Wealthy Texas couple taking advantage of Washington taxpayers?
»Play Video
VASHON, Wash. -- Is a wealthy Texas couple taking advantage of Washington taxpayers? Are they using an historic home on Vashon Island for what's become their own private summer get-away?
A KOMO 4 Problem Solver investigation found taxpayers spent nearly $500,000 for the Mukai Farm and Garden and now the state wonders what the rest of us are getting in return.
Chain link, barbed wire, and 6-foot high fences with "no trespassing" signs make the point doubly clear: The Mukai Farm and Garden on Vashon Island looks anything but welcoming.
The Problem Solvers called the phone number listed on the single, water-damaged sign out front only to hear an operator saying the call cannot be completed. And a knock on the neighboring caretaker's door also got us no answer, even though a family member told us he was home. But when the Problem Solvers contacted the Board President of the group that owns the home - Island Landmarks - Mary Matthews was at her historic Texas estate. And she immediately offered to fly to Seattle and show us the historic landmark herself.
The Mukai Farm & Garden is an historic home and Japanese garden that everyone agrees tells an incredible story. Japanese immigrants -- the Mukai family -- overcame incredible odds to become successful entrepreneurs, developing a revolutionary method of cold-packing strawberries and turning 1930's Vashon Island into the center of the strawberry-producing world. "This site is about the fulfillment of the American dream," Matthews said.
In 1999, Island Landmarks got $460,000 of taxpayer money from the county, state and federal government, using $300,000 of that to buy the Mukai property. But those grants came with a caveat: The property has to be preserved and accessible to the public. "We in Washington state don't give away money to give away money for the sake of it," said Washington State Historic Preservation Officer Allyson Brooks. "We want the public to gain something."
Brooks toured the Mukai property in December.
"I was appalled, and I was dismayed," she said. "And I got very concerned about the use of public funds."
She says it looked like someone had been living there: "Well, there's mouthwash, luggage tags, TV sets, bottles of wine in the refrigerator, all the appearance of somebody having the property for personal use."
Brooks added, "the state cannot grant money for private use." Brooks fired off a letter to Matthews ordering Island Landmarks to "cease and desist" and move her personal belongings out.
We asked Matthews about that when she showed us through the property, but her answers kept changing. We asked if the state was wrong in thinking that she was living there part time? Matthews: "Well they, they were wrong. We never lived here." Instead, she told us she stayed in the historic fruit processing plant next door which she and her husband privately own. The fruit plant has no kitchen and no shower.
When we looked inside the Mukai home, we found boots on the floor in the front bedroom and we asked about a television and VCR there as well.
Matthews replied: "We had Lori Matsukawa do a video for us, and so we show that on there."
In the kitchen, we opened the refrigerator and asked about the wine and food inside.
Matthews responds, "Well, I mean again, I was here live... using the kitchen, because I didn't have a kitchen over there so when I was here I used the kitchen."
Then days later, Matthews e-mailed the Problem Solvers explaining, "From June to Nov. 20 I was on site...I slept at Mukai, used the shower... at Mukai, and used the kitchen at Mukai." She justified it saying she was "volunteering."
But while Matthews was living there, did the public get to visit? A group of Vashon Islanders trying to take over the property called "Friends of Mukai" says no.
"It got almost half a million dollars of public funding," says Lynn Greiner of the group. "It was never intended to be a private residence."
She added, "There were a lot of expectations that they would create exhibits, get the public involved, open it up and very little of that has happened."
Island Landmarks Vice-President and Matthews' husband Nelson Happy also flew out for our visit. He lives and works as an attorney in New York.
"We've had thousands of people through here over the last 13 years," says Happy, "and we've had many many events here. It's always been open to the public."
So the Problem Solvers asked for proof. Island Landmarks' 70 page response showed over the past 12 years, only 16 documented 'events'. Most occurred in 2001, with one or two a year after that -- and nothing over the past three years. The main educational exhibit is a tri-fold report put together by a 5th grader. And as for visitors? The last guest register they gave us was from 2009 and had just 8 signatures.
"Well, there is public access," Happy said. "There's no definition of exactly what it is - it's reasonable, whatever reasonable access is."
There is also the matter of Island Landmark's non-profit status. Island Landmarks hasn't filed a tax return since 1999. The IRS revoked the organization's non-profit, or 501(c)3 tax-exempt status, in 2010. Happy says they have re-applied for it, but that is not currently documented on the IRS website.
The other caveat of those public grants is that the home and garden are to be preserved and maintained.
"I think we've done a good job of maintaining it, keeping it intact, improving it and doing what's necessary to stabilize it," Happy said.
