Coca-Cola to address obesity for first time in ads

NEW YORK (AP) - Coca-Cola became one of the world's most powerful brands by equating its soft drinks with happiness. Now it's taking to the airwaves for the first time to address a growing cloud over the industry: obesity.
The Atlanta-based company on Monday will begin airing a two-minute spot during the highest-rated shows on CNN, Fox News and MSNBC in hopes of becoming a more influential voice in the intensifying debate over sodas and their impact on public health. The ad lays out Coca-Cola's record of providing drinks with fewer calories over the years and notes that weight gain is the result of consuming too many calories of any kind - not just soda.
Coca-Cola says the campaign will kick off a variety of moves that address obesity in the year ahead, such as providing more diet options at soda fountains. The company declined to say how much it was spending on the spots, which it started putting together last summer.
For Coca-Cola, the world's No. 1 beverage company, the ads reflect the mounting pressures on the broader industry. Later this year, New York City is set to put into effect a first-in-the-nation cap on the size of soft drinks sold at restaurants, movie theaters, sports arenas and other venues. The mayor of Cambridge, Mass., has already proposed a similar measure, saying she was inspired by New York's move.
And when PepsiCo Inc., the No. 2 soda maker, recently signed a wide-ranging endorsement deal with pop singer Beyonce, critics called for the singer to drop the contract or donate the funds to groups that fund health initiatives.
Recent studies have also suggested that sugary drinks cause people to pack on the pounds, independent of other unhealthy behavior. A decades-long study involving more than 33,000 Americans, for example, suggested that drinking sugary beverages interacts with genes that affect weight, amplifying a person's risk of obesity beyond what they would be from heredity alone.
Mike Jacobson, executive director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, was skeptical about the intent behind Coca-Cola's ads and said that if the company was serious about helping reduce obesity, it would stop fighting soda taxes.
"It looks like a page out of damage control 101," he said. "They're trying to disarm the public."
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has been critical of the soda industry, and last year released a video parodying Coke's famous polar bears becoming plagued with diabetes and other health problems from drinking too much soda.
Coca-Cola said its ads aren't a reaction to negative public sentiment, however. Instead, the idea was to raise awareness about what the company has done and the work it plans to do in coming months regarding obesity, said Stuart Kronauge, general manager of sparkling beverages for Coca-Cola North America.
"There's an important conversation going on about obesity out there, and we want to be a part of the conversation," she said.
In the ad, a narrator notes that obesity is an issue that "concerns all of us" but that people can make a difference when they "come together." The spot was produced by Brighthouse and Citizen2 and is intended to reflect Coca-Cola's corporate responsibility among cable news viewers.
Another ad, which will run later this week during "American Idol" and before the Super Bowl, is much more reminiscent of catchy, upbeat advertising people have come to expect from Coca-Cola. It features a montage of activities that add up to burning off the "140 happy calories" in a can of Coke: walking a dog, dancing, sharing a laugh with friends and doing a victory dance after bowling a strike.
Diana Garza Ciarlante, a spokeswoman for Coca-Cola Co., said the 30-second ad, a version of which ran in Brazil last month, is intended to address confusion about the number of calories in soda. She said the company's consumer research showed people thought there were as many as 900 calories in a can of soda.
She noted that the company had to be careful with the ads to remain consistent with its brand voice and avoid sounding "preachy."
Garza Ciarlante declined to give details on the actions Coca-Cola has planned for the year ahead. But among the options under consideration is putting the amount of activity needed to burn off the calories in a drink on cans and bottles.
Coca-Cola noted it has already made several moves to help customers make smarter choices, such as putting calorie counts on the front of its cans and bottles in the U.S. Last year, it also started posting calorie information on its vending machines ahead of a regulation that will require soda companies to do so by 2014.
Public concern over the calories in soda is clear in Coca-Cola's changing business. In North America, all the growth in its soda business over the past 15 years has come from low- and no-calorie drinks, such as Coke Zero. Diet sodas now account for nearly a third of its sales in the U.S. and Canada. Other beverages, such as sports drinks and bottled water, are also fueling growth.
Even with the growing popularity of diet sodas, however, overall soda consumption in the U.S. has declined steadily since 1998, according to the industry tracker Beverage Digest.
The Atlanta-based company on Monday will begin airing a two-minute spot during the highest-rated shows on CNN, Fox News and MSNBC in hopes of becoming a more influential voice in the intensifying debate over sodas and their impact on public health. The ad lays out Coca-Cola's record of providing drinks with fewer calories over the years and notes that weight gain is the result of consuming too many calories of any kind - not just soda.
Coca-Cola says the campaign will kick off a variety of moves that address obesity in the year ahead, such as providing more diet options at soda fountains. The company declined to say how much it was spending on the spots, which it started putting together last summer.
