul local elections.
Under the so-called Washington Voting Rights Act, minority groups are given a legal tool to challenge local elections that they think underrepresent them.
A House panel hearing on the bill brought a packed house this week. Proponents said Latinos in central and eastern Washington are underrepresented in cities where they make up a large section of the population. The bill allows minority groups to present complaints to a municipality, and if a solution is not presented, a lawsuit can be filed. City and school lobbyists said the bill is too vague and will invite lawsuits that are expensive.
The measure received backing from Democrats last year but did not receive a floor vote. It's unclear how much support the idea has in the Senate.
Longtime activist Craig Keller of Respect Washington, which calls for strict immigration rules, doesn't expect much movement on immigration issues this year in Olympia. He's pleased that a measure barring municipalities from using E-Verify, a federal program that checks a worker's eligibility, is not back this year.
___
Associated Press writer Rachel La Corte contributed to this report from Olympia, Wash.
Activists are pushing lawmakers to provide state college financial aid for young immigrants who've won temporary resident status, and they're seeking to overhaul local elections to ensure better representation for minorities.
However, the power play by Democratic Sen. Rodney Tom that gave Republicans a ruling majority in the Senate may stifle those efforts.
Already, Republican Sen. Don Benton of Vancouver has filed a bill that would bring back the often-debated issue of requiring proof of legal U.S. residency when obtaining a driver's license.
Also, Benton and Democrat Sen. Tim Sheldon, who defected with Tom, are sponsoring a measure that would bar all illegal immigrants from in-state tuition and financial aid for college.
It's not new that Republicans have tried to pass the proof of U.S. residency rule, which Benton has included in a bill about a voter database. In 2011, Senate Republicans attempted to bring a vote through a procedural move while they were still in the minority - at least one former senior Democratic senator also backed them. Proponents of such measures say failing to ask for proof of U.S. residency invites identity fraud and could end up putting noncitizens in the state's voter rolls.
Senate Republican Leader Mark Schoesler of Ritzville said he hadn't yet seen the driver's license bill, but said there was a problem with the way people obtain driver's licenses here.
"Unfortunately, we couldn't get a vote on it in the past," he said. "We'll probably be looking at it again this year. We're in a minority of states that has a driver's license system like this."
Washington and New Mexico had been the only states without a proof of U.S. residency requirement until last month when Illinois changed its law in a move that will allow immigrants who can't prove their status to get a license. Utah has a two-tier license model that allows illegal immigrants to drive, but they can't use the permit as identification.
It remains to be seen whether either of Benton's measures will get a hearing in committee or if they will advance in their current form through the Senate.
"We're keeping an open mind," said Toby Guevin of OneAmerica, an immigrant rights advocacy group, of what he expects of the Senate this year.
Benton did not respond to interview requests, neither did Republican leadership. Democrats in the Senate minority also did not return interview requests, nor did Democratic Gov. Inslee's office.
There were no sweeping exit polls conducted in Washington, but analyst Matt Barreto of polling outfit Latino Decisions estimated that Latinos in the state broke similarly for Inslee as they did for President Barack Obama, supporting each candidate by about at 3 to 1 margin.
Asian-American voters, which at 7 percent of the voting pool have a bigger share than Latinos in Washington, are also thought to have supported Inslee similarly in the state, Barreto said.
Nationally, Obama gained more than 70 percent of the votes among Latinos and Asians. Just a few years ago, those two voting blocs were up for grabs. President George W. Bush took 40 percent of Latino votes, compared to Romney's 23 percent. The dreary results from November prompted national Republican leaders to rethink their stance on immigration, and have helped fuel support for immigration reform, including a bipartisan plan in the U.S. Senate.
So far this legislative session, activists have worked to leverage that influence by pushing for college financial aid for young immigrants under the Obama Administration's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which grants temporary resident status to young people brought to this country by their parents. These immigrants already qualify for in-state tuition.
"You have a number of students who live here and are able to access work permits," Guevin said. "We have a state that values hard work, and rewards hard work with opportunity."
The last time the issue was considered was in 2009. Back then, state analysts assumed the change in law would add about 1,000 students statewide and cost about $7 million in a two-year budget cycle. The analysts, however, stressed that it was a rough estimate because it's not known how many of these students live in Washington and how many would enroll in college.
