Big names, big money define state election

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - This has been the year of big names and big money for Washington's election.
A record $157 million has poured into state-level races, with six and seven-figure chunks coming from the likes of Microsoft co-founders Bill Gates and Paul Allen, actor Brad Pitt, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, travel guru Rick Steves and Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos.
The result has been a steady stream of television advertising, trying to sway voters who are also paying attention to a close presidential race nationally. Those voters will finally have their say when ballots start getting counted Tuesday.
At the top of the state ballot, Washington residents will decide who will replace departing Gov. Chris Gregoire. Republican Rob McKenna is seeking to secure the first GOP victory in the race since 1980, while Democrat Jay Inslee is looking to make the transition from Congress back to a governor's seat he first sought in 1996.
The candidates and outside groups have spent some $40 million on the contest. A Washington Poll this past week suggests the race is close and one of the nation's most competitive.
McKenna is up among independents by 20 points, grabbing blocs of people who are also voting for President Barack Obama, according to the Washington Poll. Inslee is strong among people who have already voted and in the population-rich Puget Sound area.
"There's plenty of encouraging and also worrying news for both candidates," said Matt Barreto, director of the Washington Poll.
Major ballot measures are also drawing attention to the election, as Washington could become the first state on Tuesday to legalize gay marriage by way of a public vote and could be the first state to approve a law that would tax and regulate marijuana.
The gay marriage referendum has drawn some $12 million in support, with money from Pitt, Bloomberg and Bezos. That far exceeds the amount raised by opponents - $2.6 million.
Last week's Washington week showed that likely voters are leaning toward approving gay marriage by a 58-37 margin. However, political observers caution that polls on the gay marriage issue have previously overstated the level of support, so supporters remain cautious.
That's a point of consideration for the political group Washington United for Marriage, which supports the state's gay marriage law. The group's campaign manager, Zach Silk, said gay marriage opponents have experience at running their campaigns and how to present their message, especially through its network of churches.
So, while same-sex marriage supporters are optimistic with the poll numbers, they are also cautious
"We've always felt like the underdog," Silk said. "We still do today."
Two other states - Maryland and Maine - are also voting on whether to legalize gay marriage. A public vote has never approved same-sex marriage.
Advocates for charter schools have previously failed at the polls in Washington state, but this year supporters have substantial financial backing from the likes of Gates and Allen. Supporters in that campaign also have a wide financial edge, with about $11 million in favor and $700,000 opposed.
The measure would create as many as 40 charter schools in the coming years.
Washington's marijuana initiative would set up a system of licensed growers, processors and retail stores. Oregon and Colorado are also considering measures that would approve marijuana for recreational use.
Other state races include legislative campaigns that will determine control of the state Senate and votes to replace departing leaders in the secretary of state's office and auditor.
At the federal level, polls suggest that U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell will comfortably win re-election. Both political parties are closely watching the states 1st District congressional race between Democrat Suzan DelBene and Republican John Koster, as that campaign is seen as the most competitive.
That 1st District campaign has also been expensive, with about $5 million raised.
A record $157 million has poured into state-level races, with six and seven-figure chunks coming from the likes of Microsoft co-founders Bill Gates and Paul Allen, actor Brad Pitt, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, travel guru Rick Steves and Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos.
The result has been a steady stream of television advertising, trying to sway voters who are also paying attention to a close presidential race nationally. Those voters will finally have their say when ballots start getting counted Tuesday.
At the top of the state ballot, Washington residents will decide who will replace departing Gov. Chris Gregoire. Republican Rob McKenna is seeking to secure the first GOP victory in the race since 1980, while Democrat Jay Inslee is looking to make the transition from Congress back to a governor's seat he first sought in 1996.
The candidates and outside groups have spent some $40 million on the contest. A Washington Poll this past week suggests the race is close and one of the nation's most competitive.
McKenna is up among independents by 20 points, grabbing blocs of people who are also voting for President Barack Obama, according to the Washington Poll. Inslee is strong among people who have already voted and in the population-rich Puget Sound area.
"There's plenty of encouraging and also worrying news for both candidates," said Matt Barreto, director of the Washington Poll.
Major ballot measures are also drawing attention to the election, as Washington could become the first state on Tuesday to legalize gay marriage by way of a public vote and could be the first state to approve a law that would tax and regulate marijuana.
The gay marriage referendum has drawn some $12 million in support, with money from Pitt, Bloomberg and Bezos. That far exceeds the amount raised by opponents - $2.6 million.