But Mukai is showing signs of age. Outside doors are weathered with paint peeling or almost entirely worn away. The leaking roof is covered with sheets of plastic. And there are numerous signs of unfinished work from downspouts pulling away to a paint job abandoned with door and window trim half painted. Inside the home there are signs of water damage and missing window and door trim.
Matthews and Happy say the projects are unfinished because winter rains set in and they had to stop. Greiner from Friends of Mukai says it's time for someone else to take over: "It's fenced off and neglected and dilapidated."
Nelson and Matthews agree that someone else should take over but they want it to be the National Park Service, though they could offer no proof that they've begun the process. A National Park Service rescue is something preservation experts say is extremely unlikely, particularly in this period of tight budgets.
In the meantime the State Attorney General is warning Island Landmarks to make immediate changes or the state will take legal action to protect the public interest.
A KOMO 4 Problem Solver investigation found taxpayers spent nearly $500,000 for the Mukai Farm and Garden and now the state wonders what the rest of us are getting in return.
Chain link, barbed wire, and 6-foot high fences with "no trespassing" signs make the point doubly clear: The Mukai Farm and Garden on Vashon Island looks anything but welcoming.
The Problem Solvers called the phone number listed on the single, water-damaged sign out front only to hear an operator saying the call cannot be completed. And a knock on the neighboring caretaker's door also got us no answer, even though a family member told us he was home. But when the Problem Solvers contacted the Board President of the group that owns the home - Island Landmarks - Mary Matthews was at her historic Texas estate. And she immediately offered to fly to Seattle and show us the historic landmark herself.
The Mukai Farm & Garden is an historic home and Japanese garden that everyone agrees tells an incredible story. Japanese immigrants -- the Mukai family -- overcame incredible odds to become successful entrepreneurs, developing a revolutionary method of cold-packing strawberries and turning 1930's Vashon Island into the center of the strawberry-producing world. "This site is about the fulfillment of the American dream," Matthews said.
In 1999, Island Landmarks got $460,000 of taxpayer money from the county, state and federal government, using $300,000 of that to buy the Mukai property. But those grants came with a caveat: The property has to be preserved and accessible to the public. "We in Washington state don't give away money to give away money for the sake of it," said Washington State Historic Preservation Officer Allyson Brooks. "We want the public to gain something."
Brooks toured the Mukai property in December.
"I was appalled, and I was dismayed," she said. "And I got very concerned about the use of public funds."
She says it looked like someone had been living there: "Well, there's mouthwash, luggage tags, TV sets, bottles of wine in the refrigerator, all the appearance of somebody having the property for personal use."
Brooks added, "the state cannot grant money for private use." Brooks fired off a letter to Matthews ordering Island Landmarks to "cease and desist" and move her personal belongings out.
We asked Matthews about that when she showed us through the property, but her answers kept changing. We asked if the state was wrong in thinking that she was living there part time? Matthews: "Well they, they were wrong. We never lived here." Instead, she told us she stayed in the historic fruit processing plant next door which she and her husband privately own. The fruit plant has no kitchen and no shower.
When we looked inside the Mukai home, we found boots on the floor in the front bedroom and we asked about a television and VCR there as well.
Matthews replied: "We had Lori Matsukawa do a video for us, and so we show that on there."
In the kitchen, we opened the refrigerator and asked about the wine and food inside.
Matthews responds, "Well, I mean again, I was here live... using the kitchen, because I didn't have a kitchen over there so when I was here I used the kitchen."
Then days later, Matthews e-mailed the Problem Solvers explaining, "From June to Nov. 20 I was on site...I slept at Mukai, used the shower... at Mukai, and used the kitchen at Mukai." She justified it saying she was "volunteering."
But while Matthews was living there, did the public get to visit? A group of Vashon Islanders trying to take over the property called "Friends of Mukai" says no.
"It got almost half a million dollars of public funding," says Lynn Greiner of the group. "It was never intended to be a private residence."
She added, "There were a lot of expectations that they would create exhibits, get the public involved, open it up and very little of that has happened."
Island Landmarks Vice-President and Matthews' husband Nelson Happy also flew out for our visit. He lives and works as an attorney in New York.
"We've had thousands of people through here over the last 13 years," says Happy, "and we've had many many events here. It's always been open to the public."
So the Problem Solvers asked for proof. Island Landmarks' 70 page response showed over the past 12 years, only 16 documented 'events'. Most occurred in 2001, with one or two a year after that -- and nothing over the past three years. The main educational exhibit is a tri-fold report put together by a 5th grader. And as for visitors? The last guest register they gave us was from 2009 and had just 8 signatures.
