Are shortcuts compromising safety of new 520 bridge?
»Play Video
Are shortcuts and pressure to meet construction deadlines compromising safety of the new 520 bridge? The $4.65 billion bridge will be open to drivers in 2014. But a KOMO 4 News investigation has uncovered serious concerns about the integrity of the pontoons that are supposed to keep the bridge afloat.
On August 22, WSDOT inspectors found problems inside two of its new 520 pontoons and within five days they posted video on the internet, saying some might use it to say the pontoons were leaking but they wanted the public to have "the full story."
"There's a leak at a construction joint," a Washington State Department of Transportation inspector says in the video.
Our investigation has uncovered information indicating at least one of the pontoons is leaking, and there is insider concern that WSDOT is allowing contractor shortcuts, undermining the integrity of these pontoons -- structures that are meant to hold up the world's longest floating bridge for the next 75 years.
The problems started at the Aberdeen casting basin where 33 of the pontoons will be built, including 21 that will be longer than a football field. Last May WSDOT discovered extensive cracking and what's called spalling in the first set of pontoons. Though WSDOT has posted dozens of photos of the Aberdeen project online, it's not made public any photos of this spalling. We've found internet images from other projects that show and define spalling as flaking or chipping in concrete.
An insider with first-hand knowledge of the project contacted the Problem Solvers and told us the damage was so severe, in some cases entire wall sections were blown out.
"It's pretty disturbing to see something like that where normally that's not the type of thing we find," said John Reilly, who headed up a panel of experts hired by WSDOT.
The panel was tasked with finding what caused the pontoon damage. They discovered it was something called post-tensioning. A simplified explanation describes post-tensioning as cables or tendons that are pulled through the sections of a pontoon, with the effect of compressing and strengthening the entire structure.
WSDOT's own expert panel found that contractor Kiewit General did not follow the design drawings for placing those cables, and during that compression process, the pontoons were severely damaged. Quoting from panel's report we asked Reilly if the issue was that the construction deviated from the contract drawings. He replied, "correct."
Additionally the panel determined that contract requirements for curing the concrete "were not rigorously followed," resulting in even more cracking. Additionally, according to Reilly, "there's also the cement itself - it's a different cement - so is that a factor in this? Probably."
WSDOT and Kiewit General launched a series of repairs and in July, just before the first set of pontoons was floated out of Aberdeen, WSDOT said the pontoons were good to go. "All of the cracks had been repaired," 520 Program Director Julie Meredith told us.
Then came that August 22 inspection. In Pontoon V, a 360-foot longitudinal pontoon, inspectors found a leak at an internal construction joint. The water was coming from another cell inside the pontoon where it had been placed as temporary ballast, so the water was not coming from Lake Washington. That leak has since been repaired.
But inside Pontoon W, a 240-foot cross pontoon, there were long streaks of white. The inspector noted it, calling it "weeping," or water seeping into the pontoon from Lake Washington. Our insider tells us those white streaks are "evidence of leaking through cracks" and are "indicative of surface cracking" that has occurred since the float out.
But when we asked WSDOT's Meredith about the repairs they're planning to the pontoon and if that meant they'd found additional cracks since the float-out, she responded, "no, there's not more cracks that we've identified, that's just how we're addressing the condensation issue we have."
Condensation. In the original 30-second video that WSDOT posted online they call the moisture on the wall of Pontoon W "condensation." When the Problem Solvers filed a public information request for all video inside the pontoons on Lake Washington, WSDOT instead posted edited videos online with the audio removed.
We asked WSDOT why we weren't given complete videos and Meredith responded, "Tracy, we've given you all the videos we have and showed everything to the public."
In fact, WSDOT gave us nothing, only posting videos online, videos with the audio removed.
Only when the Problem Solvers obtained the raw videos complete with sound from another source did we hear the inspector use that critical word to describe the water he found inside Pontoon W: "some weeping," he says in the video. Weeping, not condensation.
Our insider insists WSDOT and contractor Kiewit General are "taking a lot of shortcuts," because of "pressure for the schedule." Even worse, the insider tells us that what's potentially at risk is the very integrity of the new bridge.
The insider pointed to the 1990 collapse of the eastbound I-90 bridge. Investigators in that incident found a combination of contractor error and previously identified pontoon cracks led a single pontoon to sink, subsequently pulling down multiple bridge sections. Drawing a connection to the new 520 pontoons, the insider says one cracked pontoon "can compromise the rest."
