Candidate for Wash. auditor once accused of theft

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - The Democratic candidate for state auditor was once accused of stealing artwork from the offices of a company where he previously worked, according to court documents publicized by his opponent Thursday.
That allegation was one of several questionable details raised about state Rep. Troy Kelley in three civil lawsuits over the past 11 years. Campaign workers for his Republican rival, James Watkins, uncovered many of the court documents and posted them online.
In the 2001 court case from Los Angeles County, Calif., Kelley sued The First American Corp. for wrongful termination and defamation. He complained that one company official had told other managers that he was stealing and embezzling from the company.
The company later submitted surveillance footage of a man taking a painting from the company's offices. First American lawyers claimed it was Kelley, though Kelley said he wasn't in the area that day. Shortly after the submission of footage, Kelley dismissed his lawsuit.
Kelley, a Tacoma lawmaker first elected in 2006, said at a meeting with reporters Thursday said the allegations against him were false. He said he did not steal artwork and disagreed by the characterization that he was on security footage.
"It's not me in the photo," Kelley said.
Kelley said he moved to dismiss his lawsuit because he received a financial settlement from the company. He said he wasn't allowed to discuss the size of the settlement.
In another case from 2009, Kelley was sued by one of his clients, Old Republic Title, over how the two worked together. A judge later summarized the case as involving accusations of "misappropriation of customer funds, lying, fraudulently transferring funds, intentional spoliation of evidence, shady business schemes, tax evasion, and hiding from creditors."
In 2011, the two sides agreed to settle the dispute, and Old Republic said it "received payment" to conclude the case, according to court documents.
Kelley said the allegations in the lawsuit were not true and that it was written in a way to "extort" a high settlement. He later moved to seal the court records, saying there was reason they'd be used against him in his next political race.
U.S. District Judge James Robart denied that request.
"As to Mr. Kelley's request to seal documents that may subject him to annoyance, embarrassment or harm to his political career, the court finds that these bases do not overcome the strong presumption of public access to the court's files," Robart wrote.
Kelley emerged from last month's primary along with Watkins, and he narrowly beat a fellow Democrat, state Sen. Craig Pridemore.
Kelley got a boost in his primary campaign by running an ad in which he quoted retiring state Auditor Brian Sonntag as saying that Kelley was "the independent voice we need." Rivals complained about that usage because the quote was from October 2010 - when Kelley was running for re-election in the state House.
Sonntag has not endorsed any of the candidates looking to succeed him.
Watkins has also complained about how Kelley describes his professional history. On the official Washington voters' guide, Kelley wrote that he was "Past President, Fortune 500 Company."
Kelley said he was not president of the whole First American company, rather he was president of two divisions within the company. He says he oversaw more than 150 people.
That allegation was one of several questionable details raised about state Rep. Troy Kelley in three civil lawsuits over the past 11 years. Campaign workers for his Republican rival, James Watkins, uncovered many of the court documents and posted them online.
In the 2001 court case from Los Angeles County, Calif., Kelley sued The First American Corp. for wrongful termination and defamation. He complained that one company official had told other managers that he was stealing and embezzling from the company.
The company later submitted surveillance footage of a man taking a painting from the company's offices. First American lawyers claimed it was Kelley, though Kelley said he wasn't in the area that day. Shortly after the submission of footage, Kelley dismissed his lawsuit.
Kelley, a Tacoma lawmaker first elected in 2006, said at a meeting with reporters Thursday said the allegations against him were false. He said he did not steal artwork and disagreed by the characterization that he was on security footage.
"It's not me in the photo," Kelley said.
Kelley said he moved to dismiss his lawsuit because he received a financial settlement from the company. He said he wasn't allowed to discuss the size of the settlement.
In another case from 2009, Kelley was sued by one of his clients, Old Republic Title, over how the two worked together. A judge later summarized the case as involving accusations of "misappropriation of customer funds, lying, fraudulently transferring funds, intentional spoliation of evidence, shady business schemes, tax evasion, and hiding from creditors."
In 2011, the two sides agreed to settle the dispute, and Old Republic said it "received payment" to conclude the case, according to court documents.