"Well, there is public access," Happy said. "There's no definition of exactly what it is - it's reasonable, whatever reasonable access is."
There is also the matter of Island Landmark's non-profit status. Island Landmarks hasn't filed a tax return since 1999. The IRS revoked the organization's non-profit, or 501(c)3 tax-exempt status, in 2010. Happy says they have re-applied for it, but that is not currently documented on the IRS website.
The other caveat of those public grants is that the home and garden are to be preserved and maintained.
"I think we've done a good job of maintaining it, keeping it intact, improving it and doing what's necessary to stabilize it," Happy said.
But Mukai is showing signs of age. Outside doors are weathered with paint peeling or almost entirely worn away. The leaking roof is covered with sheets of plastic. And there are numerous signs of unfinished work from downspouts pulling away to a paint job abandoned with door and window trim half painted. Inside the home there are signs of water damage and missing window and door trim.
Matthews and Happy say the projects are unfinished because winter rains set in and they had to stop. Greiner from Friends of Mukai says it's time for someone else to take over: "It's fenced off and neglected and dilapidated."
Nelson and Matthews agree that someone else should take over but they want it to be the National Park Service, though they could offer no proof that they've begun the process. A National Park Service rescue is something preservation experts say is extremely unlikely, particularly in this period of tight budgets.
In the meantime the State Attorney General is warning Island Landmarks to make immediate changes or the state will take legal action to protect the public interest.
That's what I call FLEECING AMERICA !!!
We need to hang dirty teabags in public !
Can you spell S C A M. Of course a lawyer is the main focus. What a dirt bag
Throw the book at them!
Greedy Texans
This is very sad. One of the main reasons for preserving the Mukai farm is the formal Japanese garden that Mrs. Mukai planted and maintained. It would be horrible if that were destroyed by neglect by the people who claimed they would preserve it.
get our money back
@Tracy Vedder - "An" is only used before words that begin with a vowel or an unsouded 'H'. So in this case, 'a history' would be the appropriate usage.
Shouldn't the Washington State Historic Preservation group be just as responsible for not enforcing how investments like that are used? Â
How about rescind the grant, and give it to that Vashon group and let them take responsibility. Seems like they are the ones that actually care about it.
That sounds like a very good idea.
If the state had given a poor family $16 too much, they would throw the book at them. So far there are 33 comments from komo viewers. Why are we such dip wipes? If this had been about poor people gaming the system there would be 10 times the number of comments with most demanding we hang those no-good lazy dead-beat by sundown.
@BuddyHolly Same reason a homeless man goes to jail over $100 but a CEO can steal 4billion and get away with it.Â
I, personally, wouldn't see anything wrong with someone living there.. of course, they would need to maintain it, and have it open for tours on a daily basis. Which would mean that one room would be closed for tours (the bedroom).. Everything else, open during normal business operating hours.. which would be at leas 8 hours a day including weekends.
These people have taken advantage of Washington State taxpayers..
@Mr. H They own the property next door. They should be living there if they need to live onsite.
What I gathered from the report is that the property next door lacks some things they need to live, such as a shower and kitchen. If this is true, then I also see no problem living in the property as long as the rest of it is maintained for public use. Living on site may even help someone who is dedicated to preservation. However, they seem to have alterior motives for owning this property.
Considering that this couple is not hurting for money, if they are really telling the *cough cough* truth, they would have already had a bathroom and kitchen built onto their own property.
I am very much against the use of any grant funds from any local, state, or federal department that transfers property from one owner to another, when the final owner is not that local, state or federal government. Public funds must be for the public good. Period.
Sounds like the state needs to take this property back and sue the family in charge of its care for all the grant money back with interest... to be enacted immediately to avoid the property falling back in more disarray while they inevitably draw out what will be a long legal battle!
I have a couple questions....1. If they are only "using" the fridge and shower/bathroom because their property doesn't have one, why don't they add a kitchen/bathroom added onto their property? 2. Is there some type of exchange deal where someone from here is staying at one of their properties or is someone here getting paid for this?
@The WA Mama I don't get it either. If they have so much money why don' t they just add on a kitchen and bathroom in the building they own? To me it seems they are taking advantage of this situation and our tax money!!!
I volunteer in two museums in the Port Towsend area. All the work done to maintain them is volunteered unless we can raise enough money for a repair such as a new roof. We charge a minimal admission just to cover the utilities. Protecting historical treasures is a full time job. You do not live in these treasures, even though you might spend hours in them, doing projects or running tours. These people are taking advantage of the state and allowing a piece of history to deteriorate. I say the state needs to step in and take the property back from these thieves. There are groups who are trained to restore, maintain and operate museums in Washington. The money should be returned to the state or they can go to prison. That money would help with the restoration by a reputable historical society.
