Obama: No evidence of security breach in scandal
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama said Wednesday he has seen no evidence that national security was threatened by the widening sex scandal that ensnared his former CIA director and top military commander in Afghanistan.
Facing questions from reporters, Obama also reaffirmed his belief that the U.S. can't afford to continue tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, a key sticking point in negotiations with Republicans over the impending "fiscal cliff." He said, "The American people understood what they were getting" when they voted for him after a campaign that focused heavily on taxes.
And he defiantly told critics of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, a potential candidate to lead the State Department, that they should "go after me" - not her - if they have issues with the administration's handling of the deadly attacks on Americans in Benghazi, Libya. His words were aimed at Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have vowed to block Rice's potential nomination.
The president addressed those topics and others for about 50 minutes in his first news conference since he won re-election last week. His party also picked up seats in both houses of Congress, but the president refrained from claiming a broad mandate, other than for protecting middle class families.
The tangled email scandal that cost David Petraeus his CIA career and led to an investigation of Gen. John Allen has disrupted Obama's plans to keep a narrow focus on the economy coming out of the election. And it has overshadowed his efforts to build support behind his re-election pledge to make the wealthy pay more in taxes in order to reduce the federal deficit.
Obama said he hoped the scandal would be a "single side note" in Petraeus' otherwise extraordinary career.
Petraeus resigned as head of the CIA last Friday because of an extramarital affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, who U.S. officials say sent harassing emails to a woman she viewed as a rival for the former general's affection. The investigation revealed that that woman, Jill Kelley, also exchanged sometimes-flirtatious messages with Allen.
Obama brushed aside questions about whether he was informed about the FBI investigations that led to the disclosures quickly enough. White House officials first learned about the investigations last Wednesday, the day after the election, and Obama was alerted the following day.
"My expectation is that they follow the protocols that they've already established," Obama said. "One of the challenges here is that we're not supposed to meddle in criminal investigations and that's been our practice."
Turning back to the economy, the president vowed not to cave to Republicans who have pressed for tax cuts first passed by George W. Bush to be extended for all income earners. Obama has long opposed extending the cuts for families making more than $250,000 a year, but he gave into GOP demands in 2010 when the cuts were up for renewal.
That won't happen this time around, he said Wednesday.
"Two years ago the economy was in a different situation," Obama said. "But what I said at the time was what I meant. Which was this is a one-time proposition."
The president and Congress are also seeking to avoid across-the-board spending cuts scheduled to take effect because lawmakers failed to reach a deal to reduce the federal deficit. Failure to act would lead to spending cuts and higher taxes on all Americans, with middle-income families paying an average of about $2,000 more next year, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.
Obama said he was "open to new ideas" but would not allow current tax rates to continue for the top 2 percent of wage earners, drawing a line for Republicans who say they will not tolerate any tax rate increases. Asked if the tax rates for the rich had to return to Clinton-era levels, Obama indicated he was open to negotiations.
Looking ahead to his second-term agenda, Obama pledged quick action on comprehensive immigration reform, but said climate change would be a tougher slog. There was little action on either issue during his first term.
Obama said he expected that a comprehensive immigration reform bill would be introduced "very soon after my inauguration." The White House is already engaged in conversations with Capitol Hill.
He said the legislation should make permanent the administrative changes he made earlier this year that allow some young illegal immigrants to remain in the country legally. He said that the overall bill should include a "pathway to legal status" for the millions of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally but haven't committed crimes unrelated to immigration.
On climate change, Obama said he would soon start conversations with Congress and industry to sound out their positions.
Before tackling those issues and others, Obama will have to face the departure of several key Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers. Among those expected to leave are Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry are the leading candidates to replace Clinton. Rice is a favorite of the president, but she has faced intense criticism for her role in the initial administration response to the deaths of four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, during an attack
"When they go after the U.N. ambassador, apparently because they think she's an easy target, then they've got a problem with me," Obama said. "And should I choose, if I think that she would be the best person to serve America, in the capacity of the State Department, then I will nominate her. That's not a determination that I've made yet."
