Carbon pollution up to 2 million pounds a second

WASHINGTON (AP) - The amount of heat-trapping pollution the world spewed rose again last year by 3 percent. So scientists say it's now unlikely that global warming can be limited to a couple degrees, which is an international goal.
The overwhelming majority of the increase was from China, the world's biggest carbon dioxide polluter. Of the planet's top 10 polluters, the United States and Germany were the only countries that reduced their carbon dioxide emissions.
Last year, all the world's nations combined pumped nearly 38.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, according to new international calculations on global emissions published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change. That's about a billion tons more than the previous year.
The total amounts to more than 2.4 million pounds of carbon dioxide released into the air every second.
Because emissions of the key greenhouse gas have been rising steadily and most carbon stays in the air for a century, it is not just unlikely but "rather optimistic" to think that the world can limit future temperature increases to 2 degrees, said the study's lead author, Glen Peters at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway.
Three years ago, nearly 200 nations set the 2-degree temperature goal in a nonbinding agreement. Negotiators now at a conference under way in Doha, Qatar, are trying to find ways to reach that target.
The only way, Peters said, is to start reducing world emissions now and "throw everything we have at the problem."
Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist at the University of Victoria in Canada who was not part of the study, said: "We are losing control of our ability to get a handle on the global warming problem."
In 1997, most of the world agreed to an international treaty, known as the Kyoto Protocol, that required developed countries such as the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 5 percent when compared with the baseline year of 1990. But countries that are still developing, including China and India, were not limited by how much carbon dioxide they expelled. The United States never ratified the treaty.
The latest pollution numbers, calculated by the Global Carbon Project, a joint venture of the Energy Department and the Norwegian Research Council, show that worldwide carbon dioxide levels are 54 percent higher than the 1990 baseline.
The 2011 figures for the biggest polluters:
1. China, up 10 percent to 10 billion tons.
2. United States, down 2 percent to 5.9 billion tons
3. India, up 7 percent to 2.5 billion tons.
4. Russia, up 3 percent to 1.8 billion tons.
5. Japan, up 0.4 percent to 1.3 billion tons.
6. Germany, down 4 percent to 0.8 billion tons.
7. Iran, up 2 percent to 0.7 billion tons.
8. South Korea, up 4 percent to 0.6 billion tons.
9. Canada, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.
10. South Africa, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.
The overwhelming majority of the increase was from China, the world's biggest carbon dioxide polluter. Of the planet's top 10 polluters, the United States and Germany were the only countries that reduced their carbon dioxide emissions.
Last year, all the world's nations combined pumped nearly 38.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, according to new international calculations on global emissions published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change. That's about a billion tons more than the previous year.
The total amounts to more than 2.4 million pounds of carbon dioxide released into the air every second.
Because emissions of the key greenhouse gas have been rising steadily and most carbon stays in the air for a century, it is not just unlikely but "rather optimistic" to think that the world can limit future temperature increases to 2 degrees, said the study's lead author, Glen Peters at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway.
Three years ago, nearly 200 nations set the 2-degree temperature goal in a nonbinding agreement. Negotiators now at a conference under way in Doha, Qatar, are trying to find ways to reach that target.
The only way, Peters said, is to start reducing world emissions now and "throw everything we have at the problem."
Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist at the University of Victoria in Canada who was not part of the study, said: "We are losing control of our ability to get a handle on the global warming problem."
In 1997, most of the world agreed to an international treaty, known as the Kyoto Protocol, that required developed countries such as the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 5 percent when compared with the baseline year of 1990. But countries that are still developing, including China and India, were not limited by how much carbon dioxide they expelled. The United States never ratified the treaty.
The latest pollution numbers, calculated by the Global Carbon Project, a joint venture of the Energy Department and the Norwegian Research Council, show that worldwide carbon dioxide levels are 54 percent higher than the 1990 baseline.
The 2011 figures for the biggest polluters:
1. China, up 10 percent to 10 billion tons.
2. United States, down 2 percent to 5.9 billion tons
3. India, up 7 percent to 2.5 billion tons.
4. Russia, up 3 percent to 1.8 billion tons.
5. Japan, up 0.4 percent to 1.3 billion tons.
6. Germany, down 4 percent to 0.8 billion tons.
7. Iran, up 2 percent to 0.7 billion tons.
8. South Korea, up 4 percent to 0.6 billion tons.
9. Canada, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.
10. South Africa, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.
OMG! Gore-bal warming! We're all gonna die...(someday).
Â
18-20,000 years ago we were in an ice age. It has been warming ever since. Mankind did not, is not and never has CAUSED global warming. It is nature doing what nature does.
Â
Get over it.
lets hope bill gates and team r still working on this one, we do need the help, not so much if cars alone werent a factor. Gibberish : horse farts wouldent of lasted as long as car farts, ECT...
Phhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhttt!!
Â
It must have been those healthy legumes.
I was not the least disappointed by the discussions here. The deniers are in full swing and others who understand a lot of the science behind this article try to convince them otherwise. I'm reminded of my mother who often told us, "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still." Pretty much a waste of time at the keyboard to argue this.