Last week's Washington week showed that likely voters are leaning toward approving gay marriage by a 58-37 margin. However, political observers caution that polls on the gay marriage issue have previously overstated the level of support, so supporters remain cautious.
That's a point of consideration for the political group Washington United for Marriage, which supports the state's gay marriage law. The group's campaign manager, Zach Silk, said gay marriage opponents have experience at running their campaigns and how to present their message, especially through its network of churches.
So, while same-sex marriage supporters are optimistic with the poll numbers, they are also cautious
"We've always felt like the underdog," Silk said. "We still do today."
Two other states - Maryland and Maine - are also voting on whether to legalize gay marriage. A public vote has never approved same-sex marriage.
Advocates for charter schools have previously failed at the polls in Washington state, but this year supporters have substantial financial backing from the likes of Gates and Allen. Supporters in that campaign also have a wide financial edge, with about $11 million in favor and $700,000 opposed.
The measure would create as many as 40 charter schools in the coming years.
Washington's marijuana initiative would set up a system of licensed growers, processors and retail stores. Oregon and Colorado are also considering measures that would approve marijuana for recreational use.
Other state races include legislative campaigns that will determine control of the state Senate and votes to replace departing leaders in the secretary of state's office and auditor.
At the federal level, polls suggest that U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell will comfortably win re-election. Both political parties are closely watching the states 1st District congressional race between Democrat Suzan DelBene and Republican John Koster, as that campaign is seen as the most competitive.
That 1st District campaign has also been expensive, with about $5 million raised.
Campaign Reform; take the money out of the elections!! Lets fashion campaigning after New Zealand who limits the amount of money that political parties can spend on their election campaigns.
We also have the best congress that money can buy, bought and paid for by corporations! Time to take the government back to what it was meant to be, by the people for the people!!!Â
Were you people thinking that we really have a chioce who wins??? Its already been decided. They fool us into believing that our votes count. Its all about big money and control. The Big "Agenda" is in the works and on its way. Doesnt matter who gets in, its already been decided.....good luck people....
Yep, this is the era of 'big money'... people who know they can buy the electorate with the correctly placed campaign ads as the majority of people don't really do their own research - who has time? So, our political 'bodies' are being sold to those with the most money and those who have the most to gain from our 'sleeping' acceptance of whatever the outcomes happen to be...and we continue to get screwed....taxpayers continue to pick up the costs of 'too big to fail' institutions who blatantly go about risking all because they KNOW taxpayers will foot the bill should they lose but profits can be privatized...what a f****** system, IF YOU ARE A TAXPAYER.
The truth in advertising laws need to be extended to political advertising.
 @Rider And Citizen's United needs to be overturned immediately.
The bottom line here is that unless you have rich and powerful friends you need not think for a moment that you have a chance to run for public office and be able to afford a campaign. Makes me wonder what these rich donors expect in return. I am totally turned off by what's been going on, the lies, half truths, deceit, and basically the whole process.
I'd venture to say/add, if you've never crossed the proverbial party lines to vote for a candidate that appears better qualified.....but only pull party lines regardless, you are a part of the problem. To think only one party can field the best possible candidate is so naive it borders on insanity (doing the same thing over and over expecting different results).   Â
 @raydawg You've absolutely got it, raydawg!
Â
If you vote the way you've always voted, you're going to get what you've always gotten. As an independent, I am astounded by the die hard bluebirds of King County. For all the educated citizens in this area, they sure can be narrow-minded when it comes to voting.
 @raydawg Absolutely true!
This comment has been deleted
 @n9078jk4 Not this kid. I want NOTHING to do with any kind of monarchy.
new election rules.
Anyone can register for any race they qualify for.
10 Â names are drawn at random.Â
3 days later, a debate.
1 day later, primary election gets it down to 2 people.
3 days later, second debate
1 day later vote
Â
You can run for re-election once
Â
The details can be flushed out a little. Maybe we pick 20 names for president and have two post primary debates.
Â
But this wold get the money out and put more represenation back in government and mostly end the two party bullcrap.Â
Â
 @Star Shooter Why limit it to ten names? Why a primary with only two advancing?
Â
The origin of primary elections was to winnow down a large field of candidates to those with a chance of winning the election. Since all ballots were originally counted by hand there was much chance of error in the counting and having a smaller field reduced that chance for error. Prior to the imposition of our "top two" primary we had the choice of voting for candidates representing several minor parties as well as the two major parties. Now we have ONLY the top two primary vote receivers from which to choose. And even then the possibility exists (unlikely but possible) that BOTH "winners will be of the same major party. The voters are left with little CHOICE but to vote AGAINST the person they feel is worse, i.e. voting for the lesser of two evils.
