Obama taps Hagel for Pentagon, Brennan for CIA

WASHINGTON (AP) - Despite Republican misgivings, President Barack Obama announced Monday he will nominate former GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel as his next defense secretary, calling him "the leader our troops deserve." He also chose White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan to lead the Central Intelligence Agency.
Controversy surrounds both choices, but the president called on the Senate to quickly confirm both.
"The work of protecting our nation is never done. We've got much to do," Obama said at the East Room announcement. "My most solemn obligation is the security of our people."
Obama announced his choice of Hagel, a political moderate who represented Nebraska in the Senate, even as critics questioned the pick over issues including Hagel's views on Israel and Iran.
Facing a potential fight to get Hagel confirmed by the Senate, Obama praised his independence and bipartisan approach, and said that Hagel, a Vietnam veteran, understands war is not an abstraction. He also praised Hagel, 66, as one who could make "tough fiscal choices" in a time of increasing austerity.
Brennan, 57, a 25-year CIA veteran, is a close Obama adviser who has served in his present post for four years.
The president praised him as one of America's most skilled and respected intelligence professionals. Obama said Brennan and Hagel understand that "the work of protecting our nation is never done."
Brennan withdrew from consideration for the spy agency's top job in 2008 amid questions about his connection to harsh interrogation techniques used during the George W. Bush administration.
Hagel, in brief remarks, thanked Obama "for this opportunity to serve this country again, especially its men and women in uniform. ... These are people who give so much to this nation every day."
Hagel voted for U.S. military involvement in the Iraq war at first but later opposed it. He broke ranks with other Republicans to support Obama for president in 2008.
If confirmed, he would replace Leon Panetta as defense secretary.
Obama said Panetta, standing with the others alongside the president, had "earned the right to return to civilian life."
Panetta was CIA director before Obama tapped him to be defense chief.
Along with secretary of state nominee Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., Hagel and Brennan would play key roles implementing and shaping Obama's national security priorities in a second term. All three men must be confirmed by the Senate.
In nominating Hagel, Obama signaled he is willing to take on a tough confirmation fight. Once Hagel emerged as Obama's likely nominee, GOP lawmakers began sharply questioning his commitment to Israel and his willingness to take a hard line with Iran over its disputed nuclear program.
Of Brennan, Obama said he had an "invaluable perspective" on global affairs. He has traveled extensively in the Middle East and was once CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia. Brennan helped orchestrate administration policy in Yemen and the response to the Arab Spring, and played a role in the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
"I will make it my mission to make sure that the CIA has the tools it needs to keep our nation safe and that its work always reflects the liberties, freedoms and values that we hold so dear," Brennan said in brief remarks.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., issued a statement shortly after the White House announcement on Brennan, saying he had "many questions and concerns about his nomination to be director of the Central Intelligence Agency, especially what role he played in the so-called enhanced interrogation programs while serving at the CIA during the last administration, as well as his public defense of those programs."
Hagel, something of a maverick among Republican senators during his two terms, has criticized the discussion of a military strike by either the U.S. or Israel against Iran. He also irritated some Israel backers with his reference to the "Jewish lobby" in the United States. And he has backed efforts to bring Iran to the table for future peace talks in Afghanistan.
Obama said that when he and Hagel served in the Senate "I came to admire his courage and his judgment, his willingness to speak his mind even if it wasn't popular, even if it defied the conventional wisdom. That's exactly the spirit I want on my national security team - a recognition that when it comes to the defense of our country, we are not Democrats or Republicans. We are Americans."
Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., has called Hagel's foreign policy views "outside the mainstream" and has said he would be "the most antagonistic secretary of defense toward the state of Israel in our nation's history."
Although bracing for a confirmation fight over Hagel, the administration has expressed confidence both its nominees will be confirmed.
Supporters of Hagel's nomination have said it would be hard for Republicans to reject a former colleague, especially one who's a Vietnam veteran and served on the Foreign Relations and Intelligence committees.
Controversy surrounds both choices, but the president called on the Senate to quickly confirm both.
"The work of protecting our nation is never done. We've got much to do," Obama said at the East Room announcement. "My most solemn obligation is the security of our people."
Obama announced his choice of Hagel, a political moderate who represented Nebraska in the Senate, even as critics questioned the pick over issues including Hagel's views on Israel and Iran.
Facing a potential fight to get Hagel confirmed by the Senate, Obama praised his independence and bipartisan approach, and said that Hagel, a Vietnam veteran, understands war is not an abstraction. He also praised Hagel, 66, as one who could make "tough fiscal choices" in a time of increasing austerity.
Brennan, 57, a 25-year CIA veteran, is a close Obama adviser who has served in his present post for four years.
The president praised him as one of America's most skilled and respected intelligence professionals. Obama said Brennan and Hagel understand that "the work of protecting our nation is never done."
Brennan withdrew from consideration for the spy agency's top job in 2008 amid questions about his connection to harsh interrogation techniques used during the George W. Bush administration.