Graham responded quickly after the president's news conference, saying he did, in fact, hold Obama responsible for the Benghazi attack.
"I think you failed as commander in chief before, during, and after the attack," Graham said in a statement.
Obama broke no new ground on some of the key foreign policy issues facing him in his second term. He reiterated his long-standing position that there is still time for the U.S. and its allies to find a diplomatic solution to its nuclear standoff with Iran. And of the ongoing civil war in Syria, he said the U.S. considers opposition groups as representative of the Syrian people but is not prepared to recognize them as a government in exile, as France has done.
Facing questions from reporters, Obama also reaffirmed his belief that the U.S. can't afford to continue tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, a key sticking point in negotiations with Republicans over the impending "fiscal cliff." He said, "The American people understood what they were getting" when they voted for him after a campaign that focused heavily on taxes.
And he defiantly told critics of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, a potential candidate to lead the State Department, that they should "go after me" - not her - if they have issues with the administration's handling of the deadly attacks on Americans in Benghazi, Libya. His words were aimed at Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have vowed to block Rice's potential nomination.
The president addressed those topics and others for about 50 minutes in his first news conference since he won re-election last week. His party also picked up seats in both houses of Congress, but the president refrained from claiming a broad mandate, other than for protecting middle class families.
The tangled email scandal that cost David Petraeus his CIA career and led to an investigation of Gen. John Allen has disrupted Obama's plans to keep a narrow focus on the economy coming out of the election. And it has overshadowed his efforts to build support behind his re-election pledge to make the wealthy pay more in taxes in order to reduce the federal deficit.
Obama said he hoped the scandal would be a "single side note" in Petraeus' otherwise extraordinary career.
Petraeus resigned as head of the CIA last Friday because of an extramarital affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, who U.S. officials say sent harassing emails to a woman she viewed as a rival for the former general's affection. The investigation revealed that that woman, Jill Kelley, also exchanged sometimes-flirtatious messages with Allen.
Obama brushed aside questions about whether he was informed about the FBI investigations that led to the disclosures quickly enough. White House officials first learned about the investigations last Wednesday, the day after the election, and Obama was alerted the following day.
"My expectation is that they follow the protocols that they've already established," Obama said. "One of the challenges here is that we're not supposed to meddle in criminal investigations and that's been our practice."
Turning back to the economy, the president vowed not to cave to Republicans who have pressed for tax cuts first passed by George W. Bush to be extended for all income earners. Obama has long opposed extending the cuts for families making more than $250,000 a year, but he gave into GOP demands in 2010 when the cuts were up for renewal.
That won't happen this time around, he said Wednesday.
"Two years ago the economy was in a different situation," Obama said. "But what I said at the time was what I meant. Which was this is a one-time proposition."
The president and Congress are also seeking to avoid across-the-board spending cuts scheduled to take effect because lawmakers failed to reach a deal to reduce the federal deficit. Failure to act would lead to spending cuts and higher taxes on all Americans, with middle-income families paying an average of about $2,000 more next year, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.
Obama said he was "open to new ideas" but would not allow current tax rates to continue for the top 2 percent of wage earners, drawing a line for Republicans who say they will not tolerate any tax rate increases. Asked if the tax rates for the rich had to return to Clinton-era levels, Obama indicated he was open to negotiations.
Looking ahead to his second-term agenda, Obama pledged quick action on comprehensive immigration reform, but said climate change would be a tougher slog. There was little action on either issue during his first term.
Obama said he expected that a comprehensive immigration reform bill would be introduced "very soon after my inauguration." The White House is already engaged in conversations with Capitol Hill.
He said the legislation should make permanent the administrative changes he made earlier this year that allow some young illegal immigrants to remain in the country legally. He said that the overall bill should include a "pathway to legal status" for the millions of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally but haven't committed crimes unrelated to immigration.
On climate change, Obama said he would soon start conversations with Congress and industry to sound out their positions.
