Seattle PD's accountability office director falls under scrutiny
»Play Video
SEATTLE -- Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn's appointee to head up the Seattle Police Department's Office of Professional Accountability may be in trouble.
Sources tell KOMO OPA's director Kathryn Olson is facing a tough reconfirmation battle after KOMO News broke the story of Donald Fuller, who claims he faced criminal charges after complaining about police.
And city leaders confirm the case of alleged retaliation by OPA will be investigated.
Three years ago, Fuller was walking in downtown Seattle when police called him over for allegedly jaywalking.
"(I was) getting ready to step off (the curb)," Fuller said. "That's what they call jaywalking."
That was the beginning of a nightmare for Fuller and of a series of questionable actions by the OPA.
Though OPA's own policies prohibit retaliation, documents uncovered by Seattle attorney James Egan show if Fuller never complained about police, he never would have been charged.
"The OPA are a bunch of bald-faced liars when they say they won't retaliate against complainants," Egan said.
The documents show that both King County and city prosecutors declined to charge Fuller.
But then OPA's own investigator contacted city attorneys and said she "did not agree with their decision" and urged the city attorney "to reconsider."
Two days later, OPA noted the attorney will "file assault, obstructing and resisting arrest charges" against Fuller.
"This sets us back," said Seattle City Council member Bruce Harrell. "This is the kind of activity, if it occurred as the allegations would suggest, this erodes trust."
"People have to be able to trust OPA," said Chris Stearns of the city's Human Rights Commission. "They have to be able to believe that it is safe for them to make a complaint."
But the concerns raised by Fuller's case aren't just about an individual investigator.
"This is a pattern; this is not just some anomaly," Egan said. The attorney cited a memo in which Olson, instead of prohibiting officers from pushing for prosecution, wrote that in the future, charging "recommendations should be ... approved through the OPA chain of command" and "care must be taken to avoid even the appearance that OPA is attempting to influence a prosecution."
Harrell said this will be one of a number of issues addressed during Olson's confirmation process.
"Her job is accountability. It's not one to then retaliate or even pursue criminal charges against someone that came to her office for help," said Harrell.
The Human Rights Commission also plans to look into the incident and testify when Olson's nomination first comes up next week.
Sources tell KOMO OPA's director Kathryn Olson is facing a tough reconfirmation battle after KOMO News broke the story of Donald Fuller, who claims he faced criminal charges after complaining about police.
And city leaders confirm the case of alleged retaliation by OPA will be investigated.
Three years ago, Fuller was walking in downtown Seattle when police called him over for allegedly jaywalking.
"(I was) getting ready to step off (the curb)," Fuller said. "That's what they call jaywalking."
That was the beginning of a nightmare for Fuller and of a series of questionable actions by the OPA.
Though OPA's own policies prohibit retaliation, documents uncovered by Seattle attorney James Egan show if Fuller never complained about police, he never would have been charged.
"The OPA are a bunch of bald-faced liars when they say they won't retaliate against complainants," Egan said.
The documents show that both King County and city prosecutors declined to charge Fuller.
But then OPA's own investigator contacted city attorneys and said she "did not agree with their decision" and urged the city attorney "to reconsider."
Two days later, OPA noted the attorney will "file assault, obstructing and resisting arrest charges" against Fuller.
"This sets us back," said Seattle City Council member Bruce Harrell. "This is the kind of activity, if it occurred as the allegations would suggest, this erodes trust."
"People have to be able to trust OPA," said Chris Stearns of the city's Human Rights Commission. "They have to be able to believe that it is safe for them to make a complaint."
But the concerns raised by Fuller's case aren't just about an individual investigator.
"This is a pattern; this is not just some anomaly," Egan said. The attorney cited a memo in which Olson, instead of prohibiting officers from pushing for prosecution, wrote that in the future, charging "recommendations should be ... approved through the OPA chain of command" and "care must be taken to avoid even the appearance that OPA is attempting to influence a prosecution."
Harrell said this will be one of a number of issues addressed during Olson's confirmation process.
"Her job is accountability. It's not one to then retaliate or even pursue criminal charges against someone that came to her office for help," said Harrell.
The Human Rights Commission also plans to look into the incident and testify when Olson's nomination first comes up next week.
McGinn is responsible for these people and their job performance, good or bad. I recall thinking to myself when he appointed then acting chief diez to the top cop position; they must have something incriminating on the Mayor. While diez has his supporters, there are also those here in the community that wonder where his leadership was when his department had gone berserk making headlines with repeated acts of stupidity. I still say one of the other candidates might have been better for a fresh start.
