Sediment forming sandbars at mouth of Elwha River

PORT ANGELES, Wash. (AP) - Few people are excited to see a big pile of sand, unless it's a big pile of sand at the mouth of the Elwha River.
In a yearlong dam removal and restoration project, scientists observing its progress are witnessing the formation of sandbars at the mouth of the river, a sign of the Elwha's slow return to its natural processes and an indicator of sediment flows that haven't been seen in decades.
"Everybody has been modeling and mapping and anticipating this event for probably 20 years," said Anne Shaffer, a marine biologist and coordinator with a group of scientists, called the Elwha Nearshore Consortium, organized to observe the restoration project.
Shaffer said the formation of sandbars at the river mouth is one of the clearest signs of how much sediment, once locked behind the massive Elwha and Glines Canyon dams, is coursing down the river.
Construction crews have removed the Elwha Dam, which stood for nearly 100 years just south of Port Angeles, and are working toward the final demolition of its bigger brother, the Glines Canyon Dam 8 miles upstream, which is slated to be completely demolished by May.
A combination of lakes created by the dams being completely drained and heavy rains over the past few months have sent pulses of caramel-colored sediment into the azure waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and have started to form the sandbars, which are often clearly visible from the air.
"I don't think anybody anticipated it would be this visual," Shaffer said.
"It's just striking."
Scientists on the project estimate the two dams held back 25 million cubic yards of sand, silt, cobble and gravel.
Only about 10 percent of that has found its way to the mouth of the river or into the Strait, said Ian Miller, a coastal hazards specialist with Washington Sea Grant and one of a small army of researchers surveying beaches on either side of the Elwha's gaping maw to see where the sediment is going.
"We still think that we're just at the tip of the iceberg when it comes to sediment delivery," Miller said.
On a recent sediment- surveying trip, Miller said he documented sandbars growing 25 vertical feet from the river bottom.
That meant that he could easily walk in an area that was once underwater.
"Last week, I was able to walk a couple of hundred yards out to a place I previously would have had to scuba-dived to see," he said.
Dave Parks is a state Department of Natural Resources geologist and wetlands scientist.
Parks, who is studying how the sediment reaches beaches east of the river mouth, said the varying amounts of sediment flowing out of the river will change the profile of the bars on an almost daily basis.
That means that what Miller walked on one week might not be there the next.
"We expect the mouth to be highly dramatic over time," Parks said.
"(It) will change with every tide and every river discharge."
Scientists are seeking to answer two main questions:
- Will the sediment from the Elwha halt or reverse erosion of the surrounding beaches?
- Will the amount of sand and other sediment comprising these beaches drastically change as a result of the river's sediment flows?
"We're measuring beach profiles, and we're measuring grain size," Miller said.
The shorelines surrounding the mouth, especially those to the east, have been effectively sediment-starved for almost as long as the dams have been in place, Miller said.
This led to chronic beach erosion documented as far back as 1939.
With the dams removed, scientists expect the river to once again provide a yearly sediment supply to these shorelines, and Miller said the daily changes he is seeing at the mouth are just the beginning.
"These are very exciting changes, but we don't yet understand yet what the long-term changes are," Miller said.
Parks, who has been monitoring the beaches between the mouth of the Elwha and the western edge of Port Angeles - shoreline that runs below the Port Angeles Transfer Station and former landfill - said he has begun to see changes in the grain size and the accumulation of woody debris at these beaches but no major alterations in the beaches' shape or length.
Eventually, Parks said he and other scientists expect to see the beaches get less steep and become finer grained as sediment from the Elwha accumulates there, though he could not estimate how long the process could take.
"Ultimately, it's still an open question how fast (the sediment) will come out," Parks said.
Parks said some sediment also is expected to reach Ediz Hook, though no surveys are being done there, since those beaches are artificially maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Miller said the Elwha restoration process will serve as tool to help scientists around the world figure out how natural marine shorelines can help protect coastal communities from storm surges and other damaging, high-water events.
"Being able to study dam removal on this scale, on a marine shoreline, is unique," Miller said.
Shaffer said no other researchers in the world are getting the opportunity they are to watch a nearshore ecosystem slowly recover after nearly a century worth of concrete and steel has stopped up the river's natural processes.
"This is unprecedented for a restoration event," Shaffer said.
"It's never been seen before, ever."
In a yearlong dam removal and restoration project, scientists observing its progress are witnessing the formation of sandbars at the mouth of the river, a sign of the Elwha's slow return to its natural processes and an indicator of sediment flows that haven't been seen in decades.
