Garfield High teachers refuse to give standardized test
SEATTLE -- A group of teachers at Garfield High School have refused to administer a district-mandated standardized test they believe is flawed.
The teachers say the test -- which they call they call it a waste of time, money and resources -- cost the district $4 million.
The Measures of Academic Progress Test, or MAP, is used to measure student and teacher progress, and is given three times a year.
Seattle Public Schools began using the test several years ago under the direction of the late former superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson, and district officials say the results help improve accountability and academic decision-making.
But Garfield teachers took a vote and say they stand United -- not against measuring progress, but against the test they say is flawed.
"I'm happy to have anyone come in and look at my work," said teacher Kit McCormick, who did not give the test to her students as scheduled on Wednesday. "It's just that I don't think they should be tested by this test."
Garfield teachers give several reasons for their position, including a state audit that found Goodloe-Johnson did not comply with district ethics policy. When the MAP test was added, Goodloe-Johnson was on the board of the vendor that sold it to the district.
"They adopted it for $4 million. Why would they adopt a test they haven't vetted, they haven't made sure is aligned to our curriculum? I think there's a clear conflict of interest," said teacher Jesse Hagopian.
Seattle Public Schools, now under the direction of superintendent Jose Banda, issued a statement Thursday afternoon saying it expects all teachers to administer all required tests.
Asked whether the teachers will be disciplined for failing to follow policy, the district said it will decide on a case-by-case basis.
The teachers say the test -- which they call they call it a waste of time, money and resources -- cost the district $4 million.
The Measures of Academic Progress Test, or MAP, is used to measure student and teacher progress, and is given three times a year.
Seattle Public Schools began using the test several years ago under the direction of the late former superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson, and district officials say the results help improve accountability and academic decision-making.
But Garfield teachers took a vote and say they stand United -- not against measuring progress, but against the test they say is flawed.
"I'm happy to have anyone come in and look at my work," said teacher Kit McCormick, who did not give the test to her students as scheduled on Wednesday. "It's just that I don't think they should be tested by this test."
Garfield teachers give several reasons for their position, including a state audit that found Goodloe-Johnson did not comply with district ethics policy. When the MAP test was added, Goodloe-Johnson was on the board of the vendor that sold it to the district.
"They adopted it for $4 million. Why would they adopt a test they haven't vetted, they haven't made sure is aligned to our curriculum? I think there's a clear conflict of interest," said teacher Jesse Hagopian.
Seattle Public Schools, now under the direction of superintendent Jose Banda, issued a statement Thursday afternoon saying it expects all teachers to administer all required tests.
Asked whether the teachers will be disciplined for failing to follow policy, the district said it will decide on a case-by-case basis.
Is anyone concerned that, in addition to all the other tests, this test is administered THREE times a year? When is there time for teaching the content and practicing skills with the personal touch kind of help these kids need?
The NWEA MAP assessments are not standardized tests. They are computer based adaptive assessments, meaning they adapt to the knowledge and skill level of each student, and they are among the most valid and reliable assessments on the planet. They are used extensively across the United States and the world to accurately measure student academic progress. My school district uses them in grades k-8 in reading and math, and science at the middle school, and the teachers value the information for each student which allows them to individualize their instruction and teach each student at their instructional level. If you question their validity, go to NWEA.org and you will find all of the research and evidence you could ever want documenting their validity.
@ahile
totally inaccurate comments. This article also does not give the commplete story of the former superintendent who lost her job due to the deal with NWEA.  The graded tests are not available for analysis or accuracy to teachers, students are parents and there cannot possibly contribute to the individualization of instruction. Â
Â
The same types of high stakes standardized tests are being used in all school districts nationwide as a result of NCLB. Now that the Common Core Standards are being used as an excuse for yet another standardized test which can only be used for one purpose - to standardize students - promoters of the current tests are now beginning to say "Oh but the assessment we use now is invalid and must be replaced." And so it goes. . . .