Uh....I am not sure how she became "director." Â
Â
1. She has no policing or criminal law background. Â She is an attorney, whom officers usually don't like to deal with. Â Has she seen what victims of crime go through in proceedings? Â I would rather trust a former District Attorney from another state in the position than Olson.Â
2. Her expertise is NOT in criminal law. Employment law is a totally different field than criminal law. Â How do you expect Olson to really understand BOTH police officers and victims of crimes? Â It is like telling a four grader to operate a car. Â He or she can do whatever they want and will likely crash the car into the wall.Â
Â
Â
And uhhh, why isn't there a civilian review board in Seattle PD to investigate complaints?  Or is there? NYPD has one! Heck, I think LAPD has one as well.  The only way to be a good police organization is through transparency. its also part of the community policing model...Just having a "director" heading a "hidden" entity meant to do what a civilian review board is suppose to do is pretty darn scary.
Â
- Concerned new resident of SeattleÂ
She was hired by Mayor Mike McGinn. She's just doing what Mike tells her to do. The rot starts at the top and trickles down.
Given this level of documentation, I would say felony charges of obstruction of justice and conspiracy to commit unlawful detention (kidnapping) perjury and false and malicious prosecution are in order. This is the cops siding with and protecting the criminals (who are also cops).
Â
Way to prove your "responsibility" and "public service", SPD! A jack-booted gang of thugs with their own gun moll in OPA!
OPA Officer protection Association ok that sounds better.
How many news reports do we have to see to know that the system is rotten right to the core? Whats needed is someone without law enforcement experience to come in and clean house. Give them carte blanch to get the house in order. Then there needs to be a civilian oversight committee to investigate any corruption and misconduct from officers.
 @Blindman I volunteer... I have no emotional attachment and have zero connections to this organized gang of criminals called the Seattle Police. Â
Â
I could do it part time. Â Those who lie on their reports would go first. Â Many have been proven to do just that.
Â
Then I would just take my time going through each officers record along with all the videos they still manage to hide of the abuses they have committed.Â
Â
I would request charges against any officers who broke our laws but escaped charges in the past.Â
Â
Its also time to start drug testing which the Seattle police have been  fighting for years.  That would weed out some of the worst also.Â
Â
I would also fire the 44.  Those are all the officers who racked up 1200 use of force complaints who then misused our laws all claiming the fifth.  These cops have no integrity.  They are useless to the community.Â
Â
I would also provide weekly updates to the community and would report the officers by name and what they were fired for and would also inform the community of the crimes committed by these officers.Â
Â
In fact we should have the same position for the King County Sheriff Department. Â They aint looking so hot lately either.Â
Â
The corruption continues.Â
Â
Â
I never realized just how messed up this really is!! This system is suppose to protect and serve, but all it really does is make me feel even more vulnerable in Seattle. So, can we clean this mess up and start over again yet?
She should be charged with obstructing justice, false reporting, and whatever else they can find on her. What a worthless sack of crap.
Just the nature of a corrupt system. There's no one impartial to file a complaint with because they all work for the same people. From top to bottom its nothing but a rats nest.
 So what is the upshot of all this; have the charges of resisting arrest, etc. already been shown to be untrue? The city attorneys must have some pretty solid evidence to pursue a case that is a political bombshell, right?
Â
 People do sometimes assault police officers, and otherwise resist arrest. Because some other officers have been less than stellar in their dealings with the public, are we now free to go all Zsa Zsa on any Seattle cop?Â
Â
 Seems to me that for the time being, cases like this should be sent to an impartial third party to assess the facts only. I think the city attorneys already do that, but just to remove doubt caused by the current mistrust.Â
Â
Â
Â
Dear Seattle Voters,
Â
Part of this is your fault, too.Â
Â
Sincerely,
Me
Sound like a Seattle Gate (not Water Gate ),just a cover-up !
I wonder how Donald Fuller's complaint would have been handled if he went directly to Mayor McGinn with it.
thanks for watching another exciting episode of seattle 911. Â stay tuned...
I wonder who made her do it....Satan!!!!!!
Â
Well isn't that special......
 @sunnysandiego LOL!!!!!  I thought the same thing. Â
All my relatives from elsewhere in the country have visited and we got that over with. So no reason to go up in the land of the Needle tourism to worry about getting jackbooted for minding your own business.