Hagel, in brief remarks, thanked Obama "for this opportunity to serve this country again, especially its men and women in uniform. ... These are people who give so much to this nation every day."
Hagel voted for U.S. military involvement in the Iraq war at first but later opposed it. He broke ranks with other Republicans to support Obama for president in 2008.
If confirmed, he would replace Leon Panetta as defense secretary.
Obama said Panetta, standing with the others alongside the president, had "earned the right to return to civilian life."
Panetta was CIA director before Obama tapped him to be defense chief.
Along with secretary of state nominee Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., Hagel and Brennan would play key roles implementing and shaping Obama's national security priorities in a second term. All three men must be confirmed by the Senate.
In nominating Hagel, Obama signaled he is willing to take on a tough confirmation fight. Once Hagel emerged as Obama's likely nominee, GOP lawmakers began sharply questioning his commitment to Israel and his willingness to take a hard line with Iran over its disputed nuclear program.
Of Brennan, Obama said he had an "invaluable perspective" on global affairs. He has traveled extensively in the Middle East and was once CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia. Brennan helped orchestrate administration policy in Yemen and the response to the Arab Spring, and played a role in the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
"I will make it my mission to make sure that the CIA has the tools it needs to keep our nation safe and that its work always reflects the liberties, freedoms and values that we hold so dear," Brennan said in brief remarks.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., issued a statement shortly after the White House announcement on Brennan, saying he had "many questions and concerns about his nomination to be director of the Central Intelligence Agency, especially what role he played in the so-called enhanced interrogation programs while serving at the CIA during the last administration, as well as his public defense of those programs."
Hagel, something of a maverick among Republican senators during his two terms, has criticized the discussion of a military strike by either the U.S. or Israel against Iran. He also irritated some Israel backers with his reference to the "Jewish lobby" in the United States. And he has backed efforts to bring Iran to the table for future peace talks in Afghanistan.
Obama said that when he and Hagel served in the Senate "I came to admire his courage and his judgment, his willingness to speak his mind even if it wasn't popular, even if it defied the conventional wisdom. That's exactly the spirit I want on my national security team - a recognition that when it comes to the defense of our country, we are not Democrats or Republicans. We are Americans."
Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., has called Hagel's foreign policy views "outside the mainstream" and has said he would be "the most antagonistic secretary of defense toward the state of Israel in our nation's history."
Although bracing for a confirmation fight over Hagel, the administration has expressed confidence both its nominees will be confirmed.
Supporters of Hagel's nomination have said it would be hard for Republicans to reject a former colleague, especially one who's a Vietnam veteran and served on the Foreign Relations and Intelligence committees.
Great... more old white guys. First Kerry, now Hagel and Brennan. Hey obama how about being more diverse.Â
 @GeorgeG. Slim pickings my friend.
And of course, the falsified attacks on anyone Obama nominates commence as soon as they 'think' that he's going to nominate someone for anything.
Â
Saying Hagel is anti-Israel is a blatant lie.  He has voted FOR Israel in every vote taken when he was in Congress. The only thing he's guilty of there is not blindly voting FOR every possible anti-Iran, anti-palestinian, anti-Hamas, anti-arab oriented thing that went through Congress.  You CAN vote against military force use against IRAN as a bad idea because you beleive that Iran would use the excuse to attack Israel - without being an anti-semite.
Â
This is nothing more than a continuation of the attacks on anything and everything Obama from the very same suspects who have continiously done that from day 1.
Â
It's partisan politics at it's worst.
Â
And it's also the very thing that Republicans claimed was so unpatriotic and unAmerican of anyone who dared to make the same sort of twisted and falsified truths attacks on Bush and his cronies. It makes me wonder about the lack of patriotic pro-American behavior from these very same Republicans....
 @FormerMarineSgt I would normally agree with you, but many of the attacks on these two are going to come from Obama's own party. Nothing partisan will be involved in it. Alan Dershowitz came out against Hagel today and he is anything but partisan on any side EXCEPT Obama's. Also, I doubt very many Republicans except McCain who is the only one who was actually tortured, are going to oppose Brennan. Both of these guys are going to have more problems with liberals than with Republicans. It will be interresting to see if the left can put aside their normal problems with these two and if Obama can get them to rally around choices they would normally fight? Should be interresting!
Wow...dare I agree with Obama on one of them...Brennan? Can't believe he is going to nominate a guy that GW wanted and didn't think HE could get through the liberals in the Senate? Hagel, love the fact that he is going after a TRUE veteran (Purple Hearts and all), but if his own party is torn on this guy and Alan Dershowitz just came out against him, not to mention that Republicans, Jews and Gays hate him, then why put him forward? Not sure what Obama's angle is here, but these are more like GW picks than his. Can't he find a few more vets like John Kerry?
