Family discovers its home was a meth lab

SEATTLE -- Jessie Bates was determined to keep meth out of her family's life for good. She'd been clean for several years, but her past came back to haunt her in the form of a house.
The house, priced at $235,000 and located in Suquamish, Wash., is on the edges of jurisdiction between Kitsap County and the WestNET tribal police. Jessie Bates, her husband John and son Tyler moved in on March 29, 2007 - Jessie Bates' birthday.
"We moved from a 600-square-foot, 1964-everything-original-including-the-carpet, single-wide trailer - so lots of neon orange," Jessie Bates said. "We were really excited about having our own house."
But in June 2008, the family discovered their dream home had a history.
A year and a half after the family bought the property, the summer heat uncovered the property's problems; the house had a stench, and Tyler began having serious respiratory problems that sent him to the emergency room.
"It was scary," Jessie said. "There's just no way for us to definitively know exactly what it was that was causing it. [Doctors] said, yeah it was definitely something that came out of the walls."
Later that summer, Jessie recognized traces of cooking meth - iodine staining on the walls; hardwood floors that began to deteriorate from the chemicals underneath them; and when she woke up to find sores all over her face, it was a face she had seen before.
It was what she looked like right before she went into rehab.
In September 2008, the family tested the house for meth lab contamination. As soon as the samples tested positive, John and Jessie Bates were required by law to report it to the Department of Health and move out within the next 48 hours. The sample that tested highest of contamination came from the room where Tyler slept.
The bigger problem to meth lab homes
You're selling a house," John Bates said. "Would you write, yes, this house was a meth lab? I wouldn't. And I'm pretty honest."
Sgt. Sean Whitcomb of the Seattle Police Department said while meth labs aren't as much of an issue in the Seattle area as they are in rural areas - he only recalls a meth lab bust occurring once or twice a year - the use of meth in Seattle is an issue.
"I can say with confidence that the issue with meth labs is one that is certainly more well-known to rural areas," Whitcomb said. "Where that methamphetamine ends up is very much our problem."
In Suquamish, however, where winding roads and a mass of greenery hide property from sight, the house had passed as a lab quietly. In January 2012, the Port Orchard Independent had reported on a trailer that had been busted as a meth lab in Suquamish in 2010 and, two years later, still remained contaminated and uninhabited because the owner claimed not to have enough money to decontaminate the property.
The seizure of illegal drug labs had dropped from 137, in 2008, to 61 in 2009, according to the Pacific Northwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, a federal drug enforcement information program. Yet many labs, like John and Jessie Bates' home, are hidden from plain sight and aren't found by police. By the time the home is bought, the property is worthless, and blame sometimes can't be traced to the home seller or anyone who can offer compensation.
The price to pay
After discovering the house's history, the Bates moved in with Jessie's parents while they figured out their next step. The couple had few options.
One was to spend $15,000 to $20,000 to wipe down the house with bleach and try to make it past inspection by the Department of Health; there would have been extra costs for more repairs and a chance it still wouldn't pass the inspection. They didn't want to foreclose for risk of jeopardizing John Bates' government position, which required a security clearance and a stable financial statement.
Instead, they started from scratch: They spent $184,000 to demolish the house, fix the septic system, and rebuild. But they didn't have that money to spend, so relatives chipped in.
John said when he had spoken to the neighbors after discovering that it was a former meth lab, the neighbors revealed that they had known the house had serious problems and assumed that John and Jessie knew that when they bought the house.
"We were so angry," Jessie said. "For a while there at the beginning, we really felt that everyone had lied to us, and everyone knew, and it was a huge conspiracy. We were pissed, and we wanted someone - anyone, everyone - to pay."
Not included in the $184,000 the couple needed to rebuild the home was the $15,000 they had spent on two attorneys to see if they had a case against the home sellers.
Full disclosure
A question on the Seller Disclosure Statement, Form 17, asks whether the property was ever used to manufacture drugs. The home sellers had only owned the property for a year and never lived in the home, Jessie Bates said, but they still checked "no" instead of "I don't know" despite their lack of knowledge about the history of the property.
"It is our belief - according to what our neighbors had told us and conversations he had with the sellers - that they were aware of the meth-making history of the property, and they chose not to disclose that to us," Jessie Bates said. "And they chose not to disclose it to their real-estate agent who listed the house, and they chose not to disclose it to the home inspector. So by making that decision, it is our belief that they should've helped out with the cost of cleaning up."
