Foreign domestic violence victims seek asylum in Wash.

TACOMA, Wash. (AP) - Clara Flores-Aguilar says the beatings began days after she gave birth to her first son.
The pain wouldn't stop for more than two decades. Eyes swollen with tears, Flores-Aguilar said she endured death threats, injuries to her children, a hot oil scalding, a stab wound on her leg and continuous public humiliation at the hand of her alcoholic and drug-abusing husband. She recites a litany of abuse that only stops when she flees from Honduras, first in the mid-2000's and again two months ago. The 50-year-old is thousands of miles from Honduras, but whether she can start anew in the United States was not known on a recent January afternoon.
Flores-Aguilar was being held at the Tacoma Detention Center as she waited a decision by an immigration judge to allow her asylum case to proceed. For that to happen, the judge must believe her story of abuse.
"I just wanted to escape again," Flores-Aguilar told The Associated Press in Spanish, adding that in August she left a successful small deli behind after her husband said he'd kill her and himself at the end of the year. "I trust in God that he takes all of this into consideration. I don't want to go back."
It's an uphill legal battle. Seeking asylum because of past domestic violence abuse has not been a successful road to take because immigration judges have traditionally declined such requests, attorneys said. But recent court cases have given these women hope.
"We've been having a little more luck with these cases," said Ashley Huebner, an attorney at the National Immigrant Justice Center. "Historically, there's been significant fear and hesitation by a lot of adjudicators."
Flores-Aguilar is not alone in Tacoma.
Around 100 women from Central America applying for asylum have been processed through the Tacoma Detention Center over the past two years, said Betsy Tao, an attorney for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project who works at the detention center.
ICE officials couldn't immediately say why there's a small surge of these women in Tacoma, though it may have to do with the way the agency transfers immigrants in custody around the nation. Two years ago, after an influx of Somali asylum seekers came to the U.S. at different ports of entry, large groups of them were transferred to Tacoma.
Asylum requests from Central American women at the nation's ports increased from 95 in fiscal year 2010 to nearly 200 this past year, according to data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration and Services processes far more asylum requests, but their available data does not include requests from Central American women based on domestic violence.
Considering all the types of migration to the United States, these women represent a tiny blip and the numbers are too small to make broad conclusions. But in a place like the Tacoma Detention Center, the women stand out among the hundreds being detained.
Tao said it's not her organization's call to judge whether the stories the women tell are true. They provide the same legal information on what happens now that the women are in custody.
Under law, filing a frivolous asylum claim can lead to a lifetime bar on entering the United States.
One of the last key court cases for domestic violence victims seeking asylum came from a Guatemalan woman named Lesly Yajayra Perdomo in 2010.
She argued in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that violence against women was so rampant in Guatemala she would face the risk of murder if she was sent back. At least 4,400 women were killed in Guatemala between 2000 and 2010 and fewer than 3 percent of the cases are solved, according to the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies at the University of California's Hastings College of the Law.
At issue in the Perdomo case was defining a "particular social group" that is persecuted and qualifies for political asylum in the United States. Women who fear genital mutilation or victims of domestic abuse have been deemed "social groups" and granted asylum.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered immigration judges to seriously consider granting asylum to Guatemalan women who fear they will be killed.
Recently, advocates launched a campaign to include changes to asylum law in the immigration reform President Barack Obama and Congress are formulating. They want to ensure gender-based asylum claims constitute part of a "particular social group."
That's far away from Flores-Aguilar.
For her, life had one more tragic event. She says her father died of an infection after his small intestines were perforated during a routine hernia surgery. He had decided to undergo surgery because he had taken in Flores-Aguilar's oldest daughter into his house. She didn't find out until she had been taken into custody.
"If I had never come here, he wouldn't have gotten the surgery," she said, crying. "He wouldn't be dead. Why?"
On Feb. 1, an immigration judge deemed Flores-Aguilar's story credible and she was released from the detention center.
She now awaits the final asylum decision.
