Mired in lawsuits, trampoline park files for bankruptcy
»Play Video
BELLEVUE, Wash. -- After fighting lawsuits over broken bones and other injuries, a local trampoline park is now fighting creditors in bankruptcy court.
Bellevue's Sky High Sports filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this week. The company says it owns various creditors hundreds of thousands of dollars and is asking the courts for bankruptcy protection to reorganize.
The indoor trampoline park has fought dozens of lawsuits from people who've been injured and claimed the company was negligent.
"Nothing's going to change from a business standpoint. -- great customer service, everything like that. Nothing's going to change with that," said Sky High employee Josh Gallant.
Attorney Sim Osborn represents about 20 families who filed suit against the company.
"You can't offer great customer service with a product that continues to injure small children," Osborn said. "We have people who have broken their legs in eight-to-nine places. We have a broke hip. We have young man who is so very luck to be alive. He broke his neck at C1 and C2."
An X-ray shows the pin doctors inserted in that teenager's neck to repair his broken neck.
"I think a lot of people are not aware of the danger," Osborn said.
A number of those lawsuits have already been settled, and this week's filing does not affect those clients getting paid because Sky High's insurance company paid those claims.
The filing does, however, affect lawsuits that are still pending.
The company's attorney issued a statement saying it's restructuring its finances and insurance requirements. Court documents show the company currently owes more than $250,000 to insurance companies.
"The more important thing is will they will be able to get insurance or will they keep paying their insurance?" Osborn said.
Bellevue's Sky High Sports filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this week. The company says it owns various creditors hundreds of thousands of dollars and is asking the courts for bankruptcy protection to reorganize.
The indoor trampoline park has fought dozens of lawsuits from people who've been injured and claimed the company was negligent.
"Nothing's going to change from a business standpoint. -- great customer service, everything like that. Nothing's going to change with that," said Sky High employee Josh Gallant.
Attorney Sim Osborn represents about 20 families who filed suit against the company.
"You can't offer great customer service with a product that continues to injure small children," Osborn said. "We have people who have broken their legs in eight-to-nine places. We have a broke hip. We have young man who is so very luck to be alive. He broke his neck at C1 and C2."
An X-ray shows the pin doctors inserted in that teenager's neck to repair his broken neck.
"I think a lot of people are not aware of the danger," Osborn said.
A number of those lawsuits have already been settled, and this week's filing does not affect those clients getting paid because Sky High's insurance company paid those claims.
The filing does, however, affect lawsuits that are still pending.
The company's attorney issued a statement saying it's restructuring its finances and insurance requirements. Court documents show the company currently owes more than $250,000 to insurance companies.
"The more important thing is will they will be able to get insurance or will they keep paying their insurance?" Osborn said.
Seriously people? This is one of the funnest places on earth to take your children - to PLAY. '
Â
You all remember PLAY, right? Where you have fun. You expend energy. You exert enthusiam and physical exercise? And I mean you encourage your kids to do so.Â
Â
Goodness - people are suing instead of taking their kids to Skyhigh? Â We can't risk injury now - right? Those parents suing this business because of injuries - need to be shamed. Better to just plop their kids behind a computer screen and encourage them to zone out klling zombies instead. That'll better serve kids needs. And prepare them for real life, I guess. And keep them from being - gulp - injured. Sheez.....
Â
What a shame. What a shame. Shame. Shame! Skyhigh - I am so sorry you have been cruelly targetted like this.Â
The University of Alabama National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center put the lifetime care cost for quadriplegia at $1.35 million in March 2002, for those injured at 25 years of age. Quadriplegia is a severe injury sometimes caused by trampolining. Other injuries, involving significant medical bills, are more common to trampolining. Many Americans are uninsured when they, or their children, suffer injuries at trampoline parks. The taxpayer is left to pay for the exorbitant cost of medical treatment for the parent, or their child, for the day at the trampoline park. At the same time, the business that is aware of the of the true extent and frequency of injuries, previously had its defense lawyers draft a waiver that generally describes what might happen to clients.  SkyHigh's waiver is on its website. It states, in part,  that you can suffer sprains, twists, serious injury. Should it tell the consumer more, or is that enough? Is the consumer a single mother with less than a high school education, or a well-educated actuarial risk analyzer for Fortune 500 company? Should it matter? Should the waiver tell the consumer that other customers have previously suffered significant vertebral fracture, permanent nerve damage, lacerated tongues, broken teeth, and so on? Should the waiver state what the actual mathematical risk (ie, % chance) is based on previous operation? Should the business that possesses greater specific knowledge, and profits from the activity, not be held accountable for their superiority of knowledge and their decision not to disclose it fully as they could? Is it fair that the business knows that it will generate a certain statistical amount of significantly injured customers every year without having to pay any part of their medical bills and pass the obligation for payment on to the taxpayer? Are taxpayers at work right now okay with the idea that they may be subsidizing trampoline Park injuries, some of which may be catastrophic?