Richard Hagar, home appraiser for American Home Appraisals, said when home buyers try pinning a suit against the home appraiser or home inspector involved in evaluating property value, it's usually a lost case. But those who would most likely have knowledge of the former meth lab, he added, are the home owners, who are also under legal obligation to report it.
Despite having hired a home inspector to look over the property before they had bought it, the couple found no signs of suspicion until much later. The property's history, Jessie said, was so carefully covered up that the home inspector would have had to tear apart the property in order to see it.
"It's hard to look at that level of work that went into a manufactured home and not be suspect," Jessie said. "Why were they working so hard when back then in '07, '06, most flippers just slapped on paint and put down some new carpet and called it good? ... If they didn't know, then wow, they put a lot of work into the property. But if they did, it was a little self-serving."
In order to sue the previous home owners, John and Jessie Bates would need to prove the sellers knew about the property's history. The house had no drug history with police, only reports of DUIs and calls for domestic abuse. Jessie said their attorneys told them they have no case.
As for the real estate agent, a family friend who sold John and Jessie Bates the house, Jessie says she trusts that the agent was honest with them.
"I would really, really, really like to believe that she didn't know," Jessie Bates said. "We're always going to wonder who knew and didn't tell us. But in order for us to be at peace with this, we have to believe that the people that we trusted didn't lie to us."
Long-term costs
Jessie and John began trying for kids shortly after they got married and moved into their home in March. But they struggled.
Doctors said the chemical exposure from the meth lab home and stress had been factors to their fertility problems. Similar cases have linked children's autism to contaminated meth lab homes.
John and Jessie Bates finally conceived after trying for two and a half years; their little girl, Jordan, was born in 2009.
"On the one hand, we're so happy with the way that things turned out," Jessie said. In addition to her healthy "miracle babies" who came unexpectedly: "We both admit to each other that we never envisioned ourselves living in a house like this."
But there were so many other things for which they wanted to spend the money, Jessie said.
At the time the Bates family was struggling with a home they couldn't live in, sell, or foreclose, the largest attention they had received was from a local blogger. Five years later, they had been contacted by several media outlets including Fox News and local affiliate Q-13 Fox, bringing back feelings of resentment they had tried to bury. While the remnants of the former meth lab were gone, the financial burden, a ghost of their past, still remains.
"We've moved on, it's not even in our limelight anymore," John said, "and all of a sudden - boom, it's back."
Now the Bates know that Meth hurts innocent people. she use to use it and know karma is paying her back with a meth contaminated house. Must be a good government job to be able to afford a $235,000 home. They bought at the top of the bubble and now have remorse. if its a mobile home they should have just torn it down and bought another. should have been able to do that for the $180,000 they spent. i didn't read anything about their well water. is it contaminated too? most rural meth labs just dump chemicals outside on the ground.
What's the problem, KOMO?
Too lazy to spell 'Washington'?
I don't live in 'Wash."!!
 @spiffyjumper not komo was seattle p.i. that wrote article.
It sucks they had to go through all that just to have a nice home. I think it should be easier to hold previous homeowners accountable for the problems they don't disclose. That may be wishful thinking, though. Sounds like things are going well for them now, though. I wish them a happy future.
When a house has been used for meth production, it should be mandatory that it either get decontaminated and/or destroyed. This info should also be available publically. If I were them, I'd be going after the former owner for not disclosing it properly. If the former owner wants to go after the owner before him, then that is his choice..
Â
 @The WA Mama They tried, They did not have a case.
Its Heisenberg's fault
With all that happens due to this insidious drug, all houses that have been used for this purpose should be destroyed. They should never be available for any body to purchase except for the bare land once cleaned up.
Once again proving that this state will allow flagrant violation of its own rules and policies, unsuspecting home buyers will end up, time and time again, paying for the failures of government to police itself. There should be a stringent fine that goes w/ realtors NOT fully researching and disclosing stuff like this...we can get carfax, why not housefax?
Man, what a scare! I hope the previous seller somehow has to compensate for this.
Seems like our law enforcement orginizations should create a Meth Lab Database Registry similar to the sex offender registry. I'm sure not all meth labs get busted but at least it would be a tool for people to use when buying or renting properties.
Quoting John Bates in the article:
"You're selling a house," John Bates said. "Would you write, yes, this house was a meth lab? I wouldn't. And I'm pretty honest."
Â
Quoting Jessie Bates two seconds later:
"We were so angry," Jessie said. "For a while there at the beginning, we really felt that everyone had lied to us, and everyone knew, and it was a huge conspiracy. We were pissed, and we wanted someone - anyone, everyone - to pay."
