Celebration day for same-sex couples taking wedding vows
»Play Video
SEATTLE -- At one minute after midnight, Sarah and Emily Cofer became the first same-sex couple in King County to get married.
The Cofers have been together for more than 10 years, but Sunday was the earliest time under the state's new law allowing same-sex marriage that they could legally wed.
The couple were married at the King County Courthouse by Judge Mary Yu, one of many local judges who are donating time to marry couples on Sunday.
Several other marriages were planned for the early-morning hours at the courthouse, giving same-sex couples the opportunity to get married as soon as possible after voters approved Referendum 74.
Gov. Chris Gregoire and Secretary of State Sam Reed certified the election on Wednesday afternoon, and the law took effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday, when couples in Seattle lined up to pick up their licenses just after midnight.
Because the state has a three-day waiting period, the first weddings could not take place until Sunday.
At the Thurston County Courthouse five couples were married overnight, including Jonathon Bashford, 31, and Matthew Wiltse, 29, both of Olympia.
The couple, together for 10 years, just had a large commitment ceremony in September when they registered as domestic partners, but said they wanted to be among the first to legally marry.
"We weren't going to wait one second longer," Wiltse said.
In addition to private ceremonies that will start taking place across Washington state, about 140 couples had registered to marry at Seattle City Hall, which had set up five separate chapels to accommodate the revelers. Starting at 10 a.m., cheers and applause regularly broke out as another couple's marriage became official. Weddings at city hall were to continue through 5 p.m.
Mayor Mike McGinn, who greeted couples at they arrived, called it a "great day, a joyous day."
"It's really wonderful," he said. "A new civil right is going to be recognized in this great civil institution."
Keith Bacon and Corianton Hale of Seattle, who celebrated their six-year anniversary the night before, hugged and kissed to loud cheers and camera flashes as they took their vows.
"We're totally thrilled," Bacon said. The couple had done a commitment ceremony in August but said this day was particularly special.
"We had looked at this as maybe a day we would sign a piece of paper and seal the deal, and instead we're having this huge party being thrown in our honor," Bacon said. "It's just mind blowing."
The couple hugged and kissed to loud cheers and camera flashes as they took their vows.
Nancy Monahan, 57, a retired petty office with the Coast Guard, waited outside before the weddings began with her partner of 14 years, Deb Needham, 48.
Monahan was wearing her uniform, and Needham was wearing an ivory dress and jacket and matching hat. They said they wanted to join the large wedding event at city hall because of the significance of the day.
"It's not very private, but very historic," Needham said, to which Monahan added, "And very awesome."
Robin Wyss, of Seattle, said that the wedding ceremony to her partner, Danielle Yung, was "more emotional than I thought it would be," in part because Yung is five months pregnant.
"Our friends are here, it's a beautiful space and there's all of his love and appreciation," she said. "We've been thinking about this as more of a political celebration for all of Washington state, but obviously it's very meaningful for us and our future child as well."
Last month, Washington, Maine and Maryland became the first states to pass same-sex marriage by popular vote. They joined six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia that had already enacted laws or issued court rulings permitting same-sex marriage.
Couples in Maryland also started picking up marriage licenses Thursday, though their licenses won't take effect until Jan. 1. Maine's law takes effect on Dec. 29. There's no waiting period in Maine, and people can start marrying just after midnight.
Same-sex couples who previously were married in another state that allows gay marriage, like Massachusetts, will not have to get remarried in Washington state. Their marriages became valid here as soon as the law took effect.
The referendum had asked voters to either approve or reject the state law legalizing same-sex marriage that legislators passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Gregoire in February but was put on hold pending the outcome of the election. Nearly 54 percent of voters approved the measure.
The law doesn't require religious organizations or churches to perform marriages, and it doesn't subject churches to penalties if they don't marry gay or lesbian couples.
Married same-sex couples will still be denied access to federal pensions, health insurance and other government benefits available to heterosexual couples because the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA, bars federal recognition of gay unions.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it will take up gay marriage sometime during the current term. Several pending cases challenge the federal benefit provision of DOMA, and a separate appeal asks the justices to decide whether federal courts were correct in striking down California's Proposition 8, the amendment that outlawed gay marriage after it had been approved by courts in the nation's largest state.
