If elected, Romney wants a say in 'fiscal cliff'

WASHINGTON (AP) - Mitt Romney's transition team is quietly talking with government officials and Capitol Hill to develop a plan, if he's elected, to prevent massive cuts to the defense budget and extend tax cuts first passed under President George W. Bush.
The Republican's goal is to put his own stamp on legislation to fix the so-called fiscal cliff well before his Jan. 20 inauguration. The tax cuts are set to expire Jan. 1, and economists in both political parties warn say the reductions in spending combined with higher taxes would likely throw the country back into recession.
The economic policy planning is a major element of what's dubbed "The Readiness Project" inside the campaign.
Led by former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, Romney's transition team has been at work since summer preparing to choose Cabinet officials and build the new government if he's elected. The team has held events to raise private money, hired more staff in Washington, and moved into bigger, government-provided offices Sept. 4. Some of Romney's top campaign advisers, including former private equity colleague Bob White, are preparing to take on larger roles in the transition.
Looming over the standard transition discussions is the big policy fight on the horizon - created by lawmakers trying to force a deal to reform entitlements and cut government spending - and what role Romney should take if elected.
President Barack Obama also faced significant, pressing policy problems and began grappling with them before the inauguration. The country's financial system was in crisis, work was beginning on an economic stimulus plan and U.S. automakers were still in trouble. In the early months of his term, Obama pushed a stimulus bill through Congress and restructured the auto companies in a bailout process that Bush had begun.
This time around, the newly inaugurated president would likely face the winter session of Congress with negotiations between lawmakers over the economy well under way. Congress created the fiscal cliff threat when it tied enormous defense and discretionary spending budget cuts to passing a broad deficit-reduction deal.
Romney's campaign refused to discuss its transition team's fiscal-cliff planning at length, with officials careful not to be perceived as preparing prematurely for an election far from decided. Republicans on Capitol Hill said transition officials have begun informal conversations with GOP leaders in the House, and lawmakers are paying close attention to Romney's public statements about how he wants to handle the fiscal cliff in the event he wins.
Romney has said that if elected, he wants Congress and Obama to put off any permanent solution until after the inauguration and has suggested he would be open to fixing the problems with a series of separate bills instead of one grand bargain.
"Let's have a year of runway, or even six months of runway after the new president is elected so that we can, we can have the tax reform and the military spending plans and the budget plans that are consistent with that individual's leadership and views," Romney has said.
Both Romney and Obama say they want to extend tax cuts for middle-class families. But Obama is opposed to extending cuts for individuals who make more than $200,000 a year and couples who earn more than $250,000.
"The president has long made clear he will veto an extension of tax cuts for the top 2 percent of Americans, wealthiest Americans," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Thursday.
Carney refused to say how Obama would attempt to approach the lame-duck session of Congress if Romney were to win the presidency.
Defense cuts are a second major issue. Both parties and the Pentagon say the cuts included in the automatic "sequester" are too severe and would impact national security. Congressional Republicans have said they don't want a temporary measure to prevent changes in defense spending, instead wanting to offer a permanent solution. Still, Republican officials said GOP lawmakers would likely be willing to implement a temporary solution if Romney were elected. That would allow Romney to deal with the cuts permanently next year.
Romney has made deficit reduction a centerpiece of his campaign. But he has repeatedly acknowledged that making them too quickly could risk harming the fragile economy.
Aside from the policy strategizing, Romney's transition team - it's made up of businesspeople, longtime Romney supporters and a handful of former Bush administration officials - has been drawing up lists of names for Cabinet posts.
Romney has a history of blending business and government. He did that as governor of Massachusetts, bringing in some former officials at his private equity firm, Bain Capital, to assist in running the state.
Leading the day-to-day transition team operations is Chris Liddell, the former chief financial officer of Microsoft and General Motors who helped manage the automaker's finances when it was going through managed bankruptcy with the help of millions in government funds.
Romney's finance team also is involved in plotting the transition.
While the government provides some support, campaigns are allowed to use leftover campaign money and raise an additional $5,000 per contributor for the transition.
Beyond the fiscal cliff discussions, Romney transition officials are weighing whether to allow registered federal lobbyists to take posts in the new government.