Before tackling those issues and others, Obama will have to face the departure of several key Cabinet secretaries and White House staffers. Among those expected to leave are Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry are the leading candidates to replace Clinton. Rice is a favorite of the president, but she has faced intense criticism for her role in the initial administration response to the deaths of four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, during an attack
"When they go after the U.N. ambassador, apparently because they think she's an easy target, then they've got a problem with me," Obama said. "And should I choose, if I think that she would be the best person to serve America, in the capacity of the State Department, then I will nominate her. That's not a determination that I've made yet."
Graham responded quickly after the president's news conference, saying he did, in fact, hold Obama responsible for the Benghazi attack.
"I think you failed as commander in chief before, during, and after the attack," Graham said in a statement.
Obama broke no new ground on some of the key foreign policy issues facing him in his second term. He reiterated his long-standing position that there is still time for the U.S. and its allies to find a diplomatic solution to its nuclear standoff with Iran. And of the ongoing civil war in Syria, he said the U.S. considers opposition groups as representative of the Syrian people but is not prepared to recognize them as a government in exile, as France has done.
Just how in the He!! would he know if any security was breached. He has no time to be bothered with such thing as "security breaches" with his busy schedule on the talk show circuit plus golf. No time , no time And we have four more yeas of this to look forward to. MG what have we done to ourselves ??
I don't really care about who emails who. What happened to cause the unnecessary deaths of four Americans in a hostile foreign land!?
This is a great start to 4 more years of distraction and submission.
And the majority are far too ignornat to understand.
Â
Obies first 4 years were all about what sticks to the wall. If it didn't, they'd throw something different. All the while trying to get a 'feel' for what the people were outraged about. No sticky? No problem. Howsabout THIS?
Â
In the mean time, our country is in shambles, and the class warfare continues. Playing the race card continues. ANYTHING to divert the attention of the people as to what's really going on.
Â
Benghazi debacle? Here's a couple Generals that should deflect the matter.
Â
Four more years of the same blaiming someone else and shifting attention to what's REALY going on behind the scenes.
Hey, it's just another day. Go back to sleep.
Â
Â
 @bobalouieÂ
("And the majority are far too ignornat to understand.")
Â
Thank you so very much for expressing your contempt for your fellow citizens. That statement says about all there needs to be said by you.
@WSims007 @bobalouie Contempt is a justifiable reaction to the reelection of Socialist Obama. Obamacare is a ticking time bomb. He would sell his own mother (if she were alive) to win the election. Remember he got the electoral votes, but his margin of victory in the final tally of real votes ain't that big. Socialist Obama is set to put the final nail in the coffin of this country with his anti-business agenda. And naive lemmings such as yourself who relies on commentary from "The View" for their election decisions will rightly be blamed
 @jdoll88  @WSims007  @bobalouie Just that fact that children get free education is socialism. As @WSims007 says, you clearly don't understand socialism. Obama is your leader for the next four years. All of the rest of the Western world is happy about it. More than half of America is happy about it. Get over it.
 @jdoll88 Â
Socialist Obama? You don't really understand what socialism is that's for sure.As for the tally of the votes, if what Bush had was considered a "mandate", and he had fewer for sure, then what Obama received which is far more in both ballots and electoral, is a larger mandate...he won. You are better at pushing the personal invectives than at understanding the various political processes.
Amazing how this scandal came up when the "joke" dems got together to investigate the Libya murder of our ambassador. Hmm. Maybe to draw attention away from Obomination? I expect to see an "unfortunate" and "coincidential" accident befalling Petreaus in order to ensure he doesnt embarrass Obomination about Libya.
 @Nuclearian To late / Petreaus already has embarrassed the Obumbler. He said he thinks it was a terrorist attack. At least there is one honest person speaking out about this attack, his personal life not withstanding. I don't have a lot of use for "cheaters"
@Nuclearian  That's ridiculous. The last mysterious accidents(deaths) befell Democrats, I think, at the hands of..the other party. Obama does not need to be afraid for the truth to come out.
