Prosecutors ask for death penalty court-martial against Bales
JOINT BASE LEWIS-McCHORD, Wash. (AP) - Army prosecutors on Tuesday asked an investigative officer to recommend a death penalty court-martial for a staff sergeant accused of killing 16 Afghan villagers in a predawn rampage, saying that Staff Sgt. Robert Bales committed "heinous and despicable crimes."
Prosecutors made their closing arguments after a week of testimony in the preliminary hearing. Prosecutors say Bales, 39, slipped away from his remote base at Camp Belambay in southern Afghanistan to attack two villages early on March 11. Among the dead were nine children.
The slayings drew such angry protests that the U.S. temporarily halted combat operations in Afghanistan, and it was three weeks before American investigators could reach the crime scenes.
"Terrible, terrible things happened," said prosecutor, Maj. Rob Stelle. "That is clear."
Stelle cited statements Bales made after he was apprehended, saying that they demonstrated "a clear memory of what he had done, and consciousness of wrong-doing."
Several soldiers testified that Bales returned to the base alone just before dawn, covered in blood, and that he made incriminating statements such as, "I thought I was doing the right thing."
An attorney for Bales argued there's not enough information to move forward with the court-martial.
"There are a number of questions that have not been answered so far in this investigation," attorney Emma Scanlan told the investigating officer overseeing the preliminary hearing.
Scanlan said that it's still unknown what Bales' state of mind was the evening of the killings.
An Army criminal investigations command special agent had testified last week that Bales tested positive for steroids three days after the killings, and other soldiers testified that Bales had been drinking the evening of the massacre.
"We've heard that Sgt. Bales was lucid, coherent and responsive," Scanlan said in her closing argument. "We don't know what it means to be on alcohol, steroids and sleeping aids."
The investigating officer said Tuesday that he would have a written recommendation by the end of the week, but that is just the start of the process. That recommendation goes next to the brigade command, and the ultimate decision would be made by the three-star general on the base. There's no clear sense of how long that could take before a decision is reached on whether to proceed to a court-martial trial.
If a court-martial takes place, it will be held at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, the Washington state base south of Seattle, and witnesses will be flown in from Afghanistan.
The military hasn't executed a service member since 1961, and none of the six men on death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., today were convicted for atrocities against foreign civilians. All of their crimes involved the killing of U.S. civilians or fellow service members.
In the most recent high-profile case at Joint Base Lewis-McChord before Bales, the Army did not seek a death penalty court-martial against five soldiers accused of killing three Afghan civilians for sport. In that case, the ringleader was sentenced to life in prison with possibility of parole.
Bales faces 16 counts of premeditated murder and six counts of attempted murder. The preliminary hearing, which began Nov. 5, included nighttime sessions on Friday, Saturday and Sunday for the convenience of the Afghan witnesses. Bales did not testify.
The witnesses included a 7-year-old girl, who described how she hid behind her father when a gunman came to their village that night, how the stranger fired, and how her father died, cursing in pain and anger.
None of the Afghan witnesses were able to identify Bales as the shooter, but other evidence, including tests of the blood on his clothes, implicated him, according to testimony from a DNA expert.
After the hearing concluded, Scanlan spoke with reporters, saying that in addition to questions about Bales' state of mind, there are still questions of whether there were more people involved.
During testimony, a special agent testified that months after the killings, she was able to interview the wife of one of the victims, who recounted having seen two U.S. soldiers. Later, however, the woman's brother-in-law, Mullah Baraan, who was not present at the shootings, testified that the woman says there was only one shooter. The woman herself did not testify.
"We need to know if more than one person was outside that wire," Scanlan said.
Scanlan also raised the issue of post-traumatic stress disorder and brain injury, noting that Bales had received a screening at the traumatic brain injury clinic at Madigan Army Medical Center during a period of time that the center is under investigation for reversing hundreds of PTSD diagnoses of soldiers since 2007.
"We're in the process of investigating that," she said.
When asked if Bales had ever been diagnosed with PTSD, Scanlan said, "I'm not going to answer that right now."
Dan Conway, a military defense lawyer based in New Hampshire, said Tuesday that PTSD must be considered as a factor in the case.
"I think the defense team has an obligation to meet with doctors and determine if PTSD affected Bales' ability to premeditate the murders," Conway said. "It could play a very important role."
Bales' wife, Kari, and her sister, Stephanie Tandberg, met with reporters briefly after the hearings concluded. Tandberg read a statement, saying "we all grieve deeply for the Afghani families who lost their loved ones on March 11, but we must all not rush to judgment."