Obama placed restrictions on hiring lobbyists and has barred federally registered lobbyists from serving on government advisory boards, though he has issued waivers in some circumstances and hired lobbyists if they have been away from lobbying activities for a certain period of time. Romney is likely to lift at least some of those restrictions.
The Republican's goal is to put his own stamp on legislation to fix the so-called fiscal cliff well before his Jan. 20 inauguration. The tax cuts are set to expire Jan. 1, and economists in both political parties warn say the reductions in spending combined with higher taxes would likely throw the country back into recession.
The economic policy planning is a major element of what's dubbed "The Readiness Project" inside the campaign.
Led by former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, Romney's transition team has been at work since summer preparing to choose Cabinet officials and build the new government if he's elected. The team has held events to raise private money, hired more staff in Washington, and moved into bigger, government-provided offices Sept. 4. Some of Romney's top campaign advisers, including former private equity colleague Bob White, are preparing to take on larger roles in the transition.
Looming over the standard transition discussions is the big policy fight on the horizon - created by lawmakers trying to force a deal to reform entitlements and cut government spending - and what role Romney should take if elected.
President Barack Obama also faced significant, pressing policy problems and began grappling with them before the inauguration. The country's financial system was in crisis, work was beginning on an economic stimulus plan and U.S. automakers were still in trouble. In the early months of his term, Obama pushed a stimulus bill through Congress and restructured the auto companies in a bailout process that Bush had begun.
This time around, the newly inaugurated president would likely face the winter session of Congress with negotiations between lawmakers over the economy well under way. Congress created the fiscal cliff threat when it tied enormous defense and discretionary spending budget cuts to passing a broad deficit-reduction deal.
Romney's campaign refused to discuss its transition team's fiscal-cliff planning at length, with officials careful not to be perceived as preparing prematurely for an election far from decided. Republicans on Capitol Hill said transition officials have begun informal conversations with GOP leaders in the House, and lawmakers are paying close attention to Romney's public statements about how he wants to handle the fiscal cliff in the event he wins.
Romney has said that if elected, he wants Congress and Obama to put off any permanent solution until after the inauguration and has suggested he would be open to fixing the problems with a series of separate bills instead of one grand bargain.
"Let's have a year of runway, or even six months of runway after the new president is elected so that we can, we can have the tax reform and the military spending plans and the budget plans that are consistent with that individual's leadership and views," Romney has said.
Both Romney and Obama say they want to extend tax cuts for middle-class families. But Obama is opposed to extending cuts for individuals who make more than $200,000 a year and couples who earn more than $250,000.
"The president has long made clear he will veto an extension of tax cuts for the top 2 percent of Americans, wealthiest Americans," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Thursday.
Carney refused to say how Obama would attempt to approach the lame-duck session of Congress if Romney were to win the presidency.
Defense cuts are a second major issue. Both parties and the Pentagon say the cuts included in the automatic "sequester" are too severe and would impact national security. Congressional Republicans have said they don't want a temporary measure to prevent changes in defense spending, instead wanting to offer a permanent solution. Still, Republican officials said GOP lawmakers would likely be willing to implement a temporary solution if Romney were elected. That would allow Romney to deal with the cuts permanently next year.
Romney has made deficit reduction a centerpiece of his campaign. But he has repeatedly acknowledged that making them too quickly could risk harming the fragile economy.
Aside from the policy strategizing, Romney's transition team - it's made up of businesspeople, longtime Romney supporters and a handful of former Bush administration officials - has been drawing up lists of names for Cabinet posts.
Romney has a history of blending business and government. He did that as governor of Massachusetts, bringing in some former officials at his private equity firm, Bain Capital, to assist in running the state.
Leading the day-to-day transition team operations is Chris Liddell, the former chief financial officer of Microsoft and General Motors who helped manage the automaker's finances when it was going through managed bankruptcy with the help of millions in government funds.
Romney's finance team also is involved in plotting the transition.
While the government provides some support, campaigns are allowed to use leftover campaign money and raise an additional $5,000 per contributor for the transition.
Beyond the fiscal cliff discussions, Romney transition officials are weighing whether to allow registered federal lobbyists to take posts in the new government.