"I would really, really, really like to believe that she didn't know," Jessie Bates said. "We're always going to wonder who knew and didn't tell us. But in order for us to be at peace with this, we have to believe that the people that we trusted didn't lie to us."
Â
No, you aren't at all honest, John Bates!! Why is it so different when it happened to you, after you just freely admitted to the world you aren't even honorable enough to not put another young family's health at serious risk?Â
Â
Your kids I feel terrible for. You? Not so much.Â
Â
Â
@MargeGunderson
I had that exact same reaction! Hard to sympathize with someone who openly admits that he would have failed to disclose that his house was formerly a meth lab if he were trying to sell it. That is the exact opposite of honest. And would you really hold a person who flips houses for a living to a higher than average standard of honesty? I know I wouldn't.
Â
Also, I think it's a little irresponsible for this article to say that one "option" was to "spend $15,000 to $20,000 to wipe down the house with bleach..." Obviously, it wouldn't cost $15k to clean the whole house with bleach (even if one were to use a lot of bleach); I assume what that dollar amount referred to was the cost of hiring a certified drug lab clean-up company to come in and try to decontaminate the place. In fact, according to the EPA, the use of bleach-containing cleaners could react with meth manufacturing ingredients to form toxic gases or cause other nasty chemical reactions. So meth lab clean-up is not really a DIY project and using bleach could be dangerous for someone who doesn't know what they are doing.
Â
Also, just a warning for anyone looking to buy or rent a home: meth labs or meth contaminated homes do exist in non-rural areas and sometimes in very high-end neighborhoods. Although former meth labs pose a much greater risk of contamination, even homes where meth was consumed can have some contamination. When we were house-hunting last year, we looked at what could have been a beautiful, historic home with a view of Greenlake. It was listed suspiciously low but I insisted we check it out anyway. I think the owner was in bankruptcy proceedings because he was obviously not trying to sell the home even though it was listed for sale. Long story short, we were eventually able to see the place and it was a filthy nightmare. There was garbage everywhere, rancid smell, stains on the walls, drug paraphernalia sitting out in the open, and all the rooms that had doors on them were locked, as was the basement. The owner, was of course (and, in retrospect, thank god) not there, but some completely tweaked out woman gave me a very brief tour as well as some crazy explanation as to why all the doors were locked. Mind you, this house looked normal from the outside and houses on the same block would easily sell in the $600k-$700k range. Of course, I can only speculate that there was at the very least, some heavy meth use happening in that house and it wouldn't surprise me if people were cooking or trying to cook there. I followed the house on redfin for a while and it never sold; I think the bank foreclosed but who knows what they will do with it. Do your research on any home you are thinking of buying and, if there is any chance you think people could have been using or manufacturing meth in the home, have a meth contamination test done as part of the inspection process! You can get basic test kits for less than $50.00 and a pretty thorough inspection for around $500.00.Â
Â
Finally, as a lawyer myself (although admittedly not an expert in real-estate law), I suspect these people, or at least some people in a similar situation, could have a case against the former owner. Because it's an emerging area of law and there isn't a lot of precedent, I can see why a lawyer would tell them they have "no case" meaning, "there is a good chance you'll lose and the cost of paying me to pursue this isn't worth it." However, I suspect some scrappy lawyers out there would take on a case like this and hopefully, we'll see some better legal remedies in the future. And one last tip: if you are in this kind of situation and you're thinking maybe you do have a legal claim that's worth pursuing, whatever you do, DO NOT TELL A NEWSPAPER REPORTER: "hey, if I were selling a meth house would I disclose that, yes, this house was a meth lab? No, I wouldn't, and I consider myself a pretty honest person. Having said that, I do think the people who sold me my meth house and didn't disclose it should have to pay me for it, because when it's me who's getting screwed, that's where I draw the line." Sorry if it's a little harsh, I really do feel bad for these people and wish them the best moving forward. Certainly, no one deserves to suffer health consequences or to see their children's health affected by toxic chemicals hidden in their own home.
Â
Â
Congrats on being clean Jessie, I hope this works out well in the end.
"One was to spend $15,000 to $20,000 to wipe down the house with bleach and try to make it past inspection by the Department of Health; there would have been extra costs for more repairs and a chance it still wouldn't pass the inspection."
**********************************
Make it past inspection? Don't you mean pass inspection, editor?Â
What an awful discovery. Here's hoping things work out well for this family.