GOP leader: House to vote on debt limit increase

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Republican-controlled House will vote next week to permit the government to borrow more money to meet its obligations, a move aimed at heading off a market-rattling confrontation with President Barack Obama over the so-called debt limit.
Full details aren't settled yet, but the measure would give the government about three more months of borrowing authority beyond a deadline expected to hit as early as mid-February, No. 2 House Republican Eric Cantor of Virginia said Friday.
The legislation wouldn't require immediate spending cuts as earlier promised by GOP leaders like Speaker John Boehner of Ohio. Instead, it's aimed at forcing the Democratic-controlled Senate to join the House in debating the federal budget. It would try to do so by conditioning pay for members of Congress on passing budget measures through the House and Senate.
"We are going to pursue strategies that will obligate the Senate to finally join the House in confronting the government's spending problem," Boehner told GOP lawmakers at a retreat in Williamsburg, Va. "The principle is simple: 'no budget, no pay.'"
The Senate hasn't passed a budget since 2009, which has drawn lots of criticism from Republicans but protected Democrats controlling the chamber from politically difficult votes. The GOP measure would cut off or delay paychecks for lawmakers in either House or Senate if their chamber had not passed a budget resolution by April 15, but it would not require the two sides to reconcile their differences to keep receiving pay.
Obama and fellow Democrats welcomed the developments on the debt limit.
"We are encouraged that there are signs that congressional Republicans may back off their insistence on holding our economy hostage to extract drastic cuts in Medicare, education and programs middle-class families depend on," said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney in a statement. "Congress must pay its bills and pass a clean debt-limit increase without further delay."
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also welcomed the development, but his office appeared to suggest Senate Democrats would not accept it because of the measure on congressional pay.
"It is reassuring to see Republicans beginning to back off their threat to hold our economy hostage," said Reid spokesman Adam Jentleson. "If the House can pass a clean debt-ceiling increase to avoid default and allow the United States to meet its existing obligations, we will be happy to consider it."
In Washington-speak, a "clean" debt limit increase means a stand-alone measure without additional measures - like the "no budget, no pay" idea - attached. Jentleson said Reid and his fellow Senate Democrats have yet to decide how they'll respond to the measure.
GOP leaders have been grappling with how to gain leverage in their battles with Obama over the budget. Boehner successfully won about $2 trillion in spending cuts as a condition of increasing the government's borrowing cap in 2011.
Obama, however, was dealt a stronger hand by his re-election in November and successfully pressed through a 10-year, $600 billion increase on upper-bracket tax payers earlier this month.
Other choke points remain, including sharp, across-the-board spending cuts that would start to strike the Pentagon and domestic programs alike on March 1 and the possibility of a partial government shutdown with the expiration of a temporary budget measure on March 27.
Failing to meet those deadlines would have far less serious consequences than defaulting on U.S. obligations like payments to bondholders, Social Security recipients and myriad other commitments when the government confronts a cash crisis and can no longer borrow to make payments. That could cause a meltdown in financial markets and would inflame voters already disgusted with Congress.
Under Congress' arcane budget procedures, a congressional budget resolution is a nonbinding measure that tries to set parameters for future legislation setting agency budgets and curbing federal benefit programs like Medicare.
Boehner has previously invoked a promise that any increase in the government's borrowing cap would be matched, dollar for dollar, by spending cuts or "reforms" that could include curbs on the long-term growth in retirement programs such as Medicare. Friday's announcement did not repeat that specific promise.
"Before there is any long-term debt limit increase, a budget should be passed that cuts spending," Boehner said. "The Democratic-controlled Senate has failed to pass a budget for four years. That is a shameful run that needs to end, this year."
The measure picked up support from key GOP conservatives, including the current and former chairmen of the Republican Study Committee, a powerful group inside the House GOP.
"In order to allow time for the Senate to act, next week's bill will extend the debt limit for three months," the Study Committee said Friday in a statement. "This is a necessary first step as we work to halt the decline of America and puts the focus where it belongs: on the Senate who has failed to do their jobs to pass a budget for more than three years." The statement was issued by RSC Chairman Steve Scalise, R-La., and former chairmen, Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Tom Price, R-Ga., and Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas.
Obama's budget is due early next month but is expected to be released several weeks later.
Full details aren't settled yet, but the measure would give the government about three more months of borrowing authority beyond a deadline expected to hit as early as mid-February, No. 2 House Republican Eric Cantor of Virginia said Friday.
The legislation wouldn't require immediate spending cuts as earlier promised by GOP leaders like Speaker John Boehner of Ohio. Instead, it's aimed at forcing the Democratic-controlled Senate to join the House in debating the federal budget. It would try to do so by conditioning pay for members of Congress on passing budget measures through the House and Senate.