Word to the republicans that take all that money from other countries: Â America needs to look out for America, first. Â There should not be some litmus test for that job, as to how they view other countries. That's their problem, not ours. Â The GOP will eat their own, as usual, if it has to do with money. which it does.Â
 @DT No litmus test on how you view other countries for the job of Sec. of Defense? You can't be serious? Next to the Sec of State this is probably the most diplomatic job in the cabinet. You can't put a guy who is hated by most the world in this job. Look at the nightmare that was Rumsfeld as an example. You need your allies and a guy who drives them away is a bad choice, not saying that Hagel will, just commenting on your ridiculous comment that we shouldn't take into account how a Def Sec nominne views other countries.
I don't pretend to know what makes a good defense secretary (my ideas regarding our military use are too radical). But a guy who is willing to question our allies actions (like Israel) is a good quality to have. That's Hagel, I don't know about Brennan.
 @virtual anomaly I like that Brennan also worked for Bush. It shows that he is not a partisan pick.Â
 @DT Keep in mind it was John McCain and leftists (not the rest of Republicans) that had a problem with Brennan the first time. McCain, although a Republican, is against all torture tactics because they were used on him for seven years in the Hanoi Hilton. The rest of the Republicans loved Brennan.
 @left-center Â
Read "the Black Banners" by Ali Soufan (former FBI counter-terror interrogator) to get a real idea how that idea don't work. Â A taste below:
Â
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=ali%20soufan%2060%20minutes%20interview&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDcQtwIwAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fvideo%2Fwatch%2F%3Fid%3D7380678n&ei=A8rrUKy-Lan1iwKM9YHYCg&usg=AFQjCNEQgpyEzfBZ6JTPUp_wKMZgq3tTHA&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.cGE
@sometimesright it was a matter of discusion today on the Young Turks. Cent was talking with Jimmy Carter's Sec of Defense Zbigniew Brzezinski and he made a reasonable case for torture but only in the most extreme cases, as a tool to get information quickly when other means would take too long and fail to serve the need.
 @DT Out of curiosity..do you like the fact that he is in favor of waterboarding and other questionable torture tactics? BTW..I love the pick of Brennan, but suspect that most liberals on here have done little to no research on either of these guys. Even Bush knew he would have problems getting Brennan through the liberals of the Senate. I doubt highly that Brennan will get voted down by the Republicans, it will be Democrats that have problems with him. Love the guy!
Chuck Knox used to say that you play the hand your dealt. These are wise words. Obama had two vacancies to fill and in his best estimation he selected Hagel and Brennan.
Â
With Hagel he gets a veteran and longtime public servant. With Brennan he gets a career CIA agent. I also noticed that Sen John McCain doesn't care for either of Obama's two picks. Well, that alone proves to me that Obama has made the correct choice.
 @left-center BTW...it goes to show you haven't researched these guys. If you keep reading comments below, other liberals are starting to call Obama a neo-con for these choices (especially Brennan).Â
sometimesright: You would be better served if you didn't try to put me into your liberal box, in fact you seem to like placing people into categories; this one's he is a neo-con, that one is a liberal, this one is anti-Isreali, etc. I would stop short of calling the President a neo-con and those that think that way are mistaken. He has no need to kow-tow to either party, so if he pisses some of them off from either side well that's just too damn bad, they'll get over it. The President has a job to do, and that is to serve the American people in the most effective way he can. So if he taps a "loose cannon" independent Republican for Sec. of Defense or a tight-assed former neo-con to head up the CIA I say more power to him. Obviously he believes these men can accomplish the task assigned. Personally, I do not know enough about either job to weigh in with an opinion regarding these men, that is for the better informed to decide
 @left-center It cracks me up that liberals like you are jumping on the bandwagon of these guys. I think Brennan is a brilliant choice (as GW did), but I can promise you he is facing an uphill battle, not from Republicans, but from far left Demos who are still upset with his stance and probable participation in waterboarding and other "questionable" interrigation tactics. As for Hagel, I agree that I would love to see a serious veteran that actually earned a few Purple Hearts in the Sec. of Def. job, but he is a done deal on BOTH sides. Besides the obvious, the the Republicans can't stand him for his anti-Israel stance, there are also many liberal Obama lovers who are coming out against him including both gays and even Alan Dershowitz. If you can't get Dershowitz on your side as an appointee by a liberal President, you are already sunk. There are tons of great nominees like John Kerry out there who are not loved by Republicans, but will sail through non the less. Not sure why Obama would pick two that have just as much opposition in his own party?
 @left-center McCain is getting more out of control lately, with angry outbursts, and nastiness. I agree with you on your insights.Â
 @left-center So its ok for a supposedly liberal president to hire 2 neocons?
@Blindman Yes. If these men can accomplish the assignment and still meet the President's requirements.
Good help is hard to get. I find both of these guys as loose cannons.
 @al_wa Both bad choices
Hagel is a good choice, but Brennan is a pro-torture psychopath.
More proof that Obama is really just another neocon. He wants endless wars so that his buddies in the defense industry can get richer. Amazing now that we have no conservatives in the republican party and the latest democrat leader of the free world is not a liberal. You can't trust a single one of them any more.
where is the diversity? These two guys are from the standard power grid. Nothing exciting here, but these choices are revealing.