Furious over sanctions, North Korea vows to nuke U.S.

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously Thursday for tough new sanctions to punish North Korea for its latest nuclear test, a move that sparked a furious Pyongyang to threaten a nuclear strike against the United States.
The vote by the U.N.'s most powerful body on a resolution drafted by North Korea's closest ally, China, and the United States sends a powerful message that the international community condemns the ballistic missile and nuclear tests - and repeated violation of Security Council resolutions.
Immediately before the vote, an unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang's Foreign Ministry said the North will exercise its right for "a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors" because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North.
It appeared to be the most specific open threat of a nuclear strike by any country against another.
Although North Korea boasts of nuclear bombs and pre-emptive strikes, it is not thought to have mastered the ability to produce a warhead small enough to put on a missile capable of reaching the U.S. It is believed to have enough nuclear fuel, however, for several crude nuclear devices.
The new sanctions are aimed at reining in North Korea's nuclear and missile programs by making it more difficult for Pyongyang to finance and obtain material for these programs, tracking illegal diplomatic activity and intensifying inspections of cargo to and from the country. In a measure targeted at the reclusive nation's ruling elite, the resolution bans all nations from exporting expensive jewelry, yachts, luxury automobiles and racing cars to the North.
After the 15-0 vote, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice told reporters that "taken together, these sanctions will bite and bite hard."
Responding to Pyongyang's nuclear strike threat, she said, "North Korea will achieve nothing by continued threats and provocation."
She urged North Korea's leaders to heed President Barack Obama's call to follow the path of peace. If it doesn't, she said, the Security Council is committed in the resolution to take further measures.
China's U.N. Ambassador Li Bao Dong said the top priority now is to "bring down the heat" and focus on diplomacy and restarting the six-party talks aimed at denuclearizing the Korean peninsula.
In North Korea, Army Gen. Kang Pyo Yong told a crowd of tens of thousands that North Korea is ready to fire long-range nuclear-armed missiles at Washington.
"Intercontinental ballistic missiles and various other missiles, which have already set their striking targets, are now armed with lighter, smaller and diversified nuclear warheads and are placed on a standby status," Kang said. "When we shell (the missiles), Washington, which is the stronghold of evils, .... will be engulfed in a sea of fire."
The statement by the North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman was carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency.
It accused the U.S. of leading efforts to slap sanctions on North Korea. The statement said the new sanctions would only advance the timing for North Korea to fulfill previous vows to take "powerful second and third countermeasures" against its enemies. It hasn't elaborated on those measures.
The statement said North Korea "strongly warns the U.N. Security Council not to make another big blunder like the one in the past when it earned the inveterate grudge of the Korean nation by acting as a war servant for the U.S. in 1950."
North Korea demanded the Security Council immediately dismantle the American-led U.N. Command that's based in Seoul and move to end the state of war that exists on the Korean Peninsula, which continues six decades after fighting stopped because an armistice, not a peace treaty, ended the war.
In anticipation of the resolution's adoption, North Korea earlier in the week threatened to cancel the 1953 cease-fire that ended the Korean War.
North Korean threats have become more common as tensions have escalated following a rocket launch by Pyongyang in December and its third nuclear test on Feb. 12. Both acts defied three Security Council resolutions that bar North Korea from testing or using nuclear or ballistic missile technology and from importing or exporting material for these programs.
The United States and other nations worry that North Korea's third nuclear test pushed it closer to its goal of gaining nuclear missiles that can reach the U.S. The international community has condemned the regime's nuclear and missile efforts as threats to regional security and a drain on the resources that could go to North Korea's largely destitute people.
The U.N. resolution identifies three individuals, one corporation and one organization that will be added to the U.N. sanctions list. The targets include top officials at a company that is the country's primary arms dealer and main exporter of ballistic missile-related equipment, and a national organization responsible for research and development of missiles and probably nuclear weapons.
The success of a new round of sanctions could depend on enforcement by China, where most of the companies and banks that North Korea is believed to work with are based.
The U.N. resolution condemns the latest nuclear test "in the strongest terms" for violating and flagrantly disregarding council resolutions, bans further ballistic missile launches, nuclear tests "or any other provocation," and demands that North Korea return to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. It also condemns all of North Korea's ongoing nuclear activities, including its uranium enrichment.
But the resolution stresses the council's commitment "to a peaceful, diplomatic and political solution" and urged a resumption of six-party talks.
According to the resolution, all countries would now be required to freeze financial transactions or services that could contribute to North Korea's nuclear or missile programs.
