Defiant North Korea sets off nuclear explosion
»Play Video
PYONGYANG, North Korea (AP) - Defying U.N. warnings, North Korea on Tuesday conducted its third nuclear test in the remote, snowy northeast, taking a crucial step toward its goal of building a bomb small enough to be fitted on a missile capable of striking the United States.
North Korea said the atomic test was merely its "first response" to what it called U.S. threats, and said it will continue with unspecified "second and third measures of greater intensity" if Washington maintains its hostility.
The underground test, which set off powerful seismic waves, drew immediate condemnation from Washington, the U.N. and others. Even its only major ally, China, summoned the North's ambassador for a dressing-down.
President Barack Obama, who was scheduled to give a State of the Union address later Tuesday, said nuclear tests "do not make North Korea more secure." Instead, North Korea has "increasingly isolated and impoverished its people through its ill-advised pursuit of weapons of mass destruction," he said in a statement.
But the Obama administration's options for a response are limited, and a U.S. military strike is highly unlikely.
In an emergency session, the U.N. Security Council unanimously said the test poses "a clear threat to international peace and security" and pledged further action.
U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice called the test "highly provocative" and said the North's continued work on its nuclear and missile programs threatens regional and international peace and security and "the security of a number of countries including the United States."
"They will not be tolerated," she said, "and they will be met with North Korea's increasing isolation and pressure under United Nations sanctions."
It remains to be seen, however, whether China will sign on to any new, binding global sanctions. Beijing, Pyongyang's primary trading partner, has resisted measures that would cut off North Korea's economy completely.
China expressed firm opposition to Tuesday's test but called for a calm response by all sides. Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi summoned North Korea's ambassador and delivered a "stern representation" and demanded that North Korea "swiftly return to the correct channel of dialogue and negotiation," the ministry said in a statement.
The test was a defiant North Korean response to U.N. orders that it shut down its atomic activity or face more sanctions and international isolation. It will likely draw more sanctions from the United States and other countries at a time when North Korea is trying to rebuild its moribund economy and expand its engagement with the outside world.
Several U.N. resolutions bar North Korea from conducting nuclear or missile tests because the Security Council considers Pyongyang a would-be proliferator of weapons of mass destruction and its nuclear testing a threat to international peace and stability. North Korea dismisses that as a double standard, and claims the right to build nuclear weapons as a defense against the United States, which it has seen as Enemy No. 1 since the 1950-53 Korean War. The U.S. stations more than 28,000 troops in South Korea to protect its ally.
Tuesday's test is North Korea's first since young leader Kim Jong Un took power of a country long estranged from the West. The test will likely be portrayed in North Korea as a strong move to defend the nation against foreign aggression, particularly from the U.S.
"The test was conducted in a safe and perfect way on a high level, with the use of a smaller and light A-bomb, unlike the previous ones, yet with great explosive power," North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency said.
The U.N. Security Council recently punished North Korea for a rocket launch in December that the U.N. and Washington called a cover for a banned long-range missile test. Pyongyang said it was a peaceful launch of a satellite into space. In condemning that launch, the council demanded a stop to future launches and ordered North Korea to respect a ban on nuclear activity - or face "significant action" by the U.N.
The timing of Tuesday's test is significant. It came hours before Obama's speech and only days before the Saturday birthday of Kim Jong Un's father, late leader Kim Jong Il, whose memory North Korean propaganda has repeatedly linked to the country's nuclear ambitions.
This year also marks the 60th anniversary of the signing of the armistice that ended the 1950-53 Korean War, and in late February South Korean President-elect Park Geun-hye will be inaugurated.
In Pyongyang, where it was snowing Tuesday, North Koreans gathered around televisions to watch a 3 p.m. TV broadcast announcing the nuclear test.
The test shows the world that North Korea is a "nuclear weapons state that no one can irritate," Kim Mun Chol, a 42-year-old Pyongyang citizen, told The Associated Press in the North Korean capital. "Now we have nothing to be afraid of in the world."
