State unemployment rate increases to 8.6%

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Washington state's unemployment rate increased slightly to 8.6 percent in August, and the state saw a net loss of 1,100 jobs from the previous month, officials announced Wednesday.
The numbers released by the Employment Security Department show that the August unemployment rate increased from the July rate of 8.5 percent, the second consecutive month the state has seen an increase. The national unemployment rate is currently 8.1 percent.
There was some good news in the state's construction industry, which saw a net gain of 1,900 jobs last month, the most of any sector in the state. Since August 2011, the construction industry has seen a net gain of 3,900 jobs.
Even with the increase, there is still "a long way to go to get construction to a much healthier level," said Joe Elling, chief labor economist for the state's Employment Security Department.
At its peak in 2007, construction employment was at 208,000 jobs, now the level is down to about 140,000, Elling said.
The overall monthly job losses are a turnaround from July, which had seen an estimated gain of 5,900 jobs, a number that was revised up from 5,000 since the last employment report.
The employment estimates for the leisure-and-hospitality industry and the wholesale-trade industry showed unusually large losses for August for the second year in a row, losing a combined 4,900 jobs from July to August.
Even with the losses, jobs in the sectors didn't change significantly, officials said. They cite "seasonal adjustments" of monthly job numbers that are applied to reflect seasonal variations in employment, like summer season or holiday hiring.
A seasonally adjusted "gain" is reflected when an industry adds more jobs or doesn't eliminate as many jobs as expected based on prior employment reports. A loss is when cuts are deeper than expected, or if normal hiring doesn't occur.
Elling stressed not to read too much into the month-to-month changes, noting that any measurement error in the two surveys used by the department "can have a big impact."
"There's been positive developments when we look at where we're at in respect to employment to where we were a year ago," he said.
In August 2011, the state's unemployment rate was 9.1 percent. Since then, the state has gained a total of 52,700 jobs.
Other industries that saw job gains in August were manufacturing, financial activities, education and health services, and government. In addition to wholesale trade and leisure and hospitality, other sectors that saw losses were retail trade and professional and business services.
An estimated 301,700 people were unemployed and actively looking for work in August, including nearly 130,000 who claimed unemployment benefits that month. More than 3,400 unemployed people ran out of unemployment benefits last month.
The numbers released by the Employment Security Department show that the August unemployment rate increased from the July rate of 8.5 percent, the second consecutive month the state has seen an increase. The national unemployment rate is currently 8.1 percent.
There was some good news in the state's construction industry, which saw a net gain of 1,900 jobs last month, the most of any sector in the state. Since August 2011, the construction industry has seen a net gain of 3,900 jobs.
Even with the increase, there is still "a long way to go to get construction to a much healthier level," said Joe Elling, chief labor economist for the state's Employment Security Department.
At its peak in 2007, construction employment was at 208,000 jobs, now the level is down to about 140,000, Elling said.
The overall monthly job losses are a turnaround from July, which had seen an estimated gain of 5,900 jobs, a number that was revised up from 5,000 since the last employment report.
The employment estimates for the leisure-and-hospitality industry and the wholesale-trade industry showed unusually large losses for August for the second year in a row, losing a combined 4,900 jobs from July to August.
Even with the losses, jobs in the sectors didn't change significantly, officials said. They cite "seasonal adjustments" of monthly job numbers that are applied to reflect seasonal variations in employment, like summer season or holiday hiring.
A seasonally adjusted "gain" is reflected when an industry adds more jobs or doesn't eliminate as many jobs as expected based on prior employment reports. A loss is when cuts are deeper than expected, or if normal hiring doesn't occur.
Elling stressed not to read too much into the month-to-month changes, noting that any measurement error in the two surveys used by the department "can have a big impact."
"There's been positive developments when we look at where we're at in respect to employment to where we were a year ago," he said.
In August 2011, the state's unemployment rate was 9.1 percent. Since then, the state has gained a total of 52,700 jobs.
Other industries that saw job gains in August were manufacturing, financial activities, education and health services, and government. In addition to wholesale trade and leisure and hospitality, other sectors that saw losses were retail trade and professional and business services.
An estimated 301,700 people were unemployed and actively looking for work in August, including nearly 130,000 who claimed unemployment benefits that month. More than 3,400 unemployed people ran out of unemployment benefits last month.
What do ya wanna bet the state votes just as BLUE as ever in November!! Obama for lost hope and don't want his change!
KOMO sure moved this one off the web front page fast... I guess they do have to report the TRUTH just make sure it gets covered up ASAP...per Obama's instructions
UNEMPLOYMENT GOES UP
Â
OBAMA PUNISHES MIDDLE CLASS with his OBAMACARE!!!