"Everybody has been modeling and mapping and anticipating this event for probably 20 years," said Anne Shaffer, a marine biologist and coordinator with a group of scientists, called the Elwha Nearshore Consortium, organized to observe the restoration project.
Shaffer said the formation of sandbars at the river mouth is one of the clearest signs of how much sediment, once locked behind the massive Elwha and Glines Canyon dams, is coursing down the river.
Construction crews have removed the Elwha Dam, which stood for nearly 100 years just south of Port Angeles, and are working toward the final demolition of its bigger brother, the Glines Canyon Dam 8 miles upstream, which is slated to be completely demolished by May.
A combination of lakes created by the dams being completely drained and heavy rains over the past few months have sent pulses of caramel-colored sediment into the azure waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and have started to form the sandbars, which are often clearly visible from the air.
"I don't think anybody anticipated it would be this visual," Shaffer said.
"It's just striking."
Scientists on the project estimate the two dams held back 25 million cubic yards of sand, silt, cobble and gravel.
Only about 10 percent of that has found its way to the mouth of the river or into the Strait, said Ian Miller, a coastal hazards specialist with Washington Sea Grant and one of a small army of researchers surveying beaches on either side of the Elwha's gaping maw to see where the sediment is going.
"We still think that we're just at the tip of the iceberg when it comes to sediment delivery," Miller said.
On a recent sediment- surveying trip, Miller said he documented sandbars growing 25 vertical feet from the river bottom.
That meant that he could easily walk in an area that was once underwater.
"Last week, I was able to walk a couple of hundred yards out to a place I previously would have had to scuba-dived to see," he said.
Dave Parks is a state Department of Natural Resources geologist and wetlands scientist.
Parks, who is studying how the sediment reaches beaches east of the river mouth, said the varying amounts of sediment flowing out of the river will change the profile of the bars on an almost daily basis.
That means that what Miller walked on one week might not be there the next.
"We expect the mouth to be highly dramatic over time," Parks said.
"(It) will change with every tide and every river discharge."
Scientists are seeking to answer two main questions:
- Will the sediment from the Elwha halt or reverse erosion of the surrounding beaches?
- Will the amount of sand and other sediment comprising these beaches drastically change as a result of the river's sediment flows?
"We're measuring beach profiles, and we're measuring grain size," Miller said.
The shorelines surrounding the mouth, especially those to the east, have been effectively sediment-starved for almost as long as the dams have been in place, Miller said.
This led to chronic beach erosion documented as far back as 1939.
With the dams removed, scientists expect the river to once again provide a yearly sediment supply to these shorelines, and Miller said the daily changes he is seeing at the mouth are just the beginning.
"These are very exciting changes, but we don't yet understand yet what the long-term changes are," Miller said.
Parks, who has been monitoring the beaches between the mouth of the Elwha and the western edge of Port Angeles - shoreline that runs below the Port Angeles Transfer Station and former landfill - said he has begun to see changes in the grain size and the accumulation of woody debris at these beaches but no major alterations in the beaches' shape or length.
Eventually, Parks said he and other scientists expect to see the beaches get less steep and become finer grained as sediment from the Elwha accumulates there, though he could not estimate how long the process could take.
"Ultimately, it's still an open question how fast (the sediment) will come out," Parks said.
Parks said some sediment also is expected to reach Ediz Hook, though no surveys are being done there, since those beaches are artificially maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Miller said the Elwha restoration process will serve as tool to help scientists around the world figure out how natural marine shorelines can help protect coastal communities from storm surges and other damaging, high-water events.
"Being able to study dam removal on this scale, on a marine shoreline, is unique," Miller said.
Shaffer said no other researchers in the world are getting the opportunity they are to watch a nearshore ecosystem slowly recover after nearly a century worth of concrete and steel has stopped up the river's natural processes.
"This is unprecedented for a restoration event," Shaffer said.
"It's never been seen before, ever."
As to the name, after reading some of these posts I just had to. But in all seriousness. There are already salmon spawning above the first dam site. Many, many species of plants are already re-vegetating the former reservoirs and thatâs just in the first year of the river being free. It appears from the photo above that a new sand/gravel spit is forming just west of the river and will or could connect to the center sand bar someday soon. And to those of you saying it will take hundreds of years for the river to restore itself, I say go get yourself an education in the Natural Resource/Earth Science fields. You have no right to de-value this project based on your opinions and not on fact.
