Dems platform backs gay marriage, abortion rights

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats unveiled a party platform at their national convention Monday that echoes President Barack Obama's call for higher taxes on wealthier Americans while backing same-sex marriage and abortion rights.
Delegates will vote Tuesday to adopt the platform that reflects the president's argument that his work is unfinished and he deserves another four years to complete the job.
"Today, our economy is growing again, al-Qaeda is weaker than at any point since 9/11, and our manufacturing sector is growing for the first time in more than a decade. But there is more we need to do, and so we come together again to continue what we started," the platform said.
The document is a sharp contrast from the Republican blueprint that the GOP adopted at its convention last week. The Republican plan would ban abortion and gay marriage, repeal Obama's health care overhaul law and shift Medicare into a voucher-style program.
Democrats acknowledged that divergent views.
"This election is not simply a choice between two candidates or two political parties, but between two fundamentally different paths for our country and our families," the Democrats said.
TAXES
The Democratic platform calls for extending the middle-class tax cuts for the 98 percent of American families who make less than $250,000 a year, and makes a promise not to raise taxes on them. The platform claims a typical family has saved $3,600 during Obama's first term. "Now he's fighting to stop middle-class families and those aspiring to join the middle class from seeing their taxes go up and to extend key tax relief for working families and those paying for college, while asking the wealthiest and corporations to pay their fair share," the platform says.
The Republican platform would extend the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, pending reform of the tax code. It also says the party would try to eliminate taxes on interest, dividends and capital gains altogether for lower- and middle-income taxpayers. It also would work to repeal the estate tax and the alternative minimum tax.
ABORTION
The Democratic platform states that it "unequivocally" supports Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that made abortion legal, and "supports a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay."
The platform states: "Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a woman, her family, her doctor and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or government to get in the way."
The Republican Party platform bans abortion in all cases, even rape, incest and when the life of the mother is endangered. Republicans say "the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed." It opposes using public revenues to promote or perform abortion or to fund organizations that perform or advocate abortions.
GAY MARRIAGE
The Democratic platform supports the movement to get equal treatment under the law for same-sex couples.
The platform says: "We also support the freedom of churches and religious entities to decide how to administer marriage as a religious sacrament without government interference." The platform opposes "federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection under the law" to same-sex couples.
The Republican Party platform affirms the rights of states and the federal government not to recognize same-sex marriage. It backs a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
IMMIGRATION
The platform states that "Democrats are strongly committed to enacting comprehensive immigration reform." Immigration overhaul would include bringing "undocumented immigrants out of the shadows," requiring illegal immigrants "to get right with the law, learn English and pay taxes" to get on a path toward citizenship. It also calls for a visa system that meets the country's "economic needs, keeps families together and enforces the law." It acknowledges that administrative fixes are not permanent. "Only Congress can provide a permanent, comprehensive solution."
The Republican platform opposes "any form of amnesty" for those who intentionally violate the immigration laws, demands a halt to Justice Department lawsuits against states that have enacted tough immigration measures, would deny federal funding to universities that provide in-state tuition to illegal immigrants and advocates making English the official national language.
MEDICARE
Democrats say the new health care law makes Medicare stronger by adding new benefits, fighting fraud and improving care for patients. It notes that nearly 50 million older Americans and those with disabilities rely on Medicare. Over 10 years, the law will save the average Medicare beneficiary $4,200, the platform says. "Democrats adamantly oppose any efforts to privatize or voucherize Medicare," the platform says.
The GOP platform pledges to move Medicare away from "the current unsustainable defined-benefit entitlement model to a fiscally sound defined-contribution model." It supports a Medicare transition to a premium-support model with an income-adjusted contribution toward a health plan of the enrollee's choice.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
The Democratic platform criticizes the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, which lifted restrictions on independent political expenditures by corporations and unions, and calls for "immediate action to curb the influence of lobbyists and special interests on our political institutions" — with a constitutional amendment, if necessary, in the cause of campaign finance reform.
"We support requiring groups trying to influence elections to reveal their donors so the public will know who's funding the political ads it sees," the platform says.
