Mass. to appeal inmate sex change surgery ruling

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts will appeal a federal judge's decision to grant a convicted murderer's request for sex reassignment surgery, prison officials announced Wednesday.
The state Department of Correction said that it believes the medical care Michelle Kosilek is receiving is adequate and that the court didn't address what it says are legitimate safety concerns of protecting her in prison.
U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ruled this month that the surgery is the only adequate treatment for Kosilek's gender-identity disorder, a condition Wolf said is a "serious medical need." He said denying surgery violated Kosilek's Eighth Amendment rights. It was the first time a judge has ordered prison officials to provide sex-reassignment surgery to an inmate.
Kosilek, now 63, was named Robert when married to Cheryl Kosilek and was convicted of her 1990 murder. Kosilek has received hormone treatments and lives as a woman in an all-male prison.
"The Department's argument will not center on whether this surgery is a necessary and appropriate treatment for an individual with this particular disorder," DOC spokeswoman Diane Wiffin said in a statement.
"Our responsibilities lie with providing certain levels of medical treatment and keeping the inmates in our care and the public at large safe. We believe appealing this decision will allow us to meet those critical responsibilities," Wiffin said.
Prison officials have repeatedly cited security risks in the case, saying allowing the surgery would make Kosilek a target for sexual assaults by other inmates. Wolf has called that a "pretext" and noted that the department's own medical experts testified that they believe surgery was the only adequate treatment for Kosilek, who has twice tried to commit suicide.
Wolf's ruling led to an outcry among some legislators. They said Kosilek isn't entitled to the taxpayer-funded surgery, which can cost up to $20,000 and is considered elective by many insurance companies.
Advocates said they are disappointed but expect the judge's decision will be upheld.
"Constitutional rights belong to everyone, even the least loved, least popular people among us," said Jennifer Levi, transgender rights project director for Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. "Prisoners have a right to necessary medical care, and this is indisputably medical care, as the very strong district court decision established."
Kosilek's attorney, Frances Cohen, said she had no immediate comment because she hadn't seen an appeal.
Republican state Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr, who had urged the appeal, said, "Requiring the state to fund a medical procedure for a first-degree murderer that many private citizens cannot afford and that those receiving medical coverage from the state do not have the option to receive undermines the public's confidence in government and our institutions of corrections and justice."
Courts around the country have found that prisons must evaluate transgender inmates to determine their health care needs. Most have ordered hormone treatments and psychotherapy.
In a telephone interview from prison last week, Kosilek told the AP that she cried in relief when she learned of Wolf's ruling. She said people who don't understand gender-identity disorder may see it as "bizarre" but "this is who I am. This is who I have always been."
The state Department of Correction said that it believes the medical care Michelle Kosilek is receiving is adequate and that the court didn't address what it says are legitimate safety concerns of protecting her in prison.
U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ruled this month that the surgery is the only adequate treatment for Kosilek's gender-identity disorder, a condition Wolf said is a "serious medical need." He said denying surgery violated Kosilek's Eighth Amendment rights. It was the first time a judge has ordered prison officials to provide sex-reassignment surgery to an inmate.
Kosilek, now 63, was named Robert when married to Cheryl Kosilek and was convicted of her 1990 murder. Kosilek has received hormone treatments and lives as a woman in an all-male prison.
"The Department's argument will not center on whether this surgery is a necessary and appropriate treatment for an individual with this particular disorder," DOC spokeswoman Diane Wiffin said in a statement.
"Our responsibilities lie with providing certain levels of medical treatment and keeping the inmates in our care and the public at large safe. We believe appealing this decision will allow us to meet those critical responsibilities," Wiffin said.
Prison officials have repeatedly cited security risks in the case, saying allowing the surgery would make Kosilek a target for sexual assaults by other inmates. Wolf has called that a "pretext" and noted that the department's own medical experts testified that they believe surgery was the only adequate treatment for Kosilek, who has twice tried to commit suicide.
Wolf's ruling led to an outcry among some legislators. They said Kosilek isn't entitled to the taxpayer-funded surgery, which can cost up to $20,000 and is considered elective by many insurance companies.
Advocates said they are disappointed but expect the judge's decision will be upheld.
"Constitutional rights belong to everyone, even the least loved, least popular people among us," said Jennifer Levi, transgender rights project director for Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. "Prisoners have a right to necessary medical care, and this is indisputably medical care, as the very strong district court decision established."
Kosilek's attorney, Frances Cohen, said she had no immediate comment because she hadn't seen an appeal.
Republican state Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr, who had urged the appeal, said, "Requiring the state to fund a medical procedure for a first-degree murderer that many private citizens cannot afford and that those receiving medical coverage from the state do not have the option to receive undermines the public's confidence in government and our institutions of corrections and justice."
Courts around the country have found that prisons must evaluate transgender inmates to determine their health care needs. Most have ordered hormone treatments and psychotherapy.
