As race stands, Obama within reach of second term

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) - Five weeks to Election Day, President Barack Obama is within reach of the 270 electoral votes needed to win a second term. Republican Mitt Romney's path to victory is narrowing.
To overtake Obama, Romney would need to quickly gain the upper hand in nearly all of the nine states where he and Obama are competing the hardest.
Polls show the president with a steady lead in many of them as Romney looks to shift the dynamics of the race, starting with their first debate Wednesday in Denver.
"We'd rather be us than them," says Jennifer Psaki, an Obama spokeswoman.
But Romney's running mate Paul Ryan says there's time for the GOP ticket to win. "In these kinds of races people focus near the end, and that's what's happening now," he told "Fox News Sunday."
If the election were held today, an Associated Press analysis shows Obama would win at least 271 electoral votes, with likely victories in crucial Ohio and Iowa along with 19 other states and the District of Columbia. Romney would win 23 states for a total of 206.
To oust the Democratic incumbent, Romney would need to take up-for-grabs Florida, Colorado, Nevada, North Carolina, New Hampshire and Virginia, which would put him at 267 votes, and upend Obama in either Ohio or Iowa.
The AP analysis isn't meant to be predictive. Rather, it is intended to provide a snapshot of a race that until recently has been stubbornly close in the small number of the most contested states.
It is based on a review of public and private polls, television advertising and numerous interviews with campaign and party officials as well as Republican and Democratic strategists in the competitive states and in Washington.
In the final weeks before the Nov. 6 vote, Obama is enjoying a burst of momentum and has benefited from growing optimism about the economy as well as a series of Romney stumbles. Most notably, a secret video surfaced recently showing the Republican nominee telling a group of donors that 47 percent of Americans consider themselves victims dependent on the government.
To be sure, much could change in the coming weeks, which will feature three presidential and one vice presidential debate. A host of unknowns, both foreign and domestic, could rock the campaign, knocking Obama off course and giving Romney a boost in the homestretch.
Barring that, Romney's challenge is formidable.
Obama started the campaign with a slew of electoral-rich coastal states already in his win column. From the outset, Romney faced fewer paths to cobbling together the state-by-state victories needed to reach the magic number.
It's grown even narrower in recent weeks, as Romney has seen his standing slip in polls in Ohio, with 18 electoral votes, and Iowa, with six. That forced him to abandon plans to try to challenge Obama on traditionally Democratic turf so he could redouble his efforts in Ohio and Iowa, as well as Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Nevada and Virginia.
Romney is hoping that come Election Day, on-the-fence voters tip his way. But there are hurdles there, too.
Early voting is under way in dozens of states, and national and key states surveys show undecided voters feel more favorably toward Obama than Romney.
The Republican is in a tight battle with Obama in Florida, as well as Colorado, North Carolina and Nevada.
But Ohio's shifting landscape illustrates Romney's troubles over the past few weeks.
Republicans and Democrats agree that Obama's solid lead in public and private polling in the state is for real. Over the past month, the president has benefited from an improving economic situation in the state; its 7.2 percent unemployment rate is below the 8.1 percent national average. Obama's team also attributes his Ohio edge to the auto bailout and GM plant expansions in eastern Ohio.
Obama and his campaign have hammered Romney on his tax policies, arguing that the former Massachusetts governor favors the rich while the president as a defender of everyone else.
The president has seen the same good fortune in Iowa. A poll released Saturday by The Des Moines Register illustrates his advantage, showing Obama with 49 percent to 45 percent for Romney. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
"It's a direct result of the time and resources he's been forced to spend here," said Iowa Republican strategist John Stineman.
Indeed, Obama intently focused on the state ahead of an early voting period that began last week. He campaigned in Iowa aggressively this summer and dumped in a ton of TV advertising, much of it depicting Romney as wealthy and out-of-touch with working Americans.
Obama doesn't just have the wind at his back in those states.
