Taxpayers on the hook for millions in new 520 Bridge repairs
»Play Video
SEATTLE -- You may not realize it, but you - taxpayers - are now on the hook for millions of dollars to repair the problems with the new 520 Bridge. You know, the bridge that hasn't even opened yet.
For months, the KOMO 4 Problem Solvers have been exposing the serious constructions flaws with the pontoons for the bridge. Now we're trying to find out how much the repairs will cost you.
Problem is, the state won't tell us. Instead WSDOT is taking public documents that you have a right to see and blacking out critical sections after we used public records laws to get them. We think you deserve to see what they're hiding behind the black ink, so KOMO 4 is suing the state for violating the law.
At the same time, we've also discovered that the reserve fund for the Pontoon Project has already been depleted to fix the cracks and leaks we've uncovered.
Whether it's the first cycle of pontoons on Lake Washington or the second batch of mammoth concrete boxes under construction in Aberdeen, every week, WSDOT managers are calculating costs. What's the taxpayer price-tag for repairing the leaks and cracks the Problem Solvers uncovered? What's the price for re-designing the other 27 pontoons yet to be built?
The Problem Solvers started asking about costs last October. This is what Transportation Secretary Paula Hammond told us then, "you can be guaranteed that we're going to pay what we are due to pay for but nothing more."
WSDOT wouldn't say then - and still refuses to tell - how much taxpayers may have to pay. At a state House Transportation Committee last week, Representative Dan Kristiansen (R- Snohomish) asked Sec. Hammond, "Do we have any idea what the preliminary costs that we as the state, it sounds like, are going to be dealing with?" Secretary Hammond confirmed the state is liable for most of the pontoon problems, "when there's a design flaw - we own it." But she never answered how much it could cost.
State Senator Curtis King co-chairs the Senate Transportation Committee: "We have no idea of what is the significance from a cost standpoint."
To pin down the taxpayers' risk, the Problem Solvers sifted through tens of thousands of documents. And we found two single reports from September - long before the extent of the problems were known. One showed probable costs for repairs and redesign already well over $40 million. The other that the Pontoon Project's reserve for cost overruns already showed a negative balance of nearly $25 million.
"We as legislators should be upset about the fact that we're spending more money that we thought we were going to have," says King.
When we asked WSDOT for more recent construction reports, we got page after page after page of reports with blacked out - or redacted - numbers. Now KOMO and the Problem Solvers are suing the state, asking for complete cost reports. "Every time we spend another million dollars," says Sen. King, "it's the citizens of the state of Washington that are paying that."
Last fall, a Problem Solver investigation revealed all six of the first pontoons from Aberdeen had extensive cracking and developed leaks. "They know they have a problem," adds Senator King, "and part of it is because of the work that your station has done and you have done to bring it to the forefront."
Now our insider sources tell us that, in spite of extensive repairs, cracks in the bottom of at least some of those pontoons are getting worse. So now the state is considering a brand-new fix - using steel tendons to tighten the pontoons side to side, called 'post-tensioning' - and hopefully seal the persistent cracks. WSDOT Construction Engineer Jeff Carpenter told us, "so if we put the post-tensioning on, that's an option that we feel very confidant will give us a good solution."
Earlier this week, WSDOT showed us inside Pontoon 'R' currently under construction in Aberdeen. We saw several sections with blue marks denoting what WSDOT told us are non-structural cracks - less than .006 inches in width and Carpenter told us, "it's just the reflective cracking we're getting with the stresses." We saw several sections already showing numerous crack repair, including in the anchor gallery and the roof or 'deck' of Pontoon R. That confirmed visually what the Problem Solvers found in an internal WSDOT report saying that while overall there is less cracking with this second cycle of pontoons, in some areas - cracking is now occurring at a higher rate than in the first cycle. Carpenter: "We did get more of the cracking than we would have liked, but it's been sealed."
Now legislators are starting to demand assurances that the pontoon fixes will work. Senator King: "We need to be very much assured that that's going to happen or we need to start over."
Secretary Hammond and WSDOT say the contingency reserve funds set up for the other 520 bridge contracts have enough money in them to cover cost overruns from the pontoon project. But without current project documents - we can't confirm that. That's why KOMO 4 is suing the state for those public records to force them to give us - and you - answers about those costs.
