W. Washington woman killed by lion at Calif. animal park
DUNLAP, Calif. (AP) - Authorities are trying to determine what provoked a lion at an exotic animal park in Central California to attack and maul to death a 24-year-old intern from Washington state.
She was attacked and killed Wednesday when she entered the male African lion's enclosure at Cat Haven, about 45 miles east of Fresno, authorities said. Sheriff's deputies found her severely injured and still lying inside the enclosure with the lion nearby, said Fresno County sheriff's Lt. Bob Miller.
Another park worker couldn't lure the lion into another pen, so deputies shot and killed it to safely reach the wounded woman, but she died at the scene, he said.
Paul Hanson, a Seattle-area attorney, identified the victim as his daughter, Dianna Hanson, of the north Seattle suburb of Brier, Wash. He said he dropped her off at Cat Haven on Jan. 2 for a six-month internship.
"It was just a dream job for her," he told The Associated Press late Wednesday, adding that she hoped to parlay work at the facility into a job with a zoo later in the summer. He said she gave him a little tour and showed him the lion Cous Cous that authorities said killed her.
Hanson said his daughter had worked with big cats before and "was absolutely fearless," though she told him she would not be allowed to go in the lion cage.
Cat Haven founder and executive director Dale Anderson cried as he read a one-sentence statement about the fatal mauling at the private zoo he has operated since 1993.
Investigators were trying to determine why the intern was inside the enclosure and what might have provoked the attack, sheriff's Sgt. Greg Collins said. The facility is normally closed on Wednesdays, and only one other worker was there when the mauling happened, he said.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Janice Mackey said she was unaware if any state regulations would prohibit an employee from entering an exotic animal's enclosure.
The lion, Cous Cous, a 4-year-old male, had been raised at Cat Haven since it was a cub, said Tanya Osegueda, a spokeswoman for Project Survival, the nonprofit that operates the animal park.
Since the 100-acre facility just west of Kings Canyon National Park opened two decades ago, it has housed numerous big cats, including tigers, leopards and other exotic species. It is permitted to house exotic animals by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and is regulated as a zoo by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Results of the last 13 USDA inspections show no violations dating back to March 2010. The most recent inspection was Feb. 4.
Despite state regulations requiring annual inspections, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife most recently inspected the facility in January 2011, when the inspector found it in "good condition" after checking animal health and features such as enclosures.
"We have to do the best we can with the resources we're provided," said department spokeswoman Jordan Traverso. "Regardless of whether it was inspected, that wouldn't have prevented this from happening."
Cat Haven's current "restricted species" permit, which expires in November, states the park was authorized to house 47 animals but had only 28. The animals must be used for scientific or educational purposes.
Actress Tippi Hedren, who founded the Shambala Preserve in Southern California, home to 53 seized or abandoned exotic pets, expressed dismay over the killing of the lion.
"It wasn't the lion's fault. It's the human's fault always," Hedren said.
Nicole Paquette, vice president of the Humane Society of the United States, said the victim of Wednesday's attack should never have been in the enclosure with the animal.
"These are big cats that are extremely dangerous, and they placed a volunteer in the actual cage with a wild animal," she said. "That should have never happened."
Officials at another big cat sanctuary, Big Cat Rescue in Tampa, Fla., told The Associated Press last year that at least 21 people, including five children, have been killed and 246 mauled by exotic cats in the United States since 1990. Over that period, 254 cats escaped and 143 were killed.
In 2007, a tiger at the San Francisco Zoo was killed by police after jumping out of its enclosure and fatally mauling a 17-year-old boy and injuring two other people.
Cat Haven has housed Bengal tigers, jaguars and leopards as well as bobcats native to the area. The facility's website says it promotes conservation and preservation of wild cats in their native habitats and offers visitors tours and educational outreach.
Anderson said Project Survival would investigate to see if the intern and the other worker on-site followed the group's protocols.
"We take every precaution to ensure the safety of our staff, animals and guests," he said in a statement.
