Could large, digital billboards be coming to Seattle?
»Play Video
SEATTLE -- Some say they're ugly and distracting, but the industry that makes giant electronic billboards wants more of them in cities and along state highways.
Billboard lobbyists lined up some legislators to sponsor a bill that would allow the digital billboards along state highways in the countryside. The proposal would also allow each city to decide on its own if it wants the billboards.
The billboards, which critics call "TV on a stick," are up 400 percent nationally since 2005 , when the federal Highway Administration -- under pressure from the billboard industry -- reversed a longstanding ban.
Now some state lawmakers want to lift the ban on state highways, and the first hearing on the matter was held Tuesday.
Critics say state roads are already too cluttered, and allowing Clear Channel to install giant digital billboards will make it vastly worse.
Scenic roads around the state are also vulnerable, because the proposal would allow each city to decide whether or not to allow digital billboards inside city limits. Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn is considering it.
President Lyndon Johnson famously took on the billboard industry when he banned them on federal highways in an attempt to beautify America.
At the time, Johnson called industry leaders "a group of selfish, eager hogs," but a spokesman for for Clear Channel said they're not bullies, just running out of ways to advertise. The spokesman said the digital billboards would fit Seattle's techie image, but not everyone agrees.
"It's like having a giant TV, you know, on the side of the road. We don't need that," said Travis Metcalf of Seattle.
The organization Keep Washington Beautiful is also fighting the digital invasion.
"And now they're going to be flashing at you with lights every 8 seconds and different messages," said the organization's Paula Rees.
Billboard lobbyists lined up some legislators to sponsor a bill that would allow the digital billboards along state highways in the countryside. The proposal would also allow each city to decide on its own if it wants the billboards.
The billboards, which critics call "TV on a stick," are up 400 percent nationally since 2005 , when the federal Highway Administration -- under pressure from the billboard industry -- reversed a longstanding ban.
Now some state lawmakers want to lift the ban on state highways, and the first hearing on the matter was held Tuesday.
Critics say state roads are already too cluttered, and allowing Clear Channel to install giant digital billboards will make it vastly worse.
Scenic roads around the state are also vulnerable, because the proposal would allow each city to decide whether or not to allow digital billboards inside city limits. Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn is considering it.
President Lyndon Johnson famously took on the billboard industry when he banned them on federal highways in an attempt to beautify America.
At the time, Johnson called industry leaders "a group of selfish, eager hogs," but a spokesman for for Clear Channel said they're not bullies, just running out of ways to advertise. The spokesman said the digital billboards would fit Seattle's techie image, but not everyone agrees.
"It's like having a giant TV, you know, on the side of the road. We don't need that," said Travis Metcalf of Seattle.
The organization Keep Washington Beautiful is also fighting the digital invasion.
"And now they're going to be flashing at you with lights every 8 seconds and different messages," said the organization's Paula Rees.
Soon the roads will be paved with advertisements.Â
I think that a law that limits the liability for damage to billboards to $5 might be the way to go.
No officer, i didn't know i was blocking the left lane, i thought it was a drive in movie.
Industry running out of places to advertise?  What a joke. Where does industry not advertise these days?  Well, perhaps not public bathrooms at local parks, at least not yet. And for commercials in general, let''s see, back in time to the 1960's when an hour TV show was fifty minutes, and now an hour TV show is forty minutes and usually a variation of some idiot reality show or pseudo science BS. AMC runs an hour and twenty minute show and cuts nearly an hour out to cram it into two hours with forty minutes of commercials. And pay to see a movie, what does one see other than a blank screen and soft music before the movie like a few years ago?  Oh, yes, more damned noisy irritating commercials. So, let's go back to Lyndon Johnson's ways and get rid of these damned commercials now springing up along highways. As for the other options, I no longer own a TV and I have not been to a movie in years. Consumer choice.
I don't know about anyone else, but I am really tired of being non-stop bombarded by commercials everywhere I look. I was watching a program on tv the other night and for every 2 minutes of program there was 5 minutes of commercials. The internet is just about as bad. Pick up a magazine anymore and try to find something to actually read beside advertisements. The biggest problem I see with these billboards is traffic safety.