Â
AP Headline today!!
Â
WASHINGTON (AP) â Nearly 6 million Americans â significantly more than first estimatedâ will face a tax penalty under President Barack Obama's health overhaul for not getting insurance, congressional analysts said Wednesday. Most would be in the middle class.
The new estimate amounts to an inconvenient fact for the administration, a reminder of what critics see as broken promises.
The numbers from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office are 50 percent higher than a previous projection by the same office in 2010, shortly after the law passed. The earlier estimate found 4 million people would be affected in 2016, when the penalty is fully in effect.
Â
And this is Bush's fault how...?? LOL
Â
Barry if re-elected will have inherited his own MESS!!!Â
Â
ELVIS's brain has left the building.....last seen at the DNC.....
Found on Craigs...The GOP has been on an economic wrecking mission ever since the election of Barack Obama - indeed we now know that leading Republican strategists and legislators met and planned a course of economic sabotage and complete obstruction on Obama's very first day in office. This obstruction has had a huge price - a deliberate price that the GOP is betting the American people will blame on President Obama. GOP obstruction did not prevent the passage of ARRA - the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - popularly know as "The Stimulus" bill of 2009 during the height of the economic disaster as the economy was falling off a cliff - the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that ARRA has saved up to 3 million jobs. But nearly every economic measure since then has been blocked by GOP obstruction, filibusters and brinksmanship. What has been the result of GOP obstruction? It is hard to quantify what constant obstruction has cost - you could tally up estimates of every measure that came along, but not all would have passed - nor even been introduced if previous measures had been adopted that obviated their need. But we can look at just two big examples and get a minimal measure of the human cost to American citizens of a deliberate policy to destroy the economy in order to bring down the president; 1) austerity, and 2) obstruction of the 2011 American Jobs Act. Taking just those into account, the unemployment rate would be under 6% were it not for deliberate GOP wrecking. Austerity is madness - many in the GOP actually believe that austerity during an economic downturn is the right thing to do - even 'socialist' Europe was convinced of this - although most realize it is not true, and has no history of success - even Mitt Romney unwittingly admittedas much in an unguarded moment. But that hasn't stopped savage austerity on the state and local level - which has cost over 600,000 public sector jobs so far. Normally in a recession and recovery government at all levels increase public employment - this has happened in every GOP administration - and much of that increase is funded by federal government grants to the state and local governments. But since the Stimulus, the GOP has blocked any substantial help for the states, and in GOP led states severe austerity cuts have been the rule - even including GOP governors rejecting projects fully funded by the federal government. The economic cost of this is far more than just those 600 thousand jobs - the spillover effect on private business and local economies has been devastating - when you factor in all these effects the total job cost of austerity has been estimated at 2.3 million jobs. President Obama proposed the American Jobs Act in his 2011 State of the Union address, and spent the next year promoting it at every opportunity. Although expensive - it contained a combination of targeted tax cuts and some tax increases, along with direct spending designed to increase consumer spending and lower the cost to business of hiring new workers, all while paying for the bill. The CBO said the bill would not only have paid for itself within 10 years, but would have reduced the deficit by at least 6 billion dollars. According to an analysis by Moody's it would have created about 1.9 million jobs. The result of GOP obstruction with those two things cost us 2.3 million jobs and 1.9 million jobs respectively. US employment as of May 2011 is about 155 million jobs, which means those 4.2 million jobs that the GOP has prevented account for 2.7% of the unemployment rate. But let's be fair, there is a small amount of overlap in those jobs - a small portion (about 8%) of the American Jobs Act would have gone to State and Local governments to pay for teachers, first responders and the like - although for the most part it would have just prevented further layoffs rather than resulted in new hires. It is also very likely that without the economic wrecking of GOP obstructionism the labor participation rate would be higher - so instead of a reduction of unemployment to 5.5% it would be slightly higher, but still well under 6%. Now just for fun, consider if we had done during this recovery what every GOP administration has done, and substantially increased public sector employment. Without knowing how much we would have increased public sector employment we can't make a firm estimate of how much better employment levels would be, but if we make the assumption that we increased the public sector by just half of the amount we actually reduced it - the total effect on the economy in both public and private sector jobs would be around 1.15 million - which would push the unemployment rate below 5%. That is the human cost of GOP economic obstruction.
How is there any unemployment rate. I read an article about how there are not enough apple pickers in Eastern Washington. GET OFF YOURÂ BUTT AND PICK SOME FREAKING APPLES! There are jobs out there, people are just to comfortable with their generous government benefits that the rest of us pay for.
Â
Your welcome, unemployed. I'll keep paying my taxes so you can survive.