Paul Hanson said his daughter had been fascinated by big cats from an earlier age. She was a 2011 graduate of Western Washington University in Bellingham, Wash., where she majored in biology, her father said. She graduated from Mountlake Terrace High School.
From her early childhood, "she had a thing for lions and tigers, especially tigers," he recalled.
During college, she worked at what Hanson described as "a sizeable estate" outside Bellingham that was home to exotic animals, including three tigers and a lion. There she learned to care for the cats, he said.
"She was at ease with those big cats," he said. "They liked her."
___
Associated Press writers Kathy McCarthy in Seattle, Garance Burke in San Francisco and Sue Manning in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
She was attacked and killed Wednesday when she entered the male African lion's enclosure at Cat Haven, about 45 miles east of Fresno, authorities said. Sheriff's deputies found her severely injured and still lying inside the enclosure with the lion nearby, said Fresno County sheriff's Lt. Bob Miller.
Another park worker couldn't lure the lion into another pen, so deputies shot and killed it to safely reach the wounded woman, but she died at the scene, he said.
Paul Hanson, a Seattle-area attorney, identified the victim as his daughter, Dianna Hanson, of the north Seattle suburb of Brier, Wash. He said he dropped her off at Cat Haven on Jan. 2 for a six-month internship.
"It was just a dream job for her," he told The Associated Press late Wednesday, adding that she hoped to parlay work at the facility into a job with a zoo later in the summer. He said she gave him a little tour and showed him the lion Cous Cous that authorities said killed her.
Hanson said his daughter had worked with big cats before and "was absolutely fearless," though she told him she would not be allowed to go in the lion cage.
Cat Haven founder and executive director Dale Anderson cried as he read a one-sentence statement about the fatal mauling at the private zoo he has operated since 1993.
Investigators were trying to determine why the intern was inside the enclosure and what might have provoked the attack, sheriff's Sgt. Greg Collins said. The facility is normally closed on Wednesdays, and only one other worker was there when the mauling happened, he said.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Janice Mackey said she was unaware if any state regulations would prohibit an employee from entering an exotic animal's enclosure.
The lion, Cous Cous, a 4-year-old male, had been raised at Cat Haven since it was a cub, said Tanya Osegueda, a spokeswoman for Project Survival, the nonprofit that operates the animal park.
Since the 100-acre facility just west of Kings Canyon National Park opened two decades ago, it has housed numerous big cats, including tigers, leopards and other exotic species. It is permitted to house exotic animals by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and is regulated as a zoo by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Results of the last 13 USDA inspections show no violations dating back to March 2010. The most recent inspection was Feb. 4.
Despite state regulations requiring annual inspections, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife most recently inspected the facility in January 2011, when the inspector found it in "good condition" after checking animal health and features such as enclosures.
"We have to do the best we can with the resources we're provided," said department spokeswoman Jordan Traverso. "Regardless of whether it was inspected, that wouldn't have prevented this from happening."
Cat Haven's current "restricted species" permit, which expires in November, states the park was authorized to house 47 animals but had only 28. The animals must be used for scientific or educational purposes.
Actress Tippi Hedren, who founded the Shambala Preserve in Southern California, home to 53 seized or abandoned exotic pets, expressed dismay over the killing of the lion.
"It wasn't the lion's fault. It's the human's fault always," Hedren said.
Nicole Paquette, vice president of the Humane Society of the United States, said the victim of Wednesday's attack should never have been in the enclosure with the animal.
"These are big cats that are extremely dangerous, and they placed a volunteer in the actual cage with a wild animal," she said. "That should have never happened."
Officials at another big cat sanctuary, Big Cat Rescue in Tampa, Fla., told The Associated Press last year that at least 21 people, including five children, have been killed and 246 mauled by exotic cats in the United States since 1990. Over that period, 254 cats escaped and 143 were killed.
In 2007, a tiger at the San Francisco Zoo was killed by police after jumping out of its enclosure and fatally mauling a 17-year-old boy and injuring two other people.