Â
We here in Louisiana know - we are way ahead of you in this privatization scheme and the destruction of public education. Congrats to the teachers at Garfield and Ballard High for protecting their students.Â
The last time I took that test was in 2006. If it's still anything like it was when I was in high school then these teachers are right because it's a complete joke. Standardized tests are fine to give a vague to general idea of where students are at but this test truly proves very little in terms of knowledge or intellegence. I never understood the point of "standardizing" a test and using it for anything more than a reference taken with a grain of salt when there is no one way people learn or display their knowledge. Let alone thousands of bored teenagers packed into crowded classrooms.
I read a article that said that in Finland fines are basted on income...now that is a good idea. They said a wealthy heir paid $204,000 for speeding. Now that makes sense.
Wtg Teachers!!!!
The teachers should be fired for insubordination and replaced. Their union will file grievances that will eventually be arbitrated. The arbitrator(s) will probably be put the insubordinate teachers back to work, but only after a long, expensive fight.
Â
This is the problem with organized labor these days. Rather than follow a collective bargaining process to mediate disputes, militant unions simply take matters into their own hands. Of course, if the other side doesnât follow a collective bargaining process, the unions are all over them with unfair labor practice charges and a slew of other administration actions.
Â
And, since a majority people associated with the Seattle public school system are pro union, nobody will step up to take these teachers on.
Â
Sad.
 @amigoingcrazy You have no idea how little power unions have these days.Â
 @amigoingcrazy The acclaimed best school system in the WORLD does not use standardized assessment testing - wth should ours??? (Oh, BTW... the teachers in that best school system in the world? VERY strong union!)
 @amigoingcrazy Good job on totally missing the point. Perhaps you should have had a reading comprehension class.
 @amigoingcrazyÂ
Â
Not sad.
Â
I graduated just fine without standardized testing (1980), I took the required classes, took my electives and passed every class without government intervention to see if I'm up to par. (I also went to a high school with a very rigorous curriculum.)
Â
If there's any question of ethics here, it's on the head of the ex-superintendent that instituted the tests with a known conflict of interest.
Â
But I understand your position.. Unions=Bad, so... gotta be the teachers' fault.................
I agree that there was a conflict of interest when Goodloe-Johnson added the MAP test, but they fail to explain how the test itself was flawed. Are they saying all the other school districts taking this test will get wrong results? Are students from different school districts different from students here? Should the bar be lowered for seattle students so that everybody feel good about the results?
Â
Public schools are jokes, they spend all their energy grooming the students to take these tests basically memorizing things that will be on the test so that teachers look good. However students do no retain what they learn or know what to do with it.
@Nathan Boi:Â
Part of the problem is the fact that the teachers are never told WHAT will be on the test - it is a random drawing of topics/questions from all across the US. So, lets say you have 2 8th graders. One is an AP students in New Hampshire, taking college level math, the other is an 8th grader here in Seattle who is dyslexic, an ESL student, and stuggles with math, and is only in pre-algebra this year. They are both given a series of trig questions in the math portion. Do you think that those math questions would be a fair assessment of their math capabilities? I sure as heck wouldn't.
Â
We as a nation have come to put so much weight on the results of standardized testing, that most schools do only "teach to the test". The problem with th4e MAP is nobody knows ahead of time wht may or may not be included in the test. In many instances, MAP covers topics that have never been covered in class. Again, not exactly a true "assessment" of what the students are capable of.
Â
We need to MINIMIZE the standardized testing (personally, I believe they only show who is good at taking tests). When I was growing up the teachers were able to evaluate each of their students one-on-one, to know what their strenghts & weaknesses were, and to develop a to help each of them succeed to the best of their ability.
Â
Now, unfortunately, we are adding MORE students to each classroom, taking away instructional time, expecting teachers to deal with "high risk", "special needs", medically fragile, and ESL students all without any additional help or resources. They are human - they can only do so much. Yet, when they ask for more, they are consistantly berated & refused. Everybody wants top notch results - but nobody wants to pay for them. People expect teachers to not only teach, but also to be babysitters, to "enforce" not only homeowrk, but other (home) issues, and to be basically defacto parents.Â
Â
It's a very good thing most teachers love what they do - because we sure as hell do not show them how much they mean by what we pay them. We pay professional atheletes millions of dollars to play a game, yet we pay our teachers, those we entrust our children to, to mold them, educate them, and shape them for the future a tiny frraction of that amoount. I would say our priorities are screwed up.
