Chicago teachers suspend strike, classes to resume

CHICAGO (AP) - The city's teachers agreed Tuesday to return to the classroom after more than a week on the picket lines, ending a spiteful stalemate with Mayor Rahm Emanuel that put teacher evaluations and job security at the center of a national debate about the future of public education.
Union delegates voted overwhelmingly to formally suspend the strike after discussing details of a proposed contract settlement worked out over the weekend. Classes were to resume Wednesday.
Delegates poured out of a South Side union hall singing "solidarity forever."
"I'm very excited. I miss my students. I'm relieved because I think this contract was better than what they offered," said America Olmedo, who teaches fourth- and fifth-grade bilingual classes. "They tried to take everything away."
Said Shay Porter, a teacher at the Henderson Academy elementary school: "We ignited the labor movement in Chicago."
The walkout, the first in Chicago in 25 years, shut down the nation's third-largest school district just days after 350,000 students had returned from summer vacation. Tens of thousands of parents were forced to find alternatives for idle children, including many whose neighborhoods have been wracked by gang violence in recent months.
Union President Karen Lewis said the union's 700-plus delegates voted 98 percent to 2 percent to reopen the schools.
"We said that we couldn't solve all the problems of the world with one contract," Lewis said. "And it was time to end the strike."
Tuesday's vote was not on the contract offer itself, but on whether to continue the strike. The contract will now be submitted to a vote by the full membership of more than 25,000 teachers.
The walkout was the first for a major American city in at least six years. It drew national attention because it posed a high-profile test for teachers unions, which have seen their political influence threatened by a growing reform movement. Unions have pushed back against efforts to expand charter schools, bring in private companies to help with failing schools and link teacher evaluations to student test scores.
The strike carried political implications, too, raising the risk of a protracted labor battle in President Barack Obama's hometown at the height of the fall campaign, with a prominent Democratic mayor and Obama's former chief of staff squarely in the middle. Emanuel's forceful demands for reform have angered the teachers.
The teachers walked out Sept. 10 after months of tense contract talks that for a time appeared to be headed toward a peaceful resolution.
Emanuel and the union agreed in July on a deal to implement a longer school day with a plan to hire back 477 teachers who had been laid off rather than pay regular teachers more to work longer hours. That raised hopes the contract would be settled before the start of fall classes, but bargaining stalled on other issues.
Emanuel decried the teachers' decision to leave classrooms, calling the walkout unnecessary and a "strike of choice."
Almost from the beginning, the two sides couldn't even agree on whether they were close to a deal. Emanuel said an agreement was within easy reach and could be sealed with school in session. The union insisted that dozens of issues remained unresolved.
Chicago's long history as a union stronghold seemed to work to the teachers' advantage. As they walked the picket lines, they were joined by many of the very people who were most inconvenienced by the work stoppage: parents who had to scramble to find babysitters or a supervised place for children to pass the time.
To win friends, the union representing 25,500 teachers engaged in something of a publicity campaign, telling parents repeatedly about problems with schools and the barriers that have made it more difficult to serve their kids. They described classrooms that are stifling hot without air conditioning, important books that are unavailable and supplies as basic as toilet paper that are sometimes in short supply.
As the strike entered its second week, Emanuel turned to the courts to try to force teachers back to the classroom by filing a lawsuit that described the walkout as an unlawful danger to the public.
The complaint sought a court order to end the strike, saying it was illegal because it endangered the health and safety of students and concerned issues - evaluations, layoffs and recall rights - that state law says cannot be grounds for a work stoppage.
A judge set a hearing for Wednesday, but the case was likely to be moot if teachers went back to class.
The strike upended a district in which the vast majority of students are poor and minority. It also raised the concerns of parents who worried not just about their kids' education but their safety. Chicago's gang violence has spiked this year, with scores of shootings reported throughout a long, bloody summer and bystanders sometimes caught in the crossfire.
The district staffed more than 140 schools with non-union workers and central office employees so students who are dependent on school-provided meals would have a place to eat breakfast and lunch. But most parents refused to leave their children at unfamiliar schools where they would be thrown together with kids and supervising adults they may never have met.
When the two sides met at the bargaining table, money was only part of the problem. With an average salary of $76,000, Chicago teachers are among the highest-paid in the nation. After weeks of talks, the district proposed a 16 percent raise over four years - far beyond what most American employers have offered in the aftermath of the Great Recession.
But the evaluations and job security measures stirred the most intense debate.
The union said the evaluation system was unfair because it relied too heavily on test scores and did not take into account outside factors that affect student performance such as poverty, violence and homelessness.
The union also pushed for a policy to give laid-off teachers first dibs on open jobs anywhere in the district. The district said that would prevent principals from hiring the teachers they thought best qualified and most appropriate for the position. The tentative settlement proposed giving laid-off teachers first shot at schools that absorbed their former students.
Emanuel did not personally negotiate but monitored the talks through aides.
The strike was just the latest and highest-stakes chapter in a long and often contentious battle between him and the union.