"We are going to pursue strategies that will obligate the Senate to finally join the House in confronting the government's spending problem," Boehner told GOP lawmakers at a retreat in Williamsburg, Va. "The principle is simple: 'no budget, no pay.'"
The Senate hasn't passed a budget since 2009, which has drawn lots of criticism from Republicans but protected Democrats controlling the chamber from politically difficult votes. The GOP measure would cut off or delay paychecks for lawmakers in either House or Senate if their chamber had not passed a budget resolution by April 15, but it would not require the two sides to reconcile their differences to keep receiving pay.
Obama and fellow Democrats welcomed the developments on the debt limit.
"We are encouraged that there are signs that congressional Republicans may back off their insistence on holding our economy hostage to extract drastic cuts in Medicare, education and programs middle-class families depend on," said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney in a statement. "Congress must pay its bills and pass a clean debt-limit increase without further delay."
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also welcomed the development, but his office appeared to suggest Senate Democrats would not accept it because of the measure on congressional pay.
"It is reassuring to see Republicans beginning to back off their threat to hold our economy hostage," said Reid spokesman Adam Jentleson. "If the House can pass a clean debt-ceiling increase to avoid default and allow the United States to meet its existing obligations, we will be happy to consider it."
In Washington-speak, a "clean" debt limit increase means a stand-alone measure without additional measures - like the "no budget, no pay" idea - attached. Jentleson said Reid and his fellow Senate Democrats have yet to decide how they'll respond to the measure.
GOP leaders have been grappling with how to gain leverage in their battles with Obama over the budget. Boehner successfully won about $2 trillion in spending cuts as a condition of increasing the government's borrowing cap in 2011.
Obama, however, was dealt a stronger hand by his re-election in November and successfully pressed through a 10-year, $600 billion increase on upper-bracket tax payers earlier this month.
Other choke points remain, including sharp, across-the-board spending cuts that would start to strike the Pentagon and domestic programs alike on March 1 and the possibility of a partial government shutdown with the expiration of a temporary budget measure on March 27.
Failing to meet those deadlines would have far less serious consequences than defaulting on U.S. obligations like payments to bondholders, Social Security recipients and myriad other commitments when the government confronts a cash crisis and can no longer borrow to make payments. That could cause a meltdown in financial markets and would inflame voters already disgusted with Congress.
Under Congress' arcane budget procedures, a congressional budget resolution is a nonbinding measure that tries to set parameters for future legislation setting agency budgets and curbing federal benefit programs like Medicare.
Boehner has previously invoked a promise that any increase in the government's borrowing cap would be matched, dollar for dollar, by spending cuts or "reforms" that could include curbs on the long-term growth in retirement programs such as Medicare. Friday's announcement did not repeat that specific promise.
"Before there is any long-term debt limit increase, a budget should be passed that cuts spending," Boehner said. "The Democratic-controlled Senate has failed to pass a budget for four years. That is a shameful run that needs to end, this year."
The measure picked up support from key GOP conservatives, including the current and former chairmen of the Republican Study Committee, a powerful group inside the House GOP.
"In order to allow time for the Senate to act, next week's bill will extend the debt limit for three months," the Study Committee said Friday in a statement. "This is a necessary first step as we work to halt the decline of America and puts the focus where it belongs: on the Senate who has failed to do their jobs to pass a budget for more than three years." The statement was issued by RSC Chairman Steve Scalise, R-La., and former chairmen, Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Tom Price, R-Ga., and Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas.
Obama's budget is due early next month but is expected to be released several weeks later.
what responsible adult continues to build unsurmountable debt that their children MUST pay? after "we" are all dead and gone, our children will likely not have social security and for sure will not have a retirement unless they were military (well earned!) or a level of government employee.  my several children all voted for Mr. Obama in the first term. Not one of them voted for him again. why? because he refuses to address their future.  They wanted change they could believe in.    furthermore it is very likely that our elected politicians are all drowning in personnal debt because they just don't "get it".
".... It would try to do so by conditioning pay for members of Congress on passing budget measures through the House and Senate. "We are going to pursue strategies that will obligate the Senate to finally join the House in confronting the government's spending problem," Boehner told GOP lawmakers at a retreat in Williamsburg, Va. "The principle is simple: 'no budget, no pay   .'"
Â
Lets see if they will actually hold themselves to the "no pay" part. I think they should also lose all their benefits as well - healthcare, deductions paid into retirement accounts, pension payments - EVERYTHING!
Republicans need to get over this whole budget thing. It doesn't matter. Iraq spending was never part of the budget under Bush, Afghanistan wasn't either. There were a lot of spending bills that were never part of any official Bush/Republican budget. It's just not the way government works. This talk of not having a budget is just a dog whistle for the more ignorant part of the GOP base to get mad about. It means nothing.Â
Â
Having said that, I'm surprised that Boehner is even allowing a "clean" debt limit bill to go onto the floor, even if it is only a 3 month extension. That is not what many expected. Maybe the Republican leadership has finally realized that the American people are sick of their intransigence. Maybe...