The president also appears to be in stronger shape than Romney in Virginia, which has 13 electoral votes, and in New Hampshire, with four votes, even though Romney vacations often in the state where he has a lakeside home. Romney and GOP allies are being outspent in that state considerably, a sign of trouble for the Republican challenger.
Underscoring his challenges, Romney also has been forced to spend millions of dollars a week defending himself in North Carolina, a GOP-leaning state that's more conservative than most of the states that will decide the election.
Polls now show a competitive race there. Democrats boast of having registered 250,000 new voters in the state since April 2011. It's an eye-popping total in a state that Obama won by just 14,000 votes four years ago. A flood of new voters, presumably a chunk of them Democrats, could help keep that state within Obama's reach this year.
Also, Romney's effort to challenge Obama in Democratic-leaning Wisconsin, home state of running mate Paul Ryan, appears to have fizzled. Despite millions of dollars spent on TV in the last few weeks by both sides, polls show Obama with a clear lead in Wisconsin.
Romney's goal of forcing Obama to defend Michigan - Romney's native state - and Pennsylvania never materialized.
"The big strategic moment coming out of the conventions in my view was whether or not Romney and his campaign could succeed in expanding the parameters of the battleground," said Tad Devine, a top adviser to 2000 Democratic nominee Al Gore and 2004 nominee John Kerry. "They have not been able to do that."
All this has left Romney with an extraordinarily tight path and few options but to bear down in the states where he is competing aggressively. Time, though, is running out.
___
Associated Press Deputy Director of Polling Jenifer Agiesta and AP news Survey Specialist Dennis Junius in Washington, Associated Press writers Dan Sewell in Ohio, Beth Fouhy in New York and Julie Pace in Chicago contributed to this report.
To overtake Obama, Romney would need to quickly gain the upper hand in nearly all of the nine states where he and Obama are competing the hardest.
Polls show the president with a steady lead in many of them as Romney looks to shift the dynamics of the race, starting with their first debate Wednesday in Denver.
"We'd rather be us than them," says Jennifer Psaki, an Obama spokeswoman.
But Romney's running mate Paul Ryan says there's time for the GOP ticket to win. "In these kinds of races people focus near the end, and that's what's happening now," he told "Fox News Sunday."
If the election were held today, an Associated Press analysis shows Obama would win at least 271 electoral votes, with likely victories in crucial Ohio and Iowa along with 19 other states and the District of Columbia. Romney would win 23 states for a total of 206.
To oust the Democratic incumbent, Romney would need to take up-for-grabs Florida, Colorado, Nevada, North Carolina, New Hampshire and Virginia, which would put him at 267 votes, and upend Obama in either Ohio or Iowa.
The AP analysis isn't meant to be predictive. Rather, it is intended to provide a snapshot of a race that until recently has been stubbornly close in the small number of the most contested states.
It is based on a review of public and private polls, television advertising and numerous interviews with campaign and party officials as well as Republican and Democratic strategists in the competitive states and in Washington.
In the final weeks before the Nov. 6 vote, Obama is enjoying a burst of momentum and has benefited from growing optimism about the economy as well as a series of Romney stumbles. Most notably, a secret video surfaced recently showing the Republican nominee telling a group of donors that 47 percent of Americans consider themselves victims dependent on the government.
To be sure, much could change in the coming weeks, which will feature three presidential and one vice presidential debate. A host of unknowns, both foreign and domestic, could rock the campaign, knocking Obama off course and giving Romney a boost in the homestretch.
Barring that, Romney's challenge is formidable.
Obama started the campaign with a slew of electoral-rich coastal states already in his win column. From the outset, Romney faced fewer paths to cobbling together the state-by-state victories needed to reach the magic number.
It's grown even narrower in recent weeks, as Romney has seen his standing slip in polls in Ohio, with 18 electoral votes, and Iowa, with six. That forced him to abandon plans to try to challenge Obama on traditionally Democratic turf so he could redouble his efforts in Ohio and Iowa, as well as Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Nevada and Virginia.