Last week, the lead prosecutor, Lt. Col. Jay Morse, said on the night of the killings Bales watched a movie about a former CIA agent on a revenge killing spree, with two fellow soldiers, while drinking contraband whiskey. Morse said Bales first attacked one village, Alkozai, returned to the base at Camp Belambay, then headed out again to attack a second village, Najiban. Bales returned to the base covered in blood, Morse said, and his incriminating statements indicate he was "deliberate and methodical."
In the family statement, Tandberg said: "We all want very much to know how, why, and what happened ... Much of the testimony was painful, even heartbreaking, but we are not convinced the government has shown us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about what happened that night ... We know Bob as bright, courageous and honorable, as a man who is a good citizen, soldier, son, husband, father, uncle and sibling. We in Bob's family are proud to stand by him."
Prosecutors made their closing arguments after a week of testimony in the preliminary hearing. Prosecutors say Bales, 39, slipped away from his remote base at Camp Belambay in southern Afghanistan to attack two villages early on March 11. Among the dead were nine children.
The slayings drew such angry protests that the U.S. temporarily halted combat operations in Afghanistan, and it was three weeks before American investigators could reach the crime scenes.
"Terrible, terrible things happened," said prosecutor, Maj. Rob Stelle. "That is clear."
Stelle cited statements Bales made after he was apprehended, saying that they demonstrated "a clear memory of what he had done, and consciousness of wrong-doing."
Several soldiers testified that Bales returned to the base alone just before dawn, covered in blood, and that he made incriminating statements such as, "I thought I was doing the right thing."
An attorney for Bales argued there's not enough information to move forward with the court-martial.
"There are a number of questions that have not been answered so far in this investigation," attorney Emma Scanlan told the investigating officer overseeing the preliminary hearing.
Scanlan said that it's still unknown what Bales' state of mind was the evening of the killings.
An Army criminal investigations command special agent had testified last week that Bales tested positive for steroids three days after the killings, and other soldiers testified that Bales had been drinking the evening of the massacre.
"We've heard that Sgt. Bales was lucid, coherent and responsive," Scanlan said in her closing argument. "We don't know what it means to be on alcohol, steroids and sleeping aids."
The investigating officer said Tuesday that he would have a written recommendation by the end of the week, but that is just the start of the process. That recommendation goes next to the brigade command, and the ultimate decision would be made by the three-star general on the base. There's no clear sense of how long that could take before a decision is reached on whether to proceed to a court-martial trial.
If a court-martial takes place, it will be held at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, the Washington state base south of Seattle, and witnesses will be flown in from Afghanistan.
The military hasn't executed a service member since 1961, and none of the six men on death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., today were convicted for atrocities against foreign civilians. All of their crimes involved the killing of U.S. civilians or fellow service members.
In the most recent high-profile case at Joint Base Lewis-McChord before Bales, the Army did not seek a death penalty court-martial against five soldiers accused of killing three Afghan civilians for sport. In that case, the ringleader was sentenced to life in prison with possibility of parole.
Bales faces 16 counts of premeditated murder and six counts of attempted murder. The preliminary hearing, which began Nov. 5, included nighttime sessions on Friday, Saturday and Sunday for the convenience of the Afghan witnesses. Bales did not testify.
The witnesses included a 7-year-old girl, who described how she hid behind her father when a gunman came to their village that night, how the stranger fired, and how her father died, cursing in pain and anger.
None of the Afghan witnesses were able to identify Bales as the shooter, but other evidence, including tests of the blood on his clothes, implicated him, according to testimony from a DNA expert.
After the hearing concluded, Scanlan spoke with reporters, saying that in addition to questions about Bales' state of mind, there are still questions of whether there were more people involved.
During testimony, a special agent testified that months after the killings, she was able to interview the wife of one of the victims, who recounted having seen two U.S. soldiers. Later, however, the woman's brother-in-law, Mullah Baraan, who was not present at the shootings, testified that the woman says there was only one shooter. The woman herself did not testify.
"We need to know if more than one person was outside that wire," Scanlan said.
Scanlan also raised the issue of post-traumatic stress disorder and brain injury, noting that Bales had received a screening at the traumatic brain injury clinic at Madigan Army Medical Center during a period of time that the center is under investigation for reversing hundreds of PTSD diagnoses of soldiers since 2007.