Â
Or should a damage waiver, however written, always prevail? If so, shouldn't this permit an enterprising person to purchase 10 Costco trampolines, secure them - as conscientiously as possible - Â together, and open a trampoline park requiring a waiver before participation?
Â
If the business mandated the purchase of specific injury insurance by clients prior to trampolining, would its demographic client still be able to afford it? Or, would it be a better corporate business model for a Park to pass the cost of insurance on to unwitting taxpayers because a form waiver was signed?
Â
To relieve the taxpayer,"pay-as-you-go" dangerous event insurance is a possible. It is commonly used at European ski hills for example. It's just how those countries decided to deal with the inevitability of serious injuries, significant medical bills, and the need to pay for them.
Â
If America does not move to a system like "pay-as-you-go insurance" are Americans willing and financially capable of continuing to let businesses offering thrill v. injury excitement profit at the expense of taxpayers and less-sophisticated consumers who, by the fact of actual numerous undisclosed serious injuries alone, may not have been able accurately assessed the true risk to themselves or their kids?
Â
In the meantime, shouldn't we be glad we have a justice system that permits sophisticated businesses and profiteers to be held accountable by American jurors for what  they may have known, and may have decided not to disclose, in the interests of making money free from the true cost to society?
Â
Â
I think "sky high" is a good name. After all, that's what their new insurance policy will be. Seriously though, do these yo-yo's not understand that it's a trampoline? Yeah, it's dangerous. If you want safety, stay in the bouncy house. (not especially safe either, but you get my point.) I just don't see where you get a lawsuit. You jump, you get hurt, your problem. Unless of course you can show that the equipment is defective or there is some policy problem like too many people at a time etc. Otherwise, it's just playing the litigation lottery.
Good job editing Komo! "The company says it owns various creditors hundreds of thousands of dollars and is asking the courts for bankruptcy protection to reorganize."
I can see ambulance chasing lawyers parked outside just waiting. Duh! I go to a facility like this knowing the risk. If I get hurt it's my problem.
 @dacaptain yeah, those lawyers are jumping for joy... sky high!
I find it absolutely ludicrous that a parent would willingly allow their child to go to Sky-High, sign the waivers and then sue because their kid got hurt. You gave them permission to go jumping around on trampolines, which are inherently dangerous. More so if your kid is a risk taker. Did you sue Huffy when little Timmy fell off his bike? Are you going to sue Ford when Susie rear ends someone? No. So why sue a business when it was you who put your child in harm's way? Take responsibility for your actions, don't try to pawn them off on someone else.
I have been to Sky High Sports with teens and had a great time. I read the entire release form and signed it for myself and my kids. It was obvious to me from the waiver and from observing the facility that serious injuries were possible. (At 47 years old, I expect I was at greatest risk!) The worst behavior I observed was that of parents of young children who seemed clueless of the risks that their children posed to themselves and others. Young children cannot grasp the risks or rules. Â When I was there, the staff did a good job of supervising, frequently rolling their eyes as they had to remind people of the most basic safety rules. It is a tedious and thankless job.Â
Â
Some people should never leave the safety of their own sofas, where they can sue the airlines and FAA if a chunk of ice falls through the roof.Â
Most people are comfortable with a certain amount of risk. You make cars safer and easier to drive and what do people do? They text and drive. Then when something happens they look for somebody to blame. Same thing. Cap attorney fees at 5 percent of the settlement and things will improve overnight.