When he took office last year, the former White House chief of staff inherited a school district facing a $700 million budget shortfall. Not long after, his administration rescinded 4 percent raises for teachers. He then asked the union to re-open its contract and accept 2 percent pay raises in exchange for lengthening the school day for students by 90 minutes. The union refused.
Emanuel, who promised a longer school day during his campaign, attempted to go around the union by asking teachers at individual schools to waive the contract and add 90 minutes to the day. He halted the effort after being challenged by the union before the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board.
Union delegates voted overwhelmingly to formally suspend the strike after discussing details of a proposed contract settlement worked out over the weekend. Classes were to resume Wednesday.
Delegates poured out of a South Side union hall singing "solidarity forever."
"I'm very excited. I miss my students. I'm relieved because I think this contract was better than what they offered," said America Olmedo, who teaches fourth- and fifth-grade bilingual classes. "They tried to take everything away."
Said Shay Porter, a teacher at the Henderson Academy elementary school: "We ignited the labor movement in Chicago."
The walkout, the first in Chicago in 25 years, shut down the nation's third-largest school district just days after 350,000 students had returned from summer vacation. Tens of thousands of parents were forced to find alternatives for idle children, including many whose neighborhoods have been wracked by gang violence in recent months.
Union President Karen Lewis said the union's 700-plus delegates voted 98 percent to 2 percent to reopen the schools.
"We said that we couldn't solve all the problems of the world with one contract," Lewis said. "And it was time to end the strike."
Tuesday's vote was not on the contract offer itself, but on whether to continue the strike. The contract will now be submitted to a vote by the full membership of more than 25,000 teachers.
The walkout was the first for a major American city in at least six years. It drew national attention because it posed a high-profile test for teachers unions, which have seen their political influence threatened by a growing reform movement. Unions have pushed back against efforts to expand charter schools, bring in private companies to help with failing schools and link teacher evaluations to student test scores.
The strike carried political implications, too, raising the risk of a protracted labor battle in President Barack Obama's hometown at the height of the fall campaign, with a prominent Democratic mayor and Obama's former chief of staff squarely in the middle. Emanuel's forceful demands for reform have angered the teachers.
The teachers walked out Sept. 10 after months of tense contract talks that for a time appeared to be headed toward a peaceful resolution.
Emanuel and the union agreed in July on a deal to implement a longer school day with a plan to hire back 477 teachers who had been laid off rather than pay regular teachers more to work longer hours. That raised hopes the contract would be settled before the start of fall classes, but bargaining stalled on other issues.
Emanuel decried the teachers' decision to leave classrooms, calling the walkout unnecessary and a "strike of choice."
Almost from the beginning, the two sides couldn't even agree on whether they were close to a deal. Emanuel said an agreement was within easy reach and could be sealed with school in session. The union insisted that dozens of issues remained unresolved.
Chicago's long history as a union stronghold seemed to work to the teachers' advantage. As they walked the picket lines, they were joined by many of the very people who were most inconvenienced by the work stoppage: parents who had to scramble to find babysitters or a supervised place for children to pass the time.
To win friends, the union representing 25,500 teachers engaged in something of a publicity campaign, telling parents repeatedly about problems with schools and the barriers that have made it more difficult to serve their kids. They described classrooms that are stifling hot without air conditioning, important books that are unavailable and supplies as basic as toilet paper that are sometimes in short supply.
As the strike entered its second week, Emanuel turned to the courts to try to force teachers back to the classroom by filing a lawsuit that described the walkout as an unlawful danger to the public.
The complaint sought a court order to end the strike, saying it was illegal because it endangered the health and safety of students and concerned issues - evaluations, layoffs and recall rights - that state law says cannot be grounds for a work stoppage.
A judge set a hearing for Wednesday, but the case was likely to be moot if teachers went back to class.
The strike upended a district in which the vast majority of students are poor and minority. It also raised the concerns of parents who worried not just about their kids' education but their safety. Chicago's gang violence has spiked this year, with scores of shootings reported throughout a long, bloody summer and bystanders sometimes caught in the crossfire.
The district staffed more than 140 schools with non-union workers and central office employees so students who are dependent on school-provided meals would have a place to eat breakfast and lunch. But most parents refused to leave their children at unfamiliar schools where they would be thrown together with kids and supervising adults they may never have met.
When the two sides met at the bargaining table, money was only part of the problem. With an average salary of $76,000, Chicago teachers are among the highest-paid in the nation. After weeks of talks, the district proposed a 16 percent raise over four years - far beyond what most American employers have offered in the aftermath of the Great Recession.
But the evaluations and job security measures stirred the most intense debate.
The union said the evaluation system was unfair because it relied too heavily on test scores and did not take into account outside factors that affect student performance such as poverty, violence and homelessness.
The union also pushed for a policy to give laid-off teachers first dibs on open jobs anywhere in the district. The district said that would prevent principals from hiring the teachers they thought best qualified and most appropriate for the position. The tentative settlement proposed giving laid-off teachers first shot at schools that absorbed their former students.
Emanuel did not personally negotiate but monitored the talks through aides.
The strike was just the latest and highest-stakes chapter in a long and often contentious battle between him and the union.