For months, the KOMO 4 Problem Solvers have been exposing the serious constructions flaws with the pontoons for the bridge. Now we're trying to find out how much the repairs will cost you.
Problem is, the state won't tell us. Instead WSDOT is taking public documents that you have a right to see and blacking out critical sections after we used public records laws to get them. We think you deserve to see what they're hiding behind the black ink, so KOMO 4 is suing the state for violating the law.
At the same time, we've also discovered that the reserve fund for the Pontoon Project has already been depleted to fix the cracks and leaks we've uncovered.
Whether it's the first cycle of pontoons on Lake Washington or the second batch of mammoth concrete boxes under construction in Aberdeen, every week, WSDOT managers are calculating costs. What's the taxpayer price-tag for repairing the leaks and cracks the Problem Solvers uncovered? What's the price for re-designing the other 27 pontoons yet to be built?
The Problem Solvers started asking about costs last October. This is what Transportation Secretary Paula Hammond told us then, "you can be guaranteed that we're going to pay what we are due to pay for but nothing more."
WSDOT wouldn't say then - and still refuses to tell - how much taxpayers may have to pay. At a state House Transportation Committee last week, Representative Dan Kristiansen (R- Snohomish) asked Sec. Hammond, "Do we have any idea what the preliminary costs that we as the state, it sounds like, are going to be dealing with?" Secretary Hammond confirmed the state is liable for most of the pontoon problems, "when there's a design flaw - we own it." But she never answered how much it could cost.
State Senator Curtis King co-chairs the Senate Transportation Committee: "We have no idea of what is the significance from a cost standpoint."
To pin down the taxpayers' risk, the Problem Solvers sifted through tens of thousands of documents. And we found two single reports from September - long before the extent of the problems were known. One showed probable costs for repairs and redesign already well over $40 million. The other that the Pontoon Project's reserve for cost overruns already showed a negative balance of nearly $25 million.
"We as legislators should be upset about the fact that we're spending more money that we thought we were going to have," says King.
When we asked WSDOT for more recent construction reports, we got page after page after page of reports with blacked out - or redacted - numbers. Now KOMO and the Problem Solvers are suing the state, asking for complete cost reports. "Every time we spend another million dollars," says Sen. King, "it's the citizens of the state of Washington that are paying that."
Last fall, a Problem Solver investigation revealed all six of the first pontoons from Aberdeen had extensive cracking and developed leaks. "They know they have a problem," adds Senator King, "and part of it is because of the work that your station has done and you have done to bring it to the forefront."
Now our insider sources tell us that, in spite of extensive repairs, cracks in the bottom of at least some of those pontoons are getting worse. So now the state is considering a brand-new fix - using steel tendons to tighten the pontoons side to side, called 'post-tensioning' - and hopefully seal the persistent cracks. WSDOT Construction Engineer Jeff Carpenter told us, "so if we put the post-tensioning on, that's an option that we feel very confidant will give us a good solution."
Earlier this week, WSDOT showed us inside Pontoon 'R' currently under construction in Aberdeen. We saw several sections with blue marks denoting what WSDOT told us are non-structural cracks - less than .006 inches in width and Carpenter told us, "it's just the reflective cracking we're getting with the stresses." We saw several sections already showing numerous crack repair, including in the anchor gallery and the roof or 'deck' of Pontoon R. That confirmed visually what the Problem Solvers found in an internal WSDOT report saying that while overall there is less cracking with this second cycle of pontoons, in some areas - cracking is now occurring at a higher rate than in the first cycle. Carpenter: "We did get more of the cracking than we would have liked, but it's been sealed."
Now legislators are starting to demand assurances that the pontoon fixes will work. Senator King: "We need to be very much assured that that's going to happen or we need to start over."
Secretary Hammond and WSDOT say the contingency reserve funds set up for the other 520 bridge contracts have enough money in them to cover cost overruns from the pontoon project. But without current project documents - we can't confirm that. That's why KOMO 4 is suing the state for those public records to force them to give us - and you - answers about those costs.
Since it was the states fault...take it out of their funds...personal or otherwise. Taxpayers didn't choose this...they shouldn't have to pay for it either.
The contractor needs to fix the cracks or replace the defective pontoons or forfeit bond and be fired. NOW.
