House votes to defuse debt limit crisis

WASHINGTON (AP) - The House overwhelmingly passed a bill Wednesday to permit the government to borrow enough money to avoid a first avoid default for at least four months, defusing a crisis looming next month and setting the stage for a springtime debate over taxes, spending and the deficit.
The House passed the measure on a bipartisan 285-144 vote as majority Republicans back away from their previous demand that any increase in the government's borrowing cap be paired with an equivalent level of spending cuts.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the chamber would immediately move to advance the legislation to the White House, which has announced Obama would sign it.
The measure would suspend the $16.4 trillion cap on federal borrowing and reset it on May 19 to reflect the additional borrowing required between the date the bill becomes law and then. The amount of borrowing required depends on the tax receipts received during filing season, but over a comparable period last year the government ran deficits in the range of $150 billion.
The measure also contains a provision that slaps at the Senate, which hasn't debated a budget since 2009, by withholding the pay for either House or Senate members if the chamber in which they serve fails to pass a budget plan. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., announced Wednesday that the chamber would indeed debate a budget this year but maintained the GOP's "no budget, no pay" move had nothing to do with the decision.
President Barack Obama vows not to negotiate over the debt ceiling as he did in the summer of 2011, though he promises further action on the budget. Wednesday's developments mark a shift of the budget debate away from failed head-to-head talks between Obama and Boehner
The idea driving the move by GOP leaders like Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is to re-sequence a series of upcoming budget battles, taking the threat of a potentially devastating government default off the table and instead setting up a clash in March over automatic across-the-board spending cuts set to strike the Pentagon and many domestic programs. Those cuts - postponed by the recent "fiscal cliff" deal - are the punishment for the failure of a 2011 congressional deficit-reduction supercommittee to reach an agreement.
This "no budget, no pay" idea had previously been regarded by many as a gimmick but has been given new life by Boehner as a "reform" to pair with an increase in the so-called debt limit. Boehner previously had insisted that any increase in borrowing authority to avoid lapses in payments to contractors, unemployment benefits or Social Security checks - and possibly even interest payments on U.S. Treasury obligations - be matched dollar for dollar with spending cuts. Many Republican speakers preferred to focus on the pay provision.
"This is not a gimmick," said Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick, R-Pa. "For the past almost going on now four years, our colleagues in the Senate have failed in their most basic responsibility of governance, which is to pass a budget."
"All we're saying is 'Congress follow the law. Do your work. Budget,'" said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis. "And the reason for this (debt) extension is so that we can have the (budget) debate we need to have."
Boehner promises that the GOP blueprint will project a balanced budget at the end of a 10-year window.
"Balancing the budget over the next 10 years means that we save the future for our kids and our grandkids," Boehner said. "It also means that we strengthen programs like Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid that can't continue to exist in their current form without some kind of controls."
But the White House weighed in Tuesday with a statement that the administration would not oppose the debt measure, even though Obama just last week dismissed incremental increases in the debt ceiling as harmful to the economy.
It also appeared virtually certain that Senate Democrats would accept the bill even though they would prefer a longer-term solution to the debt issue and believe that the "no budget, no pay" provision is silly.
While the measure permits an undetermined amount of additional borrowing through May 18, the actual date in which the government might be at risk of defaulting on its obligations would be several weeks later. That's because the government would retain the ability to juggle its books through what the Treasury Department calls "extraordinary measures."
With the debt battle averted, the next fight comes in March over across-the-board cuts that would pare $85 billion from this year's budget. They were delayed from Jan. 1 until March 1 and reduced by $24 billion by the recently enacted tax bill. Defense hawks are particularly upset, saying the Pentagon cuts would devastate military readiness and cause havoc in defense contracting. The cuts, called a sequester in Washington-speak, were never intended to take effect but were instead aimed at driving the two sides to a large budget bargain in order to avoid them.
But Republicans and Obama now appear on a collision course over how to replace the across-the-board cuts. Obama and his Democratic allies insist that additional revenues be part of the solution; Republicans say further tax increases are off the table after the 10-year, $600 billion-plus increase in taxes on wealthier earners forced upon Republicans by Obama earlier this month.
"We are not going to raise taxes on the American people," Boehner told reporters Tuesday.
According to the latest calculations, which account for the recent reduction of this year's sequester from $109 billion to $85 billion, the Pentagon now faces a 7.3 percent across-the-board cut, while domestic agency budgets would absorb a 5.1 percent cut. The calculations are not official but were released Tuesday by Richard Kogan, a budget expert with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities think tank.