Obama placed restrictions on hiring lobbyists and has barred federally registered lobbyists from serving on government advisory boards, though he has issued waivers in some circumstances and hired lobbyists if they have been away from lobbying activities for a certain period of time. Romney is likely to lift at least some of those restrictions.
Obama wants all the American citizens, as many as he can get to Depend on the Gov. -- Gov. hand outs - get it?Â
It's been said there will be a Surprise coming from the Obama camp - there's alot of us out here that See through Obama. Anything he & his camp puts out there is their grasping at straws.  Â
For all of you saying he won't get elected explain to me why the voting machines his family purchased will be used here in WA as well as 4 other states?
 @Yeahright Voting machines? There will be VERY FEW "voting machines" used in Washington state, only in a selected few locations for people who can't (or won't) use the mail-in ballots.
Â
Further, the machines are bought by the specific county or the state. I can assure you that Mr. Romney's family does NOT own and did not purchase any of the voting machines.
Good get some more lobbyists in government. Just what we need.
At least one good thing would come out of waiting to start implementing permanent solutions. The election would be over and maybe....just maybe our law makers could quit campaigning and give some serious thought to what needs to be done instead of just pushing anything out there as a solution. We are going into the holiday season right after the elections and so getting back to business in a serious manner would probably be a better bet than just rushing things through to get home for the holidays.
I'm really suspicious & skeptical about Obama's pursuits - his plans that he really is not disclosing to the American people. Do you remember Obama claiming GOV. TOO BIG as it is and he would reduce it? His lie to us about that was a "Hook"- to hook us in without us realizing what he is really up to. He said he would create jobs, he is Doing the OPPOSITE.So where is this leading? IS IT PRODUCTIVE OR DESTRUCTIVE?Â
 @nunaboona I guess President Obama's record of killing terrorists, ending wars, curbing health insurance and Wall Street insanity along with other accomplishments are moot? Â
Â
We have a choice of an established record of achievements or vague promises and 5 trillion in tax cuts that have no basis in reality.
Â
Choose wisely.
you're kidding, right?
Let Romney waste his time. He's doing all this work for nothing. I'll be amazed if he gets elected.
Â
Picking a president is essentially picking the lesser of the two evils. While I don't care for Obama and some of the choices he has made, every time Romney opens his mouth he digs himself a deeper hole.
 @Tattooed_Angel "I'll be amazed if he gets elected."
"Amazed" is not the word I would use...
 @Tattooed_Angel My sentiments exactly!
Plans, facts and data will set you free!
Â
Obama started with Dreams not Plans, he gave us Hope and Change that soon became Hoax and Chains which equal 16 TRILLION in DEBT and unemployment that just recently dipped barely below 8% (Obama guaranteed below 6%) only because so many have given up HOPE and are no longer counted!.
Â
I'm tired of our country aiming at nothing because you will hit it every time...NOTHING!
Â
You cannot feed a family on Ideology!
Â
Romney 2012.
@Truth Percolates Absolutely! I'd like to add over 1 trillion in food stamps was handed out in 2011. People on Obama's side are emphatic about insisting our country isn't showing signs of Socilalism. If that isn't a red flag pointing to just that, then what do you call it?
Â
ROMNEY 2012
 @Truth Percolates You've missed the point. Truth, Romney wants to have a say in the Obama Administration. Regardless of a win or a loss Obama will still be the President until the 3rd week of January 2013 and Romney has no business trying to interject himself into his opponent's business by demanding he have a say in Obama's legislation.
 @left-center  @Truth PercolatesI guess Romney thinks that because he got away with talking over our President in the debate, he can talk over him with Congress. Mitt doesn't understand the concept that it's not his turn.Â
 @OrcasThunder I agree, Bush did sign off on Obama's draft.
 @left-center "Obama actually had the final say"
Â
AFTER he took office, not one moment before that.
Â
Drafting plans is not the same thing as actually setting policy...
 @OrcasThunder Obama actually had the final say; bear with me for a moment, I'll explain. Obama put pen to paper and draft the Wall Street bailout, thus his was the final word on the wall street collapse. Of course had he chose not to get involved (as the Bush Administration did) the banking system collapse would have been far worse than it was.