 @MajorSkeptic Your invitation is intriguing. Afghanistan is an example of a country with no attorney fees, and a willingness to accept more risk in many ways. However, Afghanistan may not be an overnight improvement to the American lifestyle. Also, perhaps it's not fair to pick Afghanistan as an example, b/c it is war torn and occupied by more terrorists (per capita) than the US. But what country out there limits attorneys fees at 5%, and is better off? And, if such a country exists, why are Americans not immigrating to it in newsworthy numbers? Lists purporting to contain places "better than America" to live in, have many social-democratic states on them.  The places listed all have attorneys fees greater than 5%.  For example, check out this list out: http://www.jasica.in/2011/03/top-10-countries-to-migrate-in-world.html. Switzerland is much higher than the United States on most  "great places to live" lists. Imagine paying a Swiss attorney fee. It may not be a rough alternative to stay in the US and pay market-dictated attorney's fees (as much as it is disliked) and attempt to thrive in one of the freest capitalist nations in history.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Waivers are legally valid only if knowingly and intelligently signed. Usually businesses that offer an element of danger or risk as part of the customer experience will require a signed injury waiver. Â However, waivers are frequently offered in contexts that do not permit knowledge and understanding of everything being waived. For example, a injury waivers are often in smaller font and contained on the backside of a fee agreement or other document. The waivers themselves are sometimes called "adhesion contracts" because they attempt to stick to the consumer, without the consumer being as aware of the risks as the vendor. An adult at a Trampoline Park may not be in a good position to knowingly and intelligently waive the legal rights of children anxious to trampoline jump at a birthday party. Â The context of how these documents are signed in order to determine their validity has been tasked to a jury of our peers in individual cases, such as this one.
Â
Sometimes business offer goods or services that are so dangerous that they cannot operate profitably if they fully disclose the extent of the danger before a consumer makes a choice. Â It's a balancing act for sure, but we may very likely live in the safest nation in history - while still being free to test the limits of wild crazy fun v. sobering accountability.
 @Good Hands People Well, I'm not sure we live in the safest nation in history. Per capita, more people below the age of 50 die in the U.S. for non-medical reasons, i.e. violent crime, automobile accidents, etc., than many other industrialized countries. This is, in large part, the reason why the average life expectancy of Americans is lower than a number of these other countries.
Why didn't the park require patrons to sign an Accident Waiver or Release of Liability form outlining the dangers of using the park?
 @Tattooed_Angel They do require you to sign a waiver. In fact anyone who will be on the trampolines needs to have a waiver signed and if's a birthday party group there, then the parents of the children going need to have a signed waiver not just the parents bringing the children to the location. Wondering how long it will take for other businesses like this to get sued. There is iFly in Tukwila, they require you to sign a waiver but I bet people will still sue if they injure themselves.Â
Cowabunga, if Homer J Simpson taught us anything, it's "tramampolenes" are a cursed bad idea. The kid down the street had one, he and his pal were jumping on it at the same time, having great fun. That is until he was in the downward phase of the trampoline fun, another kid was in the upward phase when they crashed together. The result was stitches in an almost severed tongue.
There are enough other parks out there that are much better at managing. I would recommend trying one! And tell your kids no flipping. That's where most of the injuries happened when we were there. Dodgeball is the best!
 @buggy BOMBARDMENT, BOMBARDMENT, BOMBARDMENT!
is there really a problem here? Or, isn't this just a demonstration of a healthy democratic, capitalistic, society functioning properly? A novel dangerous activity (angled trampolining with several participants) posing the legitimate questions of whether it is too dangerous, and whether the activity even if considered too dangerous can be waived in writing by an adult, or an adult on behalf of a child?
Â
Dynamite went through the same process of consideration. Within the last century, some Americans became upset that they could not freely purchase sticks of dynamite for their own use. Eventually, only qualified buyers could purchase TNT and even they were held to a standard of strict liability, the highest standard of all. It meant that anyone using dynamite would be automatically liable for any damage caused by its use.
Â
Remember the tobacco lawsuits? Initially, many people were stupefied that someone could file a lawsuit because they harmed themselves by smoking cigarettes. Then the Marlboro Man movie came out, and big tobacco was exposed for hiding dangers it knowingly peddled to the nation. The states recovered multi-millions for all those people with emphysema without insurance, in hospital beds paid for by taxpayers. Â One can still smoke but the warning labels are larger, and the purchase cost is higher to pay for cancer treatment needed by uninsured smokers, and other lung damage. Â Are we a nation of stupid wimps, or intelligent thoughtful neighbors that use the rule of law for our mutual benefit?