To get around financial sanctions, North Koreans have been carrying around large suitcases filled with cash to move illicit funds. The resolution expresses concern that these bulk cash transfers may be used to evade sanctions. It clarifies that the freeze on financial transactions and services that could violate sanctions applies to all cash transfers as well as the cash couriers.
The resolution also bans all countries from providing public financial support for trade deals, such as granting export credits, guarantees or insurance, if the assistance could contribute to the North's nuclear or missile programs.
It includes what a senior diplomat called unprecedented new travel sanctions that would require countries to expel agents working for sanctioned North Korean companies.
The resolution also requires states to inspect suspect cargo on their territory and prevent any vessel that refuses an inspection from entering their ports. And a new aviation measure calls on states to deny aircraft permission to take off, land or fly over their territory if illicit cargo is suspected to be aboard.
___
Hyung reported from Seoul, South Korea. Peter J. Spielmann at the United Nations and Foster Klug in Seoul contributed to this report.
The vote by the U.N.'s most powerful body on a resolution drafted by North Korea's closest ally, China, and the United States sends a powerful message that the international community condemns the ballistic missile and nuclear tests - and repeated violation of Security Council resolutions.
Immediately before the vote, an unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang's Foreign Ministry said the North will exercise its right for "a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors" because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North.
It appeared to be the most specific open threat of a nuclear strike by any country against another.
Although North Korea boasts of nuclear bombs and pre-emptive strikes, it is not thought to have mastered the ability to produce a warhead small enough to put on a missile capable of reaching the U.S. It is believed to have enough nuclear fuel, however, for several crude nuclear devices.
The new sanctions are aimed at reining in North Korea's nuclear and missile programs by making it more difficult for Pyongyang to finance and obtain material for these programs, tracking illegal diplomatic activity and intensifying inspections of cargo to and from the country. In a measure targeted at the reclusive nation's ruling elite, the resolution bans all nations from exporting expensive jewelry, yachts, luxury automobiles and racing cars to the North.
After the 15-0 vote, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice told reporters that "taken together, these sanctions will bite and bite hard."
Responding to Pyongyang's nuclear strike threat, she said, "North Korea will achieve nothing by continued threats and provocation."
She urged North Korea's leaders to heed President Barack Obama's call to follow the path of peace. If it doesn't, she said, the Security Council is committed in the resolution to take further measures.
China's U.N. Ambassador Li Bao Dong said the top priority now is to "bring down the heat" and focus on diplomacy and restarting the six-party talks aimed at denuclearizing the Korean peninsula.
In North Korea, Army Gen. Kang Pyo Yong told a crowd of tens of thousands that North Korea is ready to fire long-range nuclear-armed missiles at Washington.
"Intercontinental ballistic missiles and various other missiles, which have already set their striking targets, are now armed with lighter, smaller and diversified nuclear warheads and are placed on a standby status," Kang said. "When we shell (the missiles), Washington, which is the stronghold of evils, .... will be engulfed in a sea of fire."
The statement by the North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman was carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency.
It accused the U.S. of leading efforts to slap sanctions on North Korea. The statement said the new sanctions would only advance the timing for North Korea to fulfill previous vows to take "powerful second and third countermeasures" against its enemies. It hasn't elaborated on those measures.
The statement said North Korea "strongly warns the U.N. Security Council not to make another big blunder like the one in the past when it earned the inveterate grudge of the Korean nation by acting as a war servant for the U.S. in 1950."
North Korea demanded the Security Council immediately dismantle the American-led U.N. Command that's based in Seoul and move to end the state of war that exists on the Korean Peninsula, which continues six decades after fighting stopped because an armistice, not a peace treaty, ended the war.
In anticipation of the resolution's adoption, North Korea earlier in the week threatened to cancel the 1953 cease-fire that ended the Korean War.
North Korean threats have become more common as tensions have escalated following a rocket launch by Pyongyang in December and its third nuclear test on Feb. 12. Both acts defied three Security Council resolutions that bar North Korea from testing or using nuclear or ballistic missile technology and from importing or exporting material for these programs.
The United States and other nations worry that North Korea's third nuclear test pushed it closer to its goal of gaining nuclear missiles that can reach the U.S. The international community has condemned the regime's nuclear and missile efforts as threats to regional security and a drain on the resources that could go to North Korea's largely destitute people.
The U.N. resolution identifies three individuals, one corporation and one organization that will be added to the U.N. sanctions list. The targets include top officials at a company that is the country's primary arms dealer and main exporter of ballistic missile-related equipment, and a national organization responsible for research and development of missiles and probably nuclear weapons.
