Boys, 11 and 7, suspected in robbery and carjacking attempt
»Play Video
PORTLAND, Ore. – Police said two boys, ages 11 and 7, tried to rob and carjack a woman at gunpoint in Southeast Portland Saturday afternoon.
"I didn't think it was real," said Amy Garrett. "They were just two really young kids."
The 11-year-old boy had a loaded handgun, police said.
Officers found the boys after someone reported seeing the older child with a loaded handgun near Southeast 160th and Alder Street just after 12 p.m., according to Sgt. Pete Simpson.
When police arrived, the two boys tried to run away.
Officers stopped them near the Freedom Foursquare Church. They told the 11-year-old boy to keep his hands out of his pockets, but he refused, Simpson said. An officer grabbed the boy's arms and found a cocked and loaded handgun in his pocket.
Police were later flagged down by Garrett, 22, who told them the two boys tried to rob her and steal her truck.
Garrett said she was sitting in her truck and waiting for her parents outside the church when the boys approached her and threatened to shoot her if she didn't give them her truck.
"He was showing me his gun and I asked him if it was real," said Garrett. "He said 'you don't ever ask somebody if it's real. That's how you get yourself shot.'"
Garrett said the younger boy told the 11 year old to “show her your piece.” The 11-year-old boy then lifted his shirt and showed Garrett the gun.
"He said it was fully-loaded and cocked and ready to go. He told me he was going to blow my brains out if I didn't give him anything."
When Garrett refused to give the boys her truck, they demanded her wallet and phone and said they would shoot her if she didn’t give them anything.
"My heart was beating a million miles a minute. I'm surprised it didn't completely beat our of my chest. I was very scared," Garrett said.
Garrett drove away and called 911. As she pulled away, Garrett said she saw the 11-year-oldboy pull the gun from his pocket.
The 11 year old lives nearby with his family, Garrett said. He returned to the scene while KATU was interviewing Garrett, but left and did not come back when we asked to speak with his parents.
Garrett, and neighbors who spoke to KATU News said the neighborhood has seen plenty of crime in the past.
"People don't want to come because of all the criminal activity," said Robert Schultz, who attends the church. "It's really disturbing to have these kind of things go on on holy ground."
Simpson said due the boys’ ages, they cannot be taken to the Donald E. Long Juvenile Detention Home. They were both left with their parents.
The boys would be taken to the juvenile detention center and face possible charges if they were 15, Simpson said.
It’s unclear where the 11-year-old boy got the handgun. Robbery detectives are investigating the case.
"Eventually, I want them to be able to come to the church and have some faith," said Garrett. "I want them to have a brighter future because they're not going anywhere bright right now. They're just going down a really bad path."
Parents need classes, kids need juvenile hall for a LONG time.
Someone needs to slap the crap out of the parents of these kids, and then TEACH them how to discipline their little monsters, before the little punks try to rob someone who is armed, and wind up being yet ANOTHER statistic of what happens when parents are either A.W.O.L, druggies, or friggin retarded.
Put em in foster care, put the parents in jail for however long the kids would have been jailed.
I'm sure the parents will ground their little angels for a week or so and they will be fully rehabilitaed while playing Call of Duty in their bedrooms after school. Good plan.
I hope this doesn't get out of control. I was robbed at gunpoint by a gang of kids in Rio de Janerio some time ago, they have nothing to fear and usually shot just for fun, I'm happy I survived.
The Oregonian is reporting that Multnomah County prosecutors are in the process of determining whether to file juvenile charges against the 11 year old.
Â
Apparently the law in Oregon allows this if there is a judicial review and a judges signs off on it.
Â
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/12/post_304.html#incart_river_default#incart_m-rpt-2
Given back to his parents and he is still out running the streets........
"Simpson said due the boysâ ages, they cannot be taken to the Donald E. Long Juvenile Detention Home. They were both left with their parents." Oh, that's classic! Their parents have already proved that they're perfectly capable of handling them! Time for a change in law here! I sure don't think I wanna know how bad these parents are! I am just stunned from reading this!
Â
My niece was just telling me yesterday how she had a friend who was an obnoxious little **** and her mother never cares about what she does, and from what I hear, her mother is a real b****! She's apparently dating a 16 year old in Chicago who's she's never even met (she's 12 BTW) probably what we'd call an internet romance, and she's even torn my nieces room apart; defacing posters, cutting clothes, dumping drawers, ect. and my niece had to clean it all up!