@Nuclearian So how much are you willing to put up and what are your odds?
Hasn't taken the republicans any time at all to get back to their game of distraction, accusatory, blame, pointing fingers and avoid the business of moving forward in taking care of the real business of government. Perhaps, on the next round of elections we can throw all of them - especially McCain and Graham - OUT.
 @ytboarder So Americans being murdered by terrorists in Benghaz is a game of distraction to you? A game??
Susan Rice denying the truth about the attacks about Benghaz and intentionally misleading us is a game?
I think Barak feigning outrage over those seeking the truth and REAL answers is the game here.
Throw McCain out because he seeks said truth and answers? OK comrade....take a look at a map....United States, not Soviet States....we have no Siberia.
 @Sydthepiper Â
And as for games, I suppose that you tossing around that "conspiracy" thing is ok by you? Any time you can actually prove that Obama is lying, and I do mean prove, go right ahead.
 @John E. Wraughton Mr. Cotlove, the Almighty Administrator, deleted 3 of my accounts under the old system....mostly for no true rule break...just bad PC...so I have been there.
Sid seems pretty bright...he'll be back
Being that I am pretty much on opposite spectrum of Cappy, I'll reserve judgement on him.
 @John E. Wraughton Maybe he's just taking a respite....a break from this political season. Even the Snarkmaster needs a vacation.
 @Vertically Inclined The fact that what she said was not true does not make it a lie.
 @Vertically Inclined Â
I believe that the Congress, the Senate, the FBI, and the CIA are all looking into this sordid concoction of a real mess. And I have a strong hunch that 'both women' have played a major role in this being 'stupid' beyond imagination.
 @WSims007  @Sydthepiper Agreed.  On that note, this entire thing should be dug into by Congress to determine the validity of the charges.  Â
- I just read your latest post, and I agree. Â It's time to let the investigations occur.Â
 @Vertically Inclined Â
Nothing gets dismissed until any investigation either shows it or dismisses it. And I refuse to read anything into any story until said investigations have been carried out. So far, the investigations continue.
 @SydthepiperÂ
When one makes the charge, then it falls to that one to provide evidence of the charge, just saying it is so does not constitute proof.
 @WSims007  @Sydthepiper But Susan Rice *did* lie.  And as the President said in today's Press meeting (I was watching), "The white house sent her".   So, there's much more to this story, perhaps a justified national security risk.Â
Â
Nonetheless, this is not something to be dismissed simply because you like the President.
 @WSims007 Politicians, like car salesman, lie by nature.
You ask me to prove he's lying...I ask you to prove he's not.
Â
Clinton: " I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
Bush #1:Â "Read my lips, no new taxes".
Â
No need for conspiracy son, no need at all.
Why are journalist so dumb? Four people were murdered in Libya and journalist are silent; no analysis, no questions asked, no "investigative" journalism. But, hey look, real life Mad Men is happen, and oh boy, every hardcore investigative "journalist" is bending over backwards to cover it. Journalist = adolescent high school newspaper reporters.Â
 @GeorgeG. Reporting on the truth of Obamanation knowing about the Assassination of our ambassador, and having done nothing about it, would have helped keep this Socialist/Communist out of the White House. That is why it wasnt reported. The major socialist networks wanted the bum put back in, so they conveniently left that out. They wanted the village idiot for another four years, and they, along with the Americans that suck off the public teats, got it,
 @GeorgeG.Â
And no one knows anything about it because no one is writing about it? What do you read the media with? A blindfold? Or perhaps you just listen/watch it with both ear plugs and a blindfold? Many journalists have been, and still are "looking into this". So now, why don't you just continue to drag those dead bodies around some more...that does a whole lot.
What this nation REALLY could not afford was a major tax cut affecting almost exclusively the very wealthy - coupled with the costs of two major wars lasting FAR longer than promised and one fought really for the sole purpose of seeking retribution on an estranged business partner of a former President - and then coupled with a whole stack of no-bid contracts given to a company "formerly" headed by the then-sitting Vice President, which company promptly moved its HQ to Dubai to avoid U.S. financial reporting and taxes. No con game there, certainly!