The pain wouldn't stop for more than two decades. Eyes swollen with tears, Flores-Aguilar said she endured death threats, injuries to her children, a hot oil scalding, a stab wound on her leg and continuous public humiliation at the hand of her alcoholic and drug-abusing husband. She recites a litany of abuse that only stops when she flees from Honduras, first in the mid-2000's and again two months ago. The 50-year-old is thousands of miles from Honduras, but whether she can start anew in the United States was not known on a recent January afternoon.
Flores-Aguilar was being held at the Tacoma Detention Center as she waited a decision by an immigration judge to allow her asylum case to proceed. For that to happen, the judge must believe her story of abuse.
"I just wanted to escape again," Flores-Aguilar told The Associated Press in Spanish, adding that in August she left a successful small deli behind after her husband said he'd kill her and himself at the end of the year. "I trust in God that he takes all of this into consideration. I don't want to go back."
It's an uphill legal battle. Seeking asylum because of past domestic violence abuse has not been a successful road to take because immigration judges have traditionally declined such requests, attorneys said. But recent court cases have given these women hope.
"We've been having a little more luck with these cases," said Ashley Huebner, an attorney at the National Immigrant Justice Center. "Historically, there's been significant fear and hesitation by a lot of adjudicators."
Flores-Aguilar is not alone in Tacoma.
Around 100 women from Central America applying for asylum have been processed through the Tacoma Detention Center over the past two years, said Betsy Tao, an attorney for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project who works at the detention center.
ICE officials couldn't immediately say why there's a small surge of these women in Tacoma, though it may have to do with the way the agency transfers immigrants in custody around the nation. Two years ago, after an influx of Somali asylum seekers came to the U.S. at different ports of entry, large groups of them were transferred to Tacoma.
Asylum requests from Central American women at the nation's ports increased from 95 in fiscal year 2010 to nearly 200 this past year, according to data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration and Services processes far more asylum requests, but their available data does not include requests from Central American women based on domestic violence.
Considering all the types of migration to the United States, these women represent a tiny blip and the numbers are too small to make broad conclusions. But in a place like the Tacoma Detention Center, the women stand out among the hundreds being detained.
Tao said it's not her organization's call to judge whether the stories the women tell are true. They provide the same legal information on what happens now that the women are in custody.
Under law, filing a frivolous asylum claim can lead to a lifetime bar on entering the United States.
One of the last key court cases for domestic violence victims seeking asylum came from a Guatemalan woman named Lesly Yajayra Perdomo in 2010.
She argued in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that violence against women was so rampant in Guatemala she would face the risk of murder if she was sent back. At least 4,400 women were killed in Guatemala between 2000 and 2010 and fewer than 3 percent of the cases are solved, according to the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies at the University of California's Hastings College of the Law.
At issue in the Perdomo case was defining a "particular social group" that is persecuted and qualifies for political asylum in the United States. Women who fear genital mutilation or victims of domestic abuse have been deemed "social groups" and granted asylum.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered immigration judges to seriously consider granting asylum to Guatemalan women who fear they will be killed.
Recently, advocates launched a campaign to include changes to asylum law in the immigration reform President Barack Obama and Congress are formulating. They want to ensure gender-based asylum claims constitute part of a "particular social group."
That's far away from Flores-Aguilar.
For her, life had one more tragic event. She says her father died of an infection after his small intestines were perforated during a routine hernia surgery. He had decided to undergo surgery because he had taken in Flores-Aguilar's oldest daughter into his house. She didn't find out until she had been taken into custody.
"If I had never come here, he wouldn't have gotten the surgery," she said, crying. "He wouldn't be dead. Why?"
On Feb. 1, an immigration judge deemed Flores-Aguilar's story credible and she was released from the detention center.
She now awaits the final asylum decision.
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame,
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
No....I am tired of hearing about all the "poor foreigners" we have to take care of. Let's get our own house in order before we worry about anybody else's. And I find it real funny that these people come here, beg to be let into the country and then turn around and tell us how crummy it is here and that everything has to change to suit them. DV or not, let's let other countries deal with their own problems. We are not the world's police, nor should we be. Let's stay out of foreign affairs and not help people in other countries at the expense of our own people.