That was my good example of how pathetic parents are with their kids, and obviously, that was before I read this!
 I was under the assumption a juvenile detention center was for juveniles, that would mean a 7 to an 11 year old would be a juvenile, it's about time they changed their policy about detaining 15 years and up only, the criminals are getting younger and younger it seems, and they are going to need a place to put them, if they are old enough to do the things they are accused of, they are old enough to be put in the juvenile detention center.
 @MC Yeah that's what blows me away about that whole thing! You have to be 15? Good grief!
 @MC Yeah they have to. Right now they're basically saying, "Okay kids, until you're 15, you can do whatever the hell you want regardless of your parents and you don't have to be held accountable for their actions." And by the time they do finally get bsted, it's too late to really teach them right from wrong, and basically by the time they're adults, they're living the life of crime full time, therefore the circus will continue.
 @Zoso I guess they figure anyone under 15 won't commit any crime, well, now that it has happened, and it no doubt won't be the last time a kid under 15 commits a crime, it is time to open the juvenile detention centers to accomodate  those  7 yrs. old and up.
"Simpson said due the boysâ ages, they cannot be taken to the Donald E. Long Juvenile Detention Home. They were both left with their parents."
Â
*facepalm*
Â
Did they give the gun back to the kid, too? Â Remind me not to move to Oregon.
 @Tim LaneÂ
Â
"Remind me not to move to Oregon."
'specially if you have a significant income! Income tax + "No Child Left Unarmed!"
Is Oregon even going to investigate HOW these kids got a loaded handgun?
Â
Â
If they were my kids. I would ask the cops to put them in a detention center for a couple days. All this is teaching them is that they are too young to get in trouble. Screw that. Scare the crap out of those little boys now or  you know we will hear about them again in 5 years or less because they killed someone or got killed themselves.Â
 @Kel Parents don't get to make that decision.  Could you imagine the mess we would have if every parent relied on the state to punish their kids.
It really makes you wonder what is going on inside that home. I hope the whole family gets some help, not just the boys in this incident.Â
"Simpson said due the boysâ ages, they cannot be taken to the Donald E. Long Juvenile Detention Home. They were both left with their parents."
Â
And then after that, according to USA Today, the 11 year old broke out of the house and police picked him up again...
Â
Parents = FAIL
@lakeview Would it be harsh punishment if they handcuffed the 11 year old to something?
 @lakeview Where there's a will, there's a way; no matter what the age. If that child is so determined to get out of the house, he will find a way out. I don't see this as a fail for the parents but more of a they need outside help for him. Anything other than grounding your child would result in a child abuse case being brought forth by the local CPS for that area.Â
 @PrairieDawn If I had done that at age 11, my parents would have ended me. There is no excuse. The buck stops with the parents, period.Â
 @PrairieDawn  @lakeview I'd give them a good scare...call CPS and tell them they can pick the kids up.
Outrages that they went back to the parent's homes. Â That is probably where they got the weapon. And that kids saying "don't ask if it's real, that's how you get shot." Â Sorry, but there in an adult in his life that is teaching him the street cred stuff. Â Put them in foster care. Period. Â Â I'm just so grateful that the Police were careful with that kid, because the kid refused to comply and had a loaded weapon. You think some idiot 11 year old gangsta wannabe is not going to shoot that cop dead? Â Tragedy averted. Â Â
 @DT I sure wouldn't want to foster that kid, his brother or any other kid who pulled something like that, they'd shoot you or burn the house down with you in it.
if the gun was dad's - the dad better get a lawyer ... he should lose his privilegeÂ
little kids can kill you just as dead as big kids. Look at all the child soldiers in other countries. She's lucky they didn't shoot as she drove away
 @chandler I'm also grateful that the police were able to disarm him without incident. That was a nightmare waiting to happen.  And if he had shot the kid for drawing the weapon, then you know the entire community would have been marching on City Hall and screaming police brutality.  That kid should be in foster care or juvie. Period. Not back with his parents. I mean if the news people saw him outside standing around, near the witness, who knows what he has planned next.  I am shocked that the victim would actually go on tv and talk about it.  I'd move...Â
Wow..... When I was 7,  I got a whoop'n for filling up the utility trailer with water, and take'n a swim. At 11, I went to the bakery without permission and bought a cookie with my savings (5 cents). Got another Woop'n.   Yep, "woop'n"   All I have to say is  "People"...."People".....  BIRTH CONTROL.!!!
