Feds close criminal investigation on Ariz. sheriff
PHOENIX (AP) — Federal authorities said Friday that they're closing their abuse-of-power investigation into Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona without filing charges against him.
Authorities were investigating America's self-proclaimed toughest sheriff for his part in failed public corruption cases against officials who were odds with him. Arpaio brought cases against a judge and two county officials in 2009.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Birmingham Scheel released a saying her office "is closing its investigation into allegations of criminal conduct" by current and former members of the sheriff's and county attorney's offices.
Scheel, who is based in Arizona, didn't elaborate but said she was acting on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice.
The federal probe focused specifically on the sheriff's anti-public-corruption squad. In a separate probe, the U.S. Justice Department has accused Arpaio's office of a wide range of civil rights violations, and in another case, a federal judge has yet to rule in a civil case brought by a group of Latino plaintiffs that claimed Arpaio and his deputies engaged in racial profiling.
Arpaio was scheduled to give a news conference Friday night after returning from the Republican National Convention in Florida.
His deputy chief Jack MacIntyre, said, "the U.S. attorney's office and its investigators recognized what sheriff's office has said all along: We did not make any prosecutorial decisions, even though things were referred to the then-county attorney."
The timing of the federal authorities' announcement — at 5 p.m. on a Friday before a holiday weekend — was questioned by some Arpaio critics.
"It is a miscarriage of justice that the federal government is dropping its case against Sheriff Arpaio and to make such an announcement on the Friday night before the Democratic National Convention can only be politically motivated to shield the administration from criticism," Pablo Alvarado, director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said in a statement.
The 79-year-old sheriff and his top ally, former County Attorney Andrew Thomas, were embroiled in a three-year feud with county officials and judges and defended their investigations as necessary to root out corruption.
The officials who were targets of the investigations contend the probes were trumped up as retaliation for political and legal disagreements with the sheriff and prosecutor.
Criminal cases against former Superior Court Judge Gary Donahoe and county supervisors Mary Rose Wilcox and Don Stapley were dismissed after a judge ruled that Thomas prosecuted one of the three officials for political gain and had a conflict of interest in pressing the case.
Authorities say the charges against Donahoe were filed in a bid to prevent the judge from holding a hearing regarding Arpaio and Thomas' claim that judges and county officials conspired to hinder a probe into the construction of a court building.
Donahoe had disqualified Thomas from handling the court building investigation and was poised to hold another hearing over a request to appoint special prosecutors to handle the probe. The hearing was called off after the charges were filed against the judge.
The judge also had been critical of the ability of Arpaio's office to bring inmates to court on time for hearings.
Thomas was disbarred in early April by an ethics panel of the Arizona courts that found he brought unsuccessful criminal cases against the judge and two county officials for the purpose of embarrassing them.
In the separate probe, which is still ongoing, the Justice Department says Arpaio's office racially profiles Latinos, retaliates against critics of its immigration patrols and bases its immigration patrols on racially charged citizen complaints that did not allege crimes. The sheriff denies the allegations.
And in the civil case, the Latino plaintiffs aren't seeking monetary damages. Instead, they want a declaration that Arpaio's office uses racial profiling and an order requiring policy changes. If Arpaio loses the case, he won't face jail time or fines.
Authorities were investigating America's self-proclaimed toughest sheriff for his part in failed public corruption cases against officials who were odds with him. Arpaio brought cases against a judge and two county officials in 2009.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Birmingham Scheel released a saying her office "is closing its investigation into allegations of criminal conduct" by current and former members of the sheriff's and county attorney's offices.
Scheel, who is based in Arizona, didn't elaborate but said she was acting on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice.
The federal probe focused specifically on the sheriff's anti-public-corruption squad. In a separate probe, the U.S. Justice Department has accused Arpaio's office of a wide range of civil rights violations, and in another case, a federal judge has yet to rule in a civil case brought by a group of Latino plaintiffs that claimed Arpaio and his deputies engaged in racial profiling.
Arpaio was scheduled to give a news conference Friday night after returning from the Republican National Convention in Florida.
His deputy chief Jack MacIntyre, said, "the U.S. attorney's office and its investigators recognized what sheriff's office has said all along: We did not make any prosecutorial decisions, even though things were referred to the then-county attorney."
The timing of the federal authorities' announcement — at 5 p.m. on a Friday before a holiday weekend — was questioned by some Arpaio critics.
"It is a miscarriage of justice that the federal government is dropping its case against Sheriff Arpaio and to make such an announcement on the Friday night before the Democratic National Convention can only be politically motivated to shield the administration from criticism," Pablo Alvarado, director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said in a statement.