 @jcman I understand the science quite well. I also understand that most of it is nothing more than pseudoscience at best. The oceans could be completely frozen over and so-called climate scientist would still be claiming that we are on the verge of unstoppable global warming.Â
Â
"A false conclusion once arrived at and widely accepted is not easily dislodged and the less it is understood the more tenaciously it is held." Georg Cantor
 @Wayne " The oceans could be completely frozen over and so-called climate scientist would still be claiming that we are on the verge of unstoppable global warming. "
Â
(citation needed)
 @Wayne  @jcmanÂ
Suddenly going from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change" was one of those teachable moments. Â
Â
I'm waiting for all those climate experts to explain the Medieval Warm Period, followed by the Little Ice Age. Â Those were both quite recent periods of dramatic climate change. Â
 @TheBronze  @Opus8no5  @Wayne  @jcman "in fact, the northern ice cap could met tomorrow and water levels wouldn't rise.... They are already ON the water."
But the ice caps on Greenland and Antarctica are NOT "on the water". If they melt, that water DOES increase the sea level.
 @Opus8no5  @Wayne  @jcman Recent studies have shown that "global warming" as it was hysterically described in the 80s is just not happening. Ice caps were supposed to melt, temperatures were supposed to go up, etc. The ice caps ARE melting. But the ice is just going to other locations on the cap. Water levels aren't rising. in fact, the northern ice cap could met tomorrow and water levels wouldn't rise.... They are already ON the water. But lets not cloud the issue with facts. lets just get in a frenzy and claim that 10 years of study is enough to send the world into a panic...
Â
Now, that isn't to say that we should do nothing about emissions, but lets not put the two issues together, eh?
A serious question:
Â
What happens if global temperatures don't "Mann" up? Or what if they decline? Will anybody at "World Government Now!" go,"Whoops! Our bad! Never mind."?
 @Getov Mylon pollution is REAL! really bad, with in 1,000 years bad. yes, stranger things could happen. nooot at r rate. compared to the earths tolerance. and normal earth crap
 @Getov Mylon Not in so many words, but they WILL ask for billions more in research grants to improve their models and understanding.
So... it looks like the US has done its part. Now the rest of the world can just leave us alone. We could start reducing our Carbon Output by having less UN meetings. Oh and maybe y'all Tird World countries can start paying your "fair share" of the UN's operating costs. Losers...
Water vapor is the key ingredient of so-called green house gases, not carbon dixoide.
This comment has been deleted
 @Wildstar And yet China wants to import America's coal. Go figure.
Guess I better fart less.
 @I Like Meat Pretty much impossible if you like meat!
Bla bla bla....
Same old story with no facts to support it.
Â
My sticky notes have more paste than this nonsense.
 @bobalouie "Same old story with no facts to support it."
Â
Yes, all the physicists, biologists, geologists, and other eggheads are in a gigantic conspiracy, and only you, bobalouie, are smart enough to see through their wicked scheme.
Â
All of those temperature gauges around the world? Every single one of them has been personally tampered with by Al Gore.
Â
All of that weird weather we've been having the last few years? It turns out it's always been this way; we just plumb forgot about it. We call it a "100-year storm" even though it happens every 5 years, because scientists always exaggerate.
Â
All of that photographic evidence of disappearing glaciers? Photoshopped, again by Al Gore (he's very busy). If you actually went to those places, you'd see that the glaciers are fine, or at least on vacation or invisible, or something.
Â
Yep, a ludicrously complicated conspiracy involving 97% of the world's scientists is so much more plausible than the basic laws of chemistry and physics.
Â
By the way: Al Gore Al Gore Al Gore Al Gore! Think about it.
 @Sutekh  @bobalouie You need to ask yourself: Why do these "scientists" jump on this band wagon? Follow the money. "Scientists" thrive on research grants. No grants, no study. Toe the line and say what the money folks want to hear, and *voilla!* money appears!
 @Sutekh  @bobalouie Or, maybe, there hasn't been much warming in the last sixteen years, like ZERO, and the scientists who get research grants to study it will have a hard time saying "oops"
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/01/18-annual-climate-gabfests-16-years-without-warming/
Â
 @T H I S  @RN1  @GaikokujinÂ
Notice how some clowns run around posting on old stories
trying to build their points. someone would have to have pretty low self esteem to allow a silly point system to determine their self worth...HOW PATHETIC, PEOPLE WILL BE IMPRESSED BY THEÂ POINTS YOU MAKE.... NOT THE POINTS YOU HAVE..
Â
 ( reminds me of a star-kiss tune commercial ) ( SORRY CHARLIE )..
 @RN1Â
Or, there is what the science actually says
http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-cooling-intermediate.htm
Â
But you keep on posting crap and calling yourself an expert.Â
And oh look @Gaikokujin liked your BS post. Who'd have thunk it.
Yes they are in a gigantic conspiracy, they all get their money backing from those that will benifit from taking our money, the governments; through carbon taxes. It doesn't take a scientist to see that.