Garrett, I feel for you, but that was risky driving away. The good news is that you are still around to tell the story, and that the kiddos learned that pointing a loaded gun will not always get your way. But it was risky. Your car, wallet, and phone are not worth getting shot for.
These punks need to remember: Ya plays stupid games, ya wins stupid prizes.
Â
I'm sure this isn't the last we'll hear of these kids... Â No punishment at all for attempted car jacking w/a loaded weapon. Â Great job Mom & Dad. Â Hope no one is killed when they commit their next crimes.
Ok these little brats need to get a harsh lesson taught to them.. I hate the fact the system determines punishment by the offenders ages! If anyone does something like this regardless of age I do not care, you punish them! And this whole sealing records of juveniles in adult hood should go away as well.... when you break the law it is on your permanent record for life viewable by everyone! ... these kids need to be charged as adults and serve adult sentences in adult prison! We have enough degenerate children running around these days that harsher punishments need to be taken...if I saw a kid pull a gun on my wife I would act to protect my wife their ages would not protect me from my response! I'd either shoot them with the gun I carry or jump them and beat them into the ground! This 'they are just kids....' attitude has to go!
 @Freespeech I would have no problem pulling the trigger on a little punk pointing a gun at me or my family.
Play big boy games, win big boy prizes.
Â
The system needs to address these situations with the youngest of offenders and get out of the Leave It To Beaver era. And research still need to be done on the influence of shoddy parenting, violent video games, ect collectively on these youth. Just becasue you have killed 12,000 people in playing years of video games does not mean they have not been a factor in someone else's choices.
My guess is that these kids grew up playing Grand Theft Auto. When will the video game industry admit some accountability for the state of youth violence in this country???
 @IronWafflez Really... I played these games as a kid and I am not going out doing this sort of thing... it is not the games industry it is parents refusing to be PARENTS and trying to be their kids best friend instead of taking a mentoring kind of role... if your kid does something wrong they are disciplined by the parents.. the issue is the stupid system that somehow gets people thinking punishing your child is abuse! /// I got a leather belt as a kid from my dad when I misbehaved and if I did really bad I got the buckle side... it straightened me right out and I never did that again! Parents these days leave it to others to teach their kids everything which is irresponsible and just fuels why I believe their should be licenses to have children and if you have one without it the child is removed from custody of you and you are forced into the program before you get your child back or you lose them forever!
 @Freespeech  @IronWafflez Exactly! The whole fun of video games is that there are zero risks or permanent consequences to driving recklessly, running other cars off the road, shooting people full of holes, etc.Â
 @Freespeech   @IronWafflez Never played GTA before, but that sounds fun! Whack a few skulls for me, would you, please? :^DÂ
@MargeGunderson @IronWafflez I'm going to go home and play the GTA game tonight... I think I will use a baseball bat as the weapon of choice!....
 @IronWafflez Way to divert the focus towards something completely unrelated.  The state of youth violence has causes, and perpetuations, far more complex than a video game.  Look, first, to politics and the fact that the right wing demonstrates a complete disregard for human life that isn't unborn. Â
 @IronWafflezÂ
Long before there were video games or TV, there were winter snow forts with snowball fights, swordplay, sides chosen up for mock war games, fist fights and wrestling, etc. Â
Â
The belief that children are blank pages and that eliminating video games, violent TV and movies will eliminate violent juvenile crime is, well, what it is. Â
 @IronWafflez 114 million copies of Grand Theft Auto have been sold. I played Vice City in 8th grade and every game since and here I am, a law-abiding citizen with nary a speeding ticket. I wouldn't deny that some children, out of the millions exposed, have been negatively affected by the game's violence, but I genuinely suspect that these were kids already prone to psychological issues.
