Wash. to kill pack of at least 8 gray wolves
YAKIMA, Wash. (AP) - Washington officials announced plans Friday to kill a pack of at least eight gray wolves that have been attacking livestock in the state's northeast corner.
The move is likely to anger some conservation groups and deal a setback to wolf recovery efforts, though state officials said the step was necessary for sustainable, long-term wolf recovery in the region.
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife said two teams were in the field Friday to try to kill members of the Wedge Pack, which ranges over a remote area of northern Stevens County. Marksmen would hunt the wolves from the ground, and if those efforts were unsuccessful, they might use helicopters to aid their hunt, Director Phil Anderson said in a statement.
The pack is believed to have killed or injured at least 15 cattle from the Diamond M herd that grazes in a large area near the Canadian border, according to the statement. Those attacks have become increasingly more frequent since July, even after the agency killed a non-breeding member of the pack in August, and experts believe the wolves have become dependent on cattle for food.
"Once wolves become habituated to livestock as their primary food source, all of the wolf experts we've talked to agree that we have no alternative but to remove the entire pack," Anderson said. "By doing that, we will preserve the opportunity for the recovery of gray wolves in balance with viable livestock operations."
Gray wolves were eliminated as a breeding species in Washington by the 1930s, but they have since migrated to Washington from Idaho, Oregon and British Columbia. They are listed as endangered throughout Washington under state law and the western two-thirds of the state under federal law.
A wolf management plan approved late last year requires 15 successful breeding pairs for three consecutive years to remove endangered species protections. Four breeding pairs would be required in eastern Washington, the North Cascades and the South Cascades or Northwest coast, as well as three other pairs anywhere in the state.
There are currently eight confirmed wolf packs in the state - five of them in the state's northeast corner. Four other packs are suspected but not yet confirmed.
Two groups that participated in the development of the wolf management plan supported the decision Friday.
Cattlemen must work with the state to find solutions that include nonlethal measures to minimize their losses, said Jack Field, executive vice president of the Washington Cattlemen's Association. They also are being encouraged to enter into cooperative agreements with the state for managing conflicts between livestock and wolves.
Those could include "caught in the act" kill permits to allow ranchers to kill wolves to protect their livestock. The department also offers compensation to ranchers for livestock killed by wolves.
Mitch Friedman, executive director of Conservation Northwest, said that he understands and agrees that pack removal is the right action at this time, despite his difficulty accepting the decision. But he also said he hopes the department and ranchers will work together to avoid a repeat of this situation.
"There has to be a commitment on the part of all sides to allow wolves to occupy the landscape while protecting the rancher's livelihood and maintain their ability to raise cattle," he said.
The move is likely to anger some conservation groups and deal a setback to wolf recovery efforts, though state officials said the step was necessary for sustainable, long-term wolf recovery in the region.
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife said two teams were in the field Friday to try to kill members of the Wedge Pack, which ranges over a remote area of northern Stevens County. Marksmen would hunt the wolves from the ground, and if those efforts were unsuccessful, they might use helicopters to aid their hunt, Director Phil Anderson said in a statement.
The pack is believed to have killed or injured at least 15 cattle from the Diamond M herd that grazes in a large area near the Canadian border, according to the statement. Those attacks have become increasingly more frequent since July, even after the agency killed a non-breeding member of the pack in August, and experts believe the wolves have become dependent on cattle for food.
"Once wolves become habituated to livestock as their primary food source, all of the wolf experts we've talked to agree that we have no alternative but to remove the entire pack," Anderson said. "By doing that, we will preserve the opportunity for the recovery of gray wolves in balance with viable livestock operations."
Gray wolves were eliminated as a breeding species in Washington by the 1930s, but they have since migrated to Washington from Idaho, Oregon and British Columbia. They are listed as endangered throughout Washington under state law and the western two-thirds of the state under federal law.
A wolf management plan approved late last year requires 15 successful breeding pairs for three consecutive years to remove endangered species protections. Four breeding pairs would be required in eastern Washington, the North Cascades and the South Cascades or Northwest coast, as well as three other pairs anywhere in the state.
There are currently eight confirmed wolf packs in the state - five of them in the state's northeast corner. Four other packs are suspected but not yet confirmed.
Two groups that participated in the development of the wolf management plan supported the decision Friday.
Cattlemen must work with the state to find solutions that include nonlethal measures to minimize their losses, said Jack Field, executive vice president of the Washington Cattlemen's Association. They also are being encouraged to enter into cooperative agreements with the state for managing conflicts between livestock and wolves.
Those could include "caught in the act" kill permits to allow ranchers to kill wolves to protect their livestock. The department also offers compensation to ranchers for livestock killed by wolves.
Mitch Friedman, executive director of Conservation Northwest, said that he understands and agrees that pack removal is the right action at this time, despite his difficulty accepting the decision. But he also said he hopes the department and ranchers will work together to avoid a repeat of this situation.
"There has to be a commitment on the part of all sides to allow wolves to occupy the landscape while protecting the rancher's livelihood and maintain their ability to raise cattle," he said.
