12 killed, 59 injured in shooting at Batman screening in Colo.
AURORA, Colo. (AP) - A gunman wearing a gas mask and black SWAT gear hurled a gas canister inside a crowded movie theater during a midnight showing of the new Batman movie Friday and then opened fire, killing 12 people and wounding nearly 60 others in an attack so bizarre that some moviegoers at first thought they were watching Hollywood special effects.
As smoke from the canister spread, audience members watching "The Dark Knight Rises" at the suburban Denver theater saw the silhouette of a person materialize near the screen, point a gun at the crowd and begin shooting, apparently without a word.
New York City's police commissioner said he was told the gunman had painted his hair red and called himself the Joker - Batman's nemesis - but Aurora police would not confirm that.
It was one of the deadliest mass shootings in recent U.S. history.
The suspected gunman, identified as James Holmes, a 24-year-old doctoral student in neuroscience who was about to drop out of the University of Colorado-Denver, was arrested near a car behind the theater.
Authorities gave no motive for the attack. The FBI said there was no indication of ties to any terrorist groups.
"There were bullet (casings) just falling on my head. They were burning my forehead," Jennifer Seeger said, adding that the gunman, dressed like a SWAT team member, fired steadily, stopping only to reload. "Every few seconds it was just: Boom, boom, boom," she said. "He would reload and shoot and anyone who would try to leave would just get killed."
Police said 71 people in all were shot. Among the wounded were three members of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said the gunman wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest, and leg, groin and throat protectors. He said he had an AR-15 military-style, semi-automatic rifle, a shotgun and two pistols.
The suspect was not talking to investigators, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in discussing the ongoing case. The person also said police found jars of chemicals in Holmes' booby-trapped apartment with wires nearby.
While some witnesses said the gunman entered through a side-door emergency exit at the front of the theater, a federal law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Holmes bought a ticket and went into the theater as part of the crowd. The official said Holmes then apparently propped open an exit door in the theater as the movie was playing, donned the protective ballistic gear and opened fire.
FBI agents and police used a hook-and-ladder fire truck to reach Holmes' apartment in Aurora. They put a camera at the end of a 12-foot pole inside the apartment and discovered the unit was booby-trapped. Authorities evacuated five buildings as they tried to figure how to disarm the flammable and explosive material.
In New York City, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said: "It clearly looks like a deranged individual. He has his hair painted red. He said he was the Joker, obviously the enemy of Batman." Oates would not confirm that information, but confirmed he had spoken to Kelly. The two used to work together in New York.
Some of the victims were treated for chemical exposure apparently related to canisters thrown by the gunman. Those hurt included a 4-month-old baby, who was treated at a hospital and released.
Holmes enrolled in a Ph.D. program in neuroscience a year ago but was in the process of withdrawing at the time of the shooting, said University of Colorado-Denver spokeswoman Jacque Montgomery said.
Police released a statement from Holmes' family: "Our hearts go out to those who were involved in this tragedy and to the families and friends of those involved."
The movie opened across the world Friday with midnight showings in the U.S. The shooting prompted officials to cancel the red-carpet premiere in Paris, with workers pulling down the display at a theater on the Champs-Elysees.
Around the U.S., police and some movie theaters stepped up security for daytime showings of the movie, though many fans waiting in line said they were not worried about their safety.
President Barack Obama said he was saddened by the "horrific and tragic shooting," pledging that his administration was "committed to bringing whoever was responsible to justice, ensuring the safety of our people, and caring for those who have been wounded."
It was the worst mass shooting in the U.S. since the Nov. 5, 2009, attack at Fort Hood, Texas. An Army psychiatrist was charged with killing 13 soldiers and civilians and wounding more than two dozen others.
In Colorado, it was the deadliest since the Columbine High School massacre on April 20, 1999, when two students opened fire in the Denver suburb of Littleton, killing 12 classmates and a teacher and wounding 26 others before killing themselves. Columbine High is about 12 miles from the theater.
Friday's attack began shortly after midnight at the multiplex theater, and audience members said they thought it was part of the movie, or some kind of stunt associated with it.
The film has several scenes of public mayhem - a hallmark of superhero movies. In one scene, the villain Bane leads an attack on the stock exchange and, in another, leads a shooting and bombing rampage on a packed football stadium.
The gunman released a gas that smelled like pepper spray from a green canister, Seeger said. "I thought it was showmanship. I didn't think it was real," she said.
Seeger said she was in the second row, about four feet from the gunman, when he pointed a gun at her face. At first, "I was just a deer in headlights. I didn't know what to do," she said. Then she ducked to the ground as the gunman shot people seated behind her.