The Cofers have been together for more than 10 years, but Sunday was the earliest time under the state's new law allowing same-sex marriage that they could legally wed.
The couple were married at the King County Courthouse by Judge Mary Yu, one of many local judges who are donating time to marry couples on Sunday.
Several other marriages were planned for the early-morning hours at the courthouse, giving same-sex couples the opportunity to get married as soon as possible after voters approved Referendum 74.
Gov. Chris Gregoire and Secretary of State Sam Reed certified the election on Wednesday afternoon, and the law took effect at 12:01 a.m. Thursday, when couples in Seattle lined up to pick up their licenses just after midnight.
Because the state has a three-day waiting period, the first weddings could not take place until Sunday.
At the Thurston County Courthouse five couples were married overnight, including Jonathon Bashford, 31, and Matthew Wiltse, 29, both of Olympia.
The couple, together for 10 years, just had a large commitment ceremony in September when they registered as domestic partners, but said they wanted to be among the first to legally marry.
"We weren't going to wait one second longer," Wiltse said.
In addition to private ceremonies that will start taking place across Washington state, about 140 couples had registered to marry at Seattle City Hall, which had set up five separate chapels to accommodate the revelers. Starting at 10 a.m., cheers and applause regularly broke out as another couple's marriage became official. Weddings at city hall were to continue through 5 p.m.
Mayor Mike McGinn, who greeted couples at they arrived, called it a "great day, a joyous day."
"It's really wonderful," he said. "A new civil right is going to be recognized in this great civil institution."
Keith Bacon and Corianton Hale of Seattle, who celebrated their six-year anniversary the night before, hugged and kissed to loud cheers and camera flashes as they took their vows.
"We're totally thrilled," Bacon said. The couple had done a commitment ceremony in August but said this day was particularly special.
"We had looked at this as maybe a day we would sign a piece of paper and seal the deal, and instead we're having this huge party being thrown in our honor," Bacon said. "It's just mind blowing."
The couple hugged and kissed to loud cheers and camera flashes as they took their vows.
Nancy Monahan, 57, a retired petty office with the Coast Guard, waited outside before the weddings began with her partner of 14 years, Deb Needham, 48.
Monahan was wearing her uniform, and Needham was wearing an ivory dress and jacket and matching hat. They said they wanted to join the large wedding event at city hall because of the significance of the day.
"It's not very private, but very historic," Needham said, to which Monahan added, "And very awesome."
Robin Wyss, of Seattle, said that the wedding ceremony to her partner, Danielle Yung, was "more emotional than I thought it would be," in part because Yung is five months pregnant.
"Our friends are here, it's a beautiful space and there's all of his love and appreciation," she said. "We've been thinking about this as more of a political celebration for all of Washington state, but obviously it's very meaningful for us and our future child as well."
Last month, Washington, Maine and Maryland became the first states to pass same-sex marriage by popular vote. They joined six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia that had already enacted laws or issued court rulings permitting same-sex marriage.
Couples in Maryland also started picking up marriage licenses Thursday, though their licenses won't take effect until Jan. 1. Maine's law takes effect on Dec. 29. There's no waiting period in Maine, and people can start marrying just after midnight.
Same-sex couples who previously were married in another state that allows gay marriage, like Massachusetts, will not have to get remarried in Washington state. Their marriages became valid here as soon as the law took effect.
The referendum had asked voters to either approve or reject the state law legalizing same-sex marriage that legislators passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Gregoire in February but was put on hold pending the outcome of the election. Nearly 54 percent of voters approved the measure.
The law doesn't require religious organizations or churches to perform marriages, and it doesn't subject churches to penalties if they don't marry gay or lesbian couples.
Married same-sex couples will still be denied access to federal pensions, health insurance and other government benefits available to heterosexual couples because the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA, bars federal recognition of gay unions.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it will take up gay marriage sometime during the current term. Several pending cases challenge the federal benefit provision of DOMA, and a separate appeal asks the justices to decide whether federal courts were correct in striking down California's Proposition 8, the amendment that outlawed gay marriage after it had been approved by courts in the nation's largest state.