Cat Haven has housed Bengal tigers, jaguars and leopards as well as bobcats native to the area. The facility's website says it promotes conservation and preservation of wild cats in their native habitats and offers visitors tours and educational outreach.
Anderson said Project Survival would investigate to see if the intern and the other worker on-site followed the group's protocols.
"We take every precaution to ensure the safety of our staff, animals and guests," he said in a statement.
Paul Hanson said his daughter had been fascinated by big cats from an earlier age. She was a 2011 graduate of Western Washington University in Bellingham, Wash., where she majored in biology, her father said. She graduated from Mountlake Terrace High School.
From her early childhood, "she had a thing for lions and tigers, especially tigers," he recalled.
During college, she worked at what Hanson described as "a sizeable estate" outside Bellingham that was home to exotic animals, including three tigers and a lion. There she learned to care for the cats, he said.
"She was at ease with those big cats," he said. "They liked her."
___
Associated Press writers Kathy McCarthy in Seattle, Garance Burke in San Francisco and Sue Manning in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Very sad. Just have to wait for the details to come out. I doubt she knowingly walked in with the lion, and more likely there was a miscue of some sort.
I have heard reports that she was not in the lion's cage, and that the lion broke out of the cage and attacked her. Maybe all of you saying rude things about her should shut up for a while until we know for sure what has happened.
So she knowingly walks into an exhibit with a wild animals and gets herself hurt. And the ANIMAL gets shot to death for her mistake? How does that even make sense? Why wasn't the animal tranquilized instead of outright killed?Â
@Kristina Raymond
You (logically) figure the people there should have tranquilized the lion, waited around for him to pass out, then go in and see if a chewed up woman is dead yet?
She made a (very bad) mistake. Certainly an argument for not keeping these things captive or whatever, but killing the lion to save a person is not even an afterthought.
@brewzbrothers@Kristina RaymondActually, looks like you also spoke to soon. Turns out that the lion escaped a smaller cage to get to the girl. Read the new story on front page.
@brewzbrothers@Kristina RaymondActually, looks like you also spoke to soon. Turns out that the lion escaped a smaller cage to get to the girl. Read the new story on the home page.
I truly feel for this dad but
"Hanson said his daughter had worked with big cats before and "was absolutely fearless," though she told him she would not be allowed to go in the lion cage."
For the record folks, being "absolutely fearless" of big cats or any other wild animal for that matter is not a good thing. Nature instilled that fear in you for a reason, you would be wise to heed it.
So she was fascinated by big cats from an "earlier age". Would this include smilodons?
It's obvious to everyone that this girl should not have been in the lions cage, and so why do people have to keep mentioning that fact, it's not as if that thought didn't occur to her co-workers, family, friends and authorities. I wish people would stop putting this girl down for the mistake she made. She lost her life and I think that says enough. She obviously paid for her mistakes! Calling this girl a fool and making crude remarks is a bit extreme and in my opinion, HEARTLESS. It's sad that the lion had to be killed, and it's also more sad that a girl, who got a little to confident, died and lost her life at such a young age. This girl was living her dream, and as an animal lover myself , I can sympathize with what this girls true intentions were when she chose to enter the lions enclosure. People like the girl in this story, ones that live and breath love for animals, those people are usually some of the kindest hearts the world has to offer. I'm a big animal lover myself and I can totally understand and be sympathetic for what was going through this girls mind when she chose to make direct contact with the lion. When someone loves animals to the point that they feel as confident with them as this girl did, it's almost like it takes control and reality becomes fantasy, if that makes any sense. Bottom line is, this girl loved what she did, she was young and following her passion in life, that's a lot more then a lot of you people can say, and after reading some of your comments, that remark is an obvious fact. The one good thing to come from this, and not that there is really anything good about it, but the one thing that's worthy of remembering is the fact that this girl died doing something she truly loved in her life. Even though she made bad judgement, she did it out of pure love that she felt with and around animals. Was her mistake worth her loosing her life, NO. Was her mistake worth the lion loosing his life, NO. Is it appropriate to blame the girl for the lions death, NO. Should people be more sympathetic for the fact that this girl lost her life, YES. Â Â
@Rick G. And also, as an animal lover myself I realize how unpredictable animals are and practice and teach safety to my young children, even common house animals can be dangerous under the wrong circumstances if you don't use caution and common sense.Â
@Kristina Raymond@Rick G.Actually, looks like you spoke to soon. Turns out that the lion escaped a smaller cage to get to the girl. Read the new story, guess her "poor choice" wasn't so poor after all. She was an animal lover who died while offering her help to a good cause. That's sad and really is nothing to call someone stupid and lacking common sense even if she did go into the enclosure without the lion having been locked away, or so she thought.
@Rick G. An innocent animal lost it's life because of her poor choice. Going about it's business, doing nothing out of the ordinary for a wild animal. And her stupidity and lack of common sense cost an innocent animal and her, their lives. A person dying as a result of their mistake doesn't make the mistake any less stupid, but it's extra sad when innocent people and animals pay for poor choices as well.Â
@Kristina Raymond @Rick G. And I wasn't suggesting that it was not sad that this lion lost it's life. But, there was no reason to but the blame on the girl, especially due to the fact she no longer lives.
@Rick G. Next time keep in mind the Shakespeare quote "Brevity is the soul of wit".
This is what happens when you think the world is
Walt Disney. It was a wild predator. They were lulled into thinking it was a house cat.Â
Wrong= Darwin award.
I just can't understand why people are quick to blame the WILD animal when it attacks a human. I mean, even though it is in a cage, and may have been so for its entire life, it is STILL a WILD animal at heart. It may be cool with you one day and kill you the next. I am sorry for the loss of this young woman's life, but she ought not have been in that enclosure. Her father even said she told him she wouldn't be allowed in with the big cats, so why was she in? Obviously assuming that her prior experience would keep her safe to the point where she could disregard the facility's policy. The tragedy is the need to kill the lion in order to get her out. Neither death would have been necessary had she obeyed the rules. I know why the lion had to go, though. Once they get a taste of humans, they are deemed compromised and must be taken out. Even if they could have tranquilized the lion, eventually the decision would have been made to kill it. It's just like in 2007 when the tiger got loose in San Francisco and killed one boy and injured two others... you don't provoke big cats. Period.
@CaliGirl@Heart The lion was actually in a different cage eating, she was actually doing her job cleaning in another cage. The lion got out and hit her with his paw breaking her neck and then continuing to bite her after she was dead! When the police could not get the lion off of her and didn't know whe was already dead they shot it. So she did not do anything wrong! She was not in the cage with the cat!!!
Did they force her into the cage? Didn't think so. Sounds like a work hazard.
Another fool who thought that the wild animals were her friends or that she has some special relationship with them.Â
@lakeview My thoughts exactly
@Vicki Adams Sloane @lakeview The lion was actually in a different cage eating, she was actually doing her job cleaning in another cage. The lion got out and hit her with his paw breaking her neck and then continuing to bite her after she was dead! When the police could not get the lion off of her and didn't know whe was already dead they shot it. So she did not do anything wrong! She was not in the cage with the cat!!! You both are idiots!!!!
Why didn't they use a tranquilizer instead of killing it?! Pretty sure that's not what she would have wanted. Sad for both of them.
@KOMO Viewer - they still would have had to shoot the cat. still a wild animal and no one could work with it after it killed someone.
@KOMO Viewer I really wish they wouldnt have killed the cat. I am sorry someone lost thier life, but these cats are wild animals. It is NOT thier fault if they attack. Its in thier nature. That lion should have been allowed to live
@KOMO Viewer i could careless about he frigging lion
@Vicki Adams Sloane @KOMO Viewer You're all heart!
