Campaign to legalize pot gets high-profile GOP support

SEATTLE (AP) - The campaign to legalize and tax marijuana for adults in Washington state is rolling as next month's vote approaches, with more than $1 million in new contributions reported since last week and a surprising endorsement Wednesday from Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Michael Baumgartner.
The money, most of it from retired Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, means Initiative 502's backers have raised nearly $4.1 million over the course of the campaign, with $1.2 million left to spend. Alison Holcomb, campaign manager for New Approach Washington, says her group is planning a broader television campaign than the three-week advertising blitz it ran in Western Washington in August.
Meanwhile, Baumgartner's decision to endorse the initiative in an interview with The Associated Press gave the campaign one of its highest-profile Republican supporters yet. Baumgartner, a state senator from Spokane who is running a longshot bid to unseat Democratic U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, said drug law reform isn't typically supported by his party, but he believes I-502 is a good step toward changing what he described as a wasteful policy of marijuana prohibition.
"It's taking a different approach to a very expensive drug war, and potentially a better approach," Baumgartner said. "They've checked all the boxes as far as what you would want to see happen in terms of provisions to keep it away from children and limiting access in the public space. I've just been impressed with the initiative and the people running it."
I-502 would legalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana under state law for those over 21. The state would license growers, processors and retail stores, and impose 25 percent taxes at each stage. State analysts have suggested it could bring in hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
The measure, which polls show leading, would also set a blood-test limit for driving under the influence and prohibit public use of the drug.
Marijuana would remain illegal under federal law, and the burning question remains whether the Justice Department would sue to try to block I-502 from taking effect if it passes, on the grounds that it conflicts with federal law. The DOJ could also simply seize any tax revenue as proceeds of illicit drug transactions.
Washington is one of three states, along with Oregon and Colorado, considering legalization measures this year.
Cantwell has yet to take a position on the initiative, which has received high-profile endorsements from former Seattle FBI head Charles Mandigo, former U.S. Attorneys John McKay and Kate Pflaumer (FLAU'-mer), and the nonprofit Children's Alliance, which argues that drug laws disproportionately hurt minority children.
The initiative's only formal opposition comes from a group representing medical marijuana patients who say the DUI limit is so strict it could prevent them from driving at all, but some other organizations, including the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, are also opposed.
Steve Freng, of the federally funded Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, said he worries about the effect on children, especially on the modeling behavior of parents who might start smoking weed openly in the home if it's legalized.
Baumgartner responded: "That's a concern, but we have to be realistic about what's going on in people's homes today. Usage stays constant regardless of drug policy."
Baumgartner served as a civilian State Department contractor in Afghanistan, where he advised an Afghan counternarcotics team in Helmand Province. He said one of his primary motives in supporting I-502 is to bring the U.S. marijuana trade out of the shadows and regulate it. If elected, he said, he'd support allowing states to draft their own drug laws "in a responsible manner."
He said he hoped voters who care about the issue would appreciate his taking a stand.
"I really don't know the direct political ramifications," Baumgartner said. "I always think if you get the policy right, the politics will follow."
The money, most of it from retired Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, means Initiative 502's backers have raised nearly $4.1 million over the course of the campaign, with $1.2 million left to spend. Alison Holcomb, campaign manager for New Approach Washington, says her group is planning a broader television campaign than the three-week advertising blitz it ran in Western Washington in August.
Meanwhile, Baumgartner's decision to endorse the initiative in an interview with The Associated Press gave the campaign one of its highest-profile Republican supporters yet. Baumgartner, a state senator from Spokane who is running a longshot bid to unseat Democratic U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, said drug law reform isn't typically supported by his party, but he believes I-502 is a good step toward changing what he described as a wasteful policy of marijuana prohibition.
"It's taking a different approach to a very expensive drug war, and potentially a better approach," Baumgartner said. "They've checked all the boxes as far as what you would want to see happen in terms of provisions to keep it away from children and limiting access in the public space. I've just been impressed with the initiative and the people running it."
I-502 would legalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana under state law for those over 21. The state would license growers, processors and retail stores, and impose 25 percent taxes at each stage. State analysts have suggested it could bring in hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
The measure, which polls show leading, would also set a blood-test limit for driving under the influence and prohibit public use of the drug.
Marijuana would remain illegal under federal law, and the burning question remains whether the Justice Department would sue to try to block I-502 from taking effect if it passes, on the grounds that it conflicts with federal law. The DOJ could also simply seize any tax revenue as proceeds of illicit drug transactions.
Washington is one of three states, along with Oregon and Colorado, considering legalization measures this year.