She said she began crawling toward an exit when she saw a girl of about 14 "lying lifeless on the stairs." She saw a man with a bullet wound in his back and tried to check his pulse, but "I had to go. I was going to get shot."
Shayla Roeder said she saw a teenage girl on the ground bleeding outside the theater. "She just had this horrible look in her eyes. .... We made eye contact and I could tell she was not all right," Roeder said.
Sylvana Guillen said that when a man appeared at the front of the theater clad in dark clothing looking like a SWAT team member as Catwoman made an appearance in the movie, the audience "thought it was a joke, a hoax." Then they heard gunshots and smelled smoke from a canister he was carrying, and Guillen knew it was real.
The gunman began walking toward the seats and firing. Guillen said she told her friend, Misha Mostashiry, "You better get ready to be shot."
"All you could do is hope he didn't come for you," Mostashiry said.
The two ran for the emergency exit and safely escaped. On their dash to the exit, they saw a man slip in the blood of a wounded woman he was trying to help.
Police, ambulances and emergency crews swarmed on the scene after frantic calls started flooding the 911 switchboard. Officers came running in and telling people to leave the theater, Salina Jordan told the Denver Post. She said some police were carrying and dragging bodies.
___
Associated Press writers Kristen Wyatt, Steven K. Paulson, Ivan Moreno and Mead Gruver in Aurora, Dan Elliott and Colleen Slevin in Denver and Alicia A. Caldwell and Eileen Sullivan in Washington contributed to this report.
When that guy got up and propped the emergency door open and went outside that should have been a BIG RED FLAG warning to those sitting close to the door and someone should have shut the door and notified the theater staff. closing the door could have saved all the shooting in theater #9 it would have stopped his plan by a simple deed.
Pure Evil. I don't think that anyone ever really "snaps" - People do things because they WANT to and this cowardly creep invested a lot of time planning and preparing to murder innocent, defenseless people, while wearing full body armor.Â
Â
This type of crime should demand an eye for an eye punishment. Lethal injection is too painless for what this piece of rubbish has done. I say place him in a room and shoot his foot off, then let him suffer a day or two, then shoot off a kneecap, let a few days more go by and shoot him in the same knee with rock salt, then shoot his hands, wait a few days and shoot off his ear: on and on, one shot for every life he took and assure that the suffering he inflicted on his victims will be his experience.
Â
The ripple effect from this will sear through the families of the dead for generations. Rest in peace you angels and condolences to the survivors.Â
The second amendment is not worth the body count.Â
 @Citizen#3457899654 I see. So what of the body count for all those that are killed that would have been saved if someone used a firearm to protect themselves. Every credible study done shows that firearms are used far more often in defense of lives than for the opposite. Usually the firearm holder doesn't even need to fire a shot as just the presence of the firearm is enough to convince the perp to leave. There are two sides to this and you should think things through before suggesting our constitution needs changing.
 @Citizen#3457899654 as soon as no bad guys are shooting or stabbing or taking a bat or stick to people i would support you in that, but because one good citizen with a gun could prevent this kind of stuff the 2nd amendment has saved many lives all over the country i think we will keep it around. In countries were citizens have lost the right to keep arms have had a 600% increase in crime.
My sister is from Denver and luckily didn't know anyone, but such a sad story either way.
motives and reasons why this nut went off are not clear yet. Â My hope is that as we learn more we remember that this was a nut case. Â Let's not use this as an excuse to have this reflect any social or political views or groups. Â I hate the May Day protestors but we also saw nut cases who listen to Rush Limbaugh. Â Tea Party or Obama supporters, Coke or Pepsi, Oreo's or M&M's. Â Let's just accept we had someone like this among us and let's see if we could have seen this coming or done something about it. Â
 @bkburris good point. Withhold judgement for another couple of days for the fog of confusion to clear. We all will know much more than we want to in 48 hours.
Tragic and senseless, my thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families.Â
Â
To all the people using this commenting forum to vent their frustration about gun laws, whether you or for or against, grow up! This is neither the time or place to spew hatred at other people. The time will come when it will be appropriate, but that time is not now. At this point 12 people are dead and 59 more are injured, now is the time to try to figure out what can be done to help or support the victims and their families or at least not take away from their losses by spewing hate.
I can't believe that the government is already trying to make this a gun control issue. The same government that illegally gave guns to South America and then lost them?  Do they really believe that if this guy couldn't have gotten guns legally, he wouldn't have gotten them illegally?  He had this all planned out obviously. They tried banning alcohol many years go called prohibition, and it was just run underground. Many drugs are illegal and they are run underground. When are they going to learn that it doesn't work. When someone fills out an application to buy a gun, you can't predict what will happen to this person down the road, whether they will come down with a mental illness, go through a divorce or whatever.