"We're in the process of investigating that," she said.
When asked if Bales had ever been diagnosed with PTSD, Scanlan said, "I'm not going to answer that right now."
Dan Conway, a military defense lawyer based in New Hampshire, said Tuesday that PTSD must be considered as a factor in the case.
"I think the defense team has an obligation to meet with doctors and determine if PTSD affected Bales' ability to premeditate the murders," Conway said. "It could play a very important role."
Bales' wife, Kari, and her sister, Stephanie Tandberg, met with reporters briefly after the hearings concluded. Tandberg read a statement, saying "we all grieve deeply for the Afghani families who lost their loved ones on March 11, but we must all not rush to judgment."
Last week, the lead prosecutor, Lt. Col. Jay Morse, said on the night of the killings Bales watched a movie about a former CIA agent on a revenge killing spree, with two fellow soldiers, while drinking contraband whiskey. Morse said Bales first attacked one village, Alkozai, returned to the base at Camp Belambay, then headed out again to attack a second village, Najiban. Bales returned to the base covered in blood, Morse said, and his incriminating statements indicate he was "deliberate and methodical."
In the family statement, Tandberg said: "We all want very much to know how, why, and what happened ... Much of the testimony was painful, even heartbreaking, but we are not convinced the government has shown us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about what happened that night ... We know Bob as bright, courageous and honorable, as a man who is a good citizen, soldier, son, husband, father, uncle and sibling. We in Bob's family are proud to stand by him."
I am a veteran who served in combat areas. I do not feel my limited experience in actual combat qualifies me as a combat veteran; however I was involved, and interacted with those who were actually serving in daily combat. I know how things look in the field and how black and white get crossed into shades of grey. We just had some troops get in hot water for pi$$ing on some enemy bodies. I about choked. Thank GOD we did not have cell phones with cameras, wireless internet, and email during earlier combat. For those who have not been there, you have no idea, none. As for the âreportsâ we read in the MSM, they have disgraced themselves to the point that absolutely nothing they report can be taken without a lot of independent verification. We need to wait and see how this plays out. If it went down as he is being charged, then very likely the death penalty would be completely justified.  Â
@oldster70 I completely agree. People are reacting only to his Article 32 Hearing and acting like it's a verdict.
They're not trained to be cops, they're trained to kill. Probably a fair decision would be that he was given a dishonourable discharge, lose all benefits and serve maybe 5 years in federal prison. These things happen and as disgusting as they are its the nature of war. We still actively torture non combatants but no one gets the death penalty for that.
really? would you be so kind if this combat vet murdered children on the street where you live? don't fool yourself into thinking this could not happen in a Puget Sound neighborhood.Â
I am a veteran, a combat veteran, and I do not condone in any way what SSG Bales is accused of. However, we are only in the beginning of this process.
An Article 32 hearing is the military version of a grand jury. It is formed to examine the Government's evidence to see if going to a full court-martial are warranted. Because of this, SSG Bale has not been afforded a full opportunity to present anything but the barest minimum of a defense.
I will withhold my judgement of the man until all admissible evidence is heard and his trial is concluded.
I will say, however, that if he is found guilty of the premeditated murder of non-combattants I feel that this is a case that warrants execution.
As an aside, the United States military has not executed a servicemember under the UCMJ since 1961. The accused, PFC John Bennett was executed by hanging for the rape and attempted murder of an 11 year old Austrian girl.
I think too much has been made of this tragedy. This type of thing has happened forever. Its the nature of training people to be killers and then turning them lose. Had an uncle that killed a squad of russians accidentally in WW2. Nothing happened. Its why we shouldn't be over there when there's no one to fight. A lot of this stuff went on in Korea and Nam too.Both Iraq and Afghanistan could have been handled diplomatically. But we have all them big guns and we just hate to see them just sitting there so lets fire them up and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children.
@Blindman You should probably do a little reading or at the very minimum ask your uncle [if possible] before quoting another man's wartime experiences. Your lack of historical knowlege in this regard shows an ignorance you would do better to conceal.
Â
Yes, civilian massacres have happened in all war since the dawn of time. And commanders have done everything in their power to stop them, up to and including execution of the perpetrators. Yes, *some* commanders have used it as a tactic of war, but no US commander has since the Civil War. Insofar as SSG Bale is concerned, this was no 'accident' or 'incident'. If he is proven guilty of the charges against him, then he committed premeditated serial murder. That deserves punishment under the UCMJ, as well at the civil laws of every nation on Earth.