 @OrcasThunder  @left-center  @Truth Percolates Correct. He waited until after he took office. Yes, once he won the election, he started pulling people together to serve in his administration, but he did not interfere with the then current Congress.
 @Darn it!  @left-center  @Truth Percolates I don't remember Obama having a say in the financial collapse he inherited at the end of the Bush administration...
Dang Mitt, you got the Obama lovers running scared hearing about a man that has a plan....
 @Windowseat If you liked the Bush plan your going to love the Romney plan.
If he won,he will send troops to Iran riht away and next will be job cuttings to save billions....you watch !
He's no different than Bush....just another "HARDHEAD" !
 @scychan Oh, Romney is a lot different than GW Bush. Romney can think and that makes him far more dangerous than Bush.
@scychan and how do you know that? I was just hoping that Obama was going to keep his promise of shutting down GITMO, and letting the Patriot act that Joe Biden wrote to expire. But no he ramped up the war in Afghanistan. Oh but your going to come back with a snarky reply buy Obama killed OBL! Yeah any president would have given that order if the Seals had him pinned down.
 @wynooheeman I disagree "Yeah any president would have given that order if the Seals had him pinned down." nope many would've feared the failure of such a mission pertaining to entering another sovereign nation without permission. sorry, try again.
 @scychan Since neither he, his father, or any of his five sons have served in the military he is more than willing to send in troops where ever he can. It's all about profit for him.Â
@Darn it! @scychan Obama never served
Â
 @Darn it!  @scychan Mormons rarely serve in the US Military choosing instead to minister for their church. When I served I knew of only one who wore the soldiers uniform in the entire Brigade. Nice guy, a bit too straight-laced, but he could be counted on to be there to back you up when needed.
 @left-center  @scychan I understand that their church has a religious exemption to serving. I believe it started with Nam. This is an explosive subject to get into. Choosing religious missions for your church is honorable. Doing so for the purpose of avoiding serving your country is not.
Time to wake up Mitt. The election isn't over yet. Please keep voicing your opinion. The more you say the more people realize what kind of a person you really are.
Mr. President Obama, your Dream of what you want this country to Be (The United States of America), I DO NOT Believe in & therefore DO NOT ACCEPT. I have a good reason as to why I don't believe in or want what you are trying to shove down our throats ! SOCIALISM !!!
 @nunaboona I hope you're being facetious and joking. Do you even know what socialism means as an economic theory? Can you describe it?
Â
If you actually could, you'd see there's been no move towards socialism whatsoever in this country and that you're just parroting the buzzword you've heard from empty-headed pundits far too often in the last few years. Words have meaning, and the Shift key is to be used at specific times, figure it out.
@Lykos Socialism is community ownership - it's a form of communism but not as extreme. It's not indiviual ownership. Like an example " you didn't build that " --someone else did, Â
 @nunaboona  @Lykos No, no it's not. It's an economic theory in which the government controls the means of production and distribution for all goods and services. Basically every company that makes everything is owned by the overarching government, but you still work and buy things depending on your skill and work level. It's not community ownership, and it's different from communism, even though the two have existed together in some countries in history. I don't support the idea of full socialism as an economic theory, but you need to know what it is if you're going to shout it.
Â
You have no idea what you're trying to babble about, you've proven that you're poorly educated and can't tell what's actually going on in this country, but rather just repeat whatever you hear the Hannitys and Becks of the world scream in an attempt to fear-monger.
@Lykos @nunaboona all industry is ran by the state! worked really well in Europe and wonder why that system never really took off because at certain point you run out of money and you become Greece!
 @wynooheeman dude, "American" obviously isn't your first language..
@Funky-Munky Um and I don't want that form of service here you want it go live in Canada! one of my sons lives in Alberta and he comes here for the health care he would have to wit in line for in canada.
 @wynooheeman  @Lykos There is no change to the capitalist system. People still get paid for the work they do, innovators can still create and charge a price that will get them more business if their product or service is a good one, people can still go into business if they comply with American laws. Where's the change to overall capitalism? Nowhere. All that's being done is a more adequate way of financing the basic needs of a healthy country where not everyone is born to an investment banker.
Â
You don't seem to know what you're talking about, or even how to properly express it in the English language. Learn about actual economics from places other than pundits and learn how to construct an actual cogent sentence.