This is silly. If anyone's actions in connection with the Petraeus/Broadwell/Allen/Kelley/ShirtlessFool/WhoeverElse scandal actually did compromise national security, Obama would further jeopardize national security by saying anything about it. Graham knows that, which allows him to grandstand all he wants with impunity.
He sure did dance around the Benghazi questions. At one point he said they had already turned over everything they knew, moments later he said they could cooperate and turn over everything they know. Perhaps a slip up, we all know he is not the greatest speaker without the teleprompters. He still didn't answer the question to my satisfaction.
Well they relected him to four more and were still going to hell in a hand basket, oh well time to vacation in the Gulf of Mexico...
I sure hope the General did not Betraeus?? Men cannot seem to handle Power very well.
 @missyk Hmm. I thought Hillary was a woman. Secretary of State, and cant do HER job?
@missyk Sure they can. However quite a few women just seem to go all coo coo for cocoa puffs over men with power. Probably for obvious reasons. And when certain women start spreading their legs for these menâ¦.. Well we already know what happens in quite a few instances. I.e. a number of men canât (or can) handle that. Ms. Broadwell (how appropriate) is just one case in point. Man, based on a lot of what she was doing, she is obviously just one crazzzyyy a** broadâ¦.well.
 @missyk Nice one but they have all Paetread US. Men has nothing to do with us.
How about making EVERYONE pay "their fair share" of taxes, then clean up the massive welfare and unemployment fraud that is a drain on everyone? Oh, that's right, then it looks like you are attacking the poor, and nobody gets elected addressing the real issue. Stick to class warfare, that seems to do the trick.
 @JK15 No we must not initiate taxes on the rich rather sock it to the middle-class and poor! The poor will be in for a rude awakening pertaining to taxes, reduced social welfare programs and employment reduction pertaining to menial positions. Small businesses in addition will continue to suffer to the point of bankruptcy. The rich will continue to prosper, take a vacation and enjoy next to nothing in taxes after all they're such good job creators. Are you happy?
 @Funky-Munky "Small businesses in addition will continue to suffer to the point of bankruptcy."
Â
Yes, they will. Especially in this business unfriendly tax environment that is about to get worse.
Â
Simplify the tax system!!! Eliminate loopholes and lower rates!!!
That way everybody gets what they want out of it.
 @JK15  @Funky-Munky  @acepaul A flat tax is the only fair tax.  Fair means fair, not what some politician thinks it is.
 @Funky-Munky  @acepaul If people want to keep using the buzz words "paying their fair share" than I will be happy when they do just that. Tax everyone 15% of their income and call it good. A person making 30,000 would have a tax liability of 4500, and a person making 2 mil would be paying 300K. That, in my opinion, is everyone paying their fair share. And if you don't feel that welfare and unemployment fraud are major factors in our financial woes, than you my friend are the one who's head is in the clouds.
 @acepaul Sad many people still have their heads in the clouds... Storm is coming.... sad. :(
 @acepaul  @Funky-Munky Taxing business is futile, simply an expense passed on to the consumer. However, The USA and the states need a tax base from which to operate. Some times too much for certain projects that certain states or local Gov'ts can cover but still are of benifit to the whole. Sadly often times BIG business forgets this. To solve this I would suggest at a moderate rate going away from a business tax. To taxing at a standard % rate for income tax of equal to an individuals earningings. working over time to a flat tax.Encuraging the movement of money and not its stagnation.
Did you ever grow any thin while you let it sit at ground level?
 How bout a "tax the over paid government worker plan" They're always talking about raising taxes anyway let them have it. Could also have a tax the government worker- don't like it quit tax.
 @CrankyPanky ...ahem... there is a 50% of your total assets abroad and domestic not getting elected tax!