WSDOT insists the cracks in its pontoons were both expected and repairable and the pontoons will last for 75 years or longer.
"We built pontoons that are some of the best pontoons that the Department of Transportation had ever constructed," concluded 520 Program Manager Meredith.
WSDOT's expert panel was not asked to examine the leaking found after the pontoons were in Lake Washington, though Reilly says he has seen the videos. He agrees with our insider that the cracking in Aberdeen is the most logical cause of the leaks. When we asked him if that's an issue he responded, "WSDOT should be concerned about it - for them it should be, yeah."
We've also learned that everyone inside WSDOT was warned not to talk to KOMO TV about any of these issues. As for the future, WSDOT says that repairs to that one weeping pontoon will be made as needed. They add that they have made the changes recommended by their expert panel and they're confident that all the pontoons will be safe, structurally sound and last 75 years or longer.
On August 22, WSDOT inspectors found problems inside two of its new 520 pontoons and within five days they posted video on the internet, saying some might use it to say the pontoons were leaking but they wanted the public to have "the full story."
"There's a leak at a construction joint," a Washington State Department of Transportation inspector says in the video.
Our investigation has uncovered information indicating at least one of the pontoons is leaking, and there is insider concern that WSDOT is allowing contractor shortcuts, undermining the integrity of these pontoons -- structures that are meant to hold up the world's longest floating bridge for the next 75 years.
The problems started at the Aberdeen casting basin where 33 of the pontoons will be built, including 21 that will be longer than a football field. Last May WSDOT discovered extensive cracking and what's called spalling in the first set of pontoons. Though WSDOT has posted dozens of photos of the Aberdeen project online, it's not made public any photos of this spalling. We've found internet images from other projects that show and define spalling as flaking or chipping in concrete.
An insider with first-hand knowledge of the project contacted the Problem Solvers and told us the damage was so severe, in some cases entire wall sections were blown out.
"It's pretty disturbing to see something like that where normally that's not the type of thing we find," said John Reilly, who headed up a panel of experts hired by WSDOT.
The panel was tasked with finding what caused the pontoon damage. They discovered it was something called post-tensioning. A simplified explanation describes post-tensioning as cables or tendons that are pulled through the sections of a pontoon, with the effect of compressing and strengthening the entire structure.
WSDOT's own expert panel found that contractor Kiewit General did not follow the design drawings for placing those cables, and during that compression process, the pontoons were severely damaged. Quoting from panel's report we asked Reilly if the issue was that the construction deviated from the contract drawings. He replied, "correct."
Additionally the panel determined that contract requirements for curing the concrete "were not rigorously followed," resulting in even more cracking. Additionally, according to Reilly, "there's also the cement itself - it's a different cement - so is that a factor in this? Probably."
WSDOT and Kiewit General launched a series of repairs and in July, just before the first set of pontoons was floated out of Aberdeen, WSDOT said the pontoons were good to go. "All of the cracks had been repaired," 520 Program Director Julie Meredith told us.
Then came that August 22 inspection. In Pontoon V, a 360-foot longitudinal pontoon, inspectors found a leak at an internal construction joint. The water was coming from another cell inside the pontoon where it had been placed as temporary ballast, so the water was not coming from Lake Washington. That leak has since been repaired.
But inside Pontoon W, a 240-foot cross pontoon, there were long streaks of white. The inspector noted it, calling it "weeping," or water seeping into the pontoon from Lake Washington. Our insider tells us those white streaks are "evidence of leaking through cracks" and are "indicative of surface cracking" that has occurred since the float out.
But when we asked WSDOT's Meredith about the repairs they're planning to the pontoon and if that meant they'd found additional cracks since the float-out, she responded, "no, there's not more cracks that we've identified, that's just how we're addressing the condensation issue we have."
Condensation. In the original 30-second video that WSDOT posted online they call the moisture on the wall of Pontoon W "condensation." When the Problem Solvers filed a public information request for all video inside the pontoons on Lake Washington, WSDOT instead posted edited videos online with the audio removed.
We asked WSDOT why we weren't given complete videos and Meredith responded, "Tracy, we've given you all the videos we have and showed everything to the public."
In fact, WSDOT gave us nothing, only posting videos online, videos with the audio removed.
Only when the Problem Solvers obtained the raw videos complete with sound from another source did we hear the inspector use that critical word to describe the water he found inside Pontoon W: "some weeping," he says in the video. Weeping, not condensation.
Our insider insists WSDOT and contractor Kiewit General are "taking a lot of shortcuts," because of "pressure for the schedule." Even worse, the insider tells us that what's potentially at risk is the very integrity of the new bridge.
The insider pointed to the 1990 collapse of the eastbound I-90 bridge. Investigators in that incident found a combination of contractor error and previously identified pontoon cracks led a single pontoon to sink, subsequently pulling down multiple bridge sections. Drawing a connection to the new 520 pontoons, the insider says one cracked pontoon "can compromise the rest."
WSDOT insists the cracks in its pontoons were both expected and repairable and the pontoons will last for 75 years or longer.
"We built pontoons that are some of the best pontoons that the Department of Transportation had ever constructed," concluded 520 Program Manager Meredith.
WSDOT's expert panel was not asked to examine the leaking found after the pontoons were in Lake Washington, though Reilly says he has seen the videos. He agrees with our insider that the cracking in Aberdeen is the most logical cause of the leaks. When we asked him if that's an issue he responded, "WSDOT should be concerned about it - for them it should be, yeah."
We've also learned that everyone inside WSDOT was warned not to talk to KOMO TV about any of these issues. As for the future, WSDOT says that repairs to that one weeping pontoon will be made as needed. They add that they have made the changes recommended by their expert panel and they're confident that all the pontoons will be safe, structurally sound and last 75 years or longer.
How can the new bridge be more earthquake ready if it's likely to sink long before we have another earthquake?
I just happen to be taking a tour of the poontoon construction tomorrow, should be very interesting!
Anyone have good questions for me to ask?
they have to make mistakes...howelse would they get all the cost overruns they are planning?
Great article KOMO and Tracy Vedder. A + work.Â
Not to long ago there was a story about "what to do with the old 520 pontoons".
Â
Sounds like they might want to keep them for replacements on the NEW bridge....
@EASTSIDE 1 They would first, have to meet rigid quality standards ....
Hey at least you could always get a beer if you walked into the Kiewit Offices
@Dhnr ...but ya gotta get there early.....
5 years is my bet before major repairs start on this bridge.
Yeah even before I saw the part on the I-90 bridge, it just rolled thru my mind that they're chancing another disaster like like what happened with that 22 years ago. So basically they're going with a cheaper version to get on schedule, and how much more in the long run is that gonna cause if they really do end up screwing up? Don't think I even wanna think about it, let alone know.
From what I have read I would not give the bridge 75 years once it opened . More like 75 minutes before it started sinking.
so WSDOT saying Kiewit General not building it to spec,
 while Kiewit saying WSDOT's design are wrong.
Â
taxpayers get the bill.
Â
If the bridge requires repairs already, even before it has gone into operation. I can foresee millions of $ down the road to "fix" it yearly.
I wonder what the Vegas odds are on how long before it sinks?
I want the money I paid in tolls back!
I worked in state government.  During the early 2000s a new advance rivers and streams database was to be constructed at DNR as a inter-agency database to display fish presence and other related information.  I asked these questions:  1.  Do you know who to build it?  Answer:  No.  2.  Do you know how to check for errors and maintain it once it is built.  Answer:  No.  Do you know how to us it?  Answer:  No.  The project was sent off to a contractor in Maine and returned as a conundrum still being worked on today. Â
Â
I left the state several years ago and from an inside friend that after several million dollars the database is still languishing while the one I built during the early 2000s is still be used by Fish and Wildlife and others and it was constructed using three individuals including myself for about $250,000.  I used these criteria:  1.  Simple to use; 2. Simple to maintain; and 3.  Does all that is asked of it.  And it works.  It  is not used permanently because I was just a flunky doing similar work since 1986 compared to no it all life time know it all and all to lose face life time bureaucrats. Worse yet, I had a solution that was simple to correct the problems in the new one.  It was rejected because they did not think of it. Â
Â
This is standard practice for use of tax payer dollars. Â And it won't change with Democrat or Republican because of the smokescreen constantly put in front of the legislature by state government managers. Â Good luck and America, this is the way it is at nearly all levels of government. Â So this bridge incident, ho hum, please wake me when their is real news considering state government short comings.
I take pride in keeping my 2000 Mazda 626 ES-V6 as clean now as it was when I bought it new 12 years ago. That being said, I will be very upset if it ends up at the bottom of the lake due to the bridge falling apart :-)
@Mikefly562 Think of it as a complimentary car wash.
They spent all this money on light rail to nowhere and this could have been spent on the bridges or a tunnel under Lake Washington.Â
@HullenbeckCowl But your constituents can't see an underground tunnel....
If they deviated from the contract without permission, then they should be fined and made to build correct ones.
This comment has been deleted
Washington's next Governor, who ever it turns out to be, should make firing Paula Hammond and Julie Meredith his first priority!!
 @LNSeveN I like that Idea. also let get the next governer to get the director of WSDOT to take pay cut and seize his bank accounts. I would like to see if he is buying his family members some new things with all the cut backs he is getting on some of the jobs they sign off for. God knows they can't fire union employee's in this state even to save someones life.
At least Tracy isn't currently spending her time fashioning nooses for the SPD.
yeah right! I would not drive on that bridge period! And I hope and pray no one dies on it if it fails because of the shoddy workmanship.
This comment has been deleted
 @FBrumfield  @wynooheeman Maybe you missed this part;
Â
"WSDOT's own expert panel found that contractor Kiewit General did not follow the design drawings for placing those cables, and during that compression process, the pontoons were severely damaged. Quoting from panel's report we asked Reilly if the issue was that the construction deviated from the contract drawings. He replied, "correct."
Â
Sounds like shortcuts or wrong building practices to me. If you know otherwise, show us.
This is bad news. Billions we're spending, and the company puts out a substandard product.
Â
Is Kiewit the company that had engineering staff drinking on the job.
This comment has been deleted
@FBrumfield
Doesn't matter, during or after hours. No alcohol is supposed to be onsite (offices or worksite) and there is no proof that decisions pertaining to work weren't made once the drinking started.
Â
WSDOT designed it, the contractor has been apparently building it wrong. Sounds like the contractor should be changed out (and fined for violating contract/law). We'd lose a couple years but it's already been delayed by 10 anyways.
I appreciate the story and the work that's going into it. I find this on-going situation very interesting; yet quite depressing as well, if this is truly how we are making things (or rather NOT MAKING THEM) in America today. Way to keep digging KOMO and T. Vedder.
If the assumptions are true then I'm hardly surprised. Union labor typically only wants high wages and benefits, not deliver high quality with integrity. Maybe WSDOT should fly in a few planes of Chinese to get this project back on schedule and under budget?
 @AgentSTS Yeah.. it's the Union's fault.. That's GOTTA be it...................................
 @AgentSTS Its a design and curing issue. This is not the 1800s, construction workers assemble the bridge, not build it on spot. This seems to be a design and manufacturing defect from the company making pontoons. Not the workers.
Â
5 Billion spent on a bridge which will last only 75 years?? Wow!!!
 @AgentSTS The design engineers are NOT union, and THAT is where the flaws are coming from.
 @Glassman See the last paragraph of my post above to DBrumfield. If some are fine, but some are leaking, and they're all built from the same spec, then that's a quality control issue and not a design issue.
This comment has been deleted
 @FBrumfield Want to work for minimum wage? No. Paying workers what they deserve based on availability of qualified replacements? Absolutely. Speaking generally, if someone is demanding something from you, and there are ten equally (or higher) qualified people standing behind him waiting for a shot, the smart employer will cut the whiner loose. It's basic supply and demand, and for grunt work there's not much demand right now and a whole lot of supply.
Â
Spec, shmec. If you build a box, float it in water, and it leaks, then it was built incorrectly if others built to the same specs manage to not leak. Make sense?
 @AgentSTS Ouch.
This comment has been deleted
 @james dandey And this relates to bad pontoons how?
I'll tell you what's wrong with these pontoons. They are being built by buffoons. Buffoons building pontoons will soon maroon people driving on this bridge.
Â
Poor craftsmanship. Its made in America.
 @wackysoba No, sir. They are built to spec. FAULTY specs DESIGNED in America, I'll grant, by under-qualified engineers.
 @Glassman  @wackysoba So.. you know for a fact that they are under-qualified?
Â
 @Poisonous Giraffe  @wackysoba Isn't it obvious?
This comment has been deleted
 @12349876 Actually, there are MANY kinds of concrete. I consulted with a design engineer specializing in concrete specifications for a concrete pour I made. He specified air-entrained, fiber reinforced concrete for my project which is exposed to weather. In over twenty years of use, the concrete has not cracked or spalled, even in weather that has ranged from freezing to scorching.