    Ask yourself this: Is this country a better place since doing everything possible to take God out of our lives?
 @citizen kane Sadly there will always be the opportunistic member of the government who will use these situations to build their reputation on.
How horrible. Absolutely horrible. Prayers for the family and friends.
Â
For those that are posting that "if only someone was carrying", I have a couple of questions.
What was the visibility like in the theater? How well could you see the gunman?Â
What was the possibility for hitting an innocent person?Â
And, do you really think that you personally could calmly set yourself up, send your spouse or friend out or behind you, and then be able to shoot at him? I'm not doubting some can do that, but I do doubt that the normal Joe off the street can't. I know I can't. I'd be trying to get me and mine to safety first.
Â
Back on topic, I just wish this would all stop. I am so tired of this violence.
Well, for many, the first rule of self defense, is to take care of #1, so offering your self up for sacrifice, (to save the others) may cause yourself to be killed,  (this is not taking care of your self, or potentially, the rest of your familiy, (should they have one). so many may not take this line of action.  As others have said, having a gun gives you more options. You can craft up the scenario that a carrier in front row, could have taken him out at very close range. remember, the light and the cloudyness would be the same for the shooter and the carrier.  Some person up in the rafters would not have the same benefits of range, visability and lighting.
 @amr201 Good points all. But someone carrying would have had a choice on whether to engage or not. When you are defenseless, you have no choice.
Â
Here is a story about a 70-year old man taking on an armed robber and his accomplice.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2175170/Harrowing-moment-elderly-internet-cafe-goer-guns-robbers-chases-door.html
Â
 @LockesChild that has been circulating as a new meme comparing it to the tragedy in Colorado and stating that the reason it ended differently is because no one in Colorado was carrying a gun at the time.
Â
and this is my response to that:Those situations are not as similar as the image is trying to lead on. In Florida the robbers went in with the intent of getting money and leaving, and when faced with someone with a firearm their self preservation kicked in. In Colorado the person walked in and opened fire with the intent to kill as many as possible. He wore body armor, and most likely would not have backed down if someone had draw a firearm on him at the time. And how does anyone know that no one in the theater was carrying a concealed firearm?
 @Tom Allmendinger More good points. All situations are different, few are the same.
Â
But when you are unarmed you lose your choices. That is the real point
Â
Â
@LockesChild @amr201 And that is a great story. I'm glad the customer was able to make a positive difference in a situation that could have had a much worse outcome.
However, in most situations, you are not given that type of time to be able to react like that.Â
I'm against guns, but I'm not going to agree either with banning them. My personal preference has no place in making changes to the Constitution.
But, as a victim of gun violence, I remember several things of the experience. The one thing I don't remember is the gunman asking if I needed time to arm myself. Or asking anyone else in the building if they needed time. I don't remember being able to have a conversation about the pros and cons of different makes and models. I don't remember either of the men asking if I'd like to try to protect myself.  I don't remember at any time, with the barrel of the gun pressed into my back, any opportunity to make any type of move to protect myself.Â
I just think some people think it's like the movies. It isn't. There is a reason why attacks like these are so successful- surprise.Â
I'm telling you, as a victim, in most cases you are not defensless. You have choices. You can react w/o a gun. Its cases like this, or like the armored car driver at Walmart a few years back, when the element of surprise takes away all of your defenses and choices, that are you left with nothing but a prayer. No gun can minimize the element of surprise.
He was wearing ballistic gear from head to toe. I think it's more likely that you will be shot dead instead of him when you pull out your firearm. I'm not saying someone is invincible when wearing that stuff, but the odds are in his favor. Keep having action hero fantasies though. Although to be fair, it would be better to die shooting back instead of doing nothing at all. But it is funny how some people are sooooo confident that the guy would be instantly dead once they reach their gun like they are James Bond or something.
how do you know what people think? you're only imagining that scenario, for all you know there were concealed carriers there, that opted not to engage because of the gas, poor lighting, or risk of hitting innocents. HOWEVER, had there been carriers there, a couple of things may have happened.Â
1. Holmes may have thought to himself " too many pistol carriers go to this theater" so I won't go there
2. He may have been close to a CC'r that could have taken a close shot. Apparently he (Holmes) didn't want to die right away, as he surrendered to the police, so it's not unreasonable to think had he been hit, tackled, or stabbed, he might have given up the fight.
3. The purpose of carrying guns, is for self protection (or family) not to be Rambo warriors, and carriers get to use their judgement on what they think is the best action at the time.