Cantwell has yet to take a position on the initiative, which has received high-profile endorsements from former Seattle FBI head Charles Mandigo, former U.S. Attorneys John McKay and Kate Pflaumer (FLAU'-mer), and the nonprofit Children's Alliance, which argues that drug laws disproportionately hurt minority children.
The initiative's only formal opposition comes from a group representing medical marijuana patients who say the DUI limit is so strict it could prevent them from driving at all, but some other organizations, including the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, are also opposed.
Steve Freng, of the federally funded Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, said he worries about the effect on children, especially on the modeling behavior of parents who might start smoking weed openly in the home if it's legalized.
Baumgartner responded: "That's a concern, but we have to be realistic about what's going on in people's homes today. Usage stays constant regardless of drug policy."
Baumgartner served as a civilian State Department contractor in Afghanistan, where he advised an Afghan counternarcotics team in Helmand Province. He said one of his primary motives in supporting I-502 is to bring the U.S. marijuana trade out of the shadows and regulate it. If elected, he said, he'd support allowing states to draft their own drug laws "in a responsible manner."
He said he hoped voters who care about the issue would appreciate his taking a stand.
"I really don't know the direct political ramifications," Baumgartner said. "I always think if you get the policy right, the politics will follow."
I swear to all that's holy, I should write a hemp letter and save it to my documents.
Â
If pot is legalized, hemp will follow. It ain't the 'pot' that scares the government, it's the 'hemp'.
Follow the money.
All we need is more chemically altered nuts running around or worse ........... driving around. This drug effects all people differently. Not to mention what it has been laced with. I for one have smoked some nasty stuff and was lucky to get home alive. Alcohol and weed just gives you a wide awake wired drunk.
 @SEATTLITERON Everyone is dumber after reading your comment.
Liar.
Pot makes ya mellow, and alcohol makes ya lazy. There's a difference. Ya don't get 'wired' off either one.
I can't say for what you been smoking, but it must have been laced with something.
Â
 @bobalouie Although I disagree with him regarding whether it should be legalized (the fact that some of it is currently laced really has no place in an argument for legalization of marijuana, that would apply to an arguement for the substance that is being used as a lacer), alcohol doesn't make EVERYONE lazy. Some people's inhibitions are so relaxed after consuming alcohol that they become quite activated. Consequently, some people CAN have a wide awake wired drunk off the combination of pot and alcohol.
Pot does make you lazy. You can call it mellow if you want but it still makes you want to just sit around and laugh at everything. Either way it should be legal.
"High Profile" I see what you did there KOMO. :-)
What is the old cow Maria going to stand for now? She is one of  useless in Washington DC. Maybe she could run on her recordâ¦â¦â¦..Well maybe something else since there is no record.
That bud isn't trimmed very well. Where do they get these pictures?
 @Grunged ...you're right...did not notice all those stems until now....
@Controlled-Insanity @Grunged Maybe you should take a class on growing. They're called leaves...
I just might change my vote
I say vote No on this until they can figure out a realistic way to determine weather one has had to much.I just don't see what they are going to do.I have been ripped up before and had no trouble but for some people it's not same for them.Each individual is going to be different.Just like the DUI's .08 used to be funny to me because I could drink a lot and still function fairly normal where someone else might not do so well.It's all to much right now,I need to medicate again.
 @F4I There already DUI laws to cover this.  FYI: You can be under .08 and still be arrested for DUI. Â
 @F4I I say pass it, then tweak it....adjust for the DUI concerns.
I'm all for legalizing marijuana, but this is bad legislation.  The DUI provision is not appropriate and is unrealistic.  Under it, people who aren't stoned could conceivable be given a DUI.  VOTE NO. Â
 @MPS They can do that now.  This doesnt really change anything. Â
You should educate yourself before you spout off garbage. This legislation establishes a PER SE DUI at 5 nanograms of THC  for those 21 years or older. It establishes a PER SE DUI at 0.00 nanograms of THC for those under 21. Now go look up what PER SE means, because clearly you don't know. @sfvcyco  @MPS
Decriminalizing this crop will instantly force criminals to pay taxes on earnings, or sling some other illegal drug. I say yes to legal pot.
 @Fugonn That's ASSUMING a LOT. You're supposing that people that have been providing larger amounts for sale, and have been living a criminal life are suddenly going to want to jump up and give up a sizeable portion of their profits, JUST for the privilege of doing it openly!
Â
Not to mention that this doesn't change federal law, so the feds MIGHT JUST decide to have a look at the tax records and see who's moving a lot of product, and would be a good candidate to be brought up on federal charges!
