Morocco to change law allowing rape marriage

RABAT, Morocco (AP) - Nearly a year after Morocco was shocked by the suicide of a 16-year-old girl who was forced to marry her alleged rapist, the government has announced plans to change the penal code to outlaw the traditional practice.
Women's rights activists on Tuesday welcomed Justice Minister Mustapha Ramid's announcement, but said it was only a first step in reforming a penal code that doesn't do enough to stop violence against women in this North African kingdom.
A paragraph in Article 475 of the penal code allows those convicted of "corruption" or "kidnapping" of a minor to go free if they marry their victim and the practice was encouraged by judges to spare family shame.
Last March, 16-year-old Amina al-Filali poisoned herself to get out of a seven-month-old abusive marriage to a 23-year-old she said had raped her. Her parents and a judge had pushed the marriage to protect the family honor. The incident sparked calls for the law to be changed.
The traditional practice can be found across the Middle East and in places like India and Afghanistan where the loss of a woman's virginity out of wedlock is a huge stain on the honor of the family or tribe.
While the marriage age is officially 18, judges routinely approve much younger unions in this deeply traditional country of 32 million with high illiteracy and poverty.
"Changing this article is a good thing but it doesn't meet all of our demands," said Khadija Ryadi, president of the Moroccan Association for Human Rights. "The penal code has to be totally reformed because it contains many provisions that discriminate against women and doesn't protect women against violence."
She singled out in particular outmoded parts of the law that distinguish between "rape resulting in deflowering and just plain rape." The new article proposed Monday, for instance, gives a 10-year penalty for consensual sex following the corruption of a minor but doubles the sentence if the sex results in "deflowering."
Fouzia Assouli, president of the Democratic League for Women's Rights, echoed Ryadi's concerns, explaining that the code only penalizes violence against women from a moral standpoint "and not because it is just violence."
"The law doesn't recognize certain forms of violence against women, such as conjugal rape, while it still penalizes other normal behavior like sex outside of marriage between adults," she added. Recent government statistics reported that 50 percent of attacks against women occur within conjugal relations.
The change to the penal code has been a long time in coming and follows nearly a year of the Islamist-dominated government balking at reforming the law.
The Justice Ministry at the time argued that al-Filali hadn't been raped and the sex, which took place when she was 15, had been consensual. The prime minister later argued in front of parliament that the marriage provision in the article was, in any case, rarely used.
"In 550 cases of the corruption of minors between 2009 and 2010, only seven were married under Article 475 of the penal code, the rest were pursued by justice," Prime Minister Abdelilah Benkirane said on Dec. 24.
While Morocco updated its family code in 2004, a comprehensive law combating violence against women has been languishing in Parliament for the past eight years.
Social Development Minister Bassima Hakkaoui, the sole female minister in Cabinet, said in September she would try to get the law out of Parliament and passed.
Women's rights activists on Tuesday welcomed Justice Minister Mustapha Ramid's announcement, but said it was only a first step in reforming a penal code that doesn't do enough to stop violence against women in this North African kingdom.
A paragraph in Article 475 of the penal code allows those convicted of "corruption" or "kidnapping" of a minor to go free if they marry their victim and the practice was encouraged by judges to spare family shame.
Last March, 16-year-old Amina al-Filali poisoned herself to get out of a seven-month-old abusive marriage to a 23-year-old she said had raped her. Her parents and a judge had pushed the marriage to protect the family honor. The incident sparked calls for the law to be changed.
The traditional practice can be found across the Middle East and in places like India and Afghanistan where the loss of a woman's virginity out of wedlock is a huge stain on the honor of the family or tribe.
While the marriage age is officially 18, judges routinely approve much younger unions in this deeply traditional country of 32 million with high illiteracy and poverty.
"Changing this article is a good thing but it doesn't meet all of our demands," said Khadija Ryadi, president of the Moroccan Association for Human Rights. "The penal code has to be totally reformed because it contains many provisions that discriminate against women and doesn't protect women against violence."