 @windtreeman  @IronWafflez Sorry, but I disagree with you.  The thing is that the games and films are getting more and more violent, and kids are playing and watching the violence for hours.  Yeah, great that you haven't harmed anyone, but I tell you what.  You and the millions of others are DESENSITIZED to violence now.  How many studies do you need that show violent "entertainment" causes more aggressive thoughts and behaviors, AND changes the wiring in kid's brains.  Not to mention the desensitization factor.  The things that these "kids" and teens watch as "entertainment" would make most adults sick from the brutality and violence. Little by little the entire generation becomes more accepting of violence.  You want to explain to me why teens will video violent fights and attacks on their phones, to share to Youtube?? Or why people will watch someone get assaulted and not be horrified by it? Instead they say "oh, it was just like a movie!" and they film it on their phone.  You just couldn't be more wrong.  Kids brains develop empathy around the age of those two boys.  And obviously, they were watching violent films, shows, music videos, and games, instead of the stuff your kids SHOULD be watching at that age.  parents are so freakin' clueless. They're too freakin' lazy and self centered and spineless to ensure that their kids (whose brains are still developing until well into their teens,) are taking in brain appropriate entertainment.  Why would they?  Well, because the parents would actually have to make an effort, instead of just letting them do what they want. Â
 @TheTruncheon And they seem to run in packs, so the vulnerable are easy targets.
 @TheTruncheon Boy, you are so right, we are hearing more and more of kids commiting violent crimes involving a weapon, they beat the hell out of old ladies and men at bus stops, or anyone who gets in their way, including each other for a baseball cap, jacket or pair of shoes, they swarm the malls, stealing at will, it is really getting bad, I don't know about anyone else, but I do not even go out after dark, not that I have anything of value, but they don't know that, and me being of the elderly class, and not real steady on my feet any more, it wouldn't be hard to knock me down, so I stay in when night falls....lol...I take lessons from the chickens, when the sun goes down I hit the roost...lol...
 @MC You are absolutely correct. These "games" are perfect examples of "operant conditioning" methods.
 @DT Exactly so. Evil and the depiction of evil actions has become not only acceptable but glorified now.... it's no wonder that there's so many younger people shambling around the streets who are so blase about committing violence toward others... their feelings of empathy are non-existant.
 @DT You said it, decensitized to violence, and the violence in these games is getting worse and worse, because the simple shoot em up isn't stimulating enough, a lot of parents these days, for whatever reason leave children on their own, where the T.V. or video games are the babysitters, I have a 16 year old grandson and some of the violent games he plays with others on line on his computer make me cringe, but when I say anything to him he says, it's only a game, I don't approve, but his Dad does, so I have no say, the thing is, if you keep filling a glass with dirty water, there is no way it can come out clean, in the same token if kids continually fill their brains with violence from whatever source, we can't expect them to act any different in the real world, not every kid is the same, some may survive this violent video/game craze and turn out to be good people, but the weaker, more easily influenced ones may not, no one can watch 15 hours of violent videos and not be influenced in some way by what they are watching.
 @DT  @windtreeman  @IronWafflez Yup. You should read the work by Dave Grossman, Ret US Army "killologist." he wrote a book called "on killing," and he said video games and violence on TV are the ideal way to desensitize the young to violence and death. Interesting stuff.
 @windtreeman  @IronWafflezÂ
 @windtreeman Well, 8th grade is not 7 or 11 years old, it's 12 or 13. I'm not saying that this is what happened in this situation. But violent video games played by a very young child whose brain is still forming can't help but have an impact. They can't discern right from wrong yet as it is. Who is to know that this can't actually cause said psychological issues? I am not disagreeing with you, just posing more questions as it's something I struggle with every day.
 @DT Great comment.
 @windtreeman Also, something selling doesn't mean it's OK or right. I would love to interview those two boys and ask where they learned to do what they did. Yes, it is the parents' fault. I know. But the prevalence, attraction, and availability of violent games does not help and is in fact a constant and difficult obstacle for parents. I know.