This comment has been deleted
 @Sandman Welcome to the carcus (sic), brother fly...
This comment has been deleted
 @Sandman Well, then you definitely need to re calibrate your "gaydar", sunshine, 'cause right now, it's pointing 180 degrees off-target.
Goodness, the haters on this thread are awfully exhausting. For all the supporters, we genuinely appreciate all you do for us!
 @Alex L. Yes, I am sure the support of all perversion is vastly appreciated. Way to go Washington State and of the wonderful libs who are helping to flush this state down the toilet. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. If the Mayan Calendar is correct I will not be upset. It will be what this state and this immoral country deserves. :)
 @Rosie777 Not surprised that you'd believe in the Mayan malarkey.  After all, once you start buying into one set of ridiculous mythologies, it's not that big of a leap to start believing in others as well. Â
Â
Perhaps if you'd get your mind out of the gutter for a change, life would look less like a cesspool to you...
 @Alex L. I'm glad the law passed and I hope that very soon it will be the law of the country and not just a few states. As for the haters, they are always on here trying to beat people to death with their Bibles, not really worth the energy but they can be fun to mess with now and then. :-)
They are not married. ONLY according to Mans law. In the law that really matters, it is NOT a marriage, just a perversion.
Â
Live happily together on earth. You will live unhappily forever in hades.
 @Nuclearian You will live unhappily forever in hades.
Â
Wait - so you believe in the Greek Gods? Dude, don't you know that Zeus put his . . . ahem. . . lightening rod in just about every orifice he could find, right? He probably did a little man-on-man action from time to time and the Greeks were pretty cool with that whole Gay thing.
Â
So your argument is invalid!
 @Nuclearian You decide where people go when they die? Whoa, what's the Creator of Mankind doing commenting on a news site? Aren't you supposed to be busy?
Now let them all move to a state where it's not legal...then what do they do...are they still legally married or not....
Â
 @Whocares It's not fun.
I see one more story on this and I'm going to "puke"....Who cares that they get to be married...just do it in the privacy of your own circle and quit plastering this on TV. Â I DON"T CARE and DON"T WANT TO SEE IT shoved in my FACE.
 @Whocares I totally agree. I makes me feel sick to my stomach. I guess tolerance and good manners only goes one way. Not surprising but how sad.Â
 @Rosie777 Ah, the good old, "You're intolerant for not tolerating my intolerance!" rant!
 @Whocares Ummm, you do realize that you can change the channel or not click on the links, right? You don't care? Really? Because your choice to click and comment would indicate otherwise.
 @Whocares I for one welcome our new Homosexual Overlords.
 @Whocares You obviously cared enough to look through the article - and I presume nobody put a gun to your head to make you - so where do you get off being offended?  Or are you one of those types who actively seeks out things that offend you, just so that you can tell the rest of us how offended you are?
A bigger closet is needed, they are spilling out. I hope everyone feels better about what they are doing now since they get to call it something it isn't, Marriage.
 @Astinious The Lady (or Gentleman) doth protest too much.Â
 @Astinious Westboro Church hates Astinious
 @Astinious They have been granted a marriage license and have been declared married by a someone bearing the authority to marry them.  How do you figure they're NOT married?  Just because YOU say so?
 @Yackety's Ax  @Astinious They have been granted a license to be as perverted as they want and be able to push it in the face of all moral people. Something to be really proud of.Â
 @Rosie777 If that's the case then ALL marriage is perverted, since it's the same license.  Do you wake up every morning and think to yourself, "I wonder what more I can do to spread HATE throughout the world?" or does it just sort of flow out naturally, like incontinence?
 @Yackety's Ax  @Astinious Nope. Higher authority. GOD!!
 @Nuclearian When it comes to civil marriage, your "god" doesn't have any authority...
@Astinious how mean spirited!
For those that are still protesting gay marriage, this will not make any changes to your life. So get over it, move past it, focus your energies on something you can change in your own life. A gay couple marrying is not producing a new gay couple, you have nothing to fear. For all those that are planning a wedding or are celebrating, Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! May your marriage be all that you hoped, dreamt of, prayed for and more!!!
 @amr201 And most of all? A JOKE, and a LIE!!