 @wynooheeman Good grief.... Please educate yourself first sir.... Socialized medicine is in Canada, Europe and other places around the world. It has and is working just fine for everyone in those countries. I believe the color of Obama's skin has driven you mad!
@Lykos This is what gets me. How a person and other like minded people like yourself. Have a innate desire to change the American capitalist system. When there are plenty of nations that have the system already in place. Why don't you just move there and let us who enjoy Capitalism live in peace. Move to cuba or france heck England or spain even Greece! That is my question why force your Fabian Progressive Ideas on those of use who see them as a loss of freedom.
 @wynooheeman  @Lykos  @nunaboona Every time you speak, you prove that you shouldn't do so.
Â
The government is not taking control and ownership of the hospitals. Or of the pharmaceutical companies, or the medical equipment companies or any of the private entities responsible for medical care. What's being done is that a fiscal system is being set up to allow for people without other means to pay for preventative and maintenance care, rather than tax-payers having to pay for emergency room visits for a sore throat that won't go away.
Â
This is not socialism, it's a management of tax finances that makes more sense and makes us an actual unified country rather than a ravening, scrabbling group of beasts just out for ourselves that will screw over our neighbors to make sure we get ours before anyone else does.
@Lykos @nunaboona Um Hello McFly! Obama Care!= socialized medicine! 100% of Government control! Social security! Form of Socialized pension plan Medicare Form of Socialized medicine for the elderly.
 @wynooheeman  @Lykos  @nunaboona Thanks for that Dadaist version of definition and current events. I feel much more abstract. Still meaningless, since we've had no actual move towards that economic system.
Romney Robme Mittens can't wait for the keys to the kingdom.... He is revving his engine and ready to drive us all the way over the fiscal cliff! Yippee, another liar, cheat and outsourced job's creator!
Win or lose - he can't seize power before it is handed to him. If he is not the president, then he is not. Flat out.Â
Â
He should probably know that.Â
This comment has been deleted
 @Funky-Munky I'm still on my first cup. Thorry... It always annoys me when someone starts trying to shape policy before the have the authority to do so. Setting up a transition team to take the reins is one thing, doing back door deals when NOT yet strikes me as sleazy.
Â
Big surprise.Â
Â
What the hell makes him think that he is entitled to make any policy when he is still a private citizen? Wouldn't that make him a lobbyist? A special interest group based in his own interest? This guy is completely self absorbed.
Â
I bet the wife already has the the new WH china picked out. And a team of decorators standing by to get rid of any trace of "those people' in the WH already.
Â
Â
Is that better? :P
Â
 @wynooheeman  @OrcasThunder  @Audio It's called making plans for what you will do WHEN you take command.
 @wynooheeman  @OrcasThunder  @Audio Were you there? Otherwise, you have no actual knowledge of this. And I don't believe it.
 @wynooheeman  @OrcasThunder  @Audio So two wrongs make a right??
Â
Since when does somebody else doing something wrong justify you doing something wrong> What is this, The Catholic Church??
Â
I feel that is fourth grade mentality.
@OrcasThunder @Audio Kinda forming policy before being worn in
@OrcasThunder @Audio lets step in to the way back time machine. after the election and Obama is no longer US Senator But pres elect Obama him John McCain Bush sat down with others and when Bush or McCain said anything this was what he said I won the election! It will be my Plan you Lost shut up!
 @LadyRuck  @Funky-Munky Planning ahead with the transition team, yes, but trying to make current policy? Out of bounds.
 @wynooheeman  @Audio "held press conferences drafted executive orders"
That's a lot different than wanting to actually have input into policy making.
Every President elect begins working on their future administration, but it's only planning for the future - not generating policy in the old administration.
 @Audio Cat  @Funky-Munky Pretty sure it's a good idea to plan ahead... whether he wins or not... if he does, then he planned ahead to get things done!
@Audio Cat @Funky-Munky Obama did it! opened a office of president elect. held press conferences drafted executive orders all that day after the election. Plus there is always a transition team to work with the lame duck. And it would be nice to have a man with a plan. better the the current one with no plan.
 @Audio Cat Thank you.... I wondered if you were awake... Ha! I feel around the same way you do.... crazy is as crazy does....