Years ago a woman rear ended me at full speed while watching a movie at the Valley Drive-in south of Kent. I was stopped and signaling a left turn when it happened. She had two little kids in the car with her. They drive among us.
Letâs see we attempt to ban and fine people for using their cell phones or texting because its distracting drivers. Vehicle entertainment systems typically will not operate in the front of the car if the car is in drive because it distracts drivers. â¦. Great lets put a giant distracting television on the side of high speed roads. That makes sense! has anyone ever bought anything because they saw it on a billboard? I know I havenât. Companies saying they are running out of places to advertise⦠well no S*(t Sherlock. No one wants to see most of the advertising out thereâ¦. You have it plastered everywhere else like corporate porn.
@DreamTravler Sadly some people actually vote for names they see on signs along the road.
It would be nice if the state would just ban all these ugly billboards like in Hawaii and Alaska. Â There is one of these super bright billboards as you are driving north on I-5 at the King/Pierce County line and it is super bright and super distracting. Â I'm surprised these are allowed, but then money talks.
There is one of these not too far from my home, on Bothell-Everett highway.
Behind this behemoth, is a fairly new housing development that was there first.
Now, when I drive by, I cringe at what it must be like to have that thing just feet away from your house.
Even just the light that radiates from behind this thing is blinding, and it totally lights up the sides of the houses behind it.
I would think it's like living next to a Close Encounters Of The Third Kind spacecraft landing strip, all night long.
Â
I wonder what a shotgun blast would do to the screen of one of those??
@steve340 if we get some if these ugly and distracting billboards in Seattle I'm counting on you to find out exactly what kind of damage that shotgun blast will do!!
Ugly and dangerously distractive to drivers. Not a good idea.
We're blessed with some of the most beautiful scenery in the country, if not the world. Putting up digital billboards would be just stupid, immoral and crass. Not to mention the safety issue. Don't allow this to happen!
Victoria has a string of them along a stretch of highway. They are blinding. Not to mention they make them so you DO notice them by flashing and flickering. Horrible!
Nobody wants them so we'll get then for sure. The City of Tacoma did stand up to these things. While they didn't completely win they did make life difficult for this company. If it was up to me I would outlaw everyone of them. Nothing cheapens a neighborhood like a billboard.
They are hideous!
Yeah, tacky/ugly/obnoxious billboards are definitely what we need. They will blend in wonderfully with the natural beauty of the State. I'm so sick & tired of everything being for sale.Â
It's already illegal to talk or text while driving. And so-called 'authorities' have even spouted on with a threat to ban talking to your passengers and eating or drinking in our cars. And they don't think that full, vivid color, image-changing signs won't be just as distracting?......Let alone, irritating?
Â
This article doesn't state that there would be ANY monetary benefit to cities, so, in this day and age of their creating ANY means of income via taxes and fees, what is the incentive for cities to contribute to further road distractions, unsafe driving, and the safety of all citizens driving any given road?
@Yadayada What distracts me more than ANYTHING on the road are those morons who stand on overpasses with huge signs advertising politicians/initiatives/eating vegan/etc. I have seen so many near misses from people looking up for a brief second to what they're stupid signs say. Sooner or later they will be responsible for someone's death. How is their candidate going to win when that happens? There needs to be a law against that BS.Â
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !!!
One digital billboard for every wind farm: sure.
I have seen them when driving up and down I-5 near those casinos etc, there is also one in Tukwila and I don't mind them. They are high up enough that you DONT have to look at them if you don't want to. Having them in wide open spaces are great, having them in downtown Seattle, does not make sense because the light would bounce all over the place.Â
@PrairieDawn If you ask me, they're even worse when they're up high. They block out the landscape in the area. Nothing like driving down I-5 & looking over to check out Mt Rainier behind all the billboards.Â
 @PrairieDawn I would encourage you to drive by Fife's most recent digital addition - located DIRECTLY in your line of vision as you drive south on I-5 - and at a curve in the road no less. Really want to get the full picture? Try it on a rainy night - the glare is in-your-face dangerous!