Romney is hoping that come Election Day, on-the-fence voters tip his way. But there are hurdles there, too.
Early voting is under way in dozens of states, and national and key states surveys show undecided voters feel more favorably toward Obama than Romney.
The Republican is in a tight battle with Obama in Florida, as well as Colorado, North Carolina and Nevada.
But Ohio's shifting landscape illustrates Romney's troubles over the past few weeks.
Republicans and Democrats agree that Obama's solid lead in public and private polling in the state is for real. Over the past month, the president has benefited from an improving economic situation in the state; its 7.2 percent unemployment rate is below the 8.1 percent national average. Obama's team also attributes his Ohio edge to the auto bailout and GM plant expansions in eastern Ohio.
Obama and his campaign have hammered Romney on his tax policies, arguing that the former Massachusetts governor favors the rich while the president as a defender of everyone else.
The president has seen the same good fortune in Iowa. A poll released Saturday by The Des Moines Register illustrates his advantage, showing Obama with 49 percent to 45 percent for Romney. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
"It's a direct result of the time and resources he's been forced to spend here," said Iowa Republican strategist John Stineman.
Indeed, Obama intently focused on the state ahead of an early voting period that began last week. He campaigned in Iowa aggressively this summer and dumped in a ton of TV advertising, much of it depicting Romney as wealthy and out-of-touch with working Americans.
Obama doesn't just have the wind at his back in those states.
The president also appears to be in stronger shape than Romney in Virginia, which has 13 electoral votes, and in New Hampshire, with four votes, even though Romney vacations often in the state where he has a lakeside home. Romney and GOP allies are being outspent in that state considerably, a sign of trouble for the Republican challenger.
Underscoring his challenges, Romney also has been forced to spend millions of dollars a week defending himself in North Carolina, a GOP-leaning state that's more conservative than most of the states that will decide the election.
Polls now show a competitive race there. Democrats boast of having registered 250,000 new voters in the state since April 2011. It's an eye-popping total in a state that Obama won by just 14,000 votes four years ago. A flood of new voters, presumably a chunk of them Democrats, could help keep that state within Obama's reach this year.
Also, Romney's effort to challenge Obama in Democratic-leaning Wisconsin, home state of running mate Paul Ryan, appears to have fizzled. Despite millions of dollars spent on TV in the last few weeks by both sides, polls show Obama with a clear lead in Wisconsin.
Romney's goal of forcing Obama to defend Michigan - Romney's native state - and Pennsylvania never materialized.
"The big strategic moment coming out of the conventions in my view was whether or not Romney and his campaign could succeed in expanding the parameters of the battleground," said Tad Devine, a top adviser to 2000 Democratic nominee Al Gore and 2004 nominee John Kerry. "They have not been able to do that."
All this has left Romney with an extraordinarily tight path and few options but to bear down in the states where he is competing aggressively. Time, though, is running out.
___
Associated Press Deputy Director of Polling Jenifer Agiesta and AP news Survey Specialist Dennis Junius in Washington, Associated Press writers Dan Sewell in Ohio, Beth Fouhy in New York and Julie Pace in Chicago contributed to this report.
My family is NOT voting for Obama. GO Romney/Ryan.
The only numbers and poll that matter are the ones that are going to happen November 6. I am voting so at least if it does not go the way I want it to I have the right to complain about it.
The biggest problem, as I see it, is that people are ignoring the historical progression of our "party" systems - Lobbyists and special interest groups have usurped the ideology "By the people, for the people" governance, and in doing so, have bastardized what could actually work for the benefit of all.
Â
Both parties are guilty of adopting the culture of greed and that's not likely to change unless people on a grass roots level, take action by making their voices heard - contact your congressmen and congresswomen, register your concerns and get involved.
Really, everyone I talk to is voting for Romney. They don't want national healthcare, they don't want to still be unemployed, and they are tired of all their money going to a goverment that can't manage it.