She singled out in particular outmoded parts of the law that distinguish between "rape resulting in deflowering and just plain rape." The new article proposed Monday, for instance, gives a 10-year penalty for consensual sex following the corruption of a minor but doubles the sentence if the sex results in "deflowering."
Fouzia Assouli, president of the Democratic League for Women's Rights, echoed Ryadi's concerns, explaining that the code only penalizes violence against women from a moral standpoint "and not because it is just violence."
"The law doesn't recognize certain forms of violence against women, such as conjugal rape, while it still penalizes other normal behavior like sex outside of marriage between adults," she added. Recent government statistics reported that 50 percent of attacks against women occur within conjugal relations.
The change to the penal code has been a long time in coming and follows nearly a year of the Islamist-dominated government balking at reforming the law.
The Justice Ministry at the time argued that al-Filali hadn't been raped and the sex, which took place when she was 15, had been consensual. The prime minister later argued in front of parliament that the marriage provision in the article was, in any case, rarely used.
"In 550 cases of the corruption of minors between 2009 and 2010, only seven were married under Article 475 of the penal code, the rest were pursued by justice," Prime Minister Abdelilah Benkirane said on Dec. 24.
While Morocco updated its family code in 2004, a comprehensive law combating violence against women has been languishing in Parliament for the past eight years.
Social Development Minister Bassima Hakkaoui, the sole female minister in Cabinet, said in September she would try to get the law out of Parliament and passed.
And this is why we don't let them help make the big decisions in the world.
And back home we have a crazy Republican New Mexico state representative who has proposed legislation that would make women who get an abortion after being raped or becoming the victim of incest guilty of a felony count of destruction of evidence? Yeah, I'm not a fan either. Here's her contact information. Go wild: Brown, Cathrynn N. 1814 N. Guadalupe Street Carlsbad, NM 88220 cath@cathrynnbrown.com (575) 302-2746
Isn't Islam the most male chauvinist religion ever or what? I wonder if all the stupid young women I see here in America..here in Seattle converting to it realize that?
Silly muslims........
I try my hardest to not be judgemental BUTwhen you hear stories like this it makes it really hard!!!
Sick and twisted.Â
Â
"Nearly a year after Morocco was shocked by the suicide of a 16-year-old girl who was forced to marry her alleged rapist"...
Â
They were SHOCKED that a woman would kill herself after being forced to marry your rapist??!! Really? I think most anyone would be distressed and want to commit suicide to get away from a situation that you have no hope of escaping, unless they have Stockholm's Syndrome. Morocco should've been SHOCKED that she was forced to marry her rapist!! Very archaic...
Welcome to the 17th century, Muslims. Before you know it, you'll hit the 19th!!
I understand that this world is full of cultural differences but how any mother could allow their daughter to marry a man who raped them is beyond me. I'm usually find those who commit suicide to be selfish cowards however in this case my heart aches for that girl and the continous torture she had to endure. I don't blame her for doing what she did because she didn't really have any other choice.
 @Tattooed_Angel "Allowing" it is horrifying enough; to be forced into it so YOU don't shame your family, rather than immediately and permanently erasing your own child's POS rapist is nauseating on so many levels!Â
@Tattooed_Angel Often the mother has no say in matters like this- the father is the head of the family and he makes the decissions, if there is no father than it is an uncle or other male family member who is in charge. I don't understand how anyone could live with themselves knowing they were making a girl/woman marry someone who would hurt them day after day.Â
I am at a loss as to why this was even allowed in the first place -- I don't give a damn if its someone's religion -- it comes down to human decency. It sure makes me appreciate the freedoms we have here in America.
 @The WA Mama Human decency, in many cultures, only applies to "men."
God bless America.
These kind of archaic laws exist all over the world, unfortunately. I am glad that the govt is finally looking into changing things in Morocco and I hope other countries with similar law do the same!
Well, guess I'm not moving to Morocco afterall.