 @CrankyPanky The problem is it needs to start with the Three Branches of Oligarchy first. Their idea is to attack the average joe state worker or any other individual beneath them.
Well that means I can sleep better tonight ....................................................
It's a numbers game (and he's admitted he's nearly innumerate). There simply isn't enough money among the high-income earners to balance it on their backs. It is a simple arithmetic fact that either spending has to be radically cut, or tax increases must extend well down into the middle class. Anyone that says otherwise is lying or ignorant. Your move, mr winner.
This comment has been deleted
This comment has been deleted
3 2 1 Damage control....
Cut that spending Mr. Obama. The first thing you should do to show the American public you're serious is to cut Presidential, Congressional and SCOTUS pensions. Next put yourself, all of congress and the members of SCOTUS on Obamacare. Next: tax all "lawmaker" salaries at the rate you propose for those making over $250K/year.
Â
Show us that you feel the pain.
 @Gino That's called being petty. I know you're irked your candidate lost the election but how in the world would reducing elected official's pensions diffuse the deficit? Don't tell me you think pay cuts and tax hikes on politicians and lawmakers will suddenly spur the country into some altruistic trance; it's an absolutely pointless suggestion born out of anti-government sentiment and not even remotely relevant to the nation's debt. Lastly, "show us that you feel the pain?" He lived through the sixties and early seventies as the child of a multi-racial marriage...I think his comprehension of pain is beyond monetary worth.
 @windtreeman That's not being petty. That's making the people who are supposedly "serving" in the government understand that they don't get a free ride forever on the taxpayer's dime.
Â
And cut the bleeding heart crap. "I think his comprehension of pain is beyond monetary worth." Is that why he is such an elitist snob?
I think they call it being touchy feely.
 @windtreeman  @Gino I don't totally agree with Gino's feel but Gov't employees included elected officials should have no better benifits that the average citizen once voted out of office or retired. It simply gives them another entitlement. Similar if not exact retirement, medical. etc the same for corporate america's CEOs and execs. privelege be it by the gov't or business should have it's limits.
@windtreeman @Gino - the thing that these right wingers fail to acknowledge is that some very significant cuts have already been made. Yeah - there's a lot more than can be - but it's not like they haven't done any. Â
Â
Then of course, there's the fact that Obama and the dems DO actually want to make significant cuts. However, they beleive that you cannot fix the entire problem merely by cutting taxes and cutting spending.  The Repubs think the opposite.
Â
And what's very, very pathetic is that usually these 'cut spending and don't you dare raise anyone's taxes' types refuse to allow the government to cut the types of government spending that THEY are in favor of.... Instead the demand that the government go make the cuts in things that other people want instead... They are thier own hypocrites - demanding cuts BUT NOT IN THE THINGS I WANT.
Â
Pathetic. And very, very extremely unrealistic.
@Unsalvageable A lot of that 6T was already baked in by the (off the books and on the China card) 2 wars, Medicare Part D, TARP, most of â09 still under the last shrub_darth_paulson budget, plus interest on same. Unfortunately, I guess, Obama put them on the books. Go figure. And doubled?
 @FormerMarineSgt  @windtreeman  OK LEFTY LUNATICS! Before you start throwing names around you should figure out who you're talking to and what that person is trying to say.
Â
What I was trying to say was that before they start cutting spending on things that will hurt the common folks, they should cut their own benefits. I never said a word about not raising taxes.
@FormerMarineSgt A good start would have been not to add 6 trillion to the national debt...but that doesn't matter because now he wants to reduce spending and raise taxes to save us. Use some logic. If he really cared about the out of control spending he would not have doubled the national debt and he would have demanded that a budget be passed these last few years. It is all lip service from both parties!
 @FormerMarineSgt Just out of curiosity, what "significant cuts" are you specifically talking about? And if they are so significant, why do we still have record deficits? Oh, because we don't have high enough taxes?
 @Gino I think I am coming down with a serious case of religious discountenance to Obamacare. Unfortunately, I can't afford the insurance to see a doctor about it...