The National Intelligence Service in Seoul told lawmakers that North Korea may conduct an additional nuclear test and test-launch a ballistic missile in response to U.N. talks about imposing more sanctions, according to the office of South Korean lawmaker Jung Chung-rae, who attended the private meeting. Analysts have also previously speculated that Pyongyang might conduct multiple tests, possibly of plutonium and uranium devices.
North Korea is estimated to have enough weaponized plutonium for four to eight bombs, according to American nuclear scientist Siegfried Hecker.
It wasn't immediately clear to outside experts whether the device exploded Tuesday was small enough to fit on a missile, and whether it was fueled by plutonium or highly enriched uranium. A successful test would take North Korean scientists a step closer to building a nuclear warhead that can reach U.S. shores - seen as the ultimate goal of North Korea's nuclear program.
In 2006 and 2009, North Korea is believed to have tested devices made of plutonium. But in 2010, Pyongyang revealed a program to enrich uranium, which would give the country a second source of bomb-making materials - a worrying development for the United States and its allies.
"This latest test and any further nuclear testing could provide North Korean scientists with additional information for nuclear warhead designs small enough to fit on top of its ballistic missiles," Daryl Kimball and Greg Thielmann wrote on the private Arms Control Association's blog. "However, it is likely that additional testing would be needed for North Korea to field either a plutonium or enriched uranium weapon."
Uranium would be a worry because plutonium facilities are large and produce detectable radiation, making it easier for outsiders to find and monitor. However, uranium centrifuges can be hidden from satellites, drones and nuclear inspectors in caves, tunnels and other hard-to-reach places. Highly enriched uranium also is easier than plutonium to engineer into a weapon.
Monitoring stations in South Korea detected an earthquake in the North with a magnitude of 4.9 and the South's Defense Ministry said that corresponds to an estimated explosive yield of 6-7 kilotons.
The yields of the North's 2006 and 2009 tests were estimated at 1 kiloton and 2 to 6 kilotons, respectively, spokesman Kim Min-seok said. By comparison, U.S. nuclear bombs that flattened Nagasaki and Hiroshima during World War II were estimated at 13 kilotons and 22 kilotons, respectively, Kim said.
The test is a product of North Korea's military-first, or songun, policy, and shows Kim Jong Un is running the country much as his father did, said Daniel Pinkston of the International Crisis Group think tank.
The other part of a credible North Korean nuclear deterrent is its missile program. While it has capable short and medium-range missiles, it has struggled in tests of technology for long-range missiles needed to carry bombs to the United States, although it successfully launched the satellite in December.
North Korea isn't close to having a nuclear bomb it can use on the United States or its allies. Instead, Hecker said in a posting on Stanford University's website, "it wants to hold U.S. interests at risk of a nuclear attack to deter us from regime change and to create international leverage and diplomatic maneuvering room."
North Korea said the atomic test was merely its "first response" to what it called U.S. threats, and said it will continue with unspecified "second and third measures of greater intensity" if Washington maintains its hostility.
The underground test, which set off powerful seismic waves, drew immediate condemnation from Washington, the U.N. and others. Even its only major ally, China, summoned the North's ambassador for a dressing-down.
President Barack Obama, who was scheduled to give a State of the Union address later Tuesday, said nuclear tests "do not make North Korea more secure." Instead, North Korea has "increasingly isolated and impoverished its people through its ill-advised pursuit of weapons of mass destruction," he said in a statement.
But the Obama administration's options for a response are limited, and a U.S. military strike is highly unlikely.
In an emergency session, the U.N. Security Council unanimously said the test poses "a clear threat to international peace and security" and pledged further action.
U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice called the test "highly provocative" and said the North's continued work on its nuclear and missile programs threatens regional and international peace and security and "the security of a number of countries including the United States."
"They will not be tolerated," she said, "and they will be met with North Korea's increasing isolation and pressure under United Nations sanctions."