@KOMO Viewer My guess would be that they needed to get to her quickly, and a bullet works much faster than a tranquilizer.Â
@JK15Â @KOMO Viewer Sort of, I guess. But some of those tranqs act pretty darn quick.
I'm curious to see why she was in the enclosure by herself when it sounds like she shouldn't have even been allowed in.
Big cats are like any other large wild animal: Dangerous, unpredictable and immensely powerful.
What makes me sad is that the lion was killed due to a human's stupidity.
@WAbornnraised The lion was actually in a different cage eating, she was actually doing her job cleaning in another cage. The lion got out and hit her with his paw breaking her neck and then continuing to bite her after she was dead! When the police could not get the lion off of her and didn't know whe was already dead they shot it. So she did not do anything wrong! She was not in the cage with the cat!!!
@proudarmywife! @WAbornnraised That makes more sense. I knew there had to be more to the story.
Big cats could solve a lot of crime problems by taking a big bite out of crime like night time gang thugs and prowlers in our cities.By doing this they would also have the additional benefit of greatly reducing anthropogenic climate change.
See these hero cats which greatly reduced excess human populations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champawat_Tiger
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_of_Panar
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsavo_Man-Eaters
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigers_of_Chowgarh
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_of_the_Yellagiri_Hills
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_of_Gummalapur
I wish I had such fine animals in my neighborhood to justly take care of the gang kid problem.
@m9078jk3Â The wolves are coming....
she's probably one of those people that love to argue with the exceptions, saying crap like "not ALLLL black people are criminals", or "not ALL Asian are good with math". in this case, she probably reasoned with herself by thinking "not ALLLL big cats are violent, I can tame this one!!!"Â
@PuzzleFighter No, it escaped, you just stuck your foot in your mouth.
@PuzzleFighter Does race really need to be part of your argument?Â
Consider what a house cat could do to you if it really wanted to.Mulitply ten pounds times 300 or more,Tigers are over a thousand pounds.We cage these monsters and then kill them when they do what they are suppose to do.Kill,eat,s--t.Hello people!!!Ask that guy that had the Las Vegas show what they can do even when trained.............
@grog tigers generally weight the same as a large breed dog (200-300lbs) not 1,000lbs. At 1000 lbs your looking at a LARGE brown bear (or average polar bear)
@Jalharad @grog I think males are more like 400-500lbs
@1000 @Jalharad @grog - some male tigers can get up to 600 pounds. I saw one once at a big cat sanctuary -- beautiful animal raised as a cub, still sucked on the keepers thumb like it did as a kitten - would tear your head off if you got too close to it's raw meat. beatufiul but extremely deadly.
tragic.. tired of reading stories like this. again not the animals fault but they blow its brains out anyhow. Tranquilizer? Seems there would be another way to prevent this from being even a worse tragedy.   You would think sanctuaries like this would have measure it place.Â
@Willy Lee Apparently they did, she just chose to disregard them. She stated to her father that she wouldn't be allowed in the cage with the big cats, but she was found inside anyway.Â
@CaliGirl@Heart @Willy Lee - big lion escaped somehow from another cage - she wasn't in its cage. read the comments above.
Very tragic. Sounds like a case of her heart being bigger than her brain. I admire her courage and the love she had for animals might have made a big difference down the road someday, but you've got to have common sense.Â
Authorities are trying to find out what provoked the lion? Maybe the State of California will officially determine that a lion could be hazardous to your health.
An adventurous woman for sure. She was 24 and most people know that type of person. I do not blame her for living her life to the fullest, but a lion is a lion and always will be. She shouldn't have been in there.
Rest in piece, Dianna.
.
@brewzbrothers The State of California will certainly examine the incident. Then they will determine that assault cats are dangerous and ban them and other cats that have distinguishing features like claws, tails, big teeth and natural camoflage. Big cats that are already in posession will be limited to 7 teeth.