The success of a new round of sanctions could depend on enforcement by China, where most of the companies and banks that North Korea is believed to work with are based.
The U.N. resolution condemns the latest nuclear test "in the strongest terms" for violating and flagrantly disregarding council resolutions, bans further ballistic missile launches, nuclear tests "or any other provocation," and demands that North Korea return to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. It also condemns all of North Korea's ongoing nuclear activities, including its uranium enrichment.
But the resolution stresses the council's commitment "to a peaceful, diplomatic and political solution" and urged a resumption of six-party talks.
According to the resolution, all countries would now be required to freeze financial transactions or services that could contribute to North Korea's nuclear or missile programs.
To get around financial sanctions, North Koreans have been carrying around large suitcases filled with cash to move illicit funds. The resolution expresses concern that these bulk cash transfers may be used to evade sanctions. It clarifies that the freeze on financial transactions and services that could violate sanctions applies to all cash transfers as well as the cash couriers.
The resolution also bans all countries from providing public financial support for trade deals, such as granting export credits, guarantees or insurance, if the assistance could contribute to the North's nuclear or missile programs.
It includes what a senior diplomat called unprecedented new travel sanctions that would require countries to expel agents working for sanctioned North Korean companies.
The resolution also requires states to inspect suspect cargo on their territory and prevent any vessel that refuses an inspection from entering their ports. And a new aviation measure calls on states to deny aircraft permission to take off, land or fly over their territory if illicit cargo is suspected to be aboard.
___
Hyung reported from Seoul, South Korea. Peter J. Spielmann at the United Nations and Foster Klug in Seoul contributed to this report.
Many commenters here think the US would wipe out NK with our own nukes if they attacked us as they threaten. Never happen. We have US troops right up to the DMZ and the SK capitol is only about 30 miles to the south. And that's not even mentioning all of the ROK forces that would be wiped out. I don't think the US would respond with nukes and NK knows it.
If he is serious, I hope he hurries up so I don't have to write out a check to the IRS.
Couldn't he just kidnap Dennis Rodman? I mean, I'm sure we'd do anything to get him back. <wink>
Ok little chihuahua.
@HallandOates You folks DO realize that China shares a common border with North Korea, and won't be happy about the use of Nukes that close to them, right? (Think Cuba and the Russian nukes and how WE reacted...) I think a better idea is a Seal Team sniping school. We can award the Seals bonus points for Longest shot, Most embarrassing kill, Best bullet impact point, etcetera.Â
Never underestimate the enemy. They could cause havoc in South Korea. Difficult to keep close tabs on them.
@Komo Dragon and Japan. No one in the East wants Japan to get really paranoid.
Suicide by nuke eh Kim? Pissant.
Bring it on you little creeps! We'll busk ya' in da' mush!
Lets just get this over with. Drop a few atom bombs on the capital of North Korea and it will all be over.Â
@HallandOates It would only take one.
Wonder how much money it would take for Kim Ill to have an Accident.... and anyone stupid enough to replace him...
Of course they attended the rally!! Did they have the choice? LOL, they certainly dont look very enthusiastic though, do they?
@Susabelle Looks like they just found out there really is no punch and pie...
@Freespeech @Susabelle I'm sure they would've show up for a packet of sugar each. Their government doesn't care about them, they know it.
perhaps they will just build a 200 foot high wall around their country to keep people out- then we just have to fill it with water.....
@fourwalles more like we fill it with all that Hanford toxic waste... gotta put it somewhere!
Sheesh... I think someone got PK'd one too many times aye there mr ILL?
(jeepers)Â
Si vis pacem, para bellumOh really North Korea...you want to open this can of worms then I say BRING IT ON! Your 7 'if you got anything' will be shot down and not even on the ground before you have enough cruise missiles knocking down each and everyone one of your countries bases... Honestly.. you guys are like a dam Chewawa who thinks your little dam country even compares to the US / Russia / China / and even the EU.... as I somehow think your China 'allies' will not be there to save you from the wrath of the bees nest you will open if you are stupid enough to EVEN TRY IT!
If you do you can bet you will have a whole new level of hurt from the Americas!
The people in that photo look soooo thrilled to be there. I feel sorry for the average people of NK.
What we should do with that little blowhard is park two carrier off shore with support ships. Issue an ultimatum of either launch or shut up. We are tired of his idle threats and acting like a little cock of the walk. Little dictators like him need a strong message with no holds bared letting them know that they neither scare us or worry us, but any action from them will result with the total destruction of their country. As long as we play patty cake with him he will continue acting this way. North Korea needs to learn that it is only a pint size country with a pint sized dictator and had better keep their mouths shut. Am I a war monger, no but I am tired of listening to this little pip squeak banging his lips and making threats against us.