It remains to be seen, however, whether China will sign on to any new, binding global sanctions. Beijing, Pyongyang's primary trading partner, has resisted measures that would cut off North Korea's economy completely.
China expressed firm opposition to Tuesday's test but called for a calm response by all sides. Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi summoned North Korea's ambassador and delivered a "stern representation" and demanded that North Korea "swiftly return to the correct channel of dialogue and negotiation," the ministry said in a statement.
The test was a defiant North Korean response to U.N. orders that it shut down its atomic activity or face more sanctions and international isolation. It will likely draw more sanctions from the United States and other countries at a time when North Korea is trying to rebuild its moribund economy and expand its engagement with the outside world.
Several U.N. resolutions bar North Korea from conducting nuclear or missile tests because the Security Council considers Pyongyang a would-be proliferator of weapons of mass destruction and its nuclear testing a threat to international peace and stability. North Korea dismisses that as a double standard, and claims the right to build nuclear weapons as a defense against the United States, which it has seen as Enemy No. 1 since the 1950-53 Korean War. The U.S. stations more than 28,000 troops in South Korea to protect its ally.
Tuesday's test is North Korea's first since young leader Kim Jong Un took power of a country long estranged from the West. The test will likely be portrayed in North Korea as a strong move to defend the nation against foreign aggression, particularly from the U.S.
"The test was conducted in a safe and perfect way on a high level, with the use of a smaller and light A-bomb, unlike the previous ones, yet with great explosive power," North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency said.
The U.N. Security Council recently punished North Korea for a rocket launch in December that the U.N. and Washington called a cover for a banned long-range missile test. Pyongyang said it was a peaceful launch of a satellite into space. In condemning that launch, the council demanded a stop to future launches and ordered North Korea to respect a ban on nuclear activity - or face "significant action" by the U.N.
The timing of Tuesday's test is significant. It came hours before Obama's speech and only days before the Saturday birthday of Kim Jong Un's father, late leader Kim Jong Il, whose memory North Korean propaganda has repeatedly linked to the country's nuclear ambitions.
This year also marks the 60th anniversary of the signing of the armistice that ended the 1950-53 Korean War, and in late February South Korean President-elect Park Geun-hye will be inaugurated.
In Pyongyang, where it was snowing Tuesday, North Koreans gathered around televisions to watch a 3 p.m. TV broadcast announcing the nuclear test.
The test shows the world that North Korea is a "nuclear weapons state that no one can irritate," Kim Mun Chol, a 42-year-old Pyongyang citizen, told The Associated Press in the North Korean capital. "Now we have nothing to be afraid of in the world."
The National Intelligence Service in Seoul told lawmakers that North Korea may conduct an additional nuclear test and test-launch a ballistic missile in response to U.N. talks about imposing more sanctions, according to the office of South Korean lawmaker Jung Chung-rae, who attended the private meeting. Analysts have also previously speculated that Pyongyang might conduct multiple tests, possibly of plutonium and uranium devices.
North Korea is estimated to have enough weaponized plutonium for four to eight bombs, according to American nuclear scientist Siegfried Hecker.
It wasn't immediately clear to outside experts whether the device exploded Tuesday was small enough to fit on a missile, and whether it was fueled by plutonium or highly enriched uranium. A successful test would take North Korean scientists a step closer to building a nuclear warhead that can reach U.S. shores - seen as the ultimate goal of North Korea's nuclear program.
In 2006 and 2009, North Korea is believed to have tested devices made of plutonium. But in 2010, Pyongyang revealed a program to enrich uranium, which would give the country a second source of bomb-making materials - a worrying development for the United States and its allies.
"This latest test and any further nuclear testing could provide North Korean scientists with additional information for nuclear warhead designs small enough to fit on top of its ballistic missiles," Daryl Kimball and Greg Thielmann wrote on the private Arms Control Association's blog. "However, it is likely that additional testing would be needed for North Korea to field either a plutonium or enriched uranium weapon."
Uranium would be a worry because plutonium facilities are large and produce detectable radiation, making it easier for outsiders to find and monitor. However, uranium centrifuges can be hidden from satellites, drones and nuclear inspectors in caves, tunnels and other hard-to-reach places. Highly enriched uranium also is easier than plutonium to engineer into a weapon.
Monitoring stations in South Korea detected an earthquake in the North with a magnitude of 4.9 and the South's Defense Ministry said that corresponds to an estimated explosive yield of 6-7 kilotons.
The yields of the North's 2006 and 2009 tests were estimated at 1 kiloton and 2 to 6 kilotons, respectively, spokesman Kim Min-seok said. By comparison, U.S. nuclear bombs that flattened Nagasaki and Hiroshima during World War II were estimated at 13 kilotons and 22 kilotons, respectively, Kim said.
The test is a product of North Korea's military-first, or songun, policy, and shows Kim Jong Un is running the country much as his father did, said Daniel Pinkston of the International Crisis Group think tank.
The other part of a credible North Korean nuclear deterrent is its missile program. While it has capable short and medium-range missiles, it has struggled in tests of technology for long-range missiles needed to carry bombs to the United States, although it successfully launched the satellite in December.
North Korea isn't close to having a nuclear bomb it can use on the United States or its allies. Instead, Hecker said in a posting on Stanford University's website, "it wants to hold U.S. interests at risk of a nuclear attack to deter us from regime change and to create international leverage and diplomatic maneuvering room."
Bring it on, you little jerks!
Do the nukes they created, have a sticker saying, "Made in China". HA.
I wondered why our CIA hadn't snuck in and sabotaged their facilities; then figured it to be too risky. Not of getting caught, but of their bomb going off unexpectedly.
Â
I don't think we are really concerned for our own people in America, rather allies and citizens abroad.
Â
Why don't we just go in and incite civil unrest like we have done in the middle east and help the people overthrow their own government like we have done in the past.
Â
We are getting soft.
 @rite n my mind Our government is too busy inciting civil unrest here at home. No time for that in NK.
Remember when W Bush said that North Korea wasn't going to obtain nuclear weapons under his watch? Oops!Â
Â
Â
 @lakeview No, I don't remember that promise. Cite?
 @Iconoclast So I guess Bush settled for something less after all...
 You need to read up on some definitions:
Â
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/settling?s=t
Â
 @Iconoclast Bush said that he "will not tolerate nuclear weapons in North Korea" in 2003. He also said he âwill not settle for anything less than the complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of North Koreaâs nuclear weapons program.â
Â
That was in 2003, several years before they tested their first weapon.Â
Â
"We will not tolerate nuclear weapons in North Korea. We will not give into blackmail. We will not settle for anything less than the complete, verifiable, and irreversible elimination of North Koreaâs nuclear weapons program."Â Â George W. Bush 5/23/03
Â
You may have missed this because of the whole "mission accomplished" stuff going on at the time in Iraq.Â
Â
Â
 @lakeview So Bush didn't make the quote you claimed. As for not tolerating, increasing sanctions and insisting on 6 party talks doesn't quite equate toleration. Nor does it equate to settling.
Â
But sad to see that you still suffer from your version of PTSD--Bush Derangement Syndrome.
Â
As for Iraq, that would be the war that Bush won, right? Just checking.
When you play with fire...
Much ado about nothing. Any country that wants to retain its sovereignty needs nukes to make that happen. Its why Iran needs to hurry up and get theirs too. If the US tax payers weren't paying such an enormous amount of money to the Pakistani government they would have already of launched one against us. We are creating terrorists where there were none. There's only one terrorist nation that has detonated a nuke in anger and its us. We already had WW2 in the bag but someone wanted to see a pretty light show just to send a message to the rest of the world. We set a dangerous president. Thats what happens when a country lacks leadership.
@BlindmanÂ
We have a PRESIDENT, we set a PRECEDENCE. That is only one mistake in your post.