The Republican platform supports the Citizens United decision as a free speech issue.
HEALTH CARE
The platform pledges to continue building on the new health care law. It says accessible, affordable, high-quality health care is part of the American promise, that Americans should have the security that comes with good health care, and that no one should go broke because they get sick. "No law is perfect and Democrats stand willing to work with anyone to improve the law where necessary, but we are committed to moving forward," the platform says.
The GOP platform says that a Republican president on his first day in office would use his waiver authority to halt progress in carrying out the health care act. It calls for a Republican plan based on improving health care quality and lowering costs and a system that promotes the free market and gives consumers more choice.
DEFENSE
The platform says Democrats have responsibly ended the war in Iraq, put the al-Qaida terrorist organization on the path to defeat with the killing of Osama bin Laden and reversed the Taliban's momentum to set the stage for the drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
"As a consequence of the president's decisions and the brave work of our military and intelligence professionals, bin Laden can no longer threaten the United States and al-Qaida's senior leadership has been devastated, rendering the group far less capable than it was four years ago," the platform said. "The al-Qaida core in Afghanistan and Pakistan has never been weaker."
Democrats back further reductions in the nuclear weapons stockpile, building on the hard-fought U.S.-Russia treaty that Obama got through the Senate in December 2010. Democrats also say they have an "unshakable commitment to Israel's security," and Obama will do all in his power to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Democrats say they want to maintain a strong military, but argue that in the current fiscal environment, tough budgetary decisions must include defense spending. They noted that Democrats and Republicans agreed last summer in the deficit-cutting plan to reduce military spending.
Republicans, in their platform, criticizes the Obama administration as holding weak positions toward such countries as North Korea, China and Iran and for reductions in military spending.
___
Associated Press writers Andrew Miga, Michele Salcedo, Will Lester and Douglass K. Daniel contributed to this report.
Typical of the modern day politics: campaign on two big emotional issues that the government has no business messing with anyway and will have the least overall effect on those issues the government is supposed to be concerned with.
@thelastboomer Well you proved that you read the AP title to a story. You have also proved that you didnât or were not able to read much beyond that and/or you just ignored everything else.
Democrat Recovery Plan
Â
Boost abortions - hire more abortion doctors, nurses and staff.
Â
Support Gay unions - promote the growth of the Gay Wedding Industry!!
Â
How many more people will that hire...?
 @Truth Percolates Abortion is big business. I suport woment getting pregnent at least twice a year just to have an abortion and keep the economy going.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/planned-parenthood-opens-8-billion-abortionplex,20476/
If your individual success or failure depends on who/what party holds the white house/senate/house; you fail at life.
 @RomeyRome Just a word on tax fairness and the political parties. If I make between $200K and $210K and pay 35% income tax and a person making $200M to $210M pays 12% income tax, proportionally the millionaire will pay more income tax than I do in this scenario, but my annual net worth will be much lower paying the higher rate. Thus my individual success is impacted regardless of the party in power. Therefore, I vote for the party which best represents who I feel my individual taxes should benefit. Do I support the party that supports the population that already has 98% of the Nation's wealth, no I will support the party that will disperse the collected taxes to rebuilding our Nation's infrastructure and takes an interest in caring for our least fortunate? For me it is not a tough choice.
Apples and oranges dude! Your 35% is the "tax table". The 12% is the "eff.ective tax rate"
Â
Take your "total tax" from your return and divide it by your "adjusted gross income", then multiply by 100. This is YOUR effective tax rate. I'll bet it was about 19% last year (if it was more, fire your tax preparer).
Â
Its gonna be a little more than someone who'se financially independant, because they spend money to make money. Everyone else makes money to spend it.
Â
Incidentally, your $200-210K/yr puts you in the segment of US citizens who pay the most in income taxes, relative to their income. Those who earn $50k or less in total household income in this country pay almost $0 in federal income tax.
@left-center It's an easy choice for you becuase you sit in the payroll cycle. I make just as much from investments as I do from payroll some years, but not ballsy enough to quit my day job though. I'm ok with capital gains taxes going away.