Although it is unfortunate that any woman has to live in such conditions, I feel as though this whole article and agenda reeks of "LOOP HOLE". It has nothing to do with race or gender. Domestic Violence is just that.  Home Violence. Domestic Violence shelters are soon to become refuge shelters for homeless and immigration holding tanks. Most shelters are run on the grace of grants from charitable orgainizations and government. They are already on a tight budget being non profit. They are overfull and some are closing down do to lack of funds. So where are we going to put the local vicitms if we substitute beds for international vicitms? Where do you draw the line?
This comment has been deleted
@Hadrian Yes, and the ancestors of those immigrants that built this country are still here (including myself).  What did this lady's family ever do for America?
This comment has been deleted
@MomOf2 @UtterReality @HadrianÂ
Using the same logic, she could just as easily be the next big serial killer, arsonist or thief. Â Anyways, if she did have such talent, there would already be some demonstration of this at 50 years of age. Â There are tons of highly qualified individuals wanting to get in - why would we pass over them in exchange for a hypothetical "maybe?"
@UtterReality @Hadrian Who says this lady has nothing to offer to our country? She may be the next big designer, chef, teacher, etc.Â
@Hadrian @UtterRealitySure, I'll bite.  Why does America need more uneducated, unskilled workers?  Most of our low skilled jobs have already been shipped overseas, and those that remain are going to be eventually replaced by automation.  American unemployment is still high as it is.
There are hundreds of millions of people across the globe that want to live in America, and we can't let them all in. Â What does this lady specifically offer us, and why should we choose to let her in when there are millions of people that offer us valuable skills to better compete in the global economy? Â It is not America's job to cure the ills of the world, which as we've found out the hard way, is not even vaguely possible.
I don't want to make is sound like I'm anti-immigrant, as I'm not. Â I'm related to first generation immigrants and have worked with many great people that originally came over here on work visa's. Â However, all of those people had college degrees and were able to make a net positive contribution to American society, as I'm sure that you do as well.
However, that's not what this article is about, is it? Â This is about letting an individual skip ahead of the immigration lines because of domestic problems back home. Â That is clearly a Guatemalan problem - not an American problem.
Just open the damn borders to anyone who feels like colonizing this country. It would be easier for me since I couldnt be angry that I am paying the salaries of the same damn idiots in the government to do nothing but let them in.
I feel for this woman, but its not my fault and its not my problem. This country has many problems of its own we cant even afford to take care of
@northwestsurfer so who's problem was it before YOU and the other's took the land away from the original inhabitants?
This whole thing with "borders" is growing old and tired.
I get it, it was a long time ago that we did this so it doesn't hold true today? Â Unless by it we mean the antiquated old outdated gun law you made at about the same time. Â Then "it" is golden. Â Right?
Drowning in the hypocrisy.
@sunnysandiego Me? Funny, I never took anybody's land away from them. To hold a person accountable for the crimes of their ancestors is ludicrous. If we did, the blood would never stop flowing. I guess your philosophy is "one wrong turn way in the past deserves another today"? With people subscribing to your philosophy it's no wonder there is so much violence in the world today....
" For her, life had one more tragic event. She says her father died of an infection after his small intestines were perforated during a routine hernia surgery. He had decided to undergo surgery because he had taken in Flores-Aguilar's oldest daughter into his house. She didn't find out until she had been taken into custody.
"If I had never come here, he wouldn't have gotten the surgery," she said, crying. "He wouldn't be dead. Why?""
What does any of this have to do with anything? He decided to have surgery because he took in her daughter?
I feel for the lady, but how on Earth is this America's problem? Â We can't even pay our own debt or fully provide for our own people. Â
Under this argument isn't every muslim woman on the planet entitled to asylum in the US? And I assume Flores-Aguilar went from the detention center directly to the welfare office?
@Goodwin Is every Muslim woman on the planet being abused and trying to run away? Whoa, I was not aware of this.Â
@Goodwin most welfare recipients (vast majority) are citizens born here white middle class trash who suck off the system for years and years.