Â
Apparently you read enough about WWII to still be uninformed. We may have had Japan "on the ropes" in WWII but clearing all the areas that Japan occupied would have claimed MANY more American lives. Just the battle of Iwo Jima was a month long and we suffered 28,000 American casualties, including 6,821 dead. Multiply that by how many other battles we would have fought against Japan and you can see why the decision to drop the bombs was made and this DOES NOT make the US a "terrorist nation". If you really feel this way, perhaps you should leave.
Send over an ultra-elite team to break into the facilities where they keep their warheads and secretly replace them with those funky toy snakes that pop out of cans. It is the year of the serpent this year! ;-)
And what is the USA doing??? We're doing the same thing that these other countries are doing!! In fact we go with head lines on the news bragging on how we're building and buying bombs. I fail to see what the problem is!
Shall we say that we have what they have or not!
This life is nearing the end! Get with the program and give your hearts to God through Christ! It's nearing the end and the people that will do it and take each other down is not just them, but you and me!! Choose you this day whom you shall serve! I choose God!
With Fukushima, the nuke plant that is continuing to spew radiation, which is over 10 times the crud Chernobyl let out, the US Navy came to aid in the aftermath of the tsunami.  "Operation Tomodachi", now seaman, as well as familiy members are coming down with cysts, cancer, and leukemia.  You can't smell, see, touch, or detect radiation without a dosimeter or geiger counter.  70,000 effected and growing.Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjuWYA4nQko
Â
Documentary of local kids in Japan with cysts at 18 months later. Â Nuke is clean, but the risk of meltdowns are nothing to be taken lightly over. Â I pray for all the peeps effected by this.... Â Â http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD9yGONdEUY
BTW.... Â Federal Alert Status of radiation is at 100 Counts Per Minute, detection of cesium. Â EPA data pull for Range 6, Cesium @ 661 & 668, shows 1-23 of 2 hours above alert status, and 2 hours close to alert status. Â It's been quiet since. Â Japan keeps burning debris from the tsunami, which happens to be infected with radiation..... oops. Â Jet Stream brings some goodies to visit us. Â
I'm sure we will make a new law against them and talk real mean (well not to mean) when they break that rule too.
Oh good more Cancer for the inhabitants of planet earth. i think we only need to look at our own nuclear tests and our power plants to see that this a dangerous and sometime uncontrollable force. even the Columbia river gets run off form Hanford nuke plant and test sites and it all comes down stream. i'm sure that those power companies who have reactors also pushed the Feds to remove hydro power damns along the Columbia forcing more consumers to turn to nuclear plants. It doesn't do any good to remove damns if you kill off the fish with nuclear waste runoff. In Nuclear war the lucky ones die by direct hit. it's the survivors who will suffer the agony of the bomb. remember the air we breath here circulates all over the world as does nuclear fallout.
And here we are about to gut our military at just the time we are going to need it most. Our enemies are just waiting for us to do what they never could themselves - destroy the US Military. As soon as that happens, we will sorely regret it.
 @70MonteCarlo Actually I am confident we can protect ourselves with a marginal military... as when Pearl Harbor that act was enough to galvanize the entire USA and get us into WW2... I would put money on it any country stupid enough to get into a direct military conflict would wroo the day they did, that is why all these cowards are fighting the way they are..because in direct combat they would lose on most if not ALL fronts!...Also because if they did not get ALL of US there would be that many more of us signing up to bring their house of cards down! ..No doubt at all we would be all over them and knocking on the door faster than they could spit! ... No doubt in my mind we could also shoot down anything that someone like North Korea would be able to deliver with time to spare and deliver our own care package!... North Korea does not have the superior numbers to produce massive warheads - If they ever lose the backing of China they will be in a whole new world of hurt as another one of my doubts is CHINA siding in support of North Korea if they escalate this to total war... I for one do not blink at their stupid miserable excuse for saber rattling!Â
This comment has been deleted
 @Chorge flagged. If they had a flag for stupidity we could use that too.