The House passed the measure on a bipartisan 285-144 vote as majority Republicans back away from their previous demand that any increase in the government's borrowing cap be paired with an equivalent level of spending cuts.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the chamber would immediately move to advance the legislation to the White House, which has announced Obama would sign it.
The measure would suspend the $16.4 trillion cap on federal borrowing and reset it on May 19 to reflect the additional borrowing required between the date the bill becomes law and then. The amount of borrowing required depends on the tax receipts received during filing season, but over a comparable period last year the government ran deficits in the range of $150 billion.
The measure also contains a provision that slaps at the Senate, which hasn't debated a budget since 2009, by withholding the pay for either House or Senate members if the chamber in which they serve fails to pass a budget plan. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., announced Wednesday that the chamber would indeed debate a budget this year but maintained the GOP's "no budget, no pay" move had nothing to do with the decision.
President Barack Obama vows not to negotiate over the debt ceiling as he did in the summer of 2011, though he promises further action on the budget. Wednesday's developments mark a shift of the budget debate away from failed head-to-head talks between Obama and Boehner
The idea driving the move by GOP leaders like Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is to re-sequence a series of upcoming budget battles, taking the threat of a potentially devastating government default off the table and instead setting up a clash in March over automatic across-the-board spending cuts set to strike the Pentagon and many domestic programs. Those cuts - postponed by the recent "fiscal cliff" deal - are the punishment for the failure of a 2011 congressional deficit-reduction supercommittee to reach an agreement.
This "no budget, no pay" idea had previously been regarded by many as a gimmick but has been given new life by Boehner as a "reform" to pair with an increase in the so-called debt limit. Boehner previously had insisted that any increase in borrowing authority to avoid lapses in payments to contractors, unemployment benefits or Social Security checks - and possibly even interest payments on U.S. Treasury obligations - be matched dollar for dollar with spending cuts. Many Republican speakers preferred to focus on the pay provision.
"This is not a gimmick," said Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick, R-Pa. "For the past almost going on now four years, our colleagues in the Senate have failed in their most basic responsibility of governance, which is to pass a budget."
"All we're saying is 'Congress follow the law. Do your work. Budget,'" said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis. "And the reason for this (debt) extension is so that we can have the (budget) debate we need to have."
Boehner promises that the GOP blueprint will project a balanced budget at the end of a 10-year window.
"Balancing the budget over the next 10 years means that we save the future for our kids and our grandkids," Boehner said. "It also means that we strengthen programs like Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid that can't continue to exist in their current form without some kind of controls."
But the White House weighed in Tuesday with a statement that the administration would not oppose the debt measure, even though Obama just last week dismissed incremental increases in the debt ceiling as harmful to the economy.
It also appeared virtually certain that Senate Democrats would accept the bill even though they would prefer a longer-term solution to the debt issue and believe that the "no budget, no pay" provision is silly.
While the measure permits an undetermined amount of additional borrowing through May 18, the actual date in which the government might be at risk of defaulting on its obligations would be several weeks later. That's because the government would retain the ability to juggle its books through what the Treasury Department calls "extraordinary measures."
With the debt battle averted, the next fight comes in March over across-the-board cuts that would pare $85 billion from this year's budget. They were delayed from Jan. 1 until March 1 and reduced by $24 billion by the recently enacted tax bill. Defense hawks are particularly upset, saying the Pentagon cuts would devastate military readiness and cause havoc in defense contracting. The cuts, called a sequester in Washington-speak, were never intended to take effect but were instead aimed at driving the two sides to a large budget bargain in order to avoid them.
But Republicans and Obama now appear on a collision course over how to replace the across-the-board cuts. Obama and his Democratic allies insist that additional revenues be part of the solution; Republicans say further tax increases are off the table after the 10-year, $600 billion-plus increase in taxes on wealthier earners forced upon Republicans by Obama earlier this month.
"We are not going to raise taxes on the American people," Boehner told reporters Tuesday.
According to the latest calculations, which account for the recent reduction of this year's sequester from $109 billion to $85 billion, the Pentagon now faces a 7.3 percent across-the-board cut, while domestic agency budgets would absorb a 5.1 percent cut. The calculations are not official but were released Tuesday by Richard Kogan, a budget expert with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities think tank.