The 79-year-old sheriff and his top ally, former County Attorney Andrew Thomas, were embroiled in a three-year feud with county officials and judges and defended their investigations as necessary to root out corruption.
The officials who were targets of the investigations contend the probes were trumped up as retaliation for political and legal disagreements with the sheriff and prosecutor.
Criminal cases against former Superior Court Judge Gary Donahoe and county supervisors Mary Rose Wilcox and Don Stapley were dismissed after a judge ruled that Thomas prosecuted one of the three officials for political gain and had a conflict of interest in pressing the case.
Authorities say the charges against Donahoe were filed in a bid to prevent the judge from holding a hearing regarding Arpaio and Thomas' claim that judges and county officials conspired to hinder a probe into the construction of a court building.
Donahoe had disqualified Thomas from handling the court building investigation and was poised to hold another hearing over a request to appoint special prosecutors to handle the probe. The hearing was called off after the charges were filed against the judge.
The judge also had been critical of the ability of Arpaio's office to bring inmates to court on time for hearings.
Thomas was disbarred in early April by an ethics panel of the Arizona courts that found he brought unsuccessful criminal cases against the judge and two county officials for the purpose of embarrassing them.
In the separate probe, which is still ongoing, the Justice Department says Arpaio's office racially profiles Latinos, retaliates against critics of its immigration patrols and bases its immigration patrols on racially charged citizen complaints that did not allege crimes. The sheriff denies the allegations.
And in the civil case, the Latino plaintiffs aren't seeking monetary damages. Instead, they want a declaration that Arpaio's office uses racial profiling and an order requiring policy changes. If Arpaio loses the case, he won't face jail time or fines.
Can someone please clone Sheriff Joe, and put one in each county.Â
Joe is the best thing going on in this country for a long time.
That darn Sheriff Joe! What with his "profiling" of non- English speakers simply because there is a hole in the border fence and by pure coincidence, OVER THERE are these American citizens who attended public schools and of course never learned to speak English, so it's RAAACISM to say; "What's up, amigo?"
Â
Â
Good for Joe. I can't believe the the Constitution finally won out against this invasion of illegal aliens and hiding behind obama's incorrect interpretation of what he believes to be a "living and progressive" document instead of the enduring symbol of freedom that it is.Â
Â
Sorry barry, you lost this one, and many more to come.
"The timing of the federal authorities' announcement â at 5 p.m. on a Friday before a holiday weekend â was questioned by some Arpaio critics"
So now the left is complaining about the same treatment of serious problems that the right's been facing for years. The administration puts out press releases they don't want to have to explain on Fridays so everyone forgets about it by Monday when the new news week starts.
Of COURSE the Obama administration is going to back down from Sheriff Joe. He and Jan Brewer have been successfully doing what the Federal Government has FAILED to do under Obama's watch........secure the border from invasion. It's NOT the responsibility of the individual states to do this, it's the responsibility of the GOVERNMENT, yet Obama's "peeps" would rather file lawsuits against states within our own country for doing it. How DARE they try to regulate Obie's voting base in the southern border states by actually following the LAW. Welcome to the U.S.S.A.
This is what happens in Barack Obama's America if you stand up for what you think is right, if you dare exercise you right to freedom of speech. It is time to investigate this president. Obama and his administration are at the center of the eye of the hurricane when it comes to scandal. Solyndra, Lightsquared, Fast & Furious, Sestak, to name a few. Just today we have questionable government contracts with NBC to run commercials promoting "green jobs." Mr. president, a word of advice if I may. The US constitution grants the right to Americans to own and bear arms, not to protect ourselves from a foreign enemy, rather to protect ourselves from an out of control government. My advice? Time to stop pushing it. Drop your "executive privilege" claim which you have unwisely and unconstitutionally extended, as if it were an umbrella over your justice department in the case of "Fast & Furious." Give the American people the "transparent administration" that you promised. If you choose to continue on your path you risk investigation by the new, coming administration. You will risk being exposed, prosecuted, and the humiliation, and prison time that I personally think you have earned and deserve. Other Marxists such as yourself have doled out such punishment and worse to others that have disagreed with them throughout history. It is your turn Mr. president, because this is America, and we are exceptional.                                          Â
 @ByeByeBarry Cmon, this is about Sheriff Joe. NOT ONE OF HIS ENEMIES, BARACK OBAMA. Your position is that Obama shut down this investigation of a VERY well known hardline Republican why, exactly?
good! A waste of our money- live in AZ and see what goes on then judge- no more bull about protecting the ILLEAGALS- THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS