Lawyers across U.S. urged to give more free services

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Jennifer Garcia stood alone before a judge with a stack of legal papers in her hands, answering questions about her personal life.
She has acted as her own lawyer in state Family Court in a paternity, child support and visitation case on and off for three years, but representing herself in a courtroom full of strangers still makes her nervous.
"Sometimes I get this gut feeling because you never know what the judge is going to say," said the 23-year-old single mother of two from Hartford.
Garcia is part of a crush of people who are representing themselves in the nation's civil courts because they can't afford lawyers, who typically charge $200 to $500 an hour. The boom has overwhelmed courts and sparked new efforts to get attorneys to meet what the American Bar Association says is its professional responsibility to offer free legal services to people in need.
The increase in self-represented parties stems from a recession that has left fewer people able to afford lawyers and created new waves of foreclosure, debt collection and bankruptcy cases, judges and lawyers say. Judges say self-represented people are slowing down court dockets because they typically don't know what legal points to argue or what motions to file.
"There's a crisis in this country," said John Levi, board chairman of Washington, D.C.-based Legal Services Corp., the nation's largest funder of civil legal aid for the poor. "Courthouses are being filled with people just showing up, trying to figure out what their rights are. If you're a low-income person and you have a legal need, it is not easy to get it addressed."
Legal Services has a 58-member pro bono task force comprising judges, attorneys, law school deans and other legal experts working on recommendations due out next month on how to get more lawyers to provide free services.
At a time of rising demand, LSC has been dealing with funding cuts. Federal government funding for LSC dropped 17 percent to $348 million this year, compared with $420 million in 2010. LSC funds 135 legal aid groups across the country and serves about 900,000 clients a year, but it has to turn away about the same number of people seeking help because of a lack of staff.
Less than 20 percent of the legal needs of low-income people are addressed with the help of a private or legal aid lawyer, LSC says.
And the number of Americans with incomes at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty level — the income limit for qualifying for legal aid — is expected to reach an all-time high of 66 million this year. A family of four earning 125 percent of the federal poverty level makes about $28,800 a year, government figures show.
Several states report high percentages of civil and family cases with at least one self-represented person. In Connecticut, 85 percent of the more than 45,000 family law cases in the 2011 fiscal year had at least one self-represented party.
Pro bono work by large law firms has declined in the past few years amid downsizing because of the economy, according to the July and August issue of ALM's The American Lawyer magazine. Average pro bono hours per lawyer in large firms dropped to about 54 last year, a 12 percent decrease from a 2009 peak, the magazine reported.
Laurel Bellows, a Chicago attorney and president of the American Bar Association, said the magazine's findings conflict with an increasing pro bono trend that she sees. The ABA has several pro bono programs including one that helps military families.
"The need is extraordinary," Bellows said about pro bono services. "You not only have the poverty level community, but also the middle class community. We're really very proud of our lawyers because they're stepping up to the plate and helping more people who need assistance."
An ABA survey last year said 75 percent of lawyers believe that people who represent themselves are more likely to lose their cases.
Court officials say the recession from 2007 to 2009 and its aftermath sparked new waves of foreclosure, debt collection and bankruptcy cases and left fewer people able to afford a lawyer.
Garcia, the Hartford mother, said she can't afford an attorney. After several court appearances, she said she is beginning to feel more comfortable representing herself.
State judicial systems have taken steps to deal with self-represented parties, including offering legal forms and help online and setting up court service centers to answer questions. Some states, including Illinois, Georgia and Arkansas, even have pro bono cellphone apps to help lawyers find volunteer opportunities.
But state officials are trying to increase pro bono work to help meet demand.
New York will become the first state in the country to require lawyers to do pro bono work — 50 hours — as a prerequisite for obtaining a law license starting next year. The state of Washington's Supreme Court in June approved a landmark rule allowing non-lawyers to offer pro bono help in some cases after they receive training.
In June, Connecticut Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers urged members of the Connecticut Bar Association to help address what she called her No. 1 concern: the increase in self-represented parties. Judicial officials also held a pro bono summit for lawyers and judges last fall.
"Our feeling was that we needed the lawyers, the legal community, to understand the problem. It was getting worse and worse," said Judge William H. Bright Jr., chairman of the Connecticut Judicial Branch's Pro Bono Committee, referring to people representing themselves.
Sharonne Martin believes Connecticut should provide public defenders for civil cases like it does for criminal ones. She's been representing herself for two years in Family Court in Hartford and is now fighting an attempt by the father of two of her three children to gain full custody of them.
"The pressure is overwhelming," Martin, 28, of New Britain, said about representing herself. "Just keeping up with the paperwork and being organized, it's nerve-racking. It's been hard because ... you're on your own."
She has acted as her own lawyer in state Family Court in a paternity, child support and visitation case on and off for three years, but representing herself in a courtroom full of strangers still makes her nervous.
"Sometimes I get this gut feeling because you never know what the judge is going to say," said the 23-year-old single mother of two from Hartford.
Garcia is part of a crush of people who are representing themselves in the nation's civil courts because they can't afford lawyers, who typically charge $200 to $500 an hour. The boom has overwhelmed courts and sparked new efforts to get attorneys to meet what the American Bar Association says is its professional responsibility to offer free legal services to people in need.
The increase in self-represented parties stems from a recession that has left fewer people able to afford lawyers and created new waves of foreclosure, debt collection and bankruptcy cases, judges and lawyers say. Judges say self-represented people are slowing down court dockets because they typically don't know what legal points to argue or what motions to file.
"There's a crisis in this country," said John Levi, board chairman of Washington, D.C.-based Legal Services Corp., the nation's largest funder of civil legal aid for the poor. "Courthouses are being filled with people just showing up, trying to figure out what their rights are. If you're a low-income person and you have a legal need, it is not easy to get it addressed."
Legal Services has a 58-member pro bono task force comprising judges, attorneys, law school deans and other legal experts working on recommendations due out next month on how to get more lawyers to provide free services.
At a time of rising demand, LSC has been dealing with funding cuts. Federal government funding for LSC dropped 17 percent to $348 million this year, compared with $420 million in 2010. LSC funds 135 legal aid groups across the country and serves about 900,000 clients a year, but it has to turn away about the same number of people seeking help because of a lack of staff.
Less than 20 percent of the legal needs of low-income people are addressed with the help of a private or legal aid lawyer, LSC says.
And the number of Americans with incomes at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty level — the income limit for qualifying for legal aid — is expected to reach an all-time high of 66 million this year. A family of four earning 125 percent of the federal poverty level makes about $28,800 a year, government figures show.
Several states report high percentages of civil and family cases with at least one self-represented person. In Connecticut, 85 percent of the more than 45,000 family law cases in the 2011 fiscal year had at least one self-represented party.
Pro bono work by large law firms has declined in the past few years amid downsizing because of the economy, according to the July and August issue of ALM's The American Lawyer magazine. Average pro bono hours per lawyer in large firms dropped to about 54 last year, a 12 percent decrease from a 2009 peak, the magazine reported.
Laurel Bellows, a Chicago attorney and president of the American Bar Association, said the magazine's findings conflict with an increasing pro bono trend that she sees. The ABA has several pro bono programs including one that helps military families.
"The need is extraordinary," Bellows said about pro bono services. "You not only have the poverty level community, but also the middle class community. We're really very proud of our lawyers because they're stepping up to the plate and helping more people who need assistance."
An ABA survey last year said 75 percent of lawyers believe that people who represent themselves are more likely to lose their cases.
Court officials say the recession from 2007 to 2009 and its aftermath sparked new waves of foreclosure, debt collection and bankruptcy cases and left fewer people able to afford a lawyer.
Garcia, the Hartford mother, said she can't afford an attorney. After several court appearances, she said she is beginning to feel more comfortable representing herself.
State judicial systems have taken steps to deal with self-represented parties, including offering legal forms and help online and setting up court service centers to answer questions. Some states, including Illinois, Georgia and Arkansas, even have pro bono cellphone apps to help lawyers find volunteer opportunities.
But state officials are trying to increase pro bono work to help meet demand.
New York will become the first state in the country to require lawyers to do pro bono work — 50 hours — as a prerequisite for obtaining a law license starting next year. The state of Washington's Supreme Court in June approved a landmark rule allowing non-lawyers to offer pro bono help in some cases after they receive training.
In June, Connecticut Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers urged members of the Connecticut Bar Association to help address what she called her No. 1 concern: the increase in self-represented parties. Judicial officials also held a pro bono summit for lawyers and judges last fall.
"Our feeling was that we needed the lawyers, the legal community, to understand the problem. It was getting worse and worse," said Judge William H. Bright Jr., chairman of the Connecticut Judicial Branch's Pro Bono Committee, referring to people representing themselves.
Sharonne Martin believes Connecticut should provide public defenders for civil cases like it does for criminal ones. She's been representing herself for two years in Family Court in Hartford and is now fighting an attempt by the father of two of her three children to gain full custody of them.
"The pressure is overwhelming," Martin, 28, of New Britain, said about representing herself. "Just keeping up with the paperwork and being organized, it's nerve-racking. It's been hard because ... you're on your own."
I am a family law attorney. I am a sole practitioner. I employ three people, pay salary and taxes, pay rent, purchase supplies, buy insurance, pay for telephone, power, janitorial services, and postage. I have to bring in at least $24,000 per month to meet these obligations before I take a dime out of the business. There have been many months where my paralegals have been paid more than me that month. One of the reasons is mentioned in the article -- due to the economy, people are choosing not to hire a lawyer. Or worse, they hire one, then file bankruptcy and discharge the debt owed to the lawyer. Less clients who pay, means less money to meet office expenses and payroll. Worse, when we have done pro bono work, the client who gets the services for free are often obnoxious. They think nothing of making daily phone calls to the office, or walking in without an appointment, thus tying up my staff and preventing them from working on other files. Most family law attorneys I know are struggling to keep their businesses viable. To mandate that we now have to work for free would be the same as telling a mechanic that he has to fix five cars a year for free (and purchase the parts for each car out of his own pocket). I would much happier if the bar association promoted sliding fees for the poor -- at least it would help with the monthly expenses.
If they wanted lawyers to give free services, the law schools need to give free educations instead of increasing tuition at double digit rates, even through recession years. The problem isn't the cost of lawyers, it the cost to educate them. Unfortunately, the universities like their cash cows and will shift blame elsewhere.
Â
With law school students graduating with over $100K in debt, they need to bill at over $200 just to make payments on their law school loans.Â
There are so many professions that incur tremendous amounts of student debt to get into doctors, dentists, lawyers, vision providers, denture providers, etc. Why not a new "service corps" - in exchange for being absolved of a percentage of their student debt, they give pro bono services for those who need it. This could address so many needs - people in the court system who are having to go it alone, people in need of medical or dental care, people in need of glasses or dentures.
Â
I'm sure there are those here who will TD me, argue "ya, but whoz payin???" - we are ALL currently paying with lack of care & assistenace now, wouldn't it be better to put that debt tosome use & serve the public good?
If a medical doctors/dentists would give their times to the poor people,lawyers surely can do the same !
 @scychanÂ
"If a medical doctors/dentists would give their times to the poor people,lawyers surely can do the same !"
Â
I have no problem with people that want to donate their time, money, or expertise to charity. What I have a problem with is government mandating that private sector employees work for free.
Â
"New York will become the first state in the country to require lawyers to do pro bono work"
Â
This is simply outrageous and cannot be allowed to stand in a free country with a free people!
 @ByeByeBarry Well...think about the needed people,they can't afford
any legal fees,you just let them drown ? That's what I can see this is good
point for the poor public. If I were a lawyer,I would not only giving the times,I would give them more help,that's American way !
 @scychanÂ
Attorneys do Pro Bono work all the time. Two of my sisters are attorneys and a goof friend is a federal judge. If an attorney is working a case free of charge then they are donating their time to charity. But to do what New York did and mandate that attorneys donate their time is outrageous and does not happen in a free society. For an attorney time is money and being forced by government to donate your time is another form of redistribution of wealth. Surprise! Surprise! That New York, one of the most liberal of states, would do this while Obama sits in the white house. Attorneys refer to that as collusion.Â
 @Howbouthat  @ByeByeBarry Glad you had a kindhearted lawyer helping you,good for you.Still,the public just have no idea where to get help these days,they are so frustrated,if everyone (lawyers) can provide them a helping hand,they will really appreciate it you know. Only few hours their free times,that would solve someone's legal problem and why not ? Keep our country beautiful ! Â
 @scychan  @ByeByeBarry scychan- Actually aout 7 years back I was dealing with the legal system and needed a lawyer so they offered me a public defender, a couple days later I got a phone call from a actual lawyers office (not a public defender) offering to take my case for free. After doing research on my lawyer I found that he was one of the top ranking lawyers in Washington.
 @ByeByeBarryDid any lawyer volunteer for helpimg people ? I have NEVER seen one doing "charity" at all.So,now the Gov't pushing for it,I am damn sure would support it,unless,they come out and help.
 @scychanÂ
Â
 "If I were a lawyer,I would not only giving the times,I would give them more help,that's American way !"
Â
Good for you! I agree, Americans are a generous people. But government mandating, telling you that you have to do something, in this case work for free is absolutely as un-American as you can get and is totally unacceptable.
Â
Â
Maybe, just MAYBE, if we had tort reform (loser pays), all these attorneys could afford to give a little back.
Â
Â
$200-$500 an hour for a lawyer? I don't think it is only the poor people who can't afford that!
Â
So where do you draw the line on who should be entitled to free help?
 @rod:Â
They already use the federal poverty limit as the "standard. I knokw when I left my "X" & was looking for an attorney, I went through the King County Bar Associat Lawyer Referral Service. I was referred to an EXCELLENT attorney, and they had a sliding fee scale for those who could not afford "full price". The divorce was final over a decaade ago, but I am still in contact with the attorney, and have referred many people to her.
Yea, the move toward Communism. Why don't we all just work for free. âFrom each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." (Karl Marx) And why don't we start with teachers, police, firefighters, politicians, in fact all government employees being the first to set the example!
Yeah, go ahead and force an attorney that is used to collecting 200-500 dollars an hour and make them work for free. I'd steal to pay, before I had their free service.
If you're a low-income person and you have a legal need, it is not easy to get it addressed."
Â
Why does the media and activists continue to paint all poor people as stupid. This is absurd. Most people in all socio-economic groups DO NOT understand the law or their rights or legal obligations. But the article makes a sound point that lawyers should, overall, be contributing more to society by offering pro bono services to those who cannot afford to pay. Good o New York for mandating it.Â
Hospitals are forced to care for people for free in their emergency room. Maybe law firms should be forced to provide services for free in a similar manner.
@LockesChild Your analogy is stupid. Hospitals are dealing with health issues that the normal person does not have the know how to fix. Lawyers are helping people get out of their stupid choices, and for that they should be paid.Â
 @justsayin  @LockesChild  It is not a stupid analogy. If you can force someone to provide goods and services without charge, there is nothing limiting government from imposing that burden on others. Of course, as long as that someone or something is anyone but ourselves, we look askance and shrug our shoulders.