When the economy collapses due to massive debt, who will own it then? Obama will just blame other as usual. So party hardy now, you children and grandchildren will live "Les Miserables"
Just keep kicking the can down the road - one day you will stub your toe on it because the can will no longer move and you will get hurt.
Why do we give billions of dollars away when we turn around and borrow money? does that make since? or does our government run a ponzie scheme lol.
 @takingamericaback If you were to seek you would find that the US Treasury borrows virtually all paper money from the federal reserve bank which is owned by the Rothschild bank in England. The debt is owned by a phoney bank. The ONLY way to get rid of the debt is to get rid of the banking cartels. Â
Â
No one citizen can buy stock in the bullsh!t bank. Slaves to paper, worthless friggen' paper that isn't backed by any collateral.
Â
It is the responsibility of US Citizens to seek and find the truth!
Â
Google "who owns the" and see what pops up as the most popular results. BTW, the US Treasury and the IRS are one in the same.
Â
The federal reserve/IRS is the biggest hoax in American History.
 @komoispropaganda  @takingamericaback I absolutely agree with your last line
Its all about military spending and the rich defense corporations that pays for congressmen reelections now. Thats really about the only thing the fight is over. Just let the seccession kick in and make the cuts to defense that need to be made to get our budget under control.
 @Blindman "Its all about military spending"
Â
No it's not. It's about enslaved citizens and a corrupt government.
"No budget, no pay"....sounds like a good idea to me. If left to their own devices, this government will kick that can right off the cliff and we will all be drug along behind it.
 @dg54321  I agree. The rules of kick the can are similar, except the in the game I played, when the can was flattened, we dug in the garbage to get a new one. Unfortunately the lying government doesn't know the rules. When we play 'budget can' and propaganda about the american dollar seems to be the normal scam.
Â
Political games and sheep are like a horse and carriage. The horse that pulls the plow is forced to wear blinders.Â
And why are there any of these "Closed door meetings" ???? Every meeting they have should be televised for every citizen in this country to watch. Â I'm sick of the secrecy of our Government !!
 @Seahawker Remember WAY back when Obama was campaigning for his first term and he promised us all government transparency? Yeah, I thought it was funny too.....how quickly the people forget. The public at large is afflicted with political ADD worse than any drug can cure.....
 @dg54321 I remember. And it's a fair criticism.
they have not defused anything... they kicked the can down the street again.. we will be doing this all over again in several months... what a JOKE!...grow some darn balls and stop spending what you DON'T GOT!
Â
 @Freespeech Can't do it. The world banking cartel and the UN are in charge. I sincerely hope my time is up BEFORE the downfall of worldwide freedom.
@komoispropaganda @Freespeech what about your children's time? I don't think anyone is in charge. THAT is the problem
 @Freespeech  This is about the money that Congress already spent.Â
@lakeview ah... you are correct.. they already hit the cap they chose prior... but they still have not solved the problem as the reason we hit this thing was because of record spending without sufficient taxes to pay for it... the DoD to me should be taking more cuts as the amount we spend on defense is way too much... if the world wants our bases in their countries they should start paying more of the darn bill!
 @dg54321  @Freespeech  @lakeview I say we establish a 1970's East/West German border to our south. Try to run a drug tunnel under something armed with bunker busters.....
 @lakeview Actually, this conservative DID support Ron Paul. Every time. Conservative /= Republican, much less GOP. I know that's a hard concept to grasp for those who are brainwashed into thinking the 2 party system is the only way......R, D....two sides of the same coin; both looking to control the people and gain more $$$....just in different ways. Neither is a friend to liberty.
 @dg54321 Too bad you conservatives didn't support Ron Paul. It's also too bad that the mainstream GOP is against former Republican Senator Hagel for having some of those same "conservative" views such as smaller defense department.Â
 @Freespeech  @lakeview Bring all our troops home, let other countries worry about themselves. Put a strong defense here at home, cut spending, only worry about enough troops overseas to defend our embassies. Big chunk of the federal spending problem gone, right there. When you can't secure your own borders, you don't spend the people's money helping other countries secure theirs.
This is just such BS that we even have to borrow money form anyone. How is it we, The USA, should ever have to borrow any money form anyone and then give billions of that  borrowed money in away in foreign aid to countries like Pakistan and others?????  The USA needs to take care of itself quickly before we have no more USA.
There goes that can right on down the road.
 @FKS Along with the tires...