These people coming from other countries have an actual work ethic.
@sunnysandiego  Amazingly racist and ignorant.This is about legality, not skin color.Â
@sunnysandiego @Goodwin Sunny, there's a difference between a misleading statement and a lie.  A misleading one could have said "more whites than blacks are on welfare", ignoring that whites are five times more of the population (63.7% vs 12.2%, U.S. Census), and therefore blacks are far more likely to be on it.
But that would still be a lie, because as the U.S. Dept of Heath and Human Services reports, blacks are 39.8% of welfare recipients and whites only 38.8%.
In short, YOU LIED.
Stop doing that. Â Your lies are too easily pierced with remedial research.
Meanwhile, and even worse to your position than your flat-out lies, is that the Center for Immigration Studies (an overtly pro-immigrant group) found that 74.7% of Mexican immigrants with children use some form of welfare in the USA.
How much can we, and should we, afford?
@sunnysandiego @Goodwin "White trash," eh?   Nice... But hey, if you like , we can eliminate those programs so those WT people won't be able to abuse them. Sounds good to me. I do have one proposal;
Anyone demanding that we should take in  everybody from everywhere will be required to house and be financially responsible for at least two illegals-sight unseen- for a period of say 8 years-more or less. SSD can show us his/her compassion by being the  first to apply.
Sounds good, sponsor the problem if you want. SSD tends to only be compassionate with other people's money.
@Harley-H.S.C. Good one!
@Getov Mylon @sunnysandiego @Goodwin Won't work......they'd cut off his welfare. lol.Â
Republicans say no! Â That is my queue to say yes.
Funny, they want to make the borders see through when it comes to shipping jobs off shore or bringing in cheap labor under visa programs. Â And we as a society turn our backs on the atrocious working conditions in other countries but support companies doing business there.
Also let's not kid ourselves here, we are the ones guilty of taking over the country from the original citizens and inflicting upon them our will. Â Kind of makes us look slightly hypocritical to say the least.
The same fools who will come in here and root for a central american baseball player like he gives a rats butt about seattle would turn away his family member who actually would be proud to live there and unlike the average american citizen would move on to become independent and successful not a pawn of the welfare system.
You know the arguement I get tired of is the origina citizens arguement... Facts, the Native Americans were technologicaly behind the power curve (please no offense meant, maybe could have said it better). Anyhow, If not the English; the Spanish, French and Russians were poised to take it anyways. This great country is truely the bread basket of the world; food and resources abound. No-One was going to leave it undisturbed.Â
@sunnysandiego You do realize that "queue" refers to an actual line in which one waits, not a spoken line, right?  Or that if you were getting a signal to do or say something, that's a "cue", not a "queue"?
@sunnysandiego Your "queue?" You are waiting in line to say,"yes?" Â
@sunnysandiego Your first statement sums up 98% of America's problems. Instead of being part of the problem there "sunny".....try being part of the solution. I've seen some ignorant comments on here before, but your first line is right there at the top.
@sunnysandiego "Republicans say no!  That is my queue to say yes."
Well, yes of course we have to say yes. Â after all we need to have a reason to raise taxes again to pay for these people. Â
Here is an idea, Let her government deal with it.
@FBrumfield @sunnysandiego so we pick and choose between multinational and isolationist depending on how it fits your agenda.
must be a republican for sure.
@sunnysandiego @FBrumfield Nope not a dem or a repub.  I am just a hard worker thats sick of being taxed to death for people who don't put into the system.  We have people in need in our own country but they get ignored in favor to accommodate non citizens.
It is past time for us to fix our own problems instead of importing more.
@sunnysandiego @FBrumfield Based on current policies, the Republicans ARE the isolationists.  It's Obama's Democrats who have kept the wars going on, ensured continued porous (non-isolated) borders with Mexico, worry about global issues (e.g. potential warming) more than local (Keystone energy and employment), and constantly point to Europe as a desired social model.  None of that is Republican.