U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Services did not have data on how many people have applied for the temporary status program in Washington state.
Advocates are also pushing to overhaul local elections.
Under the so-called Washington Voting Rights Act, minority groups are given a legal tool to challenge local elections that they think underrepresent them.
A House panel hearing on the bill brought a packed house this week. Proponents said Latinos in central and eastern Washington are underrepresented in cities where they make up a large section of the population. The bill allows minority groups to present complaints to a municipality, and if a solution is not presented, a lawsuit can be filed. City and school lobbyists said the bill is too vague and will invite lawsuits that are expensive.
The measure received backing from Democrats last year but did not receive a floor vote. It's unclear how much support the idea has in the Senate.
Longtime activist Craig Keller of Respect Washington, which calls for strict immigration rules, doesn't expect much movement on immigration issues this year in Olympia. He's pleased that a measure barring municipalities from using E-Verify, a federal program that checks a worker's eligibility, is not back this year.
___
Associated Press writer Rachel La Corte contributed to this report from Olympia, Wash.
The United States of America needs to get back to it's root. Denying the basic spirit of communal welcome is un-american. The spirit on this land was and should remain a welcoming one. A value that has been put by the people of this land ever since the first Illegal border crossings by the Europeans.Â
We should be just like anyplace in Europe. You have to register at the local constable office in less than 10 days. Period... You cannot even rent a or purchase a house without being registered. If your a visitor, your welcomed and helped to get settled, a work visa person not so much. you get caught without a passport, visa or being registered, your shown to the border or jail. we won't want to talk about visiting the new Russia.... Â
Â
Drivers license the same, no papers, no license. It really is not hard to get a visa to enter legally the us.
@ISUPPORTTHENRAÂ Â
Â
And of course, the US born Wall Street bankers didn't do any damage to our country, right? Your comments are a photocopy of the extreme right talk radio mouth pieces. Can you come up with an original argument and facts to prove it por favor? Your racism and ignorance truly blind you.
Â
BTW, next time you get your social security check or statement, think of who supports the system to the tune of $220 million. You guessed it, the undocumented who contribute through payroll taxes using someone else's social because they CANNOT GET DOCUMENTED in the US. Read the Washington Post article and think twice next time you bash the hard working immigrants.
Â
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090202673.html
Â
Notice the typical use of disingenous propaganda:Â "Read the Washington Post article and think twice next time you bash the hard working immigrants."
Â
There is not a single person here who is "bashing immigrants."Â We are bashing ILLEGAL immigrants.
Â
See, folks, they like to twist language to suit their purposes. Just like how they accuse their opponents of being "anti-immigrant." Nope. We're "anti-illegal-immigrant."
Â
And, of course, EVERY SINGLE illegal immigrant is "hard working" while all white Americans are lazy bums. That's another common theme. It's racism. And yet, ironically, they accuse *us* of being racist.Â
@wayne0021Â
Â
"while all white Americans are lazy bums" And where did you read that? are you implying that the US is white? Hmm! someone needs to look around a little more. The US will soon be majority minority, meaning white-America is no longer the rule. Perhaps that is what scares you the most.  Â
"The state's taxpayers bear an annual burden of more than $2.7 billion as a result of an estimated 275,000 illegal aliens plus nearly 104,000 U.S.-born children of illegal aliens of whom about 78,000 are school-aged."
Â
http://www.fairus.org/publications/the-fiscal-burden-of-illegal-aliens-on-washingtonians
Â
But costs and benefits are actually irrelevant. They're here illegally. And they should be booted out. Period.Â
More "free stuff" for the taxpayers to foot the bill for.Â
Once again, we have lost sight of the end objective. The US needs immigrants, but there also needs to be some accountability for them. Many countries look for talented, financially independent immigrants. The US colleges provide many highly skilled graduates from other countries that would be an asset to the US. Those immigrants who have the financial resources to start a business in our country should be welcome, but with recognition and accountability. With this desire, however, comes restrictions on those who violate our laws. If you sneak in, you break that trust. We don't know who you are, what your objectives might be, or whether you wish to harm those who live here. Come to the US, obey our laws, contribute to our success, but don't ask for special treatment just because you feel different.