Â
But we know that for the most part, CC'rs avoid anti gun establishments. and that theater is part of a chain that prohibits guns.
Â
We weren't there, so it's hard to say, really how much visablilty was available, whether the credits were rolling and adding a bunch of light or not, how much the gas had dissabated, etc. So it is unreasonable to think that there was no possibility of a close range response to holmes. Remember the light was just as low for him too. .
 @Dave Lancaster If everyone in the theater had fired back, most likely there would be more friendly fire incidents than the looney killed.
@Xirxious yes, but who's advocating that scenario of everyone shooting? if everyone in the theater had a gun, Holmes wouldn't have gone there in the first place.
 @Hambingo Yet this guy still surrendered when caught by the police.
My deepest sympathies to all of the victims of this hateful, derranged man!  What would possess someone to do this to innocent families is beyond me. Seems like you cant feel safe walking out your front door anymore.  Where exactly is this country going with its values and morals and respect for human life?  Its a scarry thing.  Prayers for those that were lost and for those that were injured a fast recovery.
 @mpatrick His mental health will be under a microscope going forward, Im sure. I will be annoyed if his lawyer plays the "mentally insane" or "plea bargain" cards when he comes up for his court date. This guy planned it all out, premeditated assault, and should not be given any leniency.
Enough now....time to make changes in arms dealing law !! Many people already died in many such cases !!
 @Derek J Alright, lets also include cars, motorcycles, air planes, and anything else that is considered a cause of multiple people being killed.
and reacting during an emotional time worked so well with the Patriot Act... Been groped by the TSA lately?
I do have one question, if he was alone, who let him in the emergency exit?
in some of these multiplexes, the emergency exits in the theaters, just exit to a hall way, that leads to another set of doors to exit outside the building, so if one is in the hallway, they can open the door to the theater, So he may need to prop open the external door, which gets him into the hallway
 @DarkParty Reported in one of the stories that he went out the Emergency exit, propped it open while he "geared up" his things in his car.
 @DarkRenegade I did not read that, thank you
Maybe this guy was just tired of the MANY, MANY remakes of Batman.Â
Â
Seriously though. These things are a good reason that all states should have something like Washington States "Open Carry" law. Perhaps if Colorado had that law, and all law abiding citizens of that state carried their weapons with them, they could have shot this guy down before it became a massacre.
 @Nuclearian How tasteless can you get !?  Really not funny.
@Nuclearian
While I understand the frustration and the want to be able to react to this type of a situation, I do not believe that having multiple people in the theater with firearms would have been a benefit. This was set up as a tactical strike based on what has been reported so far. Having someone firing blindly into a smoke filled room would be a bad idea and could lead to many more causalities. I have a CPP, I have had combat and tactical specific training. I typically carry and do so when I go to the movies, so if this had happened at a theater I was at, I probably would have been armed. Based on the information I have read, I do not think I would have pulled my firearm in this case.
 @Conservative liberal Well-said.
 @Conservative liberal I said the same thing earlier.  And even with your skills, if you could have seen him and  you had chosen to use your weapon, the guy was wearing body armour. Â
 @Nuclearian  @Conservative liberal Please dont confuse your egotistical scores on Halo as "skills". Owning/discharging a firearm properly is not a game. Your statement alone should make you unable to own a firearm realistically.
 @Conservative liberal  @Nuclearian Obviously dont know my gun skills.
I hear you regarding the following of threads!
 @DarkRenegade Thanks for that.  That's actually what I was thinking.  I am going to NYC in a couple days and always look forward to spending time in the armor section at the Met, so I have seen many types of armor.  It just seemed so medieval to consider, with all the technology available now.
 @Doxie I'll do my best here. Body armor is generally comprised of components that cover the wearer's body from shin's up to their neck with the inclusion of a helmet. Think mid-evil Knight's suits of armor. Vests only protect the torso area from weaponry depending on what they are made of (i.e. Kevlar) and their specific purpose over all. Some can handle bullets but not knives while others can take a hit of shrapnel from an explosion.
 @Xirxious Totally agree with you.  Bruce Willis makes it look easy to take someone out when everyone else is running for their lives, but that's not usually what happens.  I assume we'll hear if anyone else fired shots at some point, but it seems like people were running for their lives.
MAN, these threads are hard to follow in this new format.
 @Doxie most people thought it was some theatrics put on by the theater to kick off the first showing of a summer hit. Some probably died thinking they were watching a show. You can't monday morning quarterback stuff like this. I've reacted to cars pulling out in front of me with out thinking and I've watched friends stumble and fall and sat there gawking.