@Circe You had a minor typo in your excellent point:
"The money should be returned to the state AND they can go to prison"
There, fixed it. :DÂ
How about an audit of the monies spent and a request for reimbursement or pull the property from them under eminent domain...
What do you expect from self-absorbed texans?
Washington State wasted taxpayer money by giving it to these incompetent thieves for their own personal use? *shocker!*
The time for the AG to act has come and gone......many times over. These rich, lazy people have been defrauding the state for years, and it is TIME for the state to recover OUR resources NOW!
CRY ME A RIVER. when poor lazy people who never made a dime or pay a cent in tax, they are entitled to all the free stuff. yet, when some motivated WEALTHY people take any kind of advantage anywhere, they are the worst people in the world. It is unfair that people like Romney pays 5% but I pay 21% in Federal Tax, but he still paid in more in one year than I could pay my entire life! In this instance, I can almost guarantee this couple have paid way more than 500k in taxes over their whole career. is it wrong? yes, but they are still much better people than the baby mamas who only pops a kid out because they know they get a extra pay check.
This is about preserving the land as a historic landmark. It doesn't matter how much they have paid in taxes, or how wealthy they are. Anytime you are entrusted with a historic landmark it's because it needs to be preserved. Obviously these people are not doing that.
@PuzzleFighter Narrow minded and I'm conservative.
The AG is warning them to "make immediate changes or the state will take legal action to protect the public interest." It appears that laws have been broken and funds embezzled, so why wait to take legal action? Prosecute them now, in the public's interest.
Why in the hell has this gone on for so long? There is no excuse for it. The state should either sell it and/ or backcharge the couple for rent.
This has been going on for over a dozen years until KOMO problem solvers uncovered this mess.  It wasn't uncovered by the Washington State Historic Preservation Office. $460,000 dollar investment with no accountability. Allyson Brooks needs to be held accountable and fired.
More public land in private hands. Â Like the issues with Lake Burien (Seattle Times). Â People with money decide that something is theirs even though the state taxpayers are footing the bill and up go the fences and out come the lawyers and outrage over their "rights". Â That's what real entitlement looks like.
Too bad it takes Komo News getting involved for the irresponsible state and these rich shysters to start responding. Â Sounds like a local group cried foul a long time ago and got nowhere with the state or the Texas goon squad.
"We in Washington state don't give away money to give away money for the sake of it," said Washington State Historic Preservation Officer Allyson Brooks."
Oh really? Â Allyson needs to be drug tested.
@FBrumfield Obviously they are not aware of the 520 bridge project!
@Freespeech @FBrumfield Or the ferry employees' overtime scam, or the thousands wasted each month on unused cell phones and grossly mismanaged plans â which don't even benefit the thieves misusing them!  or the warehouses of new, in the box, never used software and computers, or the overtime for when our paid representatives can't do their job in the scheduled session(s), or the mistake-laden expense accounts, or the checks to long-deceased welfare recipients, or the multiple food benefits cards to one individual, etc. etc.
The state gave them the money!
Common Sense ?????Â
So the problem starters are now breaking into houses for stories? I guess they thought it was ok after trespassing on railroad equipment and property.
@Common Sense Follow the money. It was the tax payers money that bought that land, with obligations that have not been met. That property is in part public owned.
and the world said " AMERICAN GREED "Â
"...and we asked about a television and VCR there as well."
Just screams wealth...
Nothing else can be expected from Texas people
"We in Washington state don't give away money to give away money for the sake of it," said Washington State Historic Preservation Officer Allyson Brooks.
Ha...now that is the funny statement of the month!
Yeah you know the state will take action the second they realize someone is taking their wasteful spending away from them!
Sounds like a private use "only" land to me...more wasted tax dollars.
Interesting story. My main question is, where did all the money go? It obviously did not go into the property as it is falling apart. And, why wasn't this caught sooner? I mean, giving someone half a million to take care of a property that is falling apart should be big red flag. Sad when people like Elsie from Problem Solvers has to make a decision to sell all her items to bury her husband but others can abuse the system for years.
@Christopher Lehnherr You know the answer to your main question they had the best vacations of their lives.Â
Doesnt sound like a place I would go see anyway.. I have an idea, lets let the illegals live there, since of course, the state paid for it with tax payers money and all.
"We in Washington state don't give away money to give away money for the sake of it," said Washington State Historic Preservation Officer Allyson Brooks. "We want the public to gain something."Â
 When in the sam heck did that become the policy around here?!
"We in Washington state don't give away money to give away money for the sake of it..."
No, of course not. Perish the thought!
And yes, you did.