Â
Remember dogs when you were a kid? They'd run around everywhere without a leash, even the dangerous breeds. Lots of people got bitten, sometimes quite savagely, and sometimes they were children. Not so much anymore. They've moved dangerous breeds into the strict liability category, right beside dynamite, in some states. The city of Yakima, for example, recently outlawed dangerous breeds inside the city limits unless special containment and handling procedures were followed. There were just too many serious maulings, they decided.
Â
A "trampoline attraction" is not dynamite or cigarettes, or a dangerous breed. Â However,I am glad that we live in America where the merits, and dangers, of commercial activities resulting in serious injury can be discussed and decided upon at jury trial.
@Good Hands People Perhaps we could just try to prevent people from harming themselves in every possible way. Like maybe no one should drive a car because they might injure themselves or someone else. Perhaps we shouldn't allow roofs on houses because someone might slip off the roof while maintaining it or building it. Perhaps we shouldn't allow trains because someone might go through a train crossing and get killed by a train. There is a point at which people need to take responsibilty for their own well being because there are lots of ways on a daily basis a person can get injured. We don't need anything more than to take responsibility for our own choices and some good old fashioned common sense.
 @Jatok  @Good Dear Jatok:  I agree that there is a point at which people need to take responsibility for their own well-being, and most states agree too by having enacted "comparative liability" laws. Under these laws, the facts of each case (motor vehicle collisions, railroad crossing injuries, fall-protection/roofing injury cases and others) are carefully weighed by jurors and accountability may be divided between the parties to the dispute. Liability must total 100%.  However, by way of example, a jury may decide that the defendant is 95% at fault, and the plaintiff is 5% at fault. Of course, it depends on the facts of each case.  The facts are considered and weighed by jurors who are specifically instructed by the court to use "common sense" as part of their decision-making process.
@Good Hands People @Good These things shouldn't end up in court to begin with. These people CHOOSE to do this activity. There is a certain amount of danger and it's not like the company set it up with the intention of harming someone. If the company was negligent that would be a different story. The bottom line is that if you CHOOSE to do something inspite of the fact that you could get injured then you need to take responsibility for the consequences. We are a lawsuit happy society and once something happens we want someone besides ourselves to take responsibility (preferably someone with deep pockets).
I'm really surprised that the legal disclaimer you sign as you enter doesn't cover all this. They say, "We are not liable". But, somehow these signers actually win liable suits. Sad.
@Gracy Pistol -- They win if they can prove negligence. Regardless what you sign, if the company is negligent, they are at fault.Â
I hope a judge dismisses this- trampolining carries risk.
Â
Heck, if  I were a parent and my kid broke their leg I'd tell my kid to be more careful, not sue the place.
It's sad it has turned into a sue happy nation, where really, only the atty profits.
Trampoline Ban anyone?
If people were so afraid of getting hurt, then DON'T GO! Oh My God! That is the risk you take in going there. Any moron with half a brain can see that. The company should not be held liable because people choose to partake in the activity. If I were that company I would counter-sue these bozos to cover all legal fees.
Thats so dangerous I dont get why they were even allowed to open it to begin with. It looks fun but guitar is fun and you wont break your neck.
 @Andy Pollow I broke my neck once playing the guitar.  Had to throw the thing away.
 @JustSayin Very good. Some of these comments are true - fast guitar playin can cause finger and wrist injuries. I like snow boarding alot and you can get hurt doin that too. I just got freaked when I saw people flippin around upside down. It looks too dangerous.
 @Andy Pollow Not allowed? Good grief, are you planning to ban bicycles? Motorcycles? Mountain trails? Skiing? Crossfit? Skydiving?
Â
Maybe you are too much of a child to be allowed to choose your activities but please do not project that immaturity upon others.
 @Andy Pollow Nobody forced anyone to go !!! Good grief, people can break a leg getting out of bed. Just why is it always somebody else who's at fault ?? Bet a few buck will make them feel so much better.
I'm surprised they got insurance coverage in the first place in the nanny state..