 @Crimsonkid NO, it just takes an idiot who would rather beleive crazy conspiracy theories than science to believe it.
Â
psstt.. your tin foil is showing.
 @bobalouie I don't think I have ever seen you post a positive comment. You must live a very sad life.
Why would you want to post a positive comment about lies; I am not saying the Earth isn't warming but it has nothing to do with green house gases and everything to do with the Sun.
 @Crimsonkid Call them lies if you like but your statement has nothing to do with facts, so does that make it a lie?
@Darn it. Sad? Yes. For my country and all those that understand the rat hole we're headed for.
Â
I post many positive comments here. How you choose to interpret them is your problem.
Â
That's what's sad. You can't think on yer own.
@Darn it! @bobalouie You're mean! He just doesn't believe it. Because someone doesn't believe like you, you don't have to be mean just ignore it.
 @GaikokujinÂ
Considering your past posts, I can understand why you would say that,
Â
Â
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Author C Clark.
Â
Â
 @jcman  @justsayin  @bobalouie Global warming is one of the self-made "new religions" of the left.
 @justsayin  @Darn  @bobalouie Global warming caused by burning fossil fuels has nothing to do with beliefs. Beliefs are for religions. The facts are the facts and it doesn't make any difference whether someone believes them or not they are still there. The facts are that the earth is warming at a faster rate than any time in the last million years and the biggest contributor is humans burning all kinds of fuels.
Did you say bla bla bla or glug glug glug?
Bla bla bla = I can't hear you.
Glug glug glug = I willingly slurp at the trough.
Â
I'm leaning toward the bla side. ;-)
Zombies AND global warming.......we're all gonna die!!!!!!! (unless I buy a Prius!! With a .50 Cal mounted to the hood)
 @Wolfen Thats the only thing that would get me to buy a prius. ARE YOU LISTENING TOYOTA?
 @progun  @Wolfen Gotta be honest, I'd be giving Priuses a second look if they came with a mounted gatling gun.
As long as world population trends continue and modernization of third world countries progresses, logistically there is nothing that can be done outside of geo-engineering that will rid the atmosphere of "excess" carbon.  Remember, carbon makes up only 4/400 of 1% of the atmosphere and human contribution is less than 5% of that. Cars are really not much of a contributor, mostly it is cattle and coal plants. On a side note last week Wall Street upgraded Monsanto as a likely major beneficiary of global warming legislation. Along with GE's nuclear power, special interest waits in the shadows for lawmakers to hand out gifts.
@Ballardog Now the real reason! Greed and money amongst the enviro's, say it ain't so!
This comment has been deleted
 @n9078jk4  @Ballardog I am really surprised that Monsanto hasn't developed something to add to cattle feed that eliminates the cattle gas. Of course, the fact that it might poison humans wouldn't hinder them.Â
 @Darn it!  @n9078jk4  @Ballardog I'm surprised Monsanto has come out with an artificial cow that produces no waste, a 100% meat ratio, and 100% probability of cancer if consumed.
 @Ballardog  @SchönLicht  @n9078jk4 They are that too. But their policies are ruled by greed. They don't care if their modified grains are harmful as long as the money keeps flowing in they are happy campers. If the chemicals they put in weed killers evenually ends up in our water supply and ends up killing good plant and fish life, well, woops. Let's go to court and maybe we can settle up in 30 years.
 @Darn it!  @SchönLicht  @n9078jk4 More of an example of corporatism and cronyism than corporate greed. They are a company of DC insiders and lawyers that use their influence to bend and write the laws in their own favor.
 @SchönLicht  @Darn  @n9078jk4  @Ballardog Monsanto has so many ties to the US government it might as well be nationalized. The current head of the USDA was an executive at Monsanto prior to being appointed by Obama. The current head of Monsanto's American operations was Al Gore's right hand man. It's not limited to Democrat's however as even Rumsfeld worked for Monsanto at one time. The list goes on and on and I don't have the energy to type so much.
 @SchönLicht  @Darn  @n9078jk4  @Ballardog If I had a magic wand I would wave it over Montsano and zap them out of existence. They are the perfect example of the evils done by corporate America all done in the name of greed.
@Darn it! @n9078jk4 @Ballardog Oh the fact that it might poison humans wouldnt stop Montsano at ALL!! They just havent figured it out yet or they would have patented it, paid off the FDA-USDA-EPA to look the other way while they unleashed it on the unsuspecting masses!! Just like they have with everything else they produce!!
 @mstipton LOL! If it works, I'm for it.
Â
How about Beano?
Hmmm, there seems to be missing information. Â How much carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and oxygen released into the atmosphere each year by plant growth? Â Maybe we should all buy more house plants. Â
 @Opus8no5 If anything we should plant more trees in the timber industries former locations. Im not surprised by the increase in CO2 worldwide with how much timber and other natural plant life is removed for population growth and hardly any replacement is done.
 @DarkRenegade  @Opus8no5Â
Â
The USA loses an average of more than 4 million acres of forest each year to forest fires. Judicious logging with clearing of underbrush fuel could significantly reduce that. Â