And another innocent animal pays the price for the selfish stupidity and venal self-aggrandizement of a human. Another news source identified Hanson as a "victim." She's not. She's a killer. "Oopsiedoodles" doesn't get her out of this one, alive or dead.
"Authorities are trying to determine what provoked a lion at an exotic animal park in Central California to attack and maul to death a 24-year-old intern from Washington state"
Here is a clue. Â Lion-- Big Carnivorous, undomesticated (AKA not a pet) cat that kills what it eats.
Why are people shocked when something like this happens? Â It is a wild animal so all you Inviro tree huggers need to realize that these animals are not pets.
@FBrumfield Well said.Â
I've often said vegetarians are people who haven't met a hungry shark in the wild. Naive, idealistic people who think any animal can be tamed or can be "acclimated" to their presence are Darwin awards. It may sound cruel or heartless, but it's the truth. Wild animals like feral cats are not friendly and should be kept away from people.Â
@NW-Economist Your paralelism in saying that vegetarians equal people who believe that any animal can be tamed is uninformed and greatly generalizing. Ignorance abounds in humanity but does mean that it pertains to all of those who might have some similarities to anyone who acts in a less than smart way. I guess we must assume that those who are not vegetarian are smarter and know better.
@spatThey aren't necessarily smarter overall, but non-vegetarian humans are embracing their natural role in the food chain which enhances their chances for survival in situations like this. Surely that's obvious....
@spat @NW-EconomistWe can go back and forth all day, I guess the real determinant is who survives. You can bet I'll never go into a big cat enclosure and my omnivorous instincts enlighten me there...
@NW-Economist I havent't even seen the movie and being condescendent and asuming what I might take to heart or how "people who more readily accept (eating meat) this will do better when forming a perspective on how to deal with the rest of the world" does not make your conclusions correct, they are just your opinion, seemingly you really know how to better "deal with the rest of the world".
@spatWhatever, if you want to deny your nature go ahead. Of course there were societies that did not maximize their nutrition and health choices, and some even denying their nature (our canine teeth, our fairly high molarity stomach HCL, etc.)Â
The point is, humans are part of the food chain whether they want to pretend they aren't or not. The people who more readily accept this will do better when forming a perspective on how to deal with the rest of the world. You may have taken that recent movie about the boy and the tiger stranded at sea too much to heart.Â
@NW-Economist @spat Obvious to you, go tell that to Indians (from India) a whole, millenarian country where most people are vegetarian... and actually have pretty tasty food. Life is full of choices and generalizing about a choice like eating meat or not does not mean that such a choice would or would not "enhance their chances for survival in situations like this (?)"
@NW-Economist Does it say she's a vegetarian?  Because I am one and have nothing but respect for the fact that these are wild animals and will always have the instinct to do what wild animals do.  That is not tamed or bred out of them, ever.
@Doxie @NW-EconomistNo, but vegetarians often are vegetarians for reason that they think it is cruel to harm a living animal. Humans are animals, so are sharks and tigers.Â
Vegetarians are also the most likely to anthropomorphise animals and assign human traits to them, where those traits do not exist.Â
@belsnicklesWhat are you talking about? I LOVE vegetarians, especially in a light wine sauce. ;)
All joking aside, it's not about right or wrong, like or dislike, just what it takes to survive and acknowledge your natural role in an ecosystem.Â
@NW-Economist @Doxie My goodness, what an expert on vegetarians!  I've been one for 30 years and this sort of ridiculous argument is something I've heard over and over.  Just because I don't want to contribute to unnecessary suffering of an animal doesn't mean I don't understand the dangers of said animal.  I wouldn't ever willingly harm an animal, yet I don't in any way doubt what would happen if I strayed into the habitat of an apex predator.  I'd be eaten.  Further, if I had to defend someone's life, I would not hesitate to use whatever force was at hand.  So what's your point?  Besides that you don't like vegetarians (and cats, I guess), I mean?
@NW-Economist@Doxie"anthropomorphise" man you gotta trump card right there!
@NW-Economist @Doxie OK.  Gotcha.