People should be aware that signing waivers for your children's dangerous activities is a legal ILLUSION. Your minor child can not sign a contract or waive their legal rights. Guess what? YOU CAN'T SIGN SOMEONE ELSE'S RIGHTS AWAY EITHER. Even your childs. If a business wants you to sign something, sign it. It in no way protects them from a lawsuit. There is no legal document that can do so. Ask any attorney. That said, anyone that gets into these types of business' are freaking morons. Thank god none of them ever last very long. I remember having lunch one day at the bike shop in Renton. Cool view from the cafe of 4 year olds flipping quads on a dirt track. Notice that didn't last long. Kind of hard to swallow that Rueben sandwich when the ambulance is carting a kid off on a backboard. Never to young to get em hooked on adrenaline, eh? Oh look, that's so cute...........
 @Kevin Larson so then the company should counter-sue because the parents are just as liable in the injuries their children suffer by allowing those children to do the activity.It is stupid that the business offers a decent way to exercise and have fun and some kids (who were probably not following the rules) got injured and sued.
Â
It would be like driving a car, hitting a wall and then suing Ford because they made a dangerous product.
To the owners ,lawsuits over an obvious danger is what happens in a Progressive democrat area. I am sure some are suing over a broken toe nail or finger nail. progressives only want to force you to do what they want no personal responsibility at all. No accountability for the decisions one makes it is always blame someone else and sue.Â
Â
It has nothing to do with progressives or democrats. I grew up in the 90s in TN and every parent wouldn't let other kids on their trampoline because it was just as sue happy there.
@quidproquo I DO NOT let any child on our trampoline except mine. We had some kids from the neighborhood sneak into our yard (because I would not let them play on it) and were jumping on it. The neighbor next door knew we were not home and called the cops on them (they were like 8-10 yrs old) Scared the living bleep out of them. Served them right though. The cops even put them in their car and drove them home to their parents. Wish I could have seen their faces.
What a shame. My kids loved that place.
Â
Isn't it time we stopped allowing law suits for things like this?! When you go you sign a form that says you take liability for your own action. The trend in allowing these lawsuits means that one day we'll have no skiing, snowboarding, rafting, or anything else that might cause the slightest injury.
Warning life is dangerous leaving your house can increase the already risky chances you have taken by living. Â Using a tool like a trampoline to increase your ability to jump will also increase your ability to be hurt or killed. Â What goes up must come down, Â go up higher come down harder. Â Using a car to increase the speed at which you travel is also more dangerous than walking or siting still. Â If you walk into this place and can't see the dangers maybe you should be happy for how long you have lasted on this earth.
This was a great outlet for the kids too bad this is a sue happy country.
I would not take my kids to a place like this- only because I worry about what others would be doing when backs are turned. If properly managed this place looks like it would be a LOT of fun BUT only for a handful of kids at a time. When they had the bouncehouse place at the Auburn Mall I would take the smaller kids to play once in a while, they loved it- but again I refused to go when there were a bunch of kids, after all they get to having fun and running and playing and next thing you knw you are in the ER while your child is getting a cast put on. As far as people sueing- REALLY I mean SERIOUSLY? you were warned, you signed a waiver saying you knew injuries could occur- quit looking for a free payday and WORK for what you want.Â
@MomOf2 Of - if properly managed/supervised/controlled....beyond fun. An absolute scream of a good time. That was my our first trip there. But add enough people/kids in the area at one time...have workers supervise who arne't really interested in supervising...and suddenly you have a total mess. There are probably places like this out there that do a great job of keeping the environment sufficiently controlled that it is ok. What I saw at this place though was far from controlled.
I was a gymnast growing up. We learned that trampolines are not toys. They can be extremely dangerous if not used correctly. We were not even allowed on without spotters on all 4 sides, & only one at a time. And we were well trained athletes. I saw many a gymnast fly off that very large, free-standing trampoline.
Â
These places (we have one near us: Absolute Air) have alleviated some of the dangers due to them not having free-standing trampolines, therefore people can not fly 'off'' and they have spotters in all areas.
Â
My youngest son has gone a few times and had a blast. I know the risks and have made an informed decision. Same goes for snowboarding, biking, boxing, etc. all the things he does.
Â
My point here is: If you go to one of these places, you are unwise if you do not know what the risks are. Do some research before you decide if the fun is worth the risk.
Â
Then take the responsibility for the decision you make!
Â
I can't stand sue-happy leaches.