Kathryn Olson should be investigated for fraud on the tax payers. Â She did NOT give us the accountability we paid for. Â
Â
If the Mayor and the city council were surprised by the federal investigation then Kathryn Olson didnt inform them of the issues of not having any accountability which was part of her job. The OPA website says she reports directly to them. Â
Â
Now....if the Mayor and City Council Knew we didn't have accountability then they are all corrupt and sat quietly while we all paid for a federal investigation, settlement after settlement and are now paying for a federal judge to babysit the police. Â
Â
Which is it? Â Bruce Harrell is one of the city council members who Kathryn Olson reports to. Â
Â
Are you corrupt Bruce Harrell or did she not do her job that she received almost a million in pay and benefits to do these past few years? Â We are all paying Dearly for the horrible job she has done. Â Weren't you paying attention at all? Â Â
Â
Where is Tim Burgess in all this? Â He was here all these years.Â
Â
Komo don't let Harrell off the hook so easy. Â Ask if he knew about all the issues with the SPD or not. Â Â Its pretty important
Â
im shocked we live in seattle.. or kabul afghanistan..
WTF
I wrote the following letter at the beginning of this year. Â
Â
January 24, 2012
Â
 Mayor McGinn, Seattle City Council, Seattle Police Chief Diaz,Â
Â
 It is absolutely impossible for you to not have known we had no constructive police accountability. It took a Federal investigation to point that out and the only thing you can do is follow their advice? This tells us all that you had absolutely no intention of even correcting the problem until you were told to. You had no ideas to reign in all the lawlessness of the Seattle Police That is not the leadership Seattle needs. Unfortunately it is now clear you are part of the problem and we are all paying dearly for it.
Â
I have put in a public disclosure request inquiring what the entire salary the Office of Professional Accountability Director Kathryn Olsen has earned since May 7, 2007. Besides recommendations on disposition and discipline to the Chief of Police she also reports to the Mayor and the City Council on OPA activity and issues concerning the professional standards. From what I can see her entire job has been to give the tax payers of Seattle the illusion (or disillusion) of accountability on their website. Anyone can sit at a desk and take in complaints that go nowhere. Did she inform you of these stalled complaints through all these years? You seem surprised by the results of the federal investigation. Was that an act? Either you were informed or she didnât do her job.
Â
Furthermore we can not even count how many officers have been proven to outright LIE on their reports anymore. No officer proven to lie should ever be able to carry a badge. Our freedom is at stake. Thousands and thousands of fines, convictions and incarcerations are in question that involved these officers. Are you doing anything at all to help these people? Imagine if one of your family members lost their freedom based on the report filed by an officer proven to repeatedly lie on reports. I donât think you can imagine this because obviously it is unlikely when you are the Mayor. What about the rest of us?
Â
Do you know how much all the investigations, lawsuits, settlements, and cost of both the prosecutors and the defense of lawless abusive officers is actually costing the tax payers? Have you ever even looked at these figures as the elected leader of this city? Does this effect property taxes? Utility bills and cuts to school budgets?  When parents are asked for even more money from schools for their children to participate in school functions do you wonder if the latest multi million dollar settlement caused this? As Mayor of this city I just assumed you would when Millions and Millions are paid out of our tax dollars for police wrongdoing.
Â
100 percent of all Seattle Police officers knew that we didn't have a system to hold them accountable and knew the public was lead to believe otherwise. Â How could they not when they witness one fellow officer after another getting away with, well, just about everything. 100 percent! That is outrageous! That is an entirely corrupt police department. We are all paying a horrible price now for both your lack of leadership and action.
Â
I have very little confidence in this federal investigation since we have already been through this whole process. In just a few years since a complete federal investigation into the abuses and rights violations being committed against inmates in the King County Jail ended we have paid millions more in investigations, defense attorneys, lawsuits and settlements.
Â
One correction officer Richard Harr almost beat an inmate to death. Four other correction officers testified that the inmate was following orders and did nothing to warrant this beating which involved choking him unconscious and kicking and stomping his head and neck repeatedly. An emergency room physician testified that the inmate suffered life threatening injuries and it took a team to save his life. Â Yet he received a misdemeanor thanks to yet another sweet deal from our prosecutors and their close relationship with our police departments. Even the judge said he was undercharged but then accepted this deal. Again a prime example of the blatantly low standards that our officers are held to.
Â
Â
Part two.....
Â
Even though Federal Laws dictates that police officers shall not be held to a lower standard of law then the citizens, Seattle police are held to the lowest possible standards and this is now proven fact!
Â
You hired Chief Diaz who refuses to fire officers proven to lie on reports and continues to hide the lawlessness of the Seattle police department from the citizens of Seattle. I understand he himself caused the city to be fined 75,000 for no other reason that refusing to provide an attorney with a police report. Who is advising this man to break the law?
Â
Does the name Shandy Cobane and 5 other unnamed officers conspiring together to file false reports in complete contradiction to video evidence ring a bell. Not to mention the police involvement with suppressing the video release on Q13. Seattle police actually dictating what will and will not be reported right at the news station is deplorable. They all still carry a badge.