Â
I will probably vote for this measure, not because I think it's a particularly good one or well thought out, but because if it passes, then work will begin to fit legalization in. If it doesn't pass, legislators will still be on notice that the people are tired of wasting money prosecuting petty offenses.
You assume that criminals will pay the taxes. That's a rather foolish position. @Fugonn
Good to see a republican actually act like a conservative for a change. But I will be voting no on it just purely because of the dui provision. It turns law abiding cannabis patients into criminals. Why trade one bad law for another one?
@Blindman I don't see the difference between drinking nyquil or taking medication like Soma and driving. Maybe we'll see warning labels saying "May cause drowsiness, do not drive or operate heavy machinery". Personally, I am so paranoid that I hate even being a passenger in a car during "those times". It's seriously akin to people saying they want to be able to drive while impaired.
@Blindman Still have to show impairment to make the actual arrest mearly stating you had some marijuana isn't enough to make the intial arrest. The cost will be the 10-20 years of prosecution and appeals due to it, because the cost of prosecution (Labor cost)Â outweights the actual crime and bogs down the system. But hey a whole new realm of ways for Lawyers to make money off of drugs
FTA:
"I really don't know the direct political ramifications," Baumgartner said. "I always think if you get the policy right, the politics will follow."
Â
If only more republicans thought this way.
Â
 @T H I S Republicans, more than people might think, did think this way.  The problem is there is no Republican Party anymore.  It's the Tea Party with Republican signs across their foreheads. Â
@T H I S Baumgartner responded: "That's a concern, but we have to be realistic about what's going on in people's homes today. Usage stays constant regardless of drug policy."
Â
Also, that too.
I hope it doesn't pass. It still has kinks to be sorted. No way in hell am i voting to pass it, and i have NOTHING against Marijuana...
 @SwishasNKush Who gives a rip how it was written? Any move towards decriminalization would be a great start. What interests me is the Federal Government's reaction towards the state.... Will the Fed's get even with the state by withholding Federal money?
@Funky-Munky @SwishasNKush That is just what Regan did to get all states to pass regulations against pot. by threatening to cut off highway tax money to any state that didn't make laws against it. Until then it was legal in Alaska. That is when Regan and the Republican party lost my respect, for making me surrender my god given right to do with my own body as I see fit. I'll never forgive then for doing that to me.
YOU SHOULD give a rip how it is written. As it is written now, If you walked through a room where people were smoking then jumped in your car and were pulled over, and the officer smelled it on you, you could be charged with PER SE DUI if you are under 21 years old, even though you did nothing more than walk through a room. You don't see anything wrong with that? @Funky-Munky  @SwishasNKush
 @slappywag What's any different than right now? Think before you jump to conclusions...... Don't drive high or smell like it..... You take your chances daily already if you're a smoker!
 @Funky-Munky  @SwishasNKush The Feds will go to war with a state to make sure it stays against the law.
@CrankyPanky @Funky-Munky @SwishasNKush I wonder what would happen if the states took the federal government and their DEA agents to the supreme court under the Tenth amendment. I believe that the tenth amendment states that the federal government will not interfere with any state rights and laws as long as those rights and laws do not cross over state lines. If they do then it becomes interstate and the government then can step in and regulate it.
 @Sydthepiper  @Funky-Munky  @SwishasNKush I agree.
 @CrankyPanky  @Funky-Munky  @SwishasNKush ....well, if Barak REALLY cares about all the people of this country, not just his loyal "47%", and if this passes, he should make an executive order and tell "The Feds" to back off and let us smoke our bowls in peace.
Time for a revolution!!!! Seriously, we need to take back our govt and our lives.
This needs to start at the federal level... Congress should legalize it... or at least vote on it..
 @Mr. H Congress???? Like those buffoons have a clue.??  Pompous millionaires that care  only about where their contributions came from.(how many pharmas are now legal??? its a joke, and all about the money.)----Congress IS the problem--and not just in this instance. They need to quit telling us how to live. Esp when they're the last ones to follow the rules.
To bad this isn't a scratch and sniff.
 @IslandAtheist I was thinking about time Komo updated the photo files for marijuana...Â
Good old Uncle Sam won't hold out much longer---forget reefer madness, there are benjamins to be had!!!! Its as political as it gets
It will only get real traction at the federal level once the paper/plasttic/textile company lobbyists are no longer able to match the dollar flow that the legalization movement can. Â @SandyBeach
Now you'll be at odds with federal law if passed and the feds can still prosecute. Not good.