@lakeview here let me give you a bridge now get over Bush! We don't need to raise the debt ceiling! We need to cut spending back to the levels when Carter was in Office! got a problem with that!
 @exiled_patriot:Â
So, the US should just default on it's current debt? You do realize the debt ceiling concerns debt already owed by the US - NOT future spending, right? What do you think will happen of the US defaults?
 @lakeview Democrats or Republicans... Doesn't matter. We need a budget, not more spending.
It appears that the 'no budget no pay' idea is against the 27th amendment to the Constitution so they might want to rethink that part.Â
@Darn it!:Â
Damn! I knew there had to be a catch, that it was too good to be true!
 @LocalLady  @Darn It sucks big time! They really deserve this to happen.
And not a single one of the old-timers in either house uttered so much as a wheeze of discord each time the debt ceiling was raised during the Bush administration. It never even registered a blip on anybody's radar. It was just business as usual. Seems the GOP only balks at spending and national debt when there's a D in the White House.
Â
A driver was stuck in a traffic jam on the highway outside Washington, DC.
Nothing was moving.
Suddenly, a man knocks on the window. The driver rolls down the window and asks, "What's going on?" "Terrorists have kidnapped the entire US Congress, and they're asking for a $100 million dollar ransom.
Otherwise, they are going to douse them all in gasoline and set them on fire.
We are going from car to car, collecting donations." "How much is everyone giving, on an average?" the driver asks.
The man replies, "Roughly a gallon."
Wait. You mean the GOP is doing something smart for once? Watch out Democrats!
Â
Btw, I am an independent :P
Washington is broken. Doesn't seem to matter, no single issue can receive a vote by both houses. If Reid won't stop it Boehner will. One party or the other tries to add unrelated crap to the bill, whether it is congressional pay or pork for Sandy relief. Same old $%$# different day.
They would not have to do this if they had been fiscally responsible in the first place. I have come to the point where I believe that neither Democrats, Republicans or a majority of voters have the will to change their ways so that we can actually reduce the deficit. It will not happen by choice. The best minds will invent clever schemes that will continually avert economic disasters until finally, it will be beyond the power of man to fix. There will be a crash. People will be miserable. But will we learn our lesson?
So the House and Senate will kick the can down the road Again! These politicians sicken me.
 @Iarehere Debt limit is related to paying the bills we've already got, not about spending more in future budgets. Raising the debt limit is a necessary action, and luckily doing so doesn't preclude our ability to reduce future deficits.Â
Â
Not paying our debts and losing the faith of our creditors on the other hand, would be toxic to our ability to function; and the massive jump in our interest rates related to such a mistake would explode our future deficits and debt.
 @AesopsTables  @Iarehere Our deficits and debt have already exploded.
 @acepaul I think the problem here is that you are making an argument which is parallel to the debt ceiling.  Yes, we need to reform our budget and spending practices.  Yes, our debt and current deficit is awful.  But again, that doesnât have much of anything to do with the debt ceiling debate, and people who insist on tying the two together as if they were the same thing are doing so at the risk of causing a lot of damage. Â
Â
Itâs like someone going out to dinner and then at the end of a huge meal saying, âIâm not going to pay for this meal. Â I really need to lose weight, and I shouldnât be eating so much food.â Â You canât stiff people on your current bills because you need to change your future habits.
 @flyskiwindsurf  @acepaul I'm not exactly talking about tax breaks for those types on your list. And some of your other examples are a bit nebulous. The oil subsidies, while high profile, are drops in a bucket. I was talking more about welfare/foodstamp/professionally unemployed/etc people. It does show, however, that our government is shaping a society that on high and low levels, creates a dependency situation that can be manipulated politically to obtain or maintain political power.
@acepaul Re: âpeople who cling to their subsidiesâ. You mean like farmers, ranchers, corporations in general including oil, military suppliers, parents, homeowners, business owners, drivers, foreign countries etc. etc. or in other words just about everybody?
 @AesopsTables The point is that people do not have the right perspective. We are already in a post-explosion financial mess. We continually spend more than we earn. Everybody wants to bury their head in the sand and pretend everything is OK, but the truth is that at some point, the diminishing group of hard working producers will no longer be able to support the growing masses of dependent people who cling to their subsidies.
 @lakeview That's true but only because of the massive spending over the last eight years, the statistic is pretty much meaningless. We are still spending like the Energizer Bunny...... keep spending and spending and spending.
 @acepaul Do you have a point, or are you just complaining? What I said remains true, our deficit and debt would get a lot worse than it is now if we were to default on our debt by not raising the debt limit.
 @acepaul The deficits are coming down and have been for a few years now.Â
 @acepaul  Â
 A little perspective on the debt.
Â
http://www.ntrc.info/doorbell.html
Works for me.