@Chorge --- Wow...just wow.Â
oh those wacky n koreans...they so craaaa-zy...
I don't think Kim Jong has much say in this. If he doesn't rubber stamp what the military leaders want to do he can kiss his A goodbye. The real power in North Korea isn't in their leader it's with their military.
@jcman I agree with you on this one. He's just a pawn - a face. The real power is behind the scenes....
As much as folk would like to nuke the crap out of NK, it would only confirm their paranoia. We can't bomb them. What we can do is post a boomer, (nuke sub), off their coast and blow their missles out of the air right above them. I had hopes that Kim Jong Un would be more sane than his father...... Oh well.
 @SargeMcC They're probably already sitting there waiting.
 @SargeMcC Wouldn't that be an anti-missile cruiser?Â
North Korea should be proud that they have spent a lot of money and effort building a weapon they case never use. I'm sure their starving masses will forget all about their hunger and shed tears of joy their great leader Kim Jong. Those that don't will be reporting to camp 22.
@Ankle Biter Note: change "never use." ... to "we hope they will never use." Never underestimate the insane leader of a country.
 @Bomarc  @Ankle Well if the Great Leader does use them then he won't have to worry about feeding the starving masses anymore. One Trident submarine can ruin your whole day.
I think the caption on the jumbo-tron says. "Comrades - that is not snow falling from the sky, it is nuclear fallout from the People's successful nuclear test. Enjoy."
shall we play a game
How about Global Thermonuclear War
Wouldn't you prefer a nice game of chess?
 @Bomarc Tic Tac Toe
For the safety of the rest of the planet, I think it's time to blow N. Korea off the face of the earth.
 @Shelly Don't forget Iran too and they are the ones I think will be the real nuclear problem. North Korea's screwed up political ideology is one thing..fanatic religion is another.
Time to start assassinating whack job leaders in certain hostile countries. If that doesn't work a couple of well placed hydrogen bombs should do the trick.
@Luciferian --- Speaking of whack job leaders.....
....might just be time to bomb them back to the stone age.....
 @bagsofdirt Unless you are part of the upper crust in the regime in NK then you are pretty much in the stone age already.
 @bagsofdirt A few kooks in power, and a bunch of impoverished citizens - which will your attack save and which will be killed. ?
When the rest of civilization is at stake, I'm not sure I care any longer.  I'm gonna go with bagsofdirt on this one.
If country doesn't want to suffer from NATO's imperialism they are going to have to have nukes. Don't blame Iran or North Korea one bit for wanting them and they certainly have the right to test them. NATO is just full of hypocrites. If they don't want other countries to have them then give up theirs.
Get a life Blindman, Do you realise that the only reason we have not been attacked here on land is because of the weapons and nukes we have??? And the other reason is that we have a gun hiding behind every tree?? Im guessing you never heard that either huh. We have nukes to keep the crazy countries and the leaders at bay and somewhat under control. Just like the good people who have guns in this country, but you have a couple idiots out there using weapons on people.
@Blindman  NATO does not have a monopoly on nukes. Non-NATO countries with nuclear weapons include Russia, China, India, Pakistan and Israel.
Â
From your previous comments, I could tell you were a kook. Now with this one, you have confirmed it. Your manifesto is from the following link:
Â
https://espressostalinist.wordpress.com/
Â
 @Blindman So madmen running countries with suicidal goals with nuclear weapons is NATO's fault. Check. Smoking anything today? Its kind of early for that isn't it?
North Korea and Iran are the two countries that scare the shyt out of me. One has not God and the other wants to hurry up and meet theirs. At least during the "Cold War" the Russians didn't want to die any more than we did.
I think it's high time for one of our patented Drone-o-grams to blow up a few of their military facilities. They just don't seem to get it.
Nuke them! that will teach that idiot of a leader to back off.
 @naturesway23 And kill off the population.  A few kooks in power + atomic bomb = dead citizens.Â