From what I read of the Repubican platfom we will be taking a step backwards in nearly everything Obama has done and then some. Hardy an incentive to vote Republican this November. Gay marriage, A womans right to choose will only be the first victims if Mitt and company end up in the White House in January. While I am hardly a die hard fan of Obama he is at least the lesser of two evils and one that I can live with.
 @Charl317 What? The Supreme Court revisited Roe v. Wade? When did that happen?Â
If the right to slaughter your unborn, viable fetus and gay marriage are your core issues, by all means, vote for Obama.
 @Sid Vishess  @Charl317 Yeah, the right to own your own body vs the government  owning it. But it is way more than that. The republican party wants to force religion upon the people, they would ship more jobs overseas to countries where slavery is legal or overlooked. People in this country can't compete with people who use slaves as labor and the legitimate workers in those countries are forced to work for lower pay for the same reason while big corporations take advantage of that situation. The republican party is against labor unions, the only thing that has managed to help working class people in this country. They don't even believe in preserving the environment. Yeah, it is a clear choice for me.
 @Mej47 When you worked in a union shop, would you have made as much, with the other benefits, without the union bargaining for you? Unless you were in a very unique skill set, probably not...there is always someone willing to take less to do the same job.
Would you like better to be forced to work 10 or 12 hour days, at low pay, with fewer (if any) benefits like vacations and sick leave and bathroom and lunch breaks? And don't forget safe working conditions...all things that UNIONS have gained for workers across the country - EVEN for those who don't work in a union situation, who forget the efforts of Union members over the past 100 years to make those benefits reality...who assume that the benefits will stick around without the unions.
Â
"tell me what I was supposed to think and who I was supposeed to vote for."
And yet you listen to the Republicans?
Â
Â
@jd94b  I see you have all the left wing talking points down pat. The only thing you missed was pushing grandma off the cliff.
As for labor unions, I've belonged to unions when it was required for employment. I never liked the idea of paying a group of people to tell me what I was supposed to think and who I was supposeed to vote for.
 @jd94b  @Charl317 The biggest threat to many union workers is the influx of illegal workers that ratchet down wages because of increased supply. Unions support the importation of low wage labor. They are more interested in the Progressive agenda than their own members.
Â
Sid, Union Member since 1978
Â
EPA? uh... let's see... that was Republican.
Â
Funny, those Tea Party rallies always left the sites cleaner than when they started. Others? Not so much...
 @Sid Vishess "What? The Supreme Court revisited Roe v. Wade?"
NO, but the GOP platform seems be that any woman having an abortion must choke a puppy to death while getting the procedure.Â
Â
Of course once that baby is born, the GOP couldn't give to farks about it. Because something something something jesus wants the rich to not have to pay taxes and we need mroe tanks something.
-------------------------------------------------------
Â
Â
"If the right to slaughter your unborn, viable fetus"
Â
you should just stick to "killing babies"
Â
Â
 @evenifitkm  @T H I S No, your irresponsibility is not my problem.  Pay for your own kid.  Pay for your own abortion. Got it? Thanks!
 @Sid Vishess  @T H I S The citizenry shouldn't be expected to pay for the consequence? Then be okay with all types of abortion.  Not okay with that? Then be okay with federal assistance for low income parents. If you aren't okay with either of those, then you are effectively putting your fingers in your ears and wishing away unplanned pregnancies in low-income settings.
@Sid Vishess  In 2003 Obama said at a news conference he was in favor of third term abortions as long as it was the woman's choice but I'm pretty sure like most other things he says, it was just in response to what the latest poll said he should support.
 @T H I S Well, I went to the NARAL website and they are in favor of total choice post 20 weeks. Just sayin'.
Â
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/media/fact-sheets/abortion-bans-at-20-weeks.pdf
@Sid Vishess @T H I S - NO ONE is advocating third trimester abortions. Not even the vast majority of pro-choice folks.  Let's talk about what's actually being discussed, not something imaginary.
Â
Â
@Sid Vishess So no more tax deduction for kids?
 @Sid Vishess "it sure makes me uneasy to say a third trimester fetus can be killed with little moral consequence."