HELL NO!! They shouldn't have any rights whatsoever! THEY ARE ILLEGAL!!
Could you be more specific with your term ILLEGAL? I think in English language the term can't be use to represent human being. Is English your first language?Â
This comment has been deleted
Wow, you sond like you know what you are talking about. Now tell me, which of the immigration "status" that they broke or violate that earn them the term "illegals?" Let me help you, is it Refugee? Non-Immigrant? Asylum? There are many more status. Which one? I'm not a lawyer, but I'm an advocate. so, which one?
look what they did to CA. ruined it in less then a decade, flat broke and destroyed cities. dont do it WA, this is a great state and immagrants are fast to suck up your resources and take your jobs and money.........
@ISUPPORTTHENRAÂ Â
Â
And the US born Wall Street bankers didn't do any damage to our country, right? Your comments are a photocopy of the extreme right talk radio mouth pieces. Can you come up with an original argument and facts to prove it por favor? Your racism and ignorance truly blind you.
Â
BTW, next time you get your social security check or statement, think of who supports the system to the tune of $220 million. You guessed it, the undocumented who contribute through payroll taxes using someone else's social because they CANNOT GET DOCUMENTED in the US. Read the Washington Post article and think twice next time you bash the hard working immigrants.
Â
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090202673.html
"The state's taxpayers bear an annual burden of more than $2.7 billion as a result of an estimated 275,000 illegal aliens plus nearly 104,000 U.S.-born children of illegal aliens of whom about 78,000 are school-aged."
Â
http://www.fairus.org/publications/the-fiscal-burden-of-illegal-aliens-on-washingtonians
Â
But costs and benefits are actually irrelevant. They're here illegally. And they should be booted out.
Get your facts straight! CA rejected the property tax, this is the fact. If it weren't the immigrants working their tails up, CA would be gone by now. Oh, wait. It's called "California" no wonder the immigrants love it their. It's their land!
Mexico is horrible and has been ruined over the years. California is becoming Mexico and Washington state is right behind it. They can't even run their own country.Â
 @Turthteller You appear to be completely uneducated.
 @TP Great. So tell me, can Refugees called Illegals? Can a Non-Immigrants be called Illegals? Can someone who just crossed the northern border from Canada into U.S. be called Illegals? Oh, you mentioned Asylee seekers (Asylum). Can they be called Illegals? Tell me this, how in the world that  there are so many terms but ONLY those who hold a greencard are called IMMIGRANT?Â
 @Melissa Angevine  @Turthteller Troll? Why? Because I raise questions? You looked smart, but hey... looks can be very deceiving.
@Turthteller
Illegal immigrant: n. an alien (non-citizen) who has entered the United States without government permission or stayed beyond the termination date of a visa.
Â
No need to get into statuses ('Refugee', 'Non-Immigrant', 'Asylum') which would mean that they have entered through the proper channel.
 @Turthteller Are you the troll of the day?
Â
Oh, thank you. I'm affraid you were going to call me a geek, or a dork. But do you have objection on my facts? If you are a citizen of the United States of America then you would know the history of this great nation. Are you a citizen of the U.S.A?
WHAT, become a U.S. resident and earn your rights!
 @nunof uors Oh, no. No, no, no. We can't do that. Making illegals EARN? Come, now. No, no, no. That would be wrong. :rolleyes:
I'm not against anyone from anywhere. BUT, illegal is illegal, and that should mean NO rights at all unless you do it the right way. Once you become a citizen, then welcome, but until then, you do not deserve any rights. Special rights, forget it. Every time our govt. helps an illegal, they are taking that much away from a legal citizen. That is wrong. And with budgets as tight as they are, it's beyond wrong.
Could you be more specific with your term ILLEGAL? I think in English language the term can't be use to represent human being. Is English your first language? Beside, can you name just one example of a 'special rights' you've mentioned?
 @Turthteller Are you a moron?
 @TP Great. Who made this definition? You?
 @Turthteller Illegal immigrant: n. an alien (non-citizen) who has entered the United States without government permission or stayed beyond the termination date of a visa.
No. Are you? Can you define Illegal?