Can you believe it? The State is going to spend probably a million dollars hunting down 8 wolves who don't know a cow from an elk. And only a few cows at that. Good thing our state's agency directors know the difference between their ass and the horses ass they're acting like. Leave the wolves alone and spend the money on some herd dogs!
Here's a novel idea for the cattle ranchers---if "wolves have become dependent on cattle as their primary food source"---STOP putting your cattle where the wolves live!
Â
The ranchers don't seem to want anything but a quick fix--kill the wolves-but prevailing data has shown that if you kill them-more will simply take their place. So killing the wolves is not the answer.
Â
Here's a link to non lethal, tried and proven wolf deterrents-ALL ranchers should be required to use these non lethal methods before they arbitrarily demand that wolves be killed :
Â
http://www.defenders.org/publications/livestock_and_wolves.pdf
Â
This is an important guide that offers many methods to keep ranch animals safe while saving the few wolves we have left.
So When is WDFW going to kill all the seals that hang out at the dams devour the returning salmon runs?
I wish I knew for certain if this is on public land that these cows are being grazed. It seems to me that public land should give priority to wildlife. If the dependence of these wolves on livestock is a problem, then take the livestock out of known predator hunting grounds on public land. Wolves provide much needed predation that is good for our rivers and our healthy balance of species. Cows on the other hand provide nothing to the area other than manure, but at a much greater expense to the habitat.
While I realize it must be quite expensive to the ranchers to lose a cow, there are programs in place that compensate people for the loss of livestock if it can be proven as predation. The idea that we can solve the problem by removing wolves from the area is short sighted and does not provide a long term solution to guarding rancher's cattle. The plan needs to address the long term issue of how these competing interests can both exist and what is in the interest of the greater public at large.
Wolves are a sign of a healthy system at work. There will be some conflicts as the wolf packs spread throughout the state because we have never known how to balance the economic interest of ranchers and of wildlife. That is why wolves were eliminated in the first place. I am not convinced that this plan addresses anything at this point other than the rancher's desires. Not a good reason to kill off a valuable resource that benefits the public interest in a healthy eco-system.
 @justlikeanyoneelse  http://www.king5.com/news/environment/Wash-DFW-to-kill-pack-of-at-least-8-gray-wolves-170782476.html  their article is a lil more informative.Â
I don't understand why these officials cater to these predator haters in the ranching community. It is obvious this rancher is a dinosaur. He doesn't want to accept depredation payments because that would legitimize wolves....Good Grief......Another example of why we shouldn't let these ranchers graze on our public lands foralmost nothing. They want no other animals near their cattle. They lose hundreds every year due to birthing complications, weather and disease, yet they whine and snivel when they lose animals suspected of being killed by wolves.
mmm, grass-fed steak. Much tastier than wolf I suspect.
Well its obvious.We humans are all idiots.Didnt we introduce these wolves back into the wild?And now that they are starting to spread out,we are gona determine lines that they cant cross or we will kill them all.Not relocate,just kill them.And the crime they committed?Killing animals to eat.Maybe we could fence all the packs in and feed them.Im losin it.......................
Everything must die, the environment must suffer, the water must be poisoned by waste, the cattle will be tortured and end their lives in suffering - all so meat eaters can have their totally unnecessary, earth destroying steak.
why isn't anyone talking about how much money this is costing the average tax payer? our state is in the midst of economic crisis and funding for vital services is routinely cut so how can the governor and her administration justify spending thousands of dollars on a daily basis to staff a team of sharp shooters to kill wolves? i can't even begin to imagine what it will cost to fund ariel gunning- why does this one livestock producer deserve such preferential treatment???? his cows were on PUBLIC land up until very recently and unfortunately not all avenues of non-lethal deterrents were explored. And even if they were, depredation is a part of doing business, just as natural disaster and disease is. there is something inherently wrong with the system that we place so much import (and resources) on the interests of one individual.Â
 @bean spencer I agree about the state spending money to end the wolf depredations. Just let the ranchers take care of the problem for free.
Â
As for grazing on public lands--these ranchers pay for that right. These lands aren't parks and trying to turn them into parks is misguided.Â
Ya, I can think of a couple of great locations to take the wolves to help weed out the dog and cat population
Let's mention the conservation groups that sent the letter to WDFW 3 weeks ago who DO NOT support this decision. National Humane Society, Cascade Wildlands, Defenders of Wildlife, Wolf Haven International, Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club. One conservation group out of all of those. The one that did support this has relationships with ranchers that they are working with, so I'm sure they are trying to keep those relationships in tact. I wouldn't call this a blazing sign of endorsement by any means. I agree their has to be a comittment from both sides. That would mean this rancher would publicly stop stating that he would like to kill wolves by any means necessary. He doesn't really look like a "in good faith" kind of guy. Aerial hunting is being mentioned. Has Washington State conducted an Environmental Impact Statement for that? Night vision equipment, bringing in extra people...this operation sounds pretty spendy. How much are tax payers doling out to protect cows that are being grazed on PUBLIC LANDS in a NATIONAL FOREST. Aren't wild animals supposed to be there? Not Cows? This whole situation is a political tool so WDFW can look tough for the ranchers. But in the end, the ranchers won't respect them and neither will the pro-wolf side. Stupid, stupid move. WDFW is not building social tolerance for wolves or for the two opposing sides, they are making it worse.