----------------------------------------------
*Most* of the pro-choice crowd only support that in life/death situations for the mother. Myself included.Â
Â
I have no problem with first tri-mester limitations and requring children to get parental consent before having an abortion.
Â
But that is not what the Right is fighting against, and they treat the entire abortion debate as if all abortions are done the day before a woman is due to give birth because the woman just up and changed her mind.
Â
Â
 @T H I S As you know, I am not a Social Conservative but the abortion issue is troubling or at least should be. While I can sign off on the morning- after pill and a procedure done shortly after conception, it sure makes me uneasy to say a third trimester fetus can be killed with little moral consequence.
Â
i think the government should not be in the bedrooms of the citizenry nor should the citizenry be expected to pay for the consequence of what happens in the bedroom.
The war in Iraq is over? Guess somebody better alert the media. Campaign finance, abortion, gay marriage, immigration.....as an independent I pretty much could care less about these issues. I want the economy fixed, I want taxes fair and that doesn't mean just taxing the rich. Healthcare and Medicare? Really? You're going to make your platform one of entitlements and gross over spending of a centralized government. As an independent I'm getting more and more turned off by Obama. Looks like I might be voting for Change just like I did in 2008. But this time I'm voting for a change to turn the economy around. I don't want four more years of this.
 @PacificNWRunner as an independent I pretty much could care less about these issues. I want the economy fixed,
Â
So you wil vote for the republicans who have made their playfor being actiley aainst these things? Â
Â
----------------------------
"Â I want taxes fair and that doesn't mean just taxing the rich"
Â
SO what does it mean.. taxing the poor people who have no money, and middle class who are already spending all of their money back in the economy?
----------------------------
"You're going to make your platform one of entitlements and gross over spending of a centralized government."
Â
You did not read the article, did you?Â
---------------------------
and lastly
"as an independent"
Yeah right. Every republican I have ever met claims to be an independent. They just happen to always vote republican.Â
Â
Â
 @T H I S Again you are over simplifying everything, I say hot, you say cold. Just because I'm against OVER taxing the rich doesn't mean I'm for taxing the poor as a policy issue. Holy crap dude. You don't know me so don't judge me. "Yeah right every..." F yourself dude, I'm independent, don't believe me? I don't give a crap you internet troll nobody. Do yourself a favor and stop being such a dolt and being so overly simple when it comes to countering things.
@PacificNWRunner You are obviously another of many many Republicans who donât want to admit who they really are. For a little while some of them even tried to say that they were part of the GOP in the hopes that would fool at least a few people. That right there pretty much shows how addle brained and/or extremely ashamed that a number of them were/are. But I think a lot of people do understand why people would no longer want to admit that they are a Republican given that the Republican party (and especially the tparty) is a very far cry from Lincoln, Ike, Goldwater, Bush1, and even Nixon although a lot of the problem could obviously be traced back to the latter. Republicans have been trying to distance themselves from shrub and Darth over the last few years much as they have been trying to distance themselves from Hoover over many decades.
 @PacificNWRunner The rich were taxed at a 90% rate in the 1950s - and in the 40%s during Reagan's era - I'm pretty sure we are far away from overtaxing the  rich.
 @PacificNWRunner  @T H I S "You don't know me so don't judge me"
Â
And they you start with the vulgarity and name calling?
Â
No, we don't know you - and don't want to.
That was a whole lot of anger... must have touched a nerve.
Â
I am sorry, you are clearly an independent conservative republican.
Â
"Just because I'm against OVER taxing the rich doesn't mean I'm for taxing the poor as a policy issue."
Â
Well what are you for? Let me guess, a flat tax where the people with the money pay the same percentage as the people without the money.
Â
Â
Â
 @PacificNWRunner "The war in Iraq is over?"
Well, we aren't fighting it any more...
A great friend of mine is in the military stationed in Iraq and tells me otherwise, so unless you have a buddy in the military being a direct source of information (not classified info. of course), we are still semi-fighting it everyday.Â
 @BVU07mazdaguy Well, we still take occasional causalities among our troops along the DMZ in Korea - but then, that war is simply in an armistice situation...