 @justsayin And they are going to vote for Romney? Â
 @justsayin You are correct. My impression, based in reality, is the same. KOMO is obviously trying to change everyone's impressions by running now multiple pro Obama articles with all these so called poll numbers that have been proven to be heavily skewed. If the pro Obama media say it's hopeless for Romney enough times those who sit on the fence or those who live and die by the headlines will be be swayed towards Obama. This tells me that the race is a lot closer than they want you to believe and this tiny percent that I have described above is critical to both sides.Â
Its rigged.
 @wackysoba Yep, by the financial sector and the other 5 industries that control our government with lobbyist money and corporate campaign contributions.
Obama has my vote just because the republican party couldn't come with a better candidate. I do support republican party but I won't vote for Romney. He scares the hell out of me.Â
Â
Obama 2012!
Â
Rob Mckenna 2012! Â Â
 @WAGUY You mean Obama the war criminal that extended every one of bush's policies including the patriot act and then doubled down on it with NDAA where he is cop, judge, jury, executioner and its all done in secret and, you're OK with that? You have the perfect right wing GOP candidate in Obama. He extended tax cuts for the rich during war time, kept torture alive at Guantanamo, created a couple more conflicts and wants to go to war with Syria and Iran. Was a corporatist at every turn bailing every failed business out while turning his back on the middle class when they were getting unlawfully kicked out of their homes during the robo signing fiasco. What more could you ask for?
Perhaps a little time travel hypothetical;
Â
George Bush is the incumbent President today. His opponent is Barack Obama.Â
Â
I don't suppose candidate Barack would hammer (and rightly so), the embedded 8.1% unemployment , the QE to Infinity and Beyond, the expected $6 Trillion debt racked up in four years (unpatriotic ), the looming largest tax increase in the history of the Milky Way Galaxy tax increases and the soaring price of health insurance, record number of folks on food stamps, unconstitutional granting of "waivers" to political friends and denial of said waivers to political foes.
Â
There is a reason they don't call it the Bushphone...
 @Sid Vishess Very true, and If Obama was offering a few specifics as Romney, he would be still be struggeling to gain ground.Â
And if Bush was able to point to a clear point in history where most of the problems started, and that point was before his election, then Obama would be struggeling even more.
And if the democrats had been as much of an obstructionist party for Bush, Obama would be about where Romney is right now.
Â
Context is everything. And it is something that is truly missing from the republican base right now.
Â
In short, The republicans refuse to take any responsibility what so ever for how they have contributed to the economy and the debt and they have no new solutions.Â
So what do they do? The project by blaming Obama for everything. They deflect to abortion and voter fraud. And they employee confirmation biaas and conspiracy theories about how the media, science, and anyone rational is against them. And, everyone who is not exacly like them is part of the problem with our country.
Â
And they will do this while accusing everyone else of not taking responsibility.Â
Â
You want to change things? Stop making excuses for the crazy wing of the GOP. Vote for an independent.
If you listen carefully to Romney's rhetoric....he says nothing! "See me after the election" doesn't instill voter confidence in anyone who uses more than the "lizard brain" to get through life.
Â
Think for yourselves and do your own research before you vote.......All the best!
 @Smokin Bear You mean like Pelosi
Â
" we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it"
There is a plethora of information that neither you nor I are privey to - context is critical so I am asking, what is your source for that quote?
@Smokin Bear Really you must not understand economics then.
Really, you must not understand common decency or consideration.Â
Â
Just sayin' that I have a right to my opinion and you don't have to agree, but resorting to personal insults? LOL. You know NOTHING about me.Â
Â
Peace out.
You've made my point:
Â
Attacking strangers online makes you appear a little weird or possibly on medication...all I can say is up the dosage. LOL!
Â
Â
Now I can see you don't understand common English as well. I don't even think you have listened one bit to Romney and the only person you are listening to is yourself. Our economy is in a bad situation that is what both Romney and Ryan have been saying. They have provided fact after fact. That is why I don't think you understand economics. My post has nothing to do with common decency or consideration, it was stating a fact.