@Smashquail ....Shortage of apple pickers=Free loading unemployeds. Genius.
I just got home from work and I noticed that missing from this comment thread is all the usual Obamaphytes praising his Glory. About all I can find is "caphillkid" and even he isn't going to bat. Maybe I can find them at the Romney thread where they are incensed at Mitter for talking all conservative and stuff.Â
 I'm sure obama is looking for the poor at Jay-Z and Beyonce's mansion you know kinda like OJ looking for the "real" killers.
yes, WA state unemployment is up and it's getting worse in the country.Â
Â
In the news today, Group Health's CFO resigned and the company is planning significant layoffs to help reduce a spending by $250 million by the end of the year. .
Â
And, American Airlines announce layoffs between 4,000 and 11,000 people as part of their bankruptcy reorganization.
Â
The administration's policies hammered the coal mining industry resulting in about 1,200Â layoffs this week alone.
Â
CH2M, working at the Hanford facility, will start laying off 300 people this week.
Â
Seimens laid off over 600 workers in Iowa and Kansas yesterday.
Â
Northrup Grumman laidoff about 600, with more to come with defense cuts planned in 2013.
Â
University of Georgia - 130 jobs lost
Â
City of Tacoma planning 200 reductions.
Â
Best Buy losing about 2,000 along with store closures.
Â
BAE in San Francisco another 95 lost
Â
Goodyear in VA - 55 cut from payroll
Â
HP is cutting 2,000 this year
Â
Kodak is slashing 1,000 before years' end
Â
Boston Children's hospital - over 250 to lose their jobs.
Â
Oh, yeah, the economy is getting better alright!
Â
See www.dailyjobcuts.com for more info...
Â
Â
More layoffs coming.
 @HonkeyCat But, but.....the Obama Camp is saying it's getting BETTER!! HOW can this be????
The smart and industrious will never feel incentivized under the current administration. It's time for a change... I'm just not sure if Romney will be able to rally us as a country... Politics suck!
 @Scoondog The President can cut the budget and get the bureaucrats--particularly the EPA--out of the way. While I doubt Romney has the stones, eliminating departments like Education or Housing would be a great start to getting a handle on the budget
@Scoondog
Most will vote for a lame duck President that won't be doing much but golfing and touring the world the next four years while middle class America continues to circle the drain. Little of anything important will be accomplished. Voting for O will mean nothing, even less Change.
Â
Do we really want to vote for a lame duck President?
Â
You said it!
Heading back over 9% time for a change in WA.
I wonder how much the unemployment numbers were/are made up of let go state/local employees who could not be sustained on the bloated state/local budgets.
Â
And like a few below have said/asked, how much of these gains are due to the people who have dropped off of the unemployed figures and now get no benefits from the state?
Â
I also don't like to see such emphasis on the building/construction sector. Please explain how many construction jobs are there from the federal stimulus grants given to WA state. There are plenty of road construction projects underway that are partly due to the stimulus grants that WA has to spend or return to the federal budget.
Â
This is nothing more than a real estate article. More flowers growing where the sun don't shine. Oh yeah, mushrooms!Â
I can tell you from personal experience that state, county, city governments are cutting way back and as people are leaving they are not getting replaced.
 @mstipton Except the local government doesn't seem to be laying off supervisors or forcing them to work shifts. At least not in King County.
Man that guy with the tattoo's should invest in some loing sleeve shirts... as that tat looks like a gang mark to me. Would make at least give me pause about hiring them...if there was not already something else I didn't like about their interview...just sayin
If congress doesn't get off it's A** on the Bush tax cuts expiring 8.9% is gonna seem like full employment. Hold onto your hats folks.
 @uplink that plus the Obamacare tax should be just enough to hammer the employment into the ground. And the barely disguised inflation that the media is desperate to hide in order to protect Barry means we are in another period of stagflation. It wasn't good last time and it certainly won't be good this time.
Â
But, hey! Some stardust and unicorns from the Lightworker--along with the proper punishment of the people who are already paying 71% of our income tax as well as laying off energy workers around the country--and everything will be just fine. Really
I like an article I read right after the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare.
Â
Justice Roberts cited the plan as a tax - which goes against the commerce clause. American's can't be "taxed" for mandatory health insurance.
Â
There's more to the story and it can be read by Googling "The Chief Justice Has Done Good". It can be found on Americanthinker.com
Â
Either way, stats are not showing true unemployment numbers.
After ten years of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, we should not be having these problems. The unemployed are still waiting for that money to trickle down, hell the stock market is way up there. Maybe the Bush tax cuts weren't the right approach?
 @rockguy I wonder why obama extended them.