In a telephone interview from prison last week, Kosilek told the AP that she cried in relief when she learned of Wolf's ruling. She said people who don't understand gender-identity disorder may see it as "bizarre" but "this is who I am. This is who I have always been."
If we paid for this woman's surgery in 1990 she might not have killer her wife...just saying!
Seriously? This is an example of what is wrong with the U.S.  Trying to decide whether or not to fund a sex change using taxpayer's money is just insane.Â
You have people without homes and hungry and this is even questionable. Man, our priorities are screwed up.
Â
Â
Â
The Dude looks like a Lady...Ok so I stole Steve Tylers line.
Â
This IT almost makes Pelosi look good.
Split the difference. Cut off what he has (with a dull knife and no pain killer), then let him pay to get the new plumbing when he gets out.
You Know this piss's me off. I am  57 and poor. I don't qualify for medicare to young, don't qualify for medicaid because my children are grown. I have REAL medical issues that I can't get the care I deserve yet this guy gets FREE medical. It seems to me being a criminal in our country pays quite well. Free health care, a roof over your head, and 3 meals a day. I must be doing something wrong.
@DeeDee Yes you need to do as he/she did and kill someone then you will be taken care of for the rest of your life; the way many of good law abiding people that need assistance and can't receive it because of people like he/she. This whole thing is wrong, he/she killed someone; he/she dosen't deserve one more penny of the tax payers dollars for some unnessassary procedure. What a crock of crap, leave it to our judical system what a bunch of dumb ...........
okay, this person has been convicted of first degree murder and now taxpayers are expected to pay not only for the gender reassignment surgery (and are already paying for the hormone therapy) but for the extra measures necessary to keep this person safe as a "woman" in an all-male prison? as far as I'm concerned, Kosilek gave up all legal rights and privileges when s/he deliberately took the life of another person. that money can be put to far better use
My question is: Would any medical insurance cover this?
Â
I say parole him and let him deal with his own medical issues.
@OttoMobile For first degree murder? Um, no. Let him do his sentance in the in body he was born with and handle his own gender reassignment when and if he ever gets out.
Is this really what we've come to? How was this not thrown out of court in the first place? My politics are staunchly centrist/moderate, but Sen. Tarr is absolutely correct in this. Being made to exist in the body you were born with is not cruel and unusual punishment by any stretch of the imagination.
And I thought that getting breast augmentation while on active duty in the military was over the top....
I have no problem with him getting gender reassignment surgery, I do have a problem with the fact that he is a killer who expects the tax payers to fund his surgery when many insurance companies consider it an elective surgery. If he wants to be a woman fine, but he needs to find a way to raise the funds to pay for it himself.
@alaska_dreamin Completely with you there....
This fellow has big issues. Â Nutty people can say or think anything. Â What bother's me most in this article is how the AP writer, Steve LeBlanc refers to Robert as a "she" Â Does Steve see himself as an agent of change?
@cheekygesturton Technically "he" is not a "she" until something is cut off.
Well Massachusetts does it again. What is wrong with those people? To many baked beans?
Gender Identity disorder is something I would not wish on anyone but this person did kill another and should not be accommodated as such. You take a life then yours should be forfeit.
This idiot murdered his WIFE. GIVE him the surgery.....without anesthetic, and nothing to stop the bleeding. What the HELL is wrong with our courts? This guy killed someone, and rather than put him to death, they want to pay for an expensive procedure to make him feel better about his IDENTITY? His "identity" at this point, SHOULD be marked with a tombstone.
Elective surgery should not be an option unless the inmate can pay for it them selves. I feel that traditional medical and psychological treatment is all that is required. In this case electro shock treatments have in the past proven 100% effective in relatively high doses. About 100,000 volts should be about right.   Â
 @oldster70 Exactly.  The rest of us can't get elective surgery unless we can afford it.  Why isn't that good enough for convicts?  Something is seriously wrong when the inmates get better treatment than the ones who pay the bills.
This comment has been deleted
 @Cooter_Brown Cooter you have the best comment in here, I agree 100%
Spending other people's money is much easier than spending money you earn yourself. Â This is BS.
When did they send Gloria Steinem up the river for murder? I gotta pay more attention to the news.
Going out on a limb here, but I believe any inmate incarcerated for a capital crime that attempts suicide, should be allowed to succeed.
Ridiculous! Are they seriously considering doing this at the taxpayers expense?
The only medical treatment available to him?? How about a boot in the back side and two for his lawyer and three for this judge!!! I have been out of work since 2008 when a drunk hit me as a pedestrian and I have to sue for disability assistance and this piece of scum criminal gets to piss my hard earned tax money down the toilet??? Time to start tossing a few lawyers and politicians in to the volcanos to see if the gods will bring us better fortunes....
Sick
 @swan sick and a very very stupid judge