The mother was part of the family that forced the kid to marry and now she's wailing--"Oh! My child is dead." What a hypocrite! What would she have done if the girl didn't marry? Force her to commit suicide to save the family honor?
Those countries need a few Lorena Bobbits!!
 @Just a dude - I'm pretty sure if they had  a Bobbit, she would beheaded in the public square.
Sheesh about time.. welcome to the 21st century!
Â
I'm pretty sure that is what you find in the Bible, too. Â Â
Â
I saw what was supposed to be a cutesy sign in a store the other day "I married you so I could kiss you whenever I wanted to.." Â Really? Â How about some personal space?Â
@DT I think you need to read it more carefully, I seem to remember a story where the raped girls brothers killed the rapists
@DT what's wrong with that? it's not like that sign says "i married you so I could F you whenever i wanted to". Please just say no if anyone is dumb enough to ever propose to you.
 @DT It also plagiarizes the movie Sweet Home Alabama; the male main character said it to the female main character when they were little kids.Â
What a sick and twisted society.
Will they call it the Mary Kay LeTourneau Act?
Hopefully they'll learn to love each other when he reunites with her in Heaven.
Funny isn't it. The same Bible thumpers here cry, gay marriage is an abomination it says so in the Bible but when you bring up that the Bible also says if you rape a woman you are obligated to marry her negating the rape - well that's just barbaric.
Â
Hey, the Bible says so...
 @Howard Beale Morocco is a Christian nation?
 @aintno1special Your ignorance on the difference between the Torah, Bible and Qur'an is showing.
Â
Â
 @lakeview - try telling that to a Muslim.
 @cm257n7  @Howard Beale Recall this is being translated...ever try to directly translate a phrase from English into another language and have it mean something totally different?
 @aintno1special  @Howard Beale I'm thinking the "lay hold on her" part is the nice way of saying rape
 @Howard Beale  @lakeview I think the comment that Jews, Muslims, and Christian worship the same good is simplifying things. I agree, as you, there are general similarities but IMO they are not the "same" God.
Â
As I re-read your original post I see that I misread your meaning, and was wondering what your point was...now I understand what you were saying, but still disagree..but for different reasoning now.
@Howard Beale
28Â If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
29Â Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days. (KJV)
Â
I think the term rape has been implied or wrongly translated from the original text.In the King James version I see nothing about forcing the woman to do anything.
Â
Â
 @lakeview  @aintno1special 1000% correct. There are broad differences but in the most simplistic of terms:
Â
Jews believe in one true God, that Jesus was not the Messiah, but a prophet, and the Messiah has still not come.
Â
Christians believe in one true God, that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah, and are awaiting his second coming.
Â
Practitioners of Islam believe in one true God, that Jesus was a high prophet, who will judge the living and the dead on Judgement day, and who sits next to God the father, but that Muhammad was the Jewish Messiah, and are awaiting his second coming.
Â
I wrote a reply to our somewhat uninformed friend on how the foundations of the Torah, Bible, and Qur'an are the same. There is ZERO deviation between the Torah and the Bible (Bible defined under any mainstream Christian religion in the world) and the first five books. They are identical. The Qur'an is a bit more complicated, but in principal it is largely the same (translation is different in some details - but I'm bordering on getting technical).
Â
Huh - and here I thought when I was forced to study religion for four years that it was a complete waste of my time.
 @Mikeftm  @aintno1special Oh, I see, the first five books. Thank you I already knew that. So lets see, the first five books of the Old Testament:
Â
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Â
All five of those books are in the Bible, recognized by every mainstream Protestant religion, the Catholic Church, and Eastern Orthodox Sects. That's important, because the Protestant religions acknowledge 39 books of the Old Testament, the Catholic Church 46, and Eastern Orthodox Sects 51.