 @rockguy Everyone is waiting to see what Congress will do with the new tax rates. No one ill spend money now if later earnings will be confiscated. Pretty simple. Also, borrowing, printing, and spending does its own damage to the economy, not to mention the war on private production by our own little fascists in the EPA all help to ensure a poor economic outlook.
Â
And most of the tax cuts went to the middle class, not the rich.
 @LockesChild really I would like to see the numbers on that one.... I still bet a bigger percentage of my net income went to my taxes than some of the other folks at the top....
 @Antistatism that is a great graphic.Â
 @justsayin and the top 10% pay 71% of income tax while earning only 37% of income.
Â
Romney was right--47% of the populace doesn't pay income taxes, so they don't really care about either a tax cut or the cost of government. Add in those who work for government and have a self-interest in growing government and you have a pretty large percentage of the electorate that doesn't respond well to reducing taxes or limiting government.
 @Freespeech  @LockesChild
These graphics might give you some understanding:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/your-taxes-work-all-you-need-know-about-who-pays-what-taxes-us
@Freespeech @LockesChild The top 1% pay 37% of the taxes yesterday's Wall Street Journal.
 @LockesChild  @Freespeech I prefer the flat tax also but the government fears it greatly. Just think of the unemployment rate after the flat tax started. All the IRS agents and all the accountants that make enough during tax season to retire the rest of the year. This is not a red or blue issue, both sides don't want a flat tax for the immediate effect on unemployment.
 @Freespeech well, with 1.3 million pages in the tax code it certainly is all about how good your account is and how bad the IRS is at understanding their own contradictory tax code. But proposals to simply flatten it down to a small percentage and then tax everything (a tax code that could fit in a paperback novel) have all been rejected. Everyone wants to use the tax code to reward something or someone, which is madness.
@rockguy If you think about QE1 2 ans now 3. Wait until inflation raises it's ugly head. And the benifit I got from them was the married reduction, I am not rich the most I have made was 66K
We have no chance at controlling raging unemployment with both education cost escalation and increasing disparity between actual GDP leftovers. It simply costs too much for government to deal with. Corporate protectionism and corporate welfare block it all now. New businesses or nothing doing now. It's paying the rich quite well not to have to invest in anything real here at home. Our government is making sure of it.
KOMO, Are we counting those that have quit looking for work? Are we counting those now on TANF? SSI? Methinks the real number is MUCH higher.
 @hologram5 Yes, it is. Probably around 14% for the US, if you include underemployment as well.
@LockesChild @hologram5 Last I saw shadowstats had it at 22%
@LockesChild yeah, cooked.
 @T_BONE_WALKER Well, the BLS has it at about 14.7%. Hopefully they aren't cooking the numbers, but with this administration you never know.
 @LockesChild  @hologram5
Â
Just about spot on: U-6 works out to be about 22,616,322 million people. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
Â
I don't think Obama ever cared about getting people back to work and it shows!
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ObamaMonthsUnemployment-600x448.png
RN1, you said it! Plenty of jobs in Eastern WA. It's physical labor thought so that might be a put off for some people.
Â
Â
I remember back east when it was apple picking season the migrant workers were provided with housing (mobile homes, trailers, bunk houses, etc). The lived right in the orchards and got to smoke all the dope they wanted while picking away.
Â
Is "housing" provided here in Washington?
Lots of apples to pick right now. No need for unemployment to rise.
Â
"Go East, young man!" </Greeley>
Obviously caused by Romney's awkward remarks several months ago. Four more years! Over 8% UE. Looking forward to it!  $20T debt in 2016! Can't believe I ever considered anyone else. Hail, Dear Leader.
Â
Please write to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave for your free ObamaCheck!
Â
Obama-He cares!
Â
 @Sid Vishess Sid has gone birther crazy. How sad.Â
 @caphillkid Wha?  This is once instance that the President has not lied to us. He put down his place of birth on his college applications.Â
DISREGARD!Â
Â
I was kidnapped by guys in black suits and ties and taken to a dark room where they threatened to play Obama speeches dubbed onto Nancy Pelosi's lips. Fearing for my life (and sanity) I agreed to say whatever they wanted.
Â
Fortunately, I was able to trick them into letting me go by showing them my Union card and County paycheck stub.
Come on Sid. You know the whole increase in unemployment is really a right wing conspiracy to hurt our kommaner in chief.Â
Â
Increasing the roles of government entitlement [ read free stuff ] compliments the administration's goals of building a voter base.
@Sid Vishess Thanks for the afternoon laugh! I think I can make it through the rest of the work day now!! lol
 @RJ1981  @Sid Vishess=Not Your Average Unionized Government Employee and Fiscontervative!