Inslee, senators differ on climate proposal
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Testifying before a state House committee, Gov. Jay Inslee insisted that Washington state is poised to lead the fight against climate change and urged lawmakers to help him move quickly on the issue.
In the wake of changes to his inaugural climate change bill made in the Republican-controlled state Senate, Inslee advocated Tuesday for his measure in the House Environment Committee. Inslee pushed for his plan to hire an outside group to advise state leaders on how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while increasing the share of energy created in Washington state. The group's report, due in October, would evaluate how other states and countries are addressing climate change.
"This is an issue about pollution, plain and simple," Inslee said, referring to the discharge of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.
Inslee pitched the same bill to the Senate Energy, Environment and Telecommunications Committee in February. That committee passed an amended version of the bill after removing language in its intent section about Washington's vulnerability to climate change and the benefits of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
The Senate version of the bill would also expand the scope of the group's study to include Washington state's efforts to cut carbon emissions - including cleaner car and fuel standards, phasing out coal power and adoption of green building rules - and to analyze their costs and benefits. Additionally, it would limit the governor's role in shaping those recommendations into legislation.
After further revisions, that measure passed the Senate Ways and Means Committee last week.
"We don't want to talk in absolutes in terms of science," said Republican Sen. Doug Ericksen of Whatcom County, chairman of the Energy, Environment and Telecommunications Committee, in explaining the changes to the intent language. "I'm not comfortable saying science is conclusive on any issue, because the science is always changing."
Brandon Houskeeper, a lobbyist for the Association of Washington Business, said his organization has concerns about Inslee's proposal but supports the current Senate version of the bill.
"We've adopted all these policies," Houskeeper said. "What are their impacts?"
Inslee lauded the Legislature and former Gov. Chris Gregoire for setting a target in 2008 to reduce the state's greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Passing his measure, Inslee said, would help provide the tools to meet that goal.
"We're not supportive of the changes they've made in the Senate," said Jaime Smith, a spokeswoman for the governor. "The governor will be talking to them more to see if we can come to an agreement on bill language."
Inslee added that Washington state has a duty to tackle the challenges of climate change even if others fail to do so.
Addressing a concern from Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy, on the utility of Washington state taking action on climate change when China's increasingly carbon-emitting ways would dwarf those efforts, Inslee allowed that "the Chinese are people of incredible mercantile ability" and said that he saw the country as a prime market for Washington state's eco-friendly products.
In the wake of changes to his inaugural climate change bill made in the Republican-controlled state Senate, Inslee advocated Tuesday for his measure in the House Environment Committee. Inslee pushed for his plan to hire an outside group to advise state leaders on how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while increasing the share of energy created in Washington state. The group's report, due in October, would evaluate how other states and countries are addressing climate change.
"This is an issue about pollution, plain and simple," Inslee said, referring to the discharge of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.
Inslee pitched the same bill to the Senate Energy, Environment and Telecommunications Committee in February. That committee passed an amended version of the bill after removing language in its intent section about Washington's vulnerability to climate change and the benefits of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
The Senate version of the bill would also expand the scope of the group's study to include Washington state's efforts to cut carbon emissions - including cleaner car and fuel standards, phasing out coal power and adoption of green building rules - and to analyze their costs and benefits. Additionally, it would limit the governor's role in shaping those recommendations into legislation.
After further revisions, that measure passed the Senate Ways and Means Committee last week.
"We don't want to talk in absolutes in terms of science," said Republican Sen. Doug Ericksen of Whatcom County, chairman of the Energy, Environment and Telecommunications Committee, in explaining the changes to the intent language. "I'm not comfortable saying science is conclusive on any issue, because the science is always changing."
Brandon Houskeeper, a lobbyist for the Association of Washington Business, said his organization has concerns about Inslee's proposal but supports the current Senate version of the bill.
"We've adopted all these policies," Houskeeper said. "What are their impacts?"
Inslee lauded the Legislature and former Gov. Chris Gregoire for setting a target in 2008 to reduce the state's greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Passing his measure, Inslee said, would help provide the tools to meet that goal.
"We're not supportive of the changes they've made in the Senate," said Jaime Smith, a spokeswoman for the governor. "The governor will be talking to them more to see if we can come to an agreement on bill language."
Inslee added that Washington state has a duty to tackle the challenges of climate change even if others fail to do so.
Addressing a concern from Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy, on the utility of Washington state taking action on climate change when China's increasingly carbon-emitting ways would dwarf those efforts, Inslee allowed that "the Chinese are people of incredible mercantile ability" and said that he saw the country as a prime market for Washington state's eco-friendly products.
Would be great if Gov Inslee could point us to the research which proves catastrophic climate change due to human emissions of greenhouse gases. I've been following the discussion for years and haven't seen anything except what MIGHT happen IF...
Shouldn't they start working on the most important issue, the budget?
One might assume that measures the State takes regarding âclimate changeâ are intended to reduce future temperature as that is how the issue has been framed. I hope the advisers will explain how much these efforts will lower the temperature and when. Maybe, too, how much will this cost?
All this is going to do is set Wa. State up to loose more jobs and send any chance of manufacturing here away from the state. We simply do not have the technology to get rid of fossil fuels completely. 32% of the energy in this state comes from coal and over the years government regulations have made coal far more enviornmentally friendly than it was years ago. We have the resources in this country to take care of ourselves and yet all of our resourses are either untapped or sent overseas. This makes no sense.
This comment has been deleted
A recent Pudget Sound Energy report.
 "the Chinese are people of incredible mercantile ability" and said that he saw the country as a prime market for Washington state's eco-friendly products.
Like China is going to buy washington states products other than apples.. What will happen, is they will buy a couple, and just pirate them... duplicate them and use them .. meanwile hosing us here..
This is just another way for the government to control everything..  People need to look up and read "Agenda 21" it is an interesting read..
If you really believe in the unproven hypothesis of AGW (Annthropogenic Global Warming) and you do not support nuclear energy then you are just a poser.
@Iconoclast This AGW nonsense has nothing to do with energy production. It is a scam for growing government and higher taxes. Â
*(citation needed)