@amr201 Where is a big closet when you need one?
 @Astinious Why do you need such a big one?  After all, it's only going to be you in it.
Ok i got it ..can we move on now?? Â
 @Willy Lee Yes we will be moving on to the acceptance and approval of more immoral acts. Just guess what will be next? My guess is that there will soon be a lot less sex criminals in prison since what they do makes them "feel so good". Why shouldn't they be accepted for what they do also? If they are not that would not b e fair. Pretty soon all sick perversions will be OK.  Think about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 @Rosie777 So now you're suggesting that Marriage Equality is one step removed from violent predatory sexual assault?  Does the limits of your sick, perverted hatred know no bounds?
 @Willy Lee News is not reported solely based on your opinion of what is news worthy. You could have moved on by choosing not to read this article, but others still see this as cause for celebration and as news worthy.
Good for them. I may not agree with same sex marriage but it's their life. What I am curious is that City Hall was opened at 12am specifically for a special interest group? Doesn't that cost extra when we have to open doors early and pay employees extra to be there? I am not sure how long Wa can keep flushing money down the toilet until it backs up and spews waste all over the place.
 @Robinsnest Everybody's time was donated. And c'mon, really? Gay marriage bankrupted Seattle because a janitor unlocked City Hall for a few hours on a Sunday? Get real.
I agree with your comment. I brought this point up eallier about tax payers paying for this special treatment. I never got a real answer back, just a bunch of negative feedback. I also brought up special treatment vs equal treatment. Boy, the comments I received on that! Cities are jacking up taxes to cover deficits, but they spend freely by opening doors extra hours for this "special event'. I may not agree with same-sex marriage, but I do not hate anyone, I just disagree with taxpayers funding this. The special treatment that they are receiving was not available for me when I got married - I had to get my license and get married during business hours. I though tthis was about equal treatment, not special treatment.
Â
 @Hotrod Probably because everyone there: from the couples getting married, to their friends & families, to the people volunteering their time, to those who just came to wish everyone well - ARE TAXPAYERS TOO, and WE approve of the City making this modest expenditure on behalf of our formerly disenfranchised fellow taxpayers.
Â
Where you people get this idea that nobody else BUT you pays taxes, and therefore have some sort of unquestionable right to decide WHAT they should pay for, is beyond me.But, if you're really that  bu#-hurt about it, please send us your address, and we'll be sure to reimburse you the 2 or 3 cents this cost you.  And be sure to provide a list of your favorite "special events" the City engages in (for example, the next time one of our sportsball teams wins a championship), so that we can be sure to bill you for the portion that we see no good reason to pay for ourselves.Â
 @Nuclearian It's people like you that can't construct a legible sentence...
 @Yackety's Ax  @Hotrod Its people like you that we cant balance a budget.
@Hotrod it might be because gay people have suffered from unequal treatment long enough? Would that be enough of a reason for the city hall to open its doors and turn on the lights to bring equal treatment to them?
Whether you support(ed) gay marriage or not, you REALLY have to wonder WHAT is next in Washington State!!
 @Eduardo Capistrano Umm. Holy judgement. God help them, or us, now.
 @Nuclearian Check back with us in 10 or 20 years and tell us how that "Holy judgement" thing worked out, umkay?
This comment has been deleted
 @pacnorthwest Totally uncalled for.
 @pacnorthwest One of us! One of us! Gooble-gobble, gooble-gobble! One of us! One of us! Gooble-gobble, gooble-gobble!
 @pacnorthwest Why? Are you having all the narrow minded, angry homophobes over to your place? You are right, that must be freaky.Â
 @nosunhere  @pacnorthwest Do you really think you are not narrow minded? If the only opinion you will accept is you own then that is what "you" are. Narrow mindedness and intolerance can go both ways believe it or not. Enjoy the perversion.Â
Â
@Rosie777 @nosunhere @pacnorthwest Actually I am straight, married, and attend Northshore Baptist Church every Sunday. I just happen to think that because we live in a free country, two consenting human adults should have the same freedoms that I do. Enjoy your righteous attitude and judgement.
Why, are you in it?
 @factchekr No you just have to go to Fremont and watch  that parade.