Kelley said the allegations in the lawsuit were not true and that it was written in a way to "extort" a high settlement. He later moved to seal the court records, saying there was reason they'd be used against him in his next political race.
U.S. District Judge James Robart denied that request.
"As to Mr. Kelley's request to seal documents that may subject him to annoyance, embarrassment or harm to his political career, the court finds that these bases do not overcome the strong presumption of public access to the court's files," Robart wrote.
Kelley emerged from last month's primary along with Watkins, and he narrowly beat a fellow Democrat, state Sen. Craig Pridemore.
Kelley got a boost in his primary campaign by running an ad in which he quoted retiring state Auditor Brian Sonntag as saying that Kelley was "the independent voice we need." Rivals complained about that usage because the quote was from October 2010 - when Kelley was running for re-election in the state House.
Sonntag has not endorsed any of the candidates looking to succeed him.
Watkins has also complained about how Kelley describes his professional history. On the official Washington voters' guide, Kelley wrote that he was "Past President, Fortune 500 Company."
Kelley said he was not president of the whole First American company, rather he was president of two divisions within the company. He says he oversaw more than 150 people.
Just what we need, an auditor that steals. Â I hope people have the good sense not to vote for this guy. Â You don't have a pattern of accusations of dishonesty like this if you haven't done something to create it. Â James Watkins is a good man, he is highly qualified and I hope he wins the election for state auditor. Â He has been highly regarded by Brian Sonntag also. Â
Â
Another Democrat not vetted by the party for the office... maybe they were expecting a free pass from the press. Given recent history, who can blame them?
He wants the records sealed because it might ruin his political career! This country NEEDS term limits. There is no way being a politician should become a career. There would be no need for deceptive practices if these people knew there wasn't a lucrative career to be gained by serving their country in a high government post.
 @Jatok I am opposed to term limits.  I think the solution is in educating the voters.  We would lose good candidates if term limits were imposed and they are hard enough to find.
Yes, that would be one downside to term limits but on the other hand it would certainly get rid of a lot of bad candidates too. When these politicians are in it for their own sake and nothing more that's when they start to twist things to keep their career going. There have been so many elections where the voter has had only the same people running for the office and perhaps that's because of party affiliation.
I keep hearing over the years that so and so gets my vote because they are the lesser of two evils. That's almost as bad as not having a choice in my mind.
Well... since he was accused of theft, he might just be the right person for auditor. After all, he'd know what to look for in cases of fraud... right?
 @responsible adult? wrong!  He would know what to look for and how to manipulate for his own gain.  We definitely do not need him as auditor.
Well this is a first the liberal press stating that a Democrat was acussed of stealing WOW! I thouhgt that KOMO only reported the sun shine and lollie pop news for democracts.
I just read a story about doing away with background checks. The libs want us to not do them but they can? Typical liberal policies.Â
"misappropriation of customer funds, lying, fraudulently transferring funds, intentional spoliation of evidence, shady business schemes, tax evasion, and hiding from creditors."
Â
All positive Democratic attributes. Elect him!
He passes the Democrat Liberal Progressive vetting process...and he loves art how liberal can you get!!
@Truth Percolates While this guy seems real "classy", I cant really see a nickel's difference between the dirt bags occupying either side of the isle. They are among some of the sickest of the sick. It sounds like you're implying that the right wing have folks they can be proud of and we both know that aint the case or, dont you have google?
 @T_BONE_WALKER  @Truth We should have been vetting candidates with scrutiny all of our lives before voting.  Now we realize it and hopefully we will get rid of the divide and conquer mindset and move on to vote for the best candidate not the letter after their name.  It makes no difference if they are republican or democrat whether they are going to be of value to the voter or of value to such as the United Nations first.  Brian Sonntag was an excellent state auditor, democrat.  I believe Watkins would also be, but I don't hold anyone in high esteem by the letter after their name. What matters is do they intend to keep their oath or do they think it is some ritual they must perform to get the job? Â
Glad I voted for Craig Pridemoore, too bad he didn't do as well as Troy Kelly in the primary.
Once accused of theft? Â Alright, it sounds like a right qualification to me.
Oh no say it aint so. Oh wait dems have been and keep stealing from us every day.Â
Accused or convicted? Â There's a BIG difference. Nice attempt to smear the man.Â
 @HallandOates The actions he took following the allegations are loud and clear.  Tonia Harding said the same things.