 @IronWafflez  @windtreeman Yes, in fact their age group is when the brain develops the area of "empathy."  Too may stupid parents think that kids are just small adults, when in fact their brains are not done creating the wiring for the rest of their lives. And that age is when they need to be watching flicks about a dog that is in peril, and there is a bad guy, but good people save the dog.  It's the age their brains learn to care about others. The garbage that parents allow in at that point, is why we see so many young people with absolutely no compunction or concern about others. Â
 @windtreeman  @IronWafflez According to Lt Col Dave Grossman (US Army, Ret, self-described "killologist") *that( is the problem - the wholesale violence available in games leads those that are predisposed to be affected over the edge. It's one of those "pushes at the margin" sorts of things; most won't be affected, but it's a very enticing straw that breaks the camel's back. It's a very good reason to strictly limit and monitor ALL you kids activities, so you can see if YOURS is one of those that might be affected.
 @RN1  @windtreeman  @IronWafflez fabulous book. The guy is a rare blend of practical knowledge and insight. If anyone hasn't read Grossman's book, "On Killing" I highly reccommend it.
 @windtreeman It *should* be obvious, but there are a lot of oblivious parents out there. As for the effects of TV, it is much greater than many realize. Look at what happens to birth rates in areas that get TV for the first time, and young mothers start watching soaps where there are few kids on the shows. Average family size drops from ~6 kids to 2! http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/fertility-rate-plummets-in-brazil/2011/12/23/gIQAsOXWPP_story.html part of the reason for the fall of the Iron Curtain was that they Let "Dallas" be broadcast, thinking it would show the decadence and dysfunction of America, but the people said "*I* want to live like that!". TV is powerful, in part because we are a very visual animal.
 @RN1 I agree, for 99% of people, violent games and television are not going to be impactful enough to change any moral perspective but there are certainly those children that are at risk. I also think it should be obvious to parents, based on their children's previous behavior, if they're in that group.Â
 @IronWafflez Wow, I've been playing violent video games since I was about 12 years old, including all of the grand theft auto games (yes, even the first one). By your thoughts I should be in jail or dead by now, but I'm not.  In fact, I don't even have a speeding tickets or ANY tickets at all, I don't even own a gun.  I've also never been arrested for anything, never hit anyone, and people describe me as laid-back and the most relaxed person they know. Â
Â
I guess maybe violent video games actually make people calmer!
Â
Â
 @Landshark  @IronWafflez That's the difference between "anecdote" and "data." Most people are not going to be affected, but *some will,* and knowing who will and who won't is still not well understood. In ANY case, though, it argues that strict monitoring of kids and their activities is a MUST in order to limit the problems from such activities as much as possible, and that requires parent education, child education, and the use of actual individual JUDGEMENT. Not an easy problem to solve.
 @RN1  @Landshark That is why, every time I walk by the TV when my son is playing Call of Duty, I tell him "that dad is not going to be home for dinner tonight." I also told him that Santa was not going to come to our house this year because he is afraid he might get shot at.
 @Landshark  @IronWafflez I knew my comment would cause controversy. Jumping to conclusions is my favorite exercise. The thought that what we take in from media or books has no influence on our psyche is reassuring I guess. So you say it's OK for me to go ahead and let my own two young sons of similar age play these games without limits?  Because this is a question I'm struggling with every day.
 @IronWafflez Just the fact that you care enough to be worried, and to intelligently consider whether or not it could cause problems puts you as a parent near the top in the quality department, and your kid(s) well ahead of most these days as to preparing to be a responsible, productive adult.
Kudos to you whether or not you end up agreeing with my views on video games!
Â
Having said that, I still think video games are a blast, even as a middle-aged adult, and the funnest part for me even as a kid was the complete lack of permanent consequences.Â
Â
You can emphasize that lack of consequences to your kid(s) by playing with them and reminding them every time one of you mows somebody down in your digital car or punches them full of digital holes with your digital weapon.Â
Â
Maybe even while you're driving: "If this was a video game, it would be fun to rip right through that red light at twice the posted speed limit, but when you do that out here in the real world, you can kill or seriously injure innocent people and yourself." Â as you coast to a safe, reasonable stop.
Â
Then, when you get home, right to the video game to let out all that energy you held back while out in the world where it'd have real, permanent consequences. :^D :^D
 @IronWafflez That's a scape-goat accusation if I ever heard one. Media, any media, is not the cause. The way these two were raised is. It's time that parents are held accountable for their offspring. These two are lucky they didn't get their heads blown off by either the cops or an armed citizen.
Â
 @Zanshin Raising kids includes their video game use. And I'm not saying this excuses the parents at all.