Â
Now, Deuteronomy, which is in the Torah, the Bible (Old Testament) and is, to keep things on the simple sized, heavily paraphrased in the Qur'an (as the Qur'an is steeped heavily in both the Old and New Testament, with details/facts changed, and the most critical point being that Jesus is seen as a high prophet. Even under the Muslim faith they believe on Judgement Day it will be Jesus who will render judgement to the people)
Â
Now, lets look at Deuteronomy 22:28 (NIV)
Â
...If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29Â he shall pay her father fifty shekels[c] of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives...
Â
Now, what about gay relationships. Oh that's covered in the Bible too. And guess what my friend, in the first five books. Specifically in Leviticus. Lets go back. In the Torah. In the Old Testament if you're Protestant, Catholic, or Eastern Orthodox.
Â
Leviticus 18:22
Â
...Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable...
Â
The punishment for this is covered also in Leviticus 18:29-30
Â
...29Â ââEveryone who does any of these detestable thingsâsuch persons must be cut off from their people. 30Â Keep my requirements and do not follow any of the detestable customs that were practiced before you came and do not defile yourselves with them. I am the Lord your God.ââ...
Â
So, my foot. I have no idea how it tastes because I was right, and have provided substantial evidence to support that.
Â
If you are against gay marriage because, "the Bible tells me so," then you must also be in favor or the marriage of rape victims to dissolve the issue of the rape. I mean, "the Bible tells me so."
Â
As does the Torah and the Qur'an.
Â
Islam and Catholicism both trace their roots, HEAVILY in fact, back to Judaism. Muhammad learned of God and Christianity from a monk while on caravan as a young teen, and was told he would be a servant/prophet for God. Each extends to each other - but the dogma on sexuality is instituted strongly in all three religions, tracing back to the Old Testament, between the two books I noted.
Â
Hopefully you can be the bigger man and apologize now.
 @aintno1special Jews, Christians, and Muslims all worship the same God.Â
 @Mikeftm Mike, the Bible is composed of the Old and New Testaments.Â
Â
Let me give you an example that you'll identify with immediately. The story of Adam and Eve in Genesis. Genesis is the first book of the Christian Bible, but it's from the Old Testament.Â
Â
Careful when you call people ignorant without doing your homework. I mean, I'm not even a practicing Christian, and I thought that it was basic common sense that the Bible includes the Old Testament.Â
 @Howard Beale The Islamic and Christian views differ greatly. While the basis may be from the same cloth the contradictions are numerous. I noticed you used the term Bible in your post the Christian book of faith, not Islamic.
 @Howard Beale  @aintno1special
 Sorry Howie, but you're the one displaying some pretty heavy duty weapons grade ignorance here. The Torah, also known as the Pentateuch, comprises the first 5 books of the Old Testament.
Â
How's that foot taste?
 @aintno1special  @Howard Beale Try reading Howard's post again. The Moroccan "traditional practice" described in this article is also found in the Christian Bible. Rape a woman? Make it "right" by marrying her, according to Yahweh.
Â
I hope you'll remember this little factoid the next time somebody says you have to hate gays because it's in the Bible.
 @Sutekh - that part of the Bible is the Old Testament, that was the original books of Judasim - it's not in the New Testament, the books written after Jesus arrived.  Those laws were the laws of the land just like some of our own crazy laws today.  The Bible gives a history of humanity as well as the ways of God.  I'm not sure but I think there are some man made 'rules' intertwined within the Old Testament.  In many countries then, and even now, women are still considered lesser beings.  We happen to live in a more enlightened country - aren't you glad?Â
At least to the Western world, forcing a girl to marry her rapist is incredibly shameful and reprehensible behavior by her family, and punishes the victim when the real shame is on the rapist and not on his victim's family. Nothing could be more shameful to a family, in my opinion, than forcing their daughter into a marriage filled with rape.
 @spacegoddess Agreed.
The "shaming the family" crap and the mistreatment of half the population because they are women (or if you are India it is a smaller ratio due to aborting female fetuses in favor of males) needs to end and people need to live in the 21st century.Â