Yep, when we're done with the wolves, lets get the Orcas too. I bet there are hundreds of salmon that we can't catch because of them.
@marvin No, Orcas won't completely decimate a population of salmon. Nor do they kill just to kill. Wolves are completely different from most other predators. Do some research on what has happened to the Elk herds in Yellowstone since their reintroduction.
Is it any wonder why ranchers killed all the wlves in the first place? Wolves don't just kill for food, they kill for sport as well.
@Boondoggler Typical stupid human comment. Taking a wild animal that survives by instinct and saying that they kill for sport. Probably a bow hunter who leaves injured animals all over the landscape.
 @Boondoggler please provide proof where wolves have killed and no eaten their kill. they hunt to survive. only chimps and humans kill for sport
 @Boondoggler Just like people!
@stratoonist @Boondoggler That's a good point. I'm not a fan of that either. I'd like to cull that type of hunter out of the herd as well.
Time to hit the reset button. The reintroduction of wolves has been so mismanaged that something really does need to be done. Areas that were once teaming with deer and elk are now desolate wastelands. I saw the result of a wolf pack moving into an area first hand. One year while hunting, we saw upwards of 30+ deer a day. The next year we saw a total of 3 in a week of hunting. Those that were seen were way down low next to the highway. The day before we left we spotted several wolves moving together across a hill side. We knew right then and there why the area was like it was.
Â
Time for people who are affected by the wolves to make the decisions about how they are handled, instead of people in Olympia who have no clue or first hand experience.
 @JeepRex The wolves were not reintroduced. They introduced themselves back into Washington.
 @stratoonist Wrong. Wolves were transported and released into several locations throughout Washington. I suggest you educate yourself on the topic.
 @JeepRex So to sum up your post; we should eleminate all of the natural predators who kill deer to survive so that those of you who wish to kill for sport aren't too put out!!!
 @Petwlkr Nope. But there has to be a means of maintaining a balance between predator and pray. With the current "management" plan, there are no provisions for control of the packs. As deer/elk habitat disappears, the ungulate population cannot support an out of control pack.
Were the cattle grazing on public lands or private lands? If on public lands, then as far as I'm concerned, the wolves were being wolves. If on private lands, then the rancher who pays property taxes on his lands has a legitimate beef (no pun intended) and the wolves must go. Can they be trapped and sent up to Alaska so Palin can shoot them from helicopters?
So they kill a few. Then others move in to take their place. Round and round we go. Where we'll stop, nobody knows.
"Those could include "caught in the act" kill permits to allow ranchers to kill wolves to protect their livestock. The department also offers compensation to ranchers for livestock killed by wolves."
Â
Why should the public pay for these predators to kill animals needed to feed people? Has WA state so much money that it can throw it away like this? Just shoot the predators and be done with it.
 @LockesChild Cattle are NOT "needed" to feed people-the meat industry has done a great job brainwashing people that they have to eat meat to survive.
Â
 I am among millions of people who have not eaten any meat in many years and I'm extremely healthy. Recent clean yearly physical-normal protein, B vitamins, iron, etc.
Â
When will you wake up to the decimation of our planet?Â
Â
Wolves are not causing barren wastelands-the meat industry is doing great all on its own in that respect.Â
Â
"Grazing on public lands - called "welfare ranching" because it is largely subsidized by taxpayers - is causing serious damage to ecosystems throughout the western states."
Â
From:Â http://www.cagreens.org/platform/animal-farming
Â
Ranchers want to make money--period. The wolves picking off a few of their dollar signs pi$$es them off-it's that simple.
Â
Â
 @LockesChild See, this is part of the political legacy of giving money to ranchers, farmers ect. Conservatives want those conservative votes and this particular legacy is a tough one. Of course no one asked the tax payers what they think.Â
 @Citizen#3457899654 Price supports are both bad and good. They came about because it wasn't in the interest of the country for ranchers and farmers to go bankrupt on  a regular basis as commodity prices fluctuated. But they certainly have changed over the years into a huge subsidy.
Â
And both parties want those voters. Tom Harkin, the senator from Iowa and a radical leftist, certainly seems to support lots and lots of agricultural subsidies.
 'state officials said the step was necessary for sustainable, long-term wolf recovery in the region.'
Â
They said that with a straight face???
So quickly we forget our place on this planet.
Hmm, keep expanding and expanding and expanding housing developments and people friendly places, where do you think the original denizens are going to go?
 @58Type2 Northestern Washington isn't a hotbed of development.
Â
Though it would be amusing to see wolves prey on cats and dogs on Snoqualmie ridge.Â
 @LockesChild  @58Type2 When I lived in the Coachella Valley in the 70's female coyotes would lure dogs into the desert. and then the males would eat them.
 @LNSeveN  just the males? I know the coyotes in Palm Springs feed well on pets but I never heard about just the males feeding.