@JLS1950Â sort of like buying a new car, only to find the engine block cracked, then being told the buyer must pay for the new engine or engine block repair on a new car still on the assembly line. Â The Union Labor, USA Labor, Got to Love the Union Labor, the Union Quality, .... You can't fire THIS, Union Labor, you can't fire THIS, Union Labor, Union Labor still gets pension and entitlements! Â Government workers cannot get fired for poor work quality, it just means you must hire MORE UNION LABOR! AND MORE UNION LABOR! Â $100,000,000 Mistake, enough to pay for 50 elementary school entire annual budget or educate 20,000 students. Â The state government cannot find money for school and education but can tolerate $100 million mistakes and screw ups by labor union workers! Â Explain why the tax payers have to pay for the Labor union dues?
@NWDemocrat @JLS1950 You had me until you started blaming the unions. As I recall, it was a union member or two who initially blew the whistle on this - followed by some independent engineers.
Follow the money: see who is benefiting from cut-rate shoddy design work (and it is the design that is faulty - not merely the assembly practice - per latest published reports.) I can guarantee that the unions and union workers are not the ones benefiting from doing this cheaply.
When Ford "Exploders" were rolling over and killing people, did you also blame assembly-line workers? Recall that the issue then was traced to vehicle/suspension design and tire design - NOT assembly-line issues. Same problem here: the assembly workers are building to spec, and the spec is faulty so the end product is faulty.
I've said before, Paula Hammond needs find her way off the job, and I hope she can somehow be tied/liable for the messed up bridge I know we will be fixing 15 years from now. If someone willingly allows these levels of incompetence they should bear the responsibility when it fails.
Yet another massively expensive cluster %*$@ "construction project" by this state. Â Let's see, how many of these can we get going simultaneously? Â Right now, we have (all on the taxpayers' dollar, of course):
- this alleged bridge
- the Alaskan Way tunnel
- the "upgrading" of the waterfront
- the light rail system being builtÂ
- the still not fixed Mercer Mess
Those are just off the top of my head - any others you guys can think of? Â I'm sure you can.
Anyone want to bet that at some point, we will be a trillion bucks in cost overruns???
A. Who designed the pontoons? The state or the contractor?
B. Who approved the design?
C. Is there a question about the quality of the materials used in their fabrication?
Â
IMHO, the answers to those questions should decide WHO pays for the repairs.
If the state designed the pontoons, and it is the design which is at fault, then we, the taxpayers, pay the price. :(
If the contractor designed them and said they would work, then the contractor should eat the cost.
If inferior quality materials were used, then there is no question the contractor eats the cost.
Â
The answer of "Â you can be guaranteed that we're going to pay what we are due to pay for but nothing more."
tells us absolutely nothing to answer the above questions. Nothing.
 @Gnirk The state DOT designed the pontoons.
Â
The state DOT approved the design.
Â
I don't know, perhaps.
Pardon my ignorance but, ummmm, is there no insurance policy for cases like this (of defective design)? No recourse other than the taxpayers footing the entire bill for a do-over after this " Oops, my bad!" from the state's design engineers?
 @bikebetty Probably not. It has become fairly standard in the last twenty years or so for government to "self-insure" everything from worker's compensation (on the job injuries) to massive projects such as this one. "They" feel that the cost of insurance premiums are greater than simply paying the costs of any claims.
KOMO is really try to drive up hysteria here for ratings. I notice the only politicians they interview had (R) behind their title...surprise...surprise. Yes, this is what happens went you get a lousy contactor. I believe most problem here are from poor workmanship. That is what happen when contactors underbid the contract they make -up the money somehow or somewhere. Thing happen in Engineering ask Boeing, Toyota, Three Mile island, and etc. Most of the problem I have seen on this project is that it has been a gravy train for expensive consultant that the state ends end up paying triple the cost. And, all the fancy add-ons for the east lake area.Â
 @LiberalChuck The state DOT designed the pontoons. The contractor built them to the state design. The reason you see those (R)'s is because basically it was a (D) administration and appointments who are responsible.Â
@oldster70 @LiberalChuck I am pretty sure this was a design-build contract. This means the contractor design and build the structure. Of course, the state has oversight to approve the design too. I heard the contractor also submitted some last minute to the design as well.Â
Â
The problem with this design-build process is the contactor does the little as possible on the design side to increase profit. This places much the earnest on the state to thoroughly review and approve the plans as quickly as possible.