Am I the only one who looks at the above picture and sees nothing but money hungry lawyers lining up? This was a bad business model in our sue happy society! Even if everyone signs waivers, lawyers are going to be in the wings waiting.Â
This is just ridiculous. Everyone that goes to that place specifically signs a waiver sheet that specifically says it is a dangerous place and you play at your own risk. Then people try to do stupid tricks because they want to show off despite the warnings, break their necks, and go blame someone else. Give it a break. You notice how careful the attorney is - he starts by saying "little kids," get injured all the time....but then when he talks about the serious injuries like breaking legs in 8 places and breaking your C1-C2, it is "people," and a "young man." - people that are old enough to know better but are stupid anyways and want a business that provides a fun place for kids to pay for their stupidity. The place does everything it can to prevent injuries - it has rules that are enforced by floor staff, it has a waiver, it has signs all over the place stating the danger and outlining the rules. This is so sad that we've come to this.Â
I love this place, though I definitely wouldn't have a kids party there. It's great, but setting little kids loose in a room full of trampolines, even with all of the rules in place, isn't a great idea. I'm not sure them doing kids' parties is a great idea, and think the parents had some questionable judgement choosing that location, but hopefully they can make it through. Their exercise classes are great and I will definitely miss them if they go.
Too bad. One of the best places around for active kids to blow off steam.Â
Nation of sissies.
Not surprised. My daughter went twice. After I saw how they operated the place, I refused to let her go again. the concept is nice enough but the way they operate - essentially mayhem - sets you up for all sorts of injuries. A little 8 year old dam near undercut my daughter as she was in the air as he went scooting from one tramp section to another.
Â
Trampolines are really fun but they carry risks and letting small kids run around freely in and around other kids is just a dumb idea.Â
 @NBA_Is_Useless They have an area on the side specifically for younger kids.
@IronWafflez Not when I was there
 @NBA_Is_Useless OK, but personally I will miss it because I have two very very active boys and this was a great outlet for them. Much better than sitting on the couch playing video games. There are too few activities like this left...
@quidproquo And you'll note, that is EXACTLY what I did. And that's how I know the way they ran the place created stupid risks. And why I didn't let my daughter return. A really stupid operational model. It works with a few kids. It works with educated disciplined careful kids. It works with tight supervision. But fail on any of those and you suddenly have an environment where people doing the right thing end up hurt because of others in the area who are not doing the right thing. However...I couldn't dive in front of a stupid 7 year old under cutting someone on a tramp. I wasn't psychic. Maybe you are. I"m not.
 @NBA_Is_Useless  It's almost like they expect the parents to watch their own children.
@Shawn Lee Thanks for sharing your thought on my daughter. But that wasn't the point of the post. It was to illustrate the problems with how they operate. Properly managed and supervised, the place would be great. What I saw there? Neither. Chaos in a trampoline area leads to lots of unnecessary and stupid injuries. And lawsuits. Do you understand my point now?
 @NBA_Is_Useless So why don't you as the parent find this area and take your kid there? Wow, parental responsibility! Who would have thunk?
Problems arise when they are not busy and let some smaller kids out, and then a swarm of disrespectful older kids come flailing into the area. This is definitely a problem with managing the facility. If there is a group of small kids using the main area (because there is not enough staff to open the kids area), then they need to get them segregated before allowing more to enter that area.
Â
I've been there with a group of 3-4 yo kids with very attentive parents, and had to be defender when others arrived.  I've also been there at 9pm with a wild 3 year old (bouncing off the walls at home, so why not go to a place where he could?) and insisted they open the kid area for us.(they did).
Â
what I see is that the staff is very young, and not experienced to be an authority to control the guests. Its probably not a high pay job, and many probably like the place as a guest as well, with all their friends are out playing while they work. If they had some drill-sergeant proctors out there keeping things sane, then it would be safer, but also probably less fun.
Â
So, big tip for them as they restructure, restructure the rules too: crack down on how many people are out at once, monitor age range segregation, and give anyone that is reckless 5 minutes in a penalty box.
@IronWafflez Let me try this again.  I WATCHED A 7-8 YEAR OLD KID MISS MY DAUGHTER BY LESS THAN TWO FEET
Â
Clear enough for you? I don't care about the side area....I care about what actually happens out on the trampolines. If anything, you're just proving these guys should be sued...they knew small kids were a risk but failed to keep them out of the way.
Â
Again - tramps are fun but carry risks and allowing people to freely mingle like they do is a stupid idea.
 @NBA_Is_Useless  @IronWafflez It's on the side close to the snack bar.Â