I think the problem is that the teachers know that the kids aren't going to pass so instead of placing the blame on the students, the students' parents and even themselves..... let's just blame the test. I know the test is not perfect, but if you step back and not nit pick every little flaw, it will does give a fair assessment of what the student has learned.
 @The WA Mama Sounds like you have a canned solution in search of a problem.
 @The WA Mama Your English is poor. In addition, you do not address the complaints of the teachers that are exposing corruption.
Â
@Mark DuPriest I am so sorry my English is not up to your standards Mr. Perfect. I happened to hit enter and since the blog does not allow a person to edit after the fact, I was not able to revise it. I did not address their complaints because I feel their complaints are a smoke screen and that the real issue is that their students are not able to pass the test.
I haven't seen the test so I'm not really sure whether or not they are flawed. But there is a clear ethical problem when the decision maker is a board member of the vendor that is getting a four million dollar contract.
Â
I think the article does both the teachers and the test vendor an injustice by not outlining the other issues that the teachers have. It stated "Garfield teachers give several reasons for their position" but only identified the ethics issue.
Â
Personally I don't see the problem with an annual assessment test, but I do feel that 3 times a year seems a little excessive. It would be nice to see the cost structure associated to the test and the vendor that manages it. To see if a reduced amount of testing would have equated to a lower cost contract.
Although I'm not a fan of standardized tests, there still needs to be some sort of baseline for assessing performance, both of students and teachers. What's frightening to me is how low the standards have fallen. In helping my stepkids with their homework over the years, I've suggested improving their projects in various ways only to get a response of "No, I don't need to do any more on it, this will get an A". And sure enough, they got As. Even though they were turning in what would have barely gotten a C when I was in school (which wasn't that long ago.) There's a reason why "picture only" instructions at places like McDonald's are proliferating - our schools are churning out a barely, BARELY literate workforce. Go stand outside when Renton High School lets out for the day. It will make you fear for the future.
What these teachers are really saying is these test are too white for the black children. These teachers should all be fired if they do not conform to the standards set by the State.
 @Telman@ Sounds like you also have a canned solution looking for a problem to apply it to - like hammering a square peg into a round hole: "See? It FITS!!!"
@Telman@ Why fire them? This is NOT a state mandated test.
The tests are a stupid expensive idea that was signed onto by the teachers union. This teacher no doubt has good objections but doesn't get to pick and choose which test to administer. She should take it up with her union. She thinks she is talking truth to power but the power that most concerns her would be her own union. Not a very classy decision.
 @lin Maybe not the union. More likely the administration, since they are the ones who budgeted the $$$$$$$$$$$$ to buy the tests.
The teachers don't want standardized testing because it defines their performance more than the students.
 @al_wa Sort of like Crash Test Dummies define driver comfort and the infamous "Fahrvergnügen"?Â
@al_wa Exactly!
This comment has been deleted
If the public knew the actual cost of these tests and how much time is spent on them, well, Tim Eyman could pass an initiative banning them by about 90%.
"The teachers say the test -- which they call they call it a waste of time, money and..."
Â
Reporters and editors are apparently Garfield alumni.
Standardized tests should be done away with, except for except for English tests, which it should only be administered to KOMO news writers and proof readers.
@Bellevue Scott That is only funny because you have a typing "stutter" while trashing others English skills.
It's interesting the teachers will walk out because they deem a test as waste of money, but they refuse to address the issue of the waste of money spent on bad teachers. Oh the hipocrasy. Where does the WEA stand on this?
http://tinyurl.com/by2n6cs
Standardized testing should be done away with. It is a waste of time and money. I spent more time covering 'formats' in the classes that I taught instead of teaching actual material, as per request of the high school administration. My course was not material that was tested on these exams, so it was considered 'extra time' in which the students could practice using the format of the test instead of learning a secondary language. Ridiculous. As a teacher, I understand that I need to constantly try new teaching methods in order to reach my students. I know I can't save them all, but I can try! Teaching for these irrelevant tests does nothing but give a false sense of assurance to the admins while students continue to fail in basic skills.