Â
While I agree with you that we hit the wrong target in Iraq [thereby breeding an entirely new generation of mujas who hate us for very good reason], there was no 'diplomatic solution' to the pre-9/11 Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. They did indeed supply some of the mujas who hit the Twin Towers, but also provided training facilities. After 9/11, they were the garden bed for Islamacist support, supplying money, fighters, traning facilities etc. I'm pretty sure that a nation that celebrated 'Death to the Great Satan America Day' didn't have a lot to say to us diplomatically.
Â
I don't take issue with you being a peace advocate. I do take issue with you misquoting history to suit your beliefs rather than forming your beliefs by reading the history.
FormerMarineSgt:....I agree..Semper Fi brother
The sad part is he may actually die before the master minds of 9/11 will. I mean, isn't that why we are over there to begin with?
Those people are still awaiting prosecution and we have already tried, convicted and put to death one of our own.
I don't condone what he did but I feel as though this guy is the one that is going to be sacrificed.
The critical thing was what cause him to go off??? Was it a mental failure or injury or just a deep hate for the Afghan people or what. Life is so different in combat and even more so now days when you have to call for permission to defend ones self or take on a target. Were those some of what tripped him up? From what I can read hear it seems that he did do the killings. Are we going to use him as a sacrificial lamb in this thing or send him for treatment if there was an underlying cause of his going on the rampage? Many questions and few answers. I just hope the military meat grinder just doesn't chew him up instead of trying to repair the problem if there was one that caused this tragedy.
Â
Â
Â
 *here not "hear."
Â
Would you condone him slaying nine children HERE in the US just as long as we  "repair the problem?"
Isn't it ironic that the commanders in charge of this war are facing charges of playing house with someone other that their better half, makes one wonder who's really running this circus called war....
They better ask for the death penalty for Nidal Hasan too.
Still haven't heard if they had him on any mood altering drugs. They're becoming pretty prevalent in the military. The steroids certainly didn't help. He should have just walked out into one of cannabis field and picked himself a few buds to fire up and calm the hell down. Fighting fake wars is very stressful.
 There is no excuse or condition where this kind of merciless slaughter can be condoned, excused or alibi-ed into some sort of insignificance. IF it happened in the heat of battle and IF the civilians were accidental casualties, it would be a very different situation. That is not what happened. These people were mercilessly slaughtered outside of the 'fog of war' no matter how you slice it.
Â
I'm not usually much of a proponent of the death penalty, but any man guilty of this kind of slaughter is an absolute candidate for it. I'll wait until the court martial is over and if he's convicted, I will most definitely agree with the death penalty being called in this case.
Â
And unfortunately, it would appear that he is clearly guilty with the details we have seen so far.
Â
.
 @FormerMarineSgt I agree with most of what you are saying, but life without parole is not condoning his actions, there is no excuse that should let him walk away from this. That being said PTSD is and should be a very legit concern for all our veterans. I believe he did 4 tours and had at least one head injury. I'm concerned that if the Army isn't even willing to look at that possibility that many of our veterans will be unable or unwilling to get the help they need.
The Army isn't willing to look at PTSD. Look at all the soldiers they turned away saying that is wasn't a real condition. The only reason they are now is because it was raked through the outcry of public opinion.
Anyone that is against this: What if an enemy combatant were to massacre innocent US civillians, how would you feel?
Like Nidal Hasan? People saw him kill civilians. Not sure if you can get anymore guilty than that.
@3rase - there are many (and usually right wing btw) who would be screaming at our government for wasting time with a trial if this were done against our civilians and would be demanding that the individual who would do it against our own people just be put to death and not waste our time or resources.
Â
Me - I'd be pretty damm close to that (and I'm by no means right wing), but I'd want a trial to make sure we had the right person before calling for the death penalty.
Â
Â
I don't feel bad for him. But I would like to say that when we send people over to another country to kill people, how do we expect to not eventually lose at least one of our soldiers to mental illness. After all the things they see and have to do over there? Please don't mistake my comment as a means for trying to excuse what he has done. I'm certainly not trying to do that. I just cant help but feel like these guys are going crazy and nobody is there to do anything about it. That is until it's too late. Then we want to "fry" them.Â
Â
Perhaps this is just the horrible "name of the game" or whatever...
Uh, we know what it means to be on alcohol, steroids, and sleeping aids. It means being stupid. This guy deserves to fry.
Good, as they should.