Â
@HallandOates Yes, there is a BIG difference, and I'll be the first to agree with you. However, if you actually read the story, Kelley was fired, He whined thinking there was no way they could tell it was him. But he dropped his case against his accusers as soon as the video was shown to him (in the professional world, this is simple STFU and GTFO. He was caught red-handed). Rather than have to fight this thief, the company said walk away and we won't ruin you, your family, and drag your name throught the dirt in doing so. He walked away, got severance and likely, unemployment, as long as he signed a NDA. Normally I'd say give the benefit of the doubt, but then there were FURTHER sealed settlements where he was accused of actions that are not becoming of a bake sale auditor.
Well, according to Councilman Harrel (earlier KOMO story this morning) none of this should count.Â
Â
Give the guy a chance.
Â
He's only going to be State Auditor. It's not like he's going to be flipping your burgers. He's the perfect politician. Maybe he can be the next Secretary of the Treasury.
Â
What damage could be done. ;>}Â
 @HonkeyCat He would not get hired for the hamburger job, bad reputation.
Even the appearance of impropriety is not a good quality in an auditor.
 @Tim Lane Especially when it's three or more serious accusations over a period of 11 years, and he's paid money to resolve at least one of them.Â
CALL OF THE ELECTION! We can save some money and not have a costly election. We found our man!
Well then he should be perfect for the job!
Sticky fingers will fit right in with all the other corrupt politicians, it's a prerequisite anyway.
The lawsuit in Washington discloses more serious issues involving millions of dollars, failure to claim the "disputed" money he kept as income for income tax purposes, movement of money to shell out of state companies and an overseas account and a claim (later conceded as false) that records couldn't be produced because they were lost in a fire, though the fire was next door. There is a reason the judge refused to seal the records even after it was requested by both sides.
he will fit right in then!
Since he's running for an auditor position, I am really leary of his motives..... he obviously knows how to get out of trouble (not get caught), but you know what they say, where there is smoke, there is fire.Â
@The WA Mama sort of like slick willy.
Is anyone surprised? All politicians are thieves, liars, and crooks.Â
 @Refined Mostly the democrat's because they can get away with it.
 @truthteller  That is not a logical or complete sentence. The Democrat's what? And which Democrat are you talking about? And what were you going to write about whatever the unspecified Democrat owns, and who are  the "they" you randomly switched over to talking about before completing your first thought?
It's kind of hard to tell the truth when you can't construct a simple sentence at a second grader's writing level.Â
@MargeGunderson @truthteller
Â
Teh grammar nazi haev invadd r formu.
 @truthteller Dude, change your screen name, you do not speak the truth.Â
 @Refined Right, that's the only way they will win.
Was never charged or convicted of a crime but It looks evidence enough that this isn't the kind of person you want handling your checkbook.
Why would anyone do a criminal background check? Don't folks believe in redemption? Or (sniff) second chances?Â
Â
I, for one, think the genius Councilmen on this other KOMO story is on to something!
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Proposal-would-ban-criminal-background-checks-on-applicants-168729886.html
Â
 @Sid Vishess Yeah, why would you want to check the background of someone who is handling money, taking care of elderly, or supervising criminals, etc.
Â
I believe in second chances, but I also want to know who I hire. Someone with shoplifting charges when they were young and made a mistake is one thing. Someone who is a habitual criminal is someone I don't want working for me. For the government to tell me I can't run a background check is simply more over-reaching regulation that will result in nothing more than stories about predators gaining positions to work their plans, and the public screaming, "How can this happen?"
"Shortly after the submission of the footage, Kelley dismissed the lawsuit." kind of tells all I need to know about him. Got cought with his hand in the cookie jar and knows it. Now looking for a bigger cookie jar to get his hands in. Need to vote for any one but him!!!
I agree with you but I am afraid the other candidates have their own hidden issues as well. I like Brewster's idea....."None of the above".
Nothing to see here, move along.
WHAT? Say it ain't so....a politician thats dishonest!?!? I'm in shock.
 @deafears1 it's okay. he's a Democrat. Just sweep it under the table.