Btw, it's interesting that any time there's a local article about illegal immigrants, it always seems to be "Manual Valdes" doing the reporting. Does the AP assign articles about Hispanics only to Hispanics?
Need to correct the article title:
"Activists push Legislature to grant more rights for ILLEGAL immigrants"
@wayne0021 Right on, our and medicare and medicade will really be in the toilet
Do you have any data to back your opinion? Or it's just in your head?
Here are some data:
Â
"The state's taxpayers bear an annual burden of more than $2.7 billion as a result of an estimated 275,000 illegal aliens plus nearly 104,000 U.S.-born children of illegal aliens of whom about 78,000 are school-aged."
Â
http://www.fairus.org/publications/the-fiscal-burden-of-illegal-aliens-on-washingtonians
Actually, the correct terminology is illegal aliens...I am sick of the PC attempts to shove this crap down our throats. But you and everyone here realize that it's the apathy of all of us that continues to allow Congress, presidents, and legislators to push these inane agendas. We are the ones to stop it. We defeated 2 fatally flawed amnesty attempts in 2006/2007 by flooding DC with phone calls, emails and faxes and we can do it again, but we have to speak up! We have to stop allowing them to believe we accept their feckless approaches to doing the right thing, which would be to enforce our laws and hold people accountable...we did it before...
Â
We can do it again!
Â
www.numbersusa.com (you can send free faxes from here)
Â
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml
Â
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_c
Â
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Bring it on baby. Bring it on... The United States of America is BIGGER then your fear. Our message is written on a stone. "Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,I lift my lamp beside the golden door! I for one will not allow the United States of America becoming a nation of denials. We are a welcoming nation, and if you have problem with it, you may live somewhere else. Not, here. Not in the United States of America.
 @wayne0021 Of course. Define "come here LEGALLY" please.
Turthteller wrote: "We are a welcoming nation"
Â
Let me correct that for you: We welcome those who come here LEGALLY. We don't welcome those who come here ILLEGALLY. I hope this clarifies the matter for you. Let me know if you have any more questions.
Of course not. I'm a Duwamish. English speaking people butchered my ancestors in Seattle. I'm gald you got my point though.
 @Turthteller Is English your first language?
We should all contact webteam@komo4news.com and ask them to fix the headline.
Â
Enough with the propaganda.
I wish they would listen to the people that pay the taxes in this state and send the illegals back to their own countries.
Â
What makes you think that the immigrants don't pay taxes? They have gave more money to your social security then yourself!
 @Turthteller Is English your first language?
Of course not. I'm a Duwamish. English speaking people butchered my ancestors in Seattle. I'm gald you got my point though.
I say round em and send them ALL back to where they came from. Mexico, Cuba, Russia... We can not care for our own VETs so why in gods name ate we caring for illegals!! They get free medical have babies and get welfare yet as a single mother working 60 PLUS hours I can't afford medical coverage even through my employer. Now I am going to be forced to get it or face a penalty.... I am against illegals because we allow them a free ride yet can NOT care for our own.
Hey, you forgot to mention China, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, my gosh... Kenya, Indonesia, and every country on the face of the earth. Speaking of Veterans, do you really care about them? I volunteered twice a month at the VA. How about you? Can I see you sometime there? Everything yolu said sounds true about these babies. Maybe we should tell them toi abort their babies eh? Do you really work 60 Plus hours a month? No wonder you can't afford medical coverage. I know for sure there are MANY immigrants who work 60 hours a week and still can provide for their families without any handouts. Now, your example of free ride is non-sense. I'm a Christian, and I'm tired with people blaming others with lies. Please, share your data or stop spreading lies before God's wrath come upon you.
 @Turthteller "Volunteered" as in past tense? Why not right now? God is a fantasy. Doesn't exist. If you were educated you would know that.
Dude. You're right. It was then until Senator Maria Cantwell fixed the problem. I'mnow volunteering for the Food not bombs. What about you?You are entitled to not believe in GOD. I'm glad. My biggest concern is when those who call themselves Christians agaisnt Comprehensive Immigration Reform. My education has nothing to do with my faith. But if you must know, I believe in GOD because I choose my religion as my moral compass. You?