 @Doxie There is 'flak-jackets' that are much cheaper and will stop shrapnel from explosions, but will not stop rifle bullets.
@Dave LancasterThis is similar to arm chair quarterbacking or questioning an umpires call based on what was read in the paper. Assumptions and comments are made based on the best available information. IF I had the opportunity for an offensive maneuver, yes, I would have taken it. But for those that think a head shot from the back or middle of a poorly lit theater, through a large group of panicked folks (running away from gunfire only to see it in front of them) is improbable at best. The easiest way I can imagine to get toward a shooter in a theater would be to go over the seats, which increases your odds of being a target. Knowing that I do not carry my "reach out and touch someone" rifle during a typical night out, I would need to close the gap between myself and the shooter. Best option in my opinion - stay low and get out. Render first aid and help clear the area for those that have the right equipement and give them the important information to make the right call/ take the correct course of action.
given the opportunity, wouldn't you have shot him in the head?  I think you would have, but if your strategy was stay low and get out, you likely wouldn't have that opportunity.
rushed from behind and stabbed in the groin/leg/neck are possibilites too,Â
Â
Not saying that I would do that, as I usually don't have a knife on me, but it could have been an option for someone he walked past that was hunkered down.
 @Tom Allmendinger I agree with that too.
 @Nuclearian In the dark while blinded by tear gas and smoke with people running and screaming all over the place? Â
 @Nuclearian While a head shot would have probably ended it, this isnt a game where you miss and no consequences, or zoom in. The head is a difficult target to hit under normal conditions, moreso in a dark movie theater that had gas canisters, and by what I read due to accounts of people saying it smelled like pepper spray Im willing to bet that it was cs gas also known as tear gas. There is a reason that military trains for center mass. Its a large target. I am not sure about law enforcement but Im pretty sure that is where they are trained to fire as well.
@Nuclearian @Doxie
Wow Nuclearian, you must be one heck of a shot to take on a shotgun with a pistol! I remember a quote I was told by an old military guy once "there are three kinds of folks in an emergency, those that can walk on water, those that tread water and those that pass water." Not meaning to sound judgmental (ok, maybe a little) you seem like the passing water kind with your comment.
 @Doxie I would have shot the idiot in the head.
 @Doxie I have heard various versions including body armor, ballistics vest,, a kevlar helmet and groin and shin protection etc.
Â
I agree with @Conservative liberal in that under the circumstances, even with training the best option was stay low and get out.
 @DarkRenegade You seem very well educated on this topic.  What is considered real body armor?  Thanks in advance.
 @Doxie Im sure the reports will be conflicting on the terminology until the official law enforcement report is posted. One persons body armor is another person's kevlar vest. Its all perception.
 @Conservative liberal  @Doxie  @Conservative .....especially considering the limited visibility due to the smoke.
 @DarkRenegade The version I saw called it body armor.  I always thought a bullet proof vest is considered body armour.  Huh. You learn something new every day.
@Doxie @Conservative liberal
Impacts from a moderate to large caliber firearm even with body armor are not pleasant and may have thrown him off balance enough for a physical take-down if one was at close enough range (within accurate pistol range of 20 feet or so). The best strategy in this case seems to have been what was done by many people in the theater, stay low and get out.
 @Doxie  @Conservative liberal He was reportedly wearing a bullet proof vest and a gas mask. That is not body armor.
 @Nuclearian Yeah, Im a weapons advocate (when its in the correct hands of course) but you must have been out of state the past 6 to 10 months for all the gun violence happening in Washington state. Not the best example to use.
 @DarkRenegade Because law abiding citizens with guns werent around to stop them.
 @DarkRenegade I looked it up, and Colorado does have a conceal and carry law. Statistically I bet there were people with guns in that theatre, and I bet out of the 59 people shot - one of them did have a gun on him.
Â
 @super Not as likely as one would think. People who carry concealed tend to be law abiding people and as such are more likely to have obeyed the theaters rules about not having guns. Some of them may have had the license but were likely not carrying.
 @super Partially true but some of the posters are forgetting the visibility issue created by the smoke bomb. It would make it more possible to hit a civilian rather than the shooter if they pulled a weapon. The wisest course of action is always to get people to safety before engaging a hostile, or at least cover them as they run out. Thats my thoughts and experiences personally, could be up for anyone elses input.
 @DarkRenegade Which again, negates the argument that having a gun would make the rest of the people safer, that people are using on this thread. I don't think anyone here is posting that in the vain of someone could have only saved themselves if they had a gun. I got the idea they mean, someone could have stopped the gun man.
 @super True but how many would react on the instinct of fear for their own safety instead of trying to get others to safety first?