But, unless the military is not reporting them, there has only been one death of a military member under Operation Iraqi Freedom - and that was due to non-hostile causes...in Bahrain.
But the fact is, that war is over. Will there be Americans injured or killed in the future in Iraq? Perhaps - but that will be due to the internal problems in Iraq, NOT to the "war".
And, if the information your buddy is passing along is being reported officially, it sounds like he may be leaking military secrets...which is a crime. And YOU are doing the same thing by relating that information in a public forum.
So, unless there is some report you can point to, zip it.
 @OrcasThunder And even so, even if it was ZERO troops, right now, I wouldn't care. This election this year is not about the War in Iraq. Oh my God, are we stuck in 2007/2008? Seriously. It's 2012, I want the President's plan on how to fix the economy without mentioning that the rich should pay "their fair share." Last time I checked, they already do.
 @PacificNWRunner As a member of the top 3% of earners, I don't think I really pay my fair share. Even so, Obama's plan won't tax me more. Capital gains taxes really do need to be higher.Â
Â
T minus 2 posts until someone tells me to write a check to the irs if I don't feel like i'm paying enough! (That isn't what this is about, its about the tax system not REQUIRING enough from the wealthy) I benefited every step of the way from the government growing up. I went to public schools, road public buses, drove on public high ways, got publicly funded scholarships for college (along with private), work in a place that has good basic hours, etc - I could go on forever.Â
 @OrcasThunder "Since the GOP insists that Obama has no record to run on"
Â
and this is why they think it should not be an issue.
Â
 @PacificNWRunnerAre you really that dense?
Since the GOP insists that Obama has no record to run on, it dang well IS an election issue!
It's about what he has accomplished during his entire first term that is the issue, NOT just "this year".
 @OrcasThunder So we have ZERO troops in Iraq, right now?
@PacificNWRunner bwahahaha âThis has just recently ended. So to say you have "ENDED the War in Iraq" this year, and you still have troops there is like saying "Mission Accomplished". bwahahaha. Thatâs rich. Or as Orca said. By the way. How many U.S troops died after âMission Accomplishedâ vs. after the U.S. war in Iraq actually did end?
@OrcasThunder @PacificNWRunner We have troops posted at the embassy yes, the only other presence is securty forces for the independant contractors. Look up my profile pic on a google search we are still there, just not all of our military.
 @PacificNWRunner  @T H I S
That statement makes absolutely zero sense.
Even for this forum.
 @PacificNWRunner  @T H I S "how is this an election issue this year"
Because it's part of Obama's RECORD, the one the GOP insists doesn't exist.
 @PacificNWRunner We have troops at the embassy - standard procedure.
But no, we have NO troops actually fighting anyone there.
 @PacificNWRunnerÂ
It is not an issue because it makes Obama look good, and you can not handle it.
that is what it is about, isn't it.
Â
He said he would end the war in Iraq.
He said he would make hunting the terrorist in Afganistan a priority.
He said if he had information that Bin Laden was in Pakistan, he would send the troops in, and not tell the Pakistani government.
Â
He said he would do it, he has done it, and it has worked.
And the republicans (ahem.. "independents") can't handle it.
Â
Â
 @T H I S And also my logic wasn't simply: Oh if there are troops there then we are at war. Way to over-simplify my point. Germany/Korea/Phillipines et al. are all decades old conflicts. This has just recently ended. So to say you have "ENDED the War in Iraq" this year, and you still have troops there is like saying "Mission Accomplished".
 @T H I S My logic is, how is this an election issue this year. Answer: It's not.
 @PacificNWRunner So we are still at war in Germany and the phillipeans also?
Â
I mean, if that is your logic
Â
I hear they are gonna have someone from Bain speak at the DNC. Awesome! Here is a list of some of my Union Brothers and Sisters investments in Bain.
Â
Union Members and Retirees Own Significant Shares of Bain!