This is exactly what the media want's you to think. If they spent more time reporting the news instead of trying to create it, we'd actually find them credible.
Â
 @sorbothegeek I was thinking the same thing about this person's comment. why would the media make up such trivial items? I have heard the theory from Fox, which is all media want their people to believe that the race is over, so they should just stay home and not vote? If their people are so stupid/gullible, they probably shouldn't be voting to begin with...
@walkthisway @sorbothegeek Have you not noticed how one sided the media has been in this race. There is always a picture of Obama looking great and Romney looking angry. The media has lacked any sort of factual reporting on the issues of our nation. Why haven't they mentioned the dire state of our ecomony. Do you not realize within the next term we will no longer be able to hold back the inflation and interest rates are going to sky rocket and if we continue with Obama and all his crap we will be paying extremely high taxes. Like 70-80% payroll. BTW look up the story in the WSJ it was there last week.
 @CenterFire Are you saying the president is not within the 270 electoral votes needed to win a second term? If the media were reporting the news rather than trying to create it as you state, just what would that report...that narrative sound like?? I'm curious.
A vote for obama is a vote for the free stuff crowd and a huge government worker pension bailout.
 @CrankyPanky This is why I am moving to Japan in a month time to bolt from the US, the people are spoiled children who think they are owed everything. We have become a joke to the rest of the world. We used to lead now we blindly follow the media and do what we are told. I love what America is supposed to stand for but most of the people need to wake up and demand that the people we elect actually work for the betterment of the people not just spout of crap to get re-elected.
@tandras @CrankyPanky Japan is in financial ruin. Good Luck, Australia would be a better choice.
According to polls where not only are Democrats oversampled but only 9% of people even answer a pollster.
Â
Just more spin from the Obama media
it is so easy to spot a crazy comment, i just look for the likes from huey, dewey, and luey...
 @LockesChild Ah, the debunked and thoroughly unscientific skewed polls nuts...the birthers of the week.
@LockesChild At least part of your so called issue is that not many people want to admit anymore that they are reps, GOPers, tbaggers, or whatever the heck that they are actually calling themselves these days.
 @LockesChild the only poll you'd believe is a poll of one... You.
Its called confirmation bias. It is what happens when people seek out sources of information to validate their points while ignoring information the invalidates their points.
It is also exactly what you just did.Â
:-)
At least right now we can have a good 401k portfolio with the economy picking up. Romney looks like he could just support businesses finding ways of stealing 401k portfolios from the middle class. If you can't show your taxes after the last two years like your father did when he was running, many should smell a rat.
@Bubbabear64 If you vote for Obama there won't be any money in the 401(k). The goverment will take it all. Look at the economy.
I'm looking at it right now. I see the Dow was up almost 78 points today closing at 13,515. The economy has been so bad that more people were standing in line for new IPhone then standing in line for a job fair interview.  At least Mitt could be a bit more realistic about things when he talks. 10,000 and above doesn't hardly merit a new leader as history has shown.
 @Bubbabear64 Actually, it looks like it's heading for a double-dip. The stealth inflation created by exporting it (and ruining China's economy) and via printing at the Fed to by treasuries, things are NOT looking that good.
 @RN1 True but is Romney just another Mormon hiding his business interests since they face some scrutiny? The courts put Wade Cook away for his and his wives. Is this state (as well this country) going to have to deal with another?
That's the real question the Republican Party should have thought of before giving their approval and expecting Bible Belt Conservatives to nod their head to someone who doesn't share in the same values as a typical Baptist would have to being with.