Â
KOMO  news should not be surprised some portions of the document had been redacted. There likely a pending lawsuit involved. I am sure the Attorney General's Office has given WSDOT guidance on what to do.
It doesnât look like WSDOT understands the root cause of the excessive pontoon cracking from the articles printed to date. If they did, then the second batch of pontoons should have had no cracking after post tensioning. Or did they really think that just patching the cracks after they occur was sufficient?  I wonder what the Engineer of Record thinks about the rebar being bathed in salt and fresh water from day one.
When you elect Democrats by reflex each year into office, .......you buy and own these kinds of "investments".
 @Attila Careful, you may have just hit the "root" cause there.........
This state is run by idiots from the top down. Let's start tolling Benson Rd on Kent East Hill. And Ambaum Ave in Burien and Rainier Ave in Renton. If it weren't so pathetic it would be funny. Absolutely no accountability. Just add more taxes.Â
Bend over and be ready to pay tolls on all bridges and roads and they still will not have enough money. Â
yep! THE TUNNEL ? IT WILL TAKE US DOWN.SAME W THE REST.NOW THIST WILL COST, 26 BIL IN% AND IN PRINC.ECT ARE YOU LEAVIHG TOWN ? i said this in 2009 look at it tks ed
One division of Kiewit is building the pontoons and is fined by the state $10,000 a day for late deliveries. Â Another division of Kiewit is building the bridge and fining the State $100,000 a day when the state fails to delivery the pontoons. Â Now the state has to pay for the repairs of the flawed, late pontoons. Â Is the state also going to be fined by Kiewit for the delay to fix the pontoons? Â I wish I could get a state contract, sounds like a license to print money.
Â
Â
Â
Thanks, Kiewit!
"when there's a design flaw - we own it."  Excuse me? When a private business sells you something, then they own it. Why is there a different set of rules for the public sector? Someone needs to get to the bottom of this.Â
 @ObsidianOne Not a different rule. The state designed the pontoons so any flaws in the design ARE the result of the actions of the state DOT.
@Furd @ObsidianOne And yet I get the impression that you think no one including the dept. head should be held accountable. If these government people designed and approved inferior pontoons then they should be held accountable. Why would we want people working for the state that that think this kind of use of taxpayer money is acceptable? Anyone responsible for this mess should be held accountable.
 @Jatok  @Furd  @ObsidianOne Your impression is WRONG, I DO thinks that heads should roll, many heads. It is obvious to me that the instruction was to design the pontoons to be built as cheaply as possible and THAT, my friend, is the real problem. Such things as bridges should always be designed to the highest possible standards.
Just wait till the tunnels are built, this will be minor.......
While this sounds like a train wreck, how does this compare to other large jobs by other states? Is this quite common? Is this worse? Compare to others please. Most of us know nothing about construction on this level, design, contract design or anything related to the topic. Maybe this is common place, but since we know nothing it looks like a mess.
FIRE PAULA HAMMOND. End of story.
 @BluefireJaguar FIRE?!?  I say INDICT!  And indict Christine, too.  They both are guilty of dragging this state down the toilet.  NEVER leave it to a Democrat to manage a large project such as this.  They go with the low, low bidder and a contract fraught with crap clauses (all in favor of the contractor).  This is completely unacceptable, and Christine's and Paula's heads SHOULD roll....in the form of fines commensurate with the damage to the state....then throw 'em both in jail for fraud.  You got what you asked for when you blindly voted for the Democrat on the ballot!  Read JustOneVoice's post above and judge for yourself if that kind of contract clause would EVER occur in business.  You think any corporate CEO would survive signing off on such a contract?
 @BluefireJaguar Excellent idea but it will do NOTHING concerning this mess.
Why not as Taxpayers file a lawsuit to stop the madness sue the state and contractor for shoddy work and poor management of funds and force the contractor to pay for any and all cost overruns and repairs and not the taxpayer.