Â
And now a lawsuit from KOMO News because the Seattle Police are violating the freedom of information act by refusing to release requested information yet again. Do you know how much that will cost us?
Â
What about officer Lee downtown kicking the teen in the store then admitting in court his report was false? Will he continue to carry a badge and take freedom of Seattle residents based on his word? How is it that both You and Chief Diaz canât see that this is against the law?
Â
What about when King County officers commit violent acts against citizens in Seattle? When King County Deputy Matthew Paul shoved Christopher Harris downtown so hard he broke his neck then lied to paramedics repeating over and over that he ran into the wall like a child caught in the act of being naughty? This is PATHETIC that this man still has the right to carry a badge and take away our freedom. Deputy Paul then proceeded to bash another citizens face into the ground for filming him and jaywalking. Do you have the opinion that it is not your Department so it is not your problem? You seem to distance yourself from the lawless actions of King County Officers committed within the Seattle city limits also.
Â
YOU approved the contract with the police union that resulted in constant threats to the taxpayers by the  police union president if we dare try to hold these officers accountable and prevents us from even drug testing officers should they, for example, shoot a elderly and partially deaf woodcarver first through the face and then multiple times through the side. Imagine not being allowed to drug test people we issue weapons to.
Â
Maybe Officer Richard F. Nelson would not have committed suicide if we drug tested these officers regularly. Instead Chief Diaz saw an opportunity to make an example of him right after the disgraceful report by our federal investigation was release.
Â
These are just a few examples and there are many more I could list and I am sure there is an abundance that the public is not and will never be aware of thanks to the magic golden police union contract that promotes and supports the lawlessness of the Seattle police.
Â
I understand you already approved a new contract and forwarded it on to the Seattle City Council for their ok. Did you read the contract you approved? Will we have more years of corruption hidden under the umbrella of immunity that only results in more news conferences with you and Chief Diaz proclaiming you are limited by that same contract for officers that break the laws we pay them to uphold?
Â
Will the Seattle Police Union President continue to threaten to sue the tax payers with the best lawyers the taxpayers can buy?Â
Â
I often wonder where Seattle would be today if we had more integrity in the office of the Mayor and within our police leadership. Right now I can not see how things could be worse.
Â
There is no way with good conscience I could vote for you a second time. You have repeatedly put the citizens of Seattle in a vulnerable position that is effecting us all both financially and instills city wide mistrust of the very people we pay to uphold the law.
Â
Your repeated promises to regain the trust within the community these past few years meant nothing. You did nothing until a federal investigation told you to. Did you at least have some ideas you were going to implement because from your recent statements on your website it doesnât appear so. Its too bad. So many opportunities lost.
Â
We can no longer afford your lack of leadership. I have no confidence in your ability to clean up your mess. McGinnâs Mess.
Â
Thank you,Â
Â
I didn't hold back  : )
OPA is a joke. I am an ex-corrections officer. A few years ago I captured a criminal near my house and handed him over to two SPD officers. The perp was face down w/ my knee in his back, totally subdued. One (very large) officer picked him up (as opposed to cuffing him then and there) and kneed this 140 lb perp in the chest a half dozen times. I was appalled. After calling the officer later on a related matter and realizing what a full time jerk he really was, I decided to file a complaint. It went nowhere, but I think I know why. The perp started a lawsuit over the matter. Can't have OPA finding their own guilty, particularly if a lawsuit is brewing, huh? Dirtbags.Â
Like the Chief, she was appointed by Mc whats-his-name. Business as usuall, move along nothing to see.Â
Now slap someone's hand and give everyone a raise as usual.
"Seattle PD's accountability office director falls under scrutiny"
Â
LOL well I should hope so
No offense to police officers in general, but there are a lot of m0r0ns work in the force. Â That's a fact. Â And thanks to those m0r0ns, we keep reading about SPD on Komo whether we're already sick of it or not. Â
 @BestBondEver! OPA is a civilian office, not part of the police hierarchy which is why the director is going for a reconfirmation instead of promotion. What what I have read about OPA under the current director, I wouldnt confirm a reservation at a restaurant for her let alone reconfirming her director position.
 @DarkRenegade Actually, OPA is *not* a civilian office.  The investigators are sworn officers, Sergeants mostly, and are members of the Seattle Police Officers Guild, just like the cops they're supposed to be investigating.The only civilians in OPA that I'm aware of are the director, the auditor (zero actual power), and the review board (even less actual power).
 @DarkRenegade I didn't mean to confuse you.  Although the story is about her, I was just talking about the initial cause of the problem - m0r0nic cops.
 @BestBondEver! I was never confused on your intended message only clarifying the subject of the story's position.
Seriously!?
Â
Shitcan those people!