 @RN1 Personally RN1, I've worked security at enough college football games telling fans to get rid of their Mormon bashing signs every time BYU plays a game. The majority of this country supporting a Mormon president is about as likely as life on Mars. Even Trey Parker certainly made a mint on Broadway spoofing them. The next time the party wants someone serious, they shouldn't choose someone that represents a religion that has placed him on a pedestal as a prophet. Judaism and Mormonism aren't the same thing. God chose the Jewish faith unlike Mormons who think they are a lost tribe of Israel that has no archaeology evidence to support it. I'm always glad to talk to agnostics in the party because most Christian Conservatives in the party really can't be a good testimony for their faith when voting for someone that represents a man made church with it's own bible written by a man behind a sheet by someone who came from a mother that practiced witchcraft and a father that was searching for Black Beards treasure.
 @Bubbabear64 Being agnostic, I really don't care how they pray, or whether it's in a temple, cathedral, synagog, or mosque. I care how they live their lives, and how they treat other people, but those "of their same type" and those who are different. I care how much they respect the right of an individual to freely live their life, and to enjoy the benefits of good choices or suffer the consequences of their poor choices. I don't really LIKE the policies of either candidate, but I think those of Romney will hurt the nation and myself less than those of Obama. What Romney's Mormon church preached 30 years ago is less important than what Obama's preached 4 years ago, but neither are as important as what they are pushing for right now.
 @RN1  @Bubbabear64 The last two years. His dad coughed up a lot more when he was running. Romney isn't practicing that it is better not to hid things from the public and expect the public to think your a wonderful human being.Â
 @RN1 Mormonism has been bigotry. African Americans were not given temple rights until 1980 since they were taught that blacks were cursed by Cain. Another fact that the party has seem to have forgotten about. My position about the faith isn't about bigotry. My position is that it is a religion that doesn't capitalize the J in Jesus as it supposed to be. They don't pray to Jesus as the book of Romans teaches. In fact the whole book of Romans pretty much quashes the whole faith leaving it to nothing more than a religion that promotes false prophets. Just like the book of Revelations talks about. Another point the party forgot to mention.  Â
 @Bubbabear64 Wow. Bigot much? substitute "Jew" for "Mormon" and you have a more traditionally obvious trifecta (religious bigotry, guilt by association, and group identity stereotypes).
Â
He has disclosed his taxes, and the left grew indignant that he gave so much to charity "just to lower his taxes." If you don't want to vote for a Mormon, because he's a Mormon, that's your right, and it is also your right to wear bigotry on your sleeve if you desire, just as it is our right to point it out.
DOW on January 20, 2009:Â 8279
Â
DOW on September 24, 2012: 13558
Â
Increase of DOW under Obama. 61%
Â
Obama - the worst socialist in the history of the world.
 @Howard Beale I wonder how many stocks the 50 million people on food stamps own?
@Howard Beale   So the rich who can afford to play the market are richer under Obama, what else is new?
 @Howard Beale GREAT example of how to lie with statistics. 2008 was a very rare (once in a life-time) panic, and markets ALWAYS rebound from extremes. OTOH, looked at in inflation adjusted terms from levels just before the crash, it's a rather different picture. Like this one:
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/11/djia-inflation.gif
(nothing special about that particular graph, just the first one that had the info I wanted)
 @RN1  @Howard Beale Once in a life time...I seem to remember a few of these panics and I am only 34.
@RN1 And neither do you.
 @RN1  @Howard Beale I've heard of butting heads with GOATS, but SHEEP? They're not going to listen RN1. Party blinders are on, tinfoil helmets are on and their fingers are in their ears while they chant "blah blah blah.....I can't hear you. My helmet and my rose colored glasses protect me, so leave me alone to lick my windows in PEACE!"
 @Howard Beale And the Dow fluctuates under EVERY president, so what's your point? Good timing? Obama is an impotent leader. Period. The communist world LOVES him because they can use him to their advantage. World leaders that HATE us, want him in power. THIS alone, speaks volumes.
@LoudNoises bwahahahaâ¦â¦ Your noise is so loud that you donât even know when you are being jimmied.
 @LoudNoises  @Howard Beale My point?
Â
You're too obtuse to recognize satire even when its beating you over the head.