@LongBeachBum No kidding... I swear I think they have a alarm on their boot legged cell phones that reminds them... 'have you threatened the USA today?'.... PK PK PK
well, i dont know about you guys, but im getting ready. if north korea strikes, i want to be one of the first out to snuff their fires and show them some real american fighting.
The real news here is that China and Russia voted along with us to impose new sanctions. Of course, you don't hear North Korea getting mad at China...gee wonder why.Â
@lakeview too true. Here is an interesting analysis of the China/N. Korea relationship that seems to be reasonable:
http://www.cfr.org/china/china-north-korea-relationship/p11097
I have never understood how Russia views N. Korea. I have a lot of Russian family who grew up under the USSR and when I ask them how Putin (and others) feel about an unstable lunatic with nuclear weapons just a few hundred kilometers from one of their major seaports (Vladivostok) they just shrug and assert that N Korea would not dare to attack them. Go figure.
@lakeview because they know darn well China will end up spending more time getting the crap out of their boot heels than it took to squash them to begin with.
So I take it Dennis Rodman didnt help much?
@Larry Bernandez Unless that laughing picture was his reaction when Kim said... is it true you have... ahem.. you know ... I think mine is way bigger!
@komonews in other words, Seattle is Ground Zero
@WillSeattle They cant hit Seattle, unless Russia or China give them something of that capability. Since that would send missiles back their direction, I'm not sure they want to do that. Their targeting and long range ability is faulty at best... Â
@Susabelle An EMP weapon would be the most devastating. And the weapon only needs to be in the size range that the norks are testing (~10kt). All power on the west coast would be lost for months.Â
@Iconoclast @Susabelle Could you IMAGINE that carnage? Seattlites wandering around town, hand held devices useless, no electricity for Starbucks machines to whir them up some coffee, no Tofu and bean curd breakfast sandwiches because all of the refrigerators would be down, and then, ALL OF A SUDDEN....they'd be aware of the world around them! They wouldn't be walking into walls or people while staring at their phones, the earbuds would be hanging limply at their sides after the batteries to their Ipods die, and they'd be looking around for someone to lead the way. (here's where I come in) I pull up in my truck, holding a rifle, and invite them "back to camp" for some REAL coffee, some squirrel soup and some deer jerky......just to finish them off.
@marvin @Iconoclast @Susabelle I disagree.
@Freespeech @Iconoclast @Susabelle LOL, the new one is out, I really might watch that tonight. I personally highly doubt any nation would try to occupy the US. We are better armed as citizens than any other military in the world.
@Iconoclast @Susabelle Did you watch Red Dawn a few too many times?...
@Iconoclast @Susabelle I'm sure they are, as soon as the target is identified, the birds will be on their way. Not a single country would have a leg to stand on about us shooting down a missile headed our way. I'm hopeful that one of their neighbors will get tired of the peacock and remove him.Â
@Susabelle Hopefully that is true.
Since shooting down their missile is a definite act of war and only has short seconds to be done I hope that the orders are in place already.
@AdAckbar Our congress has already been informed by Russian military that the norks may well have gotten ahold of plans for a super-emp weapon. There have been many stories, articles and books about the effect of an EMP attack on the USA. Our unpreparedness is well-known around the world
Not much of a secret for even the norks.
otoh, boost-stage missile defense (would that be the unworkable missile defense Obama denigrated in his first election)? should be able to intercept any missile leaving N Korea.
@Iconoclast @Susabelle We don't want the EMP going away.  Weird building, but not worth nuking.
@Iconoclast @Susabelle I would agree with that, however I'm not sure they can get it away without our noticing and/or shooting it down before it does any damage.
@Iconoclast Yes, keep publicly posting ideas for them to relay tho their superiors....
@Susabelle They've been practicing bouncing off of Spain using Angry Birds.
@Susabelle @Seattleisaslew I thought they were using scorched earth still....
@Seattleisaslew @Susabelle I was wondering how that game got so popular, who knew it was for military training??
Oppa Bomb-em style...
I think now the US has the right to shoot down any missiles launched from North Korea because of this threat.
My daughter says she thinks the Kim clan were all born with little penises and that is why they are always threatening and acting like bullies.
@Hagar ...who told you... there will be someone hopping out of your rice tonight!  LOL
@Hagar It will be interesting to see how the US responds to any new "testing" that goes on in North Korea.
@Hagar LOL, my husband would call that being hung like a squirrel! Lots of nuts but itty bitty ___.