Â
CHOICE is always good. Votes are counted by machine and machines have no more problem in counting votes for a dozen different candidates than counting votes for just two candidates. The time is long past for the elimination of the primary election and saving the costs of that election for better purposes.
Where does all the money go.....????
Â
The "media" through all its vested outlets (TV, radio, print, etc). A cash crop of which they spin, and direct, to ensure candidates have to keep paying them to "get the message" out.  We will not ever have real campaign reform, for as such it would dry up their "glory hole" gold mine, and too many people, are just too ignorant, and indoctrinated, to expect otherwise.
In the end it won't be conservative or liberal, republican, democrat, christian, muslim, straight, or gay, black or white,etc, Â that drags this country to a point of failure for our democracy, no....it will be the greedy press, under the guise of free press, that nails the coffin shut.
Â
I pray I'm wrong, but, I don't think I am....
 @raydawg "Where does all the money go"
Â
Judging by the spam in my mailbox, I would say it [the money] has been distributed in the form of propaganda.
$157 Million to put your politician of choice into power to further YOUR agenda. Think of how many people could be fed, clothed and housed for that kind of money. Political races should run on integrity and record, NOT who can outspend WHOM. What a crock.
I take some pleasure in watching the wealthy conservatives get nothing on their investments.Â
After this Election,if all these politicians have some money leftover,they should donate
them to our charity.
Money does nothing and is responsible for nothing - it cannot vote.
Â
People need to take responsibility for their own actions.  Get and education - at least graduate from highschool and don't register to vote unless you really will take the time to do your own research.  Don't let your friends' discussion, or TV ads, or the local newspeople influence your voting.
Â
Own your actions.
Â
What defines this state?  Not Bill Gates, et al.  You - the fact that most voters are ignorant and like cattle move along so long as their personal world is not rocked.  Course, the fact that the people of this state encourage the most felons from prisons to relocate here, supports sanctuary cites for illegal immigrants, and are mostly anti-police is really the definition of Washington State.
 @sentryone "Money does nothing and is responsible for nothing - it cannot vote."
If that's the case, why are economic issues so prominent in this election? If money does not count, why is Romney even running?
Â
 @OrcasThunderIf money does not count, why is Romney even running?
Â
WTF is that supposed to even mean?? Obama is running on empty checking accounts??
Are all the Hollywood celebs, and like minded "entertainers" just giving good wishes?
Are all the labor unions just pushing propaganda??
WTF are you are you saying Mr. OrcasThunder?Â
 @Controlled-Insanity You answered your own question...
Do you really think that Romney would be running if there weren't the promise of large amounts of money if he wins? Not necessarily while he were in office, but look at how other Presidents have flourished after leaving office.
Of course, this is based on his being able to actually concentrate on doing the work of the office for an entire term...from what I have heard he forgot about being Governor about 13 months into his term.
 @OrcasThunder  @sentryone Considering that Obama has outspent him on this election.....that IS to ponder.....isn't it.
 @two loons  @Wolfen  @sentryone That's the best thing I have read thus far today!
Examiner to FaceBook - that's almost an advancement in status! LOL!!!
 @OrcasThunder  @Wolfen  @sentryone The Examiner is the original source, but yeah - Facebook, where disinformation travels at the speed of likes...
 @Wolfen  @sentryone "Just like any news source can make any claim too correct?"
Who mentioned FOX?
Actually, an actual NEWS station or print venue does have to take efforts to verify their sources and the news they put out on the air or in print. It's something called Professional Journalism, and they CAN get sued if they report unverified information. That's not the case with twitter, facebook or even Youtube... since they don't actually screen what is presented on their pages, they have no control over how true something might be.
So...go ahead and "choose" to take your political mantra from those sources - no reason to change what you have been doing from the start. I'll get mine from some REAL news venues...
Â
And read your posts with your sources in mind...or maybe not even bother to waste my time on rumors and flim-flam...
 @OrcasThunder  @sentryone Just like any news source can make any claim too correct? Amazing the different spin put on the SAME stories.......depending on their political "lean." When you boil it down Orca, it's all about what we CHOOSE to believe is it not? During the course of this election process, I have seen people deny true statements because they CHOSE to. Twist and spin. As long as "our guy" wins, FACTS don't matter.