For Coca-Cola, the world's No. 1 beverage company, the ads reflect the mounting pressures on the broader industry. Later this year, New York City is set to put into effect a first-in-the-nation cap on the size of soft drinks sold at restaurants, movie theaters, sports arenas and other venues. The mayor of Cambridge, Mass., has already proposed a similar measure, saying she was inspired by New York's move.
And when PepsiCo Inc., the No. 2 soda maker, recently signed a wide-ranging endorsement deal with pop singer Beyonce, critics called for the singer to drop the contract or donate the funds to groups that fund health initiatives.
Recent studies have also suggested that sugary drinks cause people to pack on the pounds, independent of other unhealthy behavior. A decades-long study involving more than 33,000 Americans, for example, suggested that drinking sugary beverages interacts with genes that affect weight, amplifying a person's risk of obesity beyond what they would be from heredity alone.
Mike Jacobson, executive director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, was skeptical about the intent behind Coca-Cola's ads and said that if the company was serious about helping reduce obesity, it would stop fighting soda taxes.
"It looks like a page out of damage control 101," he said. "They're trying to disarm the public."
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has been critical of the soda industry, and last year released a video parodying Coke's famous polar bears becoming plagued with diabetes and other health problems from drinking too much soda.
Coca-Cola said its ads aren't a reaction to negative public sentiment, however. Instead, the idea was to raise awareness about what the company has done and the work it plans to do in coming months regarding obesity, said Stuart Kronauge, general manager of sparkling beverages for Coca-Cola North America.
"There's an important conversation going on about obesity out there, and we want to be a part of the conversation," she said.
In the ad, a narrator notes that obesity is an issue that "concerns all of us" but that people can make a difference when they "come together." The spot was produced by Brighthouse and Citizen2 and is intended to reflect Coca-Cola's corporate responsibility among cable news viewers.
Another ad, which will run later this week during "American Idol" and before the Super Bowl, is much more reminiscent of catchy, upbeat advertising people have come to expect from Coca-Cola. It features a montage of activities that add up to burning off the "140 happy calories" in a can of Coke: walking a dog, dancing, sharing a laugh with friends and doing a victory dance after bowling a strike.
Diana Garza Ciarlante, a spokeswoman for Coca-Cola Co., said the 30-second ad, a version of which ran in Brazil last month, is intended to address confusion about the number of calories in soda. She said the company's consumer research showed people thought there were as many as 900 calories in a can of soda.
She noted that the company had to be careful with the ads to remain consistent with its brand voice and avoid sounding "preachy."
Garza Ciarlante declined to give details on the actions Coca-Cola has planned for the year ahead. But among the options under consideration is putting the amount of activity needed to burn off the calories in a drink on cans and bottles.
Coca-Cola noted it has already made several moves to help customers make smarter choices, such as putting calorie counts on the front of its cans and bottles in the U.S. Last year, it also started posting calorie information on its vending machines ahead of a regulation that will require soda companies to do so by 2014.
Public concern over the calories in soda is clear in Coca-Cola's changing business. In North America, all the growth in its soda business over the past 15 years has come from low- and no-calorie drinks, such as Coke Zero. Diet sodas now account for nearly a third of its sales in the U.S. and Canada. Other beverages, such as sports drinks and bottled water, are also fueling growth.
Even with the growing popularity of diet sodas, however, overall soda consumption in the U.S. has declined steadily since 1998, according to the industry tracker Beverage Digest.
Just make your own using Soda Stream, 1/3 the calories, but real sugar. Tastes better than non-Mexican coke and is a lot cheaper.
Cocoa Cola was around long before this so called "epidemic" started and it never was a problem years ago, so my thought would be perhaps we should be concerned with the fact that people need to start taking responsibility for their own choices and not try to put the blame on these manufacturers. They just make the product, they don't force people to drink it.
When I read the headline I figured the ads were going to be followed up by "Please drink responsibly"! <g>
Personal responsibility and portion control. Â Portions have gotten out of control but just because your meal comes with a huge cup or unlimited refills doesn't mean you have to drink it all. Â I was at Five guys and a women got a soda for her kid, even questioned the size and made a comment that it was too much. Â Still handed it over and let the kid go fill it up all the way with Mountain Dew. Â I'm just thinking the whole time, walk over there with your kid and fill up how much you want to give them, it's not that difficult. Â You can still put 8 ounces of soda in a 32 ounce cup, duh!
So why doesn't Coke, Pepsi and all the others come out with a reduced calorie drink that is based on reduced sugar. I can't stand the taste of diet drinks and straight up who ever is too sweet.