No one posting here will ever see any sort of salmon return in their lifetime in this river.
It will take decades for the silt/sand/debri to wash out of the river, and in the process, it will be scoured clean of any meaningful life support for any fish. Good job tree huggers.
Â
Â
Â
Â
""I don't think anybody anticipated it would be this visual," Shaffer said." Environmentalists seldom realize the unintended consequences. It is often too late and then they shirk responsibility.
Im sure they can remove the rip rap now off Ediz Hook just east of the mouth.This might even plug the straits up.................No more ships,no more submarines,we are trapped.................
I'm going on a limb and suggesting that local scientists and scientists around the world can "figure out how natural marine shorelines can help protect coastal communities from storm surges and other damaging, high-water events" by studying the many, many shorelines at the mouths of the rivers around the world. Â
There'll be some great claming out there over the next 20 years.
There won't be any clamming there for at least a hundred years.
If it is 25 million cubic yards of sand, silt flowing into the sound it is restoration.. If it is a few yards of sand, silt flowing into the sound from a logging road it is habitat destruction.
The ground will give a good shake one day soon and all of this head scratching will be for naught. It's nice that they are trying, but mother nature will have the last laugh.
Anyone with a brain "could have anticipated it would be this visual". Of course it's going to be this visual. 100 years of muck were backed up behind these dams. What really blows me away is the self-righteousness of the people involved here. They have elevated themselves to godhood, glorying in the massive amount of sediment pouring into Puget Sound, while at the same time legislating that all earth-moving activity performed by us uninformed ground-dwellers, require expensive permits, silt fencing, and and very expensive erosion control structures I order to avoid any possible harm tot he little fishies. They really think we're stupid. We're not supposed to wonder how many millions of fish are being slaughtered in this carnage. This isn't something that is going to end in this rainy season. It will take many years for this accumulation to clear out. The part the burns my gut here is that the self-appointed gods of the environment snicker at the mere thought of clearing or dredging rivers like the Chehalis in order to protect us ignorant ground-crawlers in the best interest of the fishies. KOMO, why aren't you asking these questions. How many fish have died? What happens when this reaches the shipping channel? How come a mudflow of this magnitude released by anyone but the gods of the environment would be called an environmental disaster of epic proportions and would entail years of litigation and millions of dollars. Just ask any construction company what the cost of temporery erosion control is and what happens if it fails. The gods of the environment are a bunch of freaking, two-faced, hippocrites and they really don't have our best interest is mind. I think natural-flowing rivers are a beautiful thing and that when this is over, it will be good, but if you or I did this, there would be hell to pay. I hate the double standard and how much they suck out of us taxpayers every year as a result.
@Whoanelly Returning a river to it's natural state isn't being godlike, it's correcting the damage that people in the past did. Â
@Murigen You are trying to suggest logic in the face of fanaticism; good luck with that.
@northwestsurfer Doesn't hurt to try once in awhile ;-)
This comment has been deleted
 @northwestsurfer  @Whoanelly Does the tone or timing of his post change the veracity of his claims? Please discuss...
@contraryjim @Getov @Whoanelly Tell you what; if you want to debate, I'm happy to do so. Come back with some kind of factual data other than redneck spitoon rhetoric, and I'll oblige.
 @northwestsurfer  @Getov  @Whoanelly "few people will deny removing the dams was a good thing." Really, wait til the fat lady sings. The eco nuts would rather wind farms than hydro . go figure??
@Getov Mylon @Whoanelly Take your pick. Nothing but anger and seething contempt in his comment. To me it was kind of overstated; the article is about sandbars forming, and very few people will deny removing the dams was a good thing. These dams had no fish ladders when they were built, and the total power output they were designed to producefor the Daishowa America mill was only 38% of its operating requirements.
Neither dam was produced or served any viable purpose anymore, and I thought it was odd how whoanelly reacted so strongly.
 @Whoanelly Yup, pretty much. True at a local, state, and federal level- if the experts are doing it, it's fine, but if it is the great unwashed do it, well then, call in the eco cops as bankrupt them!
Nice story. Come on in Salmon.
Can't wait until we can walk across the river on the backs of salmon.
 @Magic 8 Ball That's kind of mean to them isn't it? ;>
 @Commenter87643  @Magic 8 Ball As long as they're steelhead (and back) it's no problem.
Gotta love geomorphology! I wonder how many grad students are takiing this opportunity to write a thesis or disertation on the Elwha?