@Eharper Because the contractor has done nothing wrong as mush as most people on here would like to think. They've built the pontoons to the specs that the state provided. There was no "shoddy" workmanship or anything that let to this. The root cause of the leaks is due to improper design of reinforcing by the desinger aka the State.
 @Eharper Because IF the contractor is following the design and specifications set down by the state they have done nothing wrong.
1) the person who wrote the contracts for this project, should be fired.
2) In a design/build contract, each company should carry Professional liability coverage. Why isn't WSDOT filing a claim against the company that designed the pontoons and the company building them? Tax payers should not have to foot the bill for incompetence.
3) This isn't the first bridge in the world to be built. Then why are there so many issues?
WSDOT is the designer of the pontoons so if they file a claim against themselves then we as taxpayers will pay twice. When they let this contract out for bid contractors had the option of accepting the states design of the pontoons or designing their own. Every contractor that bid the job chose the states design as going through the entire design process wouldn't have allowed them to build the bridge within the schedule required and would have driven their bid up so high they would have never had the chance of being awarded the contract.
Â
There are so many issues because there were so many protests on the project where things had to continuously be changed thus rushing the state to put a design out without going through a review of the design as they should have.
 @des6786 As far as I know it is NOT a design/build contract; the state DOT designed the pontoons.
Shut it down!
 @Grumpa I'm sure it felt great to shout that... but um... now back to reality.
 @TruthinAdverts Felt really good! Now for a beer and back to pouring that last bridge piling... :-)
 @Grumpa Right because that's an option... not!
This contractor seems to have a history of issues and problems so how does the state award the contract to them in the first place? That alone merits a full and independent investigation.
 @Citizen#3457899654 Exactly, Citizen......whose relatives are running Kiewit??
This whole project is an effing joke. Shut it down until a competent construction company can be hired and competent supervision at the WSDOT can be found.
Shut down that project, it has never been clearly thought out. It has caused financial havoc for most eastsiders. From the beginning this project has been a money pit.
At this point, Eastside1 nailed it! Shut it down, and put the whole thing on hold. This project is no where near ready to move forward. So far it has only gone backwards. It seems to me that we have done a very good job in the past, building not one, but three floating bridges. The I90 one sunk due to DOE stupidity, not to any flaw in the design or construction. The Hoods Canal Bridge failed in a storm, not due to design or construction, but to a bad assumption. Had the bridge remained closed, it likely would have survived just fine. This bridge is totally flawed and construction must stop immediately. It is falling apart in the yard during construction. We are just throwing good (?) money after bad.       Â
way to go Komo! Can we make it a class action lawsuit so the taxpayers can get in on it since will all be damaged by their actions? :)
 @Andrea Gearllach So who pays the taxpayers if "we win" a class action suit against ourselves? You see, the "State" really is the taxpayers, if only for liabilities.Â
that was supposed to "we will" oops.
Sounds to me like there is a fundamental design flaw. This thing should be scrapped and started again from scratch, as Senator King indicated. What kind of engineer looked at this project and thought it was just fine? Now, how can we recoup some of the money? If we go for the contractor they could file bankruptcy and dodge it...and open up shop the next day under a new name.
This kind of "keystone cops" run around would be comical if it weren't so fiscally painful.
Kiewit should lose their license to do business in this state. I doubt that the government has thought out how all these tolls are going to hurt our local economy. Every toll that is paid is that much less spent in a local business. This contract should never have been signed.
@Darn it! Why should Kiewit lose their license when they followed the design the State put out. Kiewit isn't the one to blame for all of the issues.
@Reggie Kiewit is a joke!! They screwed up the San Fransisco Bay bridge and now they are going to do the same with this one.
Â
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/05/26/4519092/caltrans-records-reveal-concerns.html
 @Tattooed_Angel Not to mention there is a bridge in Vancouver, BC that is falling apart that Kiewit built as well. http://www.komonews.com/news/local/520-bridge-contractor-blamed-for-BC-bridge-mishap-184501621.html
 @Reggie Shoddy workmanship is shoddy workmanship. You can meet the technical aspects of a design, like using specific components in a concrete mix, and still use shoddy workmanship in the application.Â
I'd like to see how you can prove shoddy workmanship has anything to do with this. The cause of the issues is 100% due to the lack of reinforcing in the pontoons that were designed by the state. They've been doing a great job working with the design they've been given.