Â
My solution is 1/2 coke 1/2 soda water. You get the same flavor but 1/2 the sugar...
 @DoctorPC Pepsi already does, its called Pepsi Next if I'm not mistaken. It has 60 calories per serving instead of 160.
 @Dredd57 Read the label, It contains fake sugar as I recall.
Â
What's needed is a reduce sugar beverage with out the artificial crap...
 @DoctorPC Oh I wouldn't doubt it has fake sweeteners in it at all, they all do just about.
Â
I'm trying to cut my soda consumption down to just "occasionally" instead of daily (but no more than a can or so per day). I've also tried natural sodas sweetened with Stevia, they are too sweet and don't feel heavy enough...if that makes any sense. I'm probably just going to cut out soda altogether soon.
Good luck with that. Coca-Cola's trying to prevent the very real possibility that HFCS could be banned from soft drinks altogether, thanks to a recent study that indicates HFCS does, indeed, behave differently than table sugar.
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S26/91/22K07
 @FormlessOne Not to mention it comes from genetically modified corn- which is very dangerous.
 @Dredd57  @FormlessOne Monsanto would disagree
The real culprits are the chemical sweeteners (aspertame) and high fructose corn syrup. Very few diet sodas use Splenda or Stevia. Stevia is a natural, almost zero calorie sweetener taken from a plant. It has no side effects.
Â
But to get the soda companies to eschew the bad sweeteners is almost unheard of. Locally, Jones soda is the only brand I know of that does not use high fructose corn syrup. It uses real sugar and tastes better.
 @Glassman But it's still too sweet and cost more than coke...
What's needed is natural and Real ingredients . I like coke but I'd like it more if they used real sugar but less of it.
@Glassman For a short time, you could buy "Throwback" Mountain Dew, made with cane sugar - the flavor is subtly different, and there wasn't a drop of HFCS to be found. Similarly, Jolt Cola used to be made with cane sugar, before the recipe was changed to make it cheaper to produce. There are a few other brands of soft drink out there that don't include HFCS, but they're hard to find.
 @FormlessOne  @Glassman We get Pepsi Throwback whenever we buy non-diet cola, it's easy to find at Walmart at least.
 @FormlessOne  @Glassman You can still find Coke and Sprite made with real sugar imported from Mexico. Tastes better, worth the time to find it.
 @DontTreadonMe  @FormlessOne  @Glassman Rum & Cokes mixed with Mexican coke are ridiculously good.
 @glassman:Â
Coca Cola actually had a Diet Coke version sweetened with Splenda on the market here a few years ago. It was not very popular because it did not taste the same as "regulatr" Diet Coke, so they discountinued it. I tried it while it was available here, and did NOT like it. It tasted "strange" (like there was something else mixed into the soda, some other flavor besides Diet Coke), and it had a weird after taste.
Â
If changing the formula changes the taste, consumers will not purchase the product. They will "go back" toi what they feel tastes good/right - regardless of whether it is" good for them" or not..
Â
Â
 @LocalLady  @glassman:  I've tried most diet products and don't care for the "chemical" taste, so I mix 1/2 original coke with club soda. Then add a shot of rum to balance the flavor
"Coca-Cola became one of the world's most powerful brands by equating its soft drinks with happiness."
Â
Sorry, every marketing campaign promotes the idea that the consumer would be happier if they bought said advertised product...
Â
Personally I am tired of seeing people fail to accept responsibility for their actions. McDonald's doesn't make people fat anymore than Coke does. It's the misuse and over use of fatty foods that creates obese and increased risk of developing diabetes. Is a can of coke ok from time to time? Sure it is. Just as an occasional trip through the drive through is ok. Basing one's diet entirely on fast food and junk food products however is not. Time to be accountable for your own actions society. Misplaced blame like this is asinine.
People need to take responsibility for their own health. Just because it's on a shelf in the store doesn't mean you have to buy it. The states that are banning certain size drinks are just playing big brother. They do know someone will just buy two, don't they? Of course they do because they can tax the same amount twice. They just say it's in the best interest of the health of the population. It's what is in their best interest, as in money earned.
@swansong68 I agree with you however the tax will be the same rate on every dollar, regardless of if it's spent $.50 or $1.50 at a time...
"if the company was serious about helping reduce obesity, it would stop fighting soda taxes."
Â
What a blow hard. Taxes on soda are nothing more than a money grab by local and state politicians. How would not fighting taxes help obesity in any way? Coke is protecting their brand by fighting taxes in that they are trying to keep the final cost to consumers down.
 @TheBronze It is also called social engineering as well.  tax incentives to get married, sin taxes on boos, the list is quite long.
@APenny4MyThoughts @TheBronze And Washington state has one of the highest sin taxes in the country.
Hey, fatties!