The Democrats are the pro-Immigration party generally. Â The latest Pew study shows we're at 13% of the U.S. is immigrants currently.
For what it's worth, Obama and the Dems have supported expanding H1B more than the Republicans have, though both sides seem to be for it.  The I2 act was authored by Orrin Hatch (R-UTAH), Amy Klobuchar (D-MINN.), Marco Rubio (R-FLA.) and Chris Coones (D-DEL.)
So your posing is as inaccurate as it is pretentious. Â Must be a democrat for sure. ;)
I say no,
I am sorry for her abuse at the hands of her husband, but now this country is suppose to start taking in all of the 3rd world countries problems caused by husbands that abuse they wives. Most of the women in Afican/Middle Eastern countries are treated worst than dogs at the hands of their husbands, and in some cases their own families. Forced marriages, so called honor killings by the families if the women does not marry who they say. This "particular social group" will open a floodgate of women and their children for us to take care of and support.Â
We can not solve all of the worlds social problems, when we have not even solved all of the social problems in our our country, the homeless - the unemployed - gang problems, the list goes on and on.Â
I am tried of giving up my seat on the lifeboat so someone else can get on it.
I think we should put homeless people in decent shelters too, but that doesn't happen. I feel for these people, I really do, but they have their OWN countries to help them out. We need to take care of OURS first, and THEN worry about the rest of the world.
SANCTUARY STATE.
@SoTweetie Dr. Mylon's EZ solution.
1) Require all new hires as of January 1, 2014 to be screened through E-Verify.
2) Require all existing employees to be screened through E-Verify via a staggered time-line beginning July 1st, 2014. First, all Northern States that border Canada. Then six months later, those States that border those States. Â Then so on, at six month intervals on down to Mexico border.
3) Heavy fines and jail time for non-compliance and/or Social Security Number Fraud (yes, the President is exempted and yes, that was a joke. Lighten up, willya?).
4) Elimination of chain migration policies (you can sponsor your spouse and kids, not your 3rd cousin by marriage.
Our immigration system is not broken. Our immigration enforcement system is.
@Getov Mylon Your solution is just too easy for our government to comprehend.
@Getov Mylon AMEN!!!
This is why it's the UN's job to better conditions around the world and advocate for victims in their own countries...not expect us to babysit and accommodate the world in this one. It should also be the people who are willing to fight for better conditions, employment, political leadership and lives in their own countries, not violate our laws and then expect us to give in.Â
Ship of Fools.
This comment has been deleted
@Rspence Regular posters SoTweetie and dg54321 have, by liking this post, publicly acknowledged that they are white supremacists.
@Sutekh@Rspence"In a debate, a false accusation of racism is a specific type of ad hominem argument."Â Â
Sad that our liberal friends can't come up with actual rebuttals to posts they disagree with....I'd really enjoy an intelligent debate one of these days.....if only I could find one.
So was South Africa a white country too? The identity of being "white" is socially constructed. The irish in Ireland were not considered white by the english.
You should be posting on white supremicst sites where your particular type of delusion is welcomed.
@Rspence O_o The USA cannot possibly be the country of which you speak.Â
Are you from rural Idaho by any chance?
@Rspence No no no no no. You have no idea what you're talking about. Please, keep that racist rhetoric to yourself and the other people who prefer to hide behind bedsheets as this is not the place.
@Rspence Why do you assume this is a white country? And I think you belong on stormfront not komo.
Republicans will say no.
@EÂ Perhaps they should. Â We aren't taking care of our own yet. Â We're out of money and being asked for higher taxes every year. Â The schools aren't working and Tacoma's streets aren't safe at night. Â Shouldn't we clean up our own mess before over-extending ourselves to saving the rest of the world?
@TCat @E Yeah sometimes I get blinded by the fact that people from different countries are people.
@E @TCat "Life is not all about money."  That and about 3 bucks will get you a latte.
@TCat @E Life is not all about money.
@E @TCat They aren't paying my taxes.  You want to help them, YOU help them.  I'll focus on the village.