I do not agree with standardized testing, not all people learn things the same way.
Â
We need to allow kids to learn in different ways, and allow teachers to teach different ways.
Â
I am a sit and listen to a lecture person, some learn other ways.
Â
Hell, if kids actually stay in school, give them options to learn and give the teachers the latitude to teach it to fit the students.
Â
You may be surprised.Â
@Melissa Angevine  yeah , and if they bother to show up and have at least 50% attendance, lets move them on to the next grade too !   Cmon , everyone gets a trophy ! No losers here !    Not how real life works.
 @sportbuff01 @Melissa Angevine No, we flunk the star quarterback because he can't kick a field goal for nothing - and can't block either!
tests?  Go look at "dumbing down: then and now" at minding the campus dot com. Shows an 1895 fifth grade matriculation requirement.  I"d question the ability of half  the first year college students now to answer half of the questions.  I don't have the answers memorized, and I have well over four years college. http://www.mindingthecampus.com/forum/2008/04/then_and_now.html
@Popi Oso Actually this wasn't a test for or of 8th grade. It was a test for applicants, possibly meaning for teacher(s) positions in a number of locals in and around this area. Yes, it's an orriganl test. Just whom it is for has been altered.
 @Popi Oso Ha crazy, "bushels of hay... "  I am almost a professional student with over 10 years of university studies and I would do poorly on this test, yet I build and maintain complex web systems; go figure...Â
They are right, standardized tests ARE useless, especially when administered in an ethnically diverse environment. Â I studied this in college - some kids will literally not understand some of the questions themselves because they may be immigrants/English second language, some may have learning disabilities, some may just test poorly, some will not care. Â There are many factors not taken into account for 'standardized' tests and they do NOT provide a picture of how well a district is doing. Â
 @Doxie Yes, how about children with dyslexia?
 @Thunder Exactly.  Or kids raised in a home with parents who don't look like the writers of the test.  So many factors.
Actually, these teachers are probably correct that the test is completely useless, expensive and disruptive, and tends to lead to false conclusions about student progress and learning.
For a real eye-opener, check out the video DVD entitled "The Finland phenomenon : inside the world's most surprising school system" (available from King County Library, call # "DVD 370.94897 FIN" - but NOT from Seattle Public Library!) and watch it. Find out about the acknowledged BEST school system in the WORLD - and be surprised by what is the same and what is very different. For example, Finnish teachers earn about what American teachers do and school budgets are similar or smaller, but Finnish students do very little homework and take very few tests... at all... Yet Finnish students come away from high school at a level akin to American college graduates.
America's school system and school districts have got a LOT to learn.
or you could watch it on youtube
 @FED__UP I think only a trailer is posted there - the whole video is ~1 hour.
Academia has so many goofy ideas and poorly executed concepts that both students and parents owe it to themselves to be vigilant and proactive and speak up about things. If these teachers view the test that strongly then the district should hear them out.Â
One of MANY reasons why we've chosen to homeschool our children.Â
This comment has been deleted
 @Common Sense Slightly disturbing that that's the first thing you think of, even if it was meant as a joke.Â
 @Common Sense This is a COMPLETELY uncalled for statement. You clearly have no 'common sense' if you think that what you have said to LunchWithABear is in anyway acceptable. Usually those who are accusing others about something like this are the ones who are doing it...I am a teacher and there are some kids who would succeed far better in school if they were home-schooled. If I ever have kids, I would love to have them learn relevant topics from me and from a tutor, rather than listen to a teacher send unruly kids in and out of class to detention all day.
 @SouthofSeattle   Thank you. I am not against public schools at all. My mom's a wonderful teacher. For our family, however, we feel that homeschooling is the best option. I love that we can develop a curriculum for each of our kids based on their own unique learning styles. I love that they can get the one on one instruction they need to better grasp new concepts. I love that we can speed up or slow down as needed. And yes, I do love that we can avoid some of the negative influences they'd be exposed to in a public school classroom.  Most teachers I know would love to be able to do these things for each of their students, but it's just not possible. Some parents don't want to, can't or shouldn't take on the responsibility of educating their children at home, but under the right circumstances it can be a great option.Â