 @Wolfen  @sentryone "you can actually deny that Facebook is a networking tool"
Yeah, and so is talking to the person in the next bathroom stall...
The point is, anyone can make any claim on Facebook - or any forum for that matter - and not bother with anything resembling the truth.
It's like getting excited when you read about BigFoot...
@OrcasThunder
OrcasThunder I am so sure the huff-puff post is unbiased, correct?
To claim Obi has taken no "dark money" is to claim it never rains in Seattle, Gregior has been the best Governor in the history of the State, and the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, and Santa Clause are real.
When 502 passes, you HAVE GOT to hook me up with what you've been smoking...obviously the best feces in town.
 @OrcasThunder MSNBC?
Is that the source of your news?
 @OrcasThunder  @sentryone Ummm.....look at who WROTE the article first. The SUBJECT of the article used Facebook, and if you can actually deny that Facebook is a networking tool, you've been living under a rock. Next comment?
 @Wolfen  @sentryoneÂ
Facebook?
Â
That's your "source" of "news"?
Â
Â
 @OrcasThunder  @sentryone That's o.k......Obama has "sneakier" friends. http://www.examiner.com/article/north-carolina-man-brags-on-facebook-about-voting-multiple-times-for-obama
Â
Looks like it's anyone's game huh? Now you know why I'm neither Dem, NOR Repub. Both sides are crooked as hell.
@Wolfen@sentryone "
More than half a billion dollars.
Thatâs the monster mountain of money outside political groups collectively spent in October to fill the nationâs airwaves, scorch your phone lines and flood your mailbox with flyers that directly promote or attack federal candidates, according to a POLITICO analysis of federal campaign spending disclosures.
Leading the way were the Karl Rove-backed super PAC American Crossroads, its nonprofit sister group Crossroads GPS and pro-Mitt Romney super PAC Restore Our Future, which has been fueled by tens of millions of dollars from billionaires such as casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and Texas home builder Bob Perry.
The three groups together spent nearly $173 million last month on ads and other communications, with the bulk targeting President Barack Obama.
To put that in perspective: Thatâs nearly as much as the roughly $179 million that all outside together spent in September to promote or attack federal candidates.
Pro-Obama super PAC Priorities USA Action, bankrolled by the likes of billionaire investor George Soros and movie producers Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, topped outside groups that support Democrats. Congressional races-focused super PACs House Majority PAC and Majority PAC followed closely behind. This Democrat-backing trio spent a combined $75.5 million in October.
In all, 57 different outside organizations â the majority of them conservative-leaning â spent at least $1 million in October to promote or attack federal political candidates."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83218.html#ixzz2BCDBoSo5
 @Wolfen  @sentryone "that IS to ponder.....isn't it."
Â
Has he? Romney seems to be getting the most of the "dark money" - from groups that do not have to publish who is actually donating or how much...
"Four conservative nonprofits and the business industry's lead trade association have spent nearly $300 million on political efforts over the course of the past two years, accounting for 70 percent of the so-called "dark money" reported to have been spent since the beginning of 2011.
The Karl Rove-founded Crossroads GPS, the Koch brothers' Americans for Prosperity, Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, the shadowy American Future Fund, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have spent $295 million since the beginning of 2011, targeting candidates from President Barack Obama on down to the most contested House and Senate races, all without disclosing the names of their donors to the public."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/02/dark-money-2012-election-400-million_n_2065689.html
......Money, so they say Is the root of all evil today.
-Floyd
 @Controlled-Insanity The adage is "The LOVE of money is the root of all evil". Not money by itself but the love of money. There IS a difference.
 @Furd  @Controlled-Insanity Furd? The band Pink Floyd has a song called "Money".....Controlled Insanity was quoting the lyrics word for word. We know the biblical verse, but that's not how it was being used in this context. Easy Flipper.
Dude, just quoting the lyric, my point was made. sheeesh.
 @Controlled-Insanity Never use the junk, never have and probably never will.
 @Furd I never said it effin was...you are taking me way to seriously there oh Furdian one. Can someone not just have a little fun with a post?
Take a toke and relax pal, no wait, take at least three tokes, you'll feel much better...trust me, I know. (breath it in deep, no Clinton "I didn't inhale" type)
Â
 @Controlled-Insanity What? You think that was made up by Pink Floyd? It comes from the bible; 1Timothy, 6:10
Â
Sheesh, Indeed!
What a waste of money Think of the good that could be done with it.