Â
"Government-worker pension funds are the chief beneficiaries of Bainâs economic stewardship. New York-based Preqin uses public documents, news accounts and Freedom of Information requests to track private-equity holdings. Since 2000, Preqin reports, the following funds have entrusted some $1.56 billion to Bain:
* Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund ($2.2 million)
* Indiana Public Retirement System ($39.3 million)
* Iowa Public Employeesâ Retirement System ($177.1 million)
* The Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System ($19.5 million)
* Maryland State Retirement and Pension System ($117.5 million)
* Public Employeesâ Retirement System of Nevada ($20.3 million)
* State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio ($767.3 million)
* Pennsylvania State Employeesâ Retirement System ($231.5 million)
* Employeesâ Retirement System of Rhode Island ($25 million)
* San Diego County Employees Retirement Association ($23.5 million)
* Teacher Retirement System of Texas ($122.5 million)
* Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ($15 million)"
Â
courtesy of;
Â
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/look_who_parks_their_cash_at_bain_88KSQrw8BXciEidja2ZQXN#ixzz25RxLWtli
Â
Â
 @Sid VishessÂ
So your point is this
Â
We should not vote for Obama because some unions have invested in Bain.
Â
Instead we should vote for Romney who actively headed up Bain, and personally oversaw the destruction of many companies while somehow rackin gup at 401K with over 100 million in it, but since he wont release his tax forms like his own father suggested, we will never know.
Â
Do you have you depalicious talking point correct?
 @T H I S No, you should not vote for Obama because... he failed at his job.Sorry to break the news about capitalism but sometimes life just sucks. Good news is Bain created wealth for thousands of retirees and Union members. If you hate Union members and Seniors, please vote for that guy on your poster in your bedroom.
@Sid Vishess bwahahahahâ¦.. Keep telling yourself that Sid.
 @T H I S High gas prices, high unemployment, low job growth, a sense that Obama wasn't up to the task (surprising, considering his extensive executive resume and numerous accomplishments such as... as...getting elected). This is a situation similar to Carter-Reagan in 1980.Â
Â
 And do you read those links? That is a poll about acceptance speeches.
 @Sid Vishess SO Romney is going to win?
http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/b9jv057joueekewa97r6cq.gif
Â
 @T H I S http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/20/scott-brown-leading-elizabeth-warren-poll_n_1811566.html
Â
She won't  even beat "Malibu" Brown!
 @T H I S Correction: Progressive ACTIVISTS. I guess Ralph Nader retired, huh? Probably on his Bain funded pension...
 @T H I S Maybe she can get some plagiarizer tips from "You Didn't Write That "Biden.
 @T H I S "Elizabeth Warren Preferred Over Hillary Clinton For President In 2016, Shows Poll Of Progressive Activists."
Â
Seriously?  Elizabeth Warren? That's great. Please run her! One of the most grating, unattractive political figures around. Oh, please, please... PLEASE!
Â
And why would you link a Progressive Poll?  See, that's a pretty small snapshot of the American spectrum. Did you actually read the headline?  I don't think you did.
 @Sid Vishess I hate to break it to you.. but.. umm...http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/20/elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton-2016-poll_n_1613671.html
Â
The days of conservatives trying to win an argument by calling someone a liberal are over. It is time for you guys to stand on your actual record. Â
You know, the one where you have spent the last 30 years growing the government and the debt, and the trying to hangit on democrats.Â
The one where you have supported a tax system that allows the wealthy "job creators" to hide all their "profits" in other countries becuase of something something patriotis.
You know, your record of "science, facts, and education = bad"
Â
Â
 @T H I S It's just a stepping stone to Ryan in 2020 anyway.
Think of it! Sixteen years of Fiscal Sanity! Supreme Court judges! Budgets within a 3 iron of being balanced! A  re-election campaign that won't start in February 2013! Obama will be free to give his $200,000 speeches and receive the adoration of his sycophants without that pesky Constitution just like alleged rapist and confirmed sexual predator Clinton. Win-win!
 @Sid Vishess "No, you should not vote for Obama because... he failed at his job"
Â
keep telling yourself that. And you should totally vote for this guy:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2012/08/29/mitt-romney-tells-533-lies-in-30-weeks-steve-benen-documents-them/
Â
he seems to be a good fit for you
Â