 @PrairieDawn Perhaps you can ignore them. I can't. I find them extremely distracting and annoying.
Tacoma has suffered for the past two years at the hands of Clear Channel who, instead of removing non-conforming, dilapidated static signs, now are filing a lawsuit with the goal of adding jumbo digital billboards. GO AWAY CLEAR CHANNEL. Visit www.keepwashingtonbeautiful.org to learn more and easily send your state legislators the message that DIGITAL SUCKS - yes, it sucks energy, beauty, night skies, local jurisdiction's coffers - and the safety of our roads.Â
@stopdigitalbillboards Thanks for the info on www.keepwashingtonbeautiful.org. I just filled out the form and sent an email to the state legislature.
Very distracting to me. That one coming out of fife at night is nasty at night. Typically I'm pro-business and market but these are just over the top and not necessary (kind of like jacking up the volume on radio and TV ads). It's not like businesses suffer from a lack of advertising avenues. Besides, the first time somebody crashes and points their finger at those billboards they're gonna get sued all over the place.
<sarc>
Hey, I'm all for it. Because after I've finished calling and texting my friends, downing a Big Mac and a latte, putting on my makeup, reading my e-mail, and giving the finger to some guy who "thinks" I cut him off, I get kinda bored with driving. Reading these billboards would be a nice way to pass the time.
</sarc>
This is a terrible idea, ugly and annoying. But it will probably happen, because our municipal and state leaders have done nothing but come up with terrible ideas, and for the most part have been ugly and annoying as well.
No no no no. I just got back from Atlanta and these things are all over the freeways. Ugly, distracting, and yet another assault on the senses.Â
 @nwbackpacker You are right on!
How can we complain of graffiti but allow this? These billboards are corporate graffiti.
i can see it now Electronic Taggers tagging the mega electronic bill boards
This comment has been deleted
as long as the bill board owners pay all injuries, vehicle replacement, and mental duress and attorney fees within 1 mile of the billboards.
I hate these damned things when driving they are an irritant and safety hazard. It's as if a hundred cars with their headlights on high beam aimed right in one's face. Does commercialization ever end? I got rid of the TV because of idiot shows with idiot commercials, now trying to read the news on the Internet ads are often slammed in one's face and/or the images bounce around while several ads are trying to load at once. Go to the movies and guess what, before the movie there are noisy crap ads one has to endure, and the irony is that one has to pay to see these damned things. I don't listen to radio, watch TV nor go movies because of ads these days. Now, one will have to take the back roads to avoid these glittering ads along the freeway. What next?
How about no billboards or advertising in public at all?
Â
I've seen before and after photos from sao paulo and it's amazing how much better the city of 11 million people looks after everything was removed. They banned all public advertising. Billboards, ads on buses, in front of businesses, the works back in 2006. No urging people to buy crap they don't need or can't afford, no destroying views, no making everything seem like a commercial your forced to look at each and every day. It was a wonderful idea that more of the world should adopt.
Â
And unlike what the industry lobby said would happen, there was no economic harm, there was no loss of jobs or revenue. And in the end over 75% of the cities residents are glad it happened. Cause really, if you had a choice, ask yourself what would you prefer. Billboards and ads everywhere you look? Or none at all?
Â
Â
@Aidenag I love you
 @Aidenag Sao Paulo before and after billboard blight. http://youtu.be/Vta6Cn_dLTE
 @Aidenag but i'm sure the state is dreaming of big flashy signs hanging on all those ferry boats to make money for the state.
 @32jim2  @Aidenag your name should be 'mind reader' as your proposal is already in the works
I sure hope not. We got enough distractions on the roads already!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDr0mPuyQc
 @Derp Damned well put.
 @Derp LOL! Well put!
I would llike to 'lift' some politicians over this issue.Â
Follow the money.
Â
Does it really matter if the peoples safety is compromised? Since when?
Â
Â
@bobalouie "Safety first? Well maybe not. Safety third? That's a streatch. It's at least in the top ten."
Â
Mike Rowe
NO NO NO! A thousand times NO!Â