When he took office last year, the former White House chief of staff inherited a school district facing a $700 million budget shortfall. Not long after, his administration rescinded 4 percent raises for teachers. He then asked the union to re-open its contract and accept 2 percent pay raises in exchange for lengthening the school day for students by 90 minutes. The union refused.
Emanuel, who promised a longer school day during his campaign, attempted to go around the union by asking teachers at individual schools to waive the contract and add 90 minutes to the day. He halted the effort after being challenged by the union before the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board.
"With an average salary of $76,000, Chicago teachers are among the highest-paid in the nation"
Â
This strike highlights the need to abolish public sector unions. The liberal hero FDR himself was opposed to and warned of the dangers of public sector unions. When the average teacher in Chicago makes nearly double the average income of an American household the greed has gone too far. Public sector unions negotiate with the government over how much taxpayer money they are going to take for their services. The taxpayers do not have a seat and the negotiating table. It is time to stop the public sector unions and their workers from fleecing private sector workers of their hard earned money.Â
@ByeByeBarry Only $76k with college? wow 10 grand less then Sweden's median wage. I hope they get more and encourage americans to leverage their own wages higher this $46k median really spells doom for US families especially with no health care or pension.
"But the evaluations and job security measures stirred the most intense debate."
Â
Of course. The union doesn't care about great teachers. It exists to protect poor teachers. And, of course, fat socialist cows like Karen LewisÂ
@LockesChild Nope, thats not it. The union exists because those are US workers exercising their right to association, assembly, and representation as outlined under the constitution. The union is simply a group of workers, and in this case, US workers, thats all. Don't be so scared. I believe Karen Lewis has those rights also. Is there any other group of Americans you wish to use as the identity of an enemy or scapegoat as a unifying cause for your right wing fascist bastard movement?
It's truly sad all of them were not fired! But RAHM is a chicken manure brown noser corrupt schmuck.Â
Â
Chicago SUCKS. My family ran from that corrupt DUMP several decades ago. Capone still lives.
Â
Land of Lincoln, who spins in his grave due to the Chicago horrid nightmare in the whitehouse now.
Â
Socialism. What a wonderful thing. Chicago teachers, you are garbage.
@pbs7mm Would that Socialist Rahm be the same Rahm that was a contract employee for Goldman Sachs fleecing 401s right up until 1-21-09?
Children held hostage again.Who now a days is getting any kind of raise.These teachers are Chicago THUGS from one of the nastiest States in the Country.Â
Not bad, considering they we're "...very unhappy" with the proposal as of just yesterday. What a load.
....some of the highest paid teachers who work some of the shortest days.
This is why we need more politicians like Scott Walker & Chris Christie...someone to put these public union thugs in their place, which should be the darkest rat hole available.
@Sydthepiper Yeah I hear ya Bro, I am really super tired of 7% of the US workforce destroying our country, they've fleeced us for 40% of our wealth. Bastard
 @Sydthepiper Polly want a cracker?
 @Audio Cat Not very bright, are you?
Â
But say that sometime in a bar on 2nd Ave. Maybe I will be there to share my opinion
 @LockesChild Huh, whether or not I am bright is probably determined by my career. Which is not flipping burgers, let me tell you. I'd love to get some of us together for some beers, although not all, the extremist idiots on either side would just bug me too hard.
Â
Although it would probably not be entirely civil, it would be interesting. But hey that's America - If we all agreed ( officially ) - this would be China.
Â
Â
Â
 @Audio Cat Ahhh,come on AC, you can have more substance than that.
No more "parroting" then most MSNBC devotee's when they feign their passion or vitriol on any given issue of the day.
@Sydthepiper @Audio Cat Supported Clinton? Must be right wing, hows all that globalization working for your society now? Oh and the financial crisis? We couldn't be enjoying our loss of 40% of our wealth without his help. I guess 40% from your nothing isnt much though so you're ok with him.
 @Audio Cat   Are you a member of a particular political party?
Oh Helll no. I have voted both sides. Mentioned in previous post that I liked & voted for Clinton...the repubs in this State have put HORRID candidates up for election...small wonder why the "D side has remained in power. I am fully supporting Mckenna this time...Inslee is Gregoir with a sack, we will not change as a State with him on Chris's throne.
I agree with the right on several issues, lean left on a few others..ie-medical...to an extent.Â
No pigeon hole for me.
 @Sydthepiper Meh. You're right. My apologies. I just get tired of hearing the same old crap out of either side. It bugs me that there are no new solutions to the same old problems.Â
Â
Just party lines.
Â
Not all union members are thugs, just like not all conservatives are in favor of rape.Â
Â
Although I have to strongly disagree with you on your choices. I am from NJ, and have a lot of people back there. The word on the street is that Chris is bought and paid for. A classic political pig. And Walker, well, my opinion is that if he needs to hide from his constituents while he is passing legislation, then there is something seriously wrong with what he is doing.
Â
I don't watch FOX, or MSNBC, and I am pretty wary of AP and the BBC. I make up my own mind - please tell me that you make up yours. Â Are you a member of a particular political party? Â