Obama to announce return of 34,000 troops from Afghanistan

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama's decision to bring home about half of the 66,000 U.S. troops now in Afghanistan within a year will shrink the force to the size he found it when he entered the White House vowing to reinvigorate a stalemated war.
Still to be decided is how many troops will remain beyond 2014, when the U.S.-led combat mission is scheduled to end. The stated goal is to prepare Afghanistan's army and police to handle the Taliban insurgency largely on their own by then.
Obama determined that his war goals could be achieved by bringing 34,000 U.S. troops home by this time next year, officials said, leaving somewhere between 32,000 and 34,000 to support and train Afghan forces. That is about the number in Afghanistan when he took office in January 2009. In a series of moves designed to reverse the Taliban's battlefield momentum, he tripled the total American force before starting to scale it back in the summer of 2011.
Obama's new move coincides with a major shakeup in his war command. Gen. Joseph Dunford took over Sunday for Gen. John Allen as the commander of all allied forces in Afghanistan. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is planning to retire as soon as his replacement is confirmed. Obama has nominated former Sen. Chuck Hagel to take the Pentagon post.
The decision also reflects Obama's determination to wind down a war that is the longest in American history. He has many other security problems to consider around the globe - from North Korea's development of nuclear weapons to civil war in Syria to the worrisome spread of al-Qaida affiliated terrorist groups in the Middle East and North Africa.
Obama was to announce the troop reductions in the State of the Union address Tuesday night. The White House said he had made his decision based on recommendations by the military and his national security advisers, as well as consultations with allies such as Britain and Germany and talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
A Pentagon statement said Panetta fully supports Obama's troop reductions.
In farewell remarks to Pentagon employees, Panetta said Tuesday he is confident that the war strategy is on track.
"We will be able to transition over these next two years to a point where the Afghans themselves can govern and secure themselves," he said.
The White House did not spell out the pace at which the 34,000 troops will be withdrawn over the coming year. Defense officials said it's likely that the bulk of them will be kept through summer. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because details of the withdrawal had not been announced.
Private analysts are divided on the wisdom of accelerating the withdrawal of American forces. Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution wrote on Tuesday that he believes the current U.S. troop level should remain until autumn, when a seasonal lull in Taliban activity usually begins. "The president should now be patient with what happens over the next eight months," O'Hanlon wrote, adding that Dunford needs time to consolidate progress in eastern Afghanistan.
The U.S. is still finalizing plans for the size and scope of its military presence after the allied combat mission ends in December 2014.
Obama discussed the next phases of the drawdown with Karzai during a meeting in Washington last month, their first meeting since Obama's re-election. They agreed to accelerate their timetable for putting Afghan forces in the lead combat role nationwide, moving that transition up from the summer to the spring.
A persistent worry is that pulling out of Afghanistan too quickly will leave the battle-scarred country vulnerable to collapse. In a worst-case scenario, that could allow the Taliban to regain power and revert to the role they played in the years before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as protectors of al-Qaida terrorists bent on striking the U.S.
However, many Americans are weary of the war, according to public opinion polls, and are skeptical of any claim that Afghanistan is worth more U.S. blood. Registered voters are roughly split between those who say the U.S. should remove all troops and those who favor leaving some troops in place for counterterrorism efforts, according to a recent Fox News poll.
Still to be decided is how many troops will remain beyond 2014, when the U.S.-led combat mission is scheduled to end. The stated goal is to prepare Afghanistan's army and police to handle the Taliban insurgency largely on their own by then.
Obama determined that his war goals could be achieved by bringing 34,000 U.S. troops home by this time next year, officials said, leaving somewhere between 32,000 and 34,000 to support and train Afghan forces. That is about the number in Afghanistan when he took office in January 2009. In a series of moves designed to reverse the Taliban's battlefield momentum, he tripled the total American force before starting to scale it back in the summer of 2011.
Obama's new move coincides with a major shakeup in his war command. Gen. Joseph Dunford took over Sunday for Gen. John Allen as the commander of all allied forces in Afghanistan. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is planning to retire as soon as his replacement is confirmed. Obama has nominated former Sen. Chuck Hagel to take the Pentagon post.
The decision also reflects Obama's determination to wind down a war that is the longest in American history. He has many other security problems to consider around the globe - from North Korea's development of nuclear weapons to civil war in Syria to the worrisome spread of al-Qaida affiliated terrorist groups in the Middle East and North Africa.
Obama was to announce the troop reductions in the State of the Union address Tuesday night. The White House said he had made his decision based on recommendations by the military and his national security advisers, as well as consultations with allies such as Britain and Germany and talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
A Pentagon statement said Panetta fully supports Obama's troop reductions.
In farewell remarks to Pentagon employees, Panetta said Tuesday he is confident that the war strategy is on track.
"We will be able to transition over these next two years to a point where the Afghans themselves can govern and secure themselves," he said.
The White House did not spell out the pace at which the 34,000 troops will be withdrawn over the coming year. Defense officials said it's likely that the bulk of them will be kept through summer. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because details of the withdrawal had not been announced.
Private analysts are divided on the wisdom of accelerating the withdrawal of American forces. Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution wrote on Tuesday that he believes the current U.S. troop level should remain until autumn, when a seasonal lull in Taliban activity usually begins. "The president should now be patient with what happens over the next eight months," O'Hanlon wrote, adding that Dunford needs time to consolidate progress in eastern Afghanistan.
The U.S. is still finalizing plans for the size and scope of its military presence after the allied combat mission ends in December 2014.
Obama discussed the next phases of the drawdown with Karzai during a meeting in Washington last month, their first meeting since Obama's re-election. They agreed to accelerate their timetable for putting Afghan forces in the lead combat role nationwide, moving that transition up from the summer to the spring.
A persistent worry is that pulling out of Afghanistan too quickly will leave the battle-scarred country vulnerable to collapse. In a worst-case scenario, that could allow the Taliban to regain power and revert to the role they played in the years before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as protectors of al-Qaida terrorists bent on striking the U.S.
However, many Americans are weary of the war, according to public opinion polls, and are skeptical of any claim that Afghanistan is worth more U.S. blood. Registered voters are roughly split between those who say the U.S. should remove all troops and those who favor leaving some troops in place for counterterrorism efforts, according to a recent Fox News poll.
We spent a decade in Afghanistan where the enemy doesnât wear a uniform and both the enemy and alleged ally harbor hatred and disdain for us. Our people spent ten years being picked off as individuals and in handfuls by an unseen enemy. Although there doesnât seem to be any significant result of being there for so long, at least weâre getting out and bringing our people home. I hope no other country makes the same mistake we did and learns from our great loss of life and economy. Sincerely, Soviet Union.
As long as the corrupt puppet leadership installed by GW is in charge (and that's questionable to begin with) there will be nonstop killing in the country. The people will suffer horribly and the region will continue to be unstable. Having or not having our troops there will make little difference, so bring them all home.
 @jcman As opposed to the Taliban leadership of course who were a bunch of angels.
LOL. Troops are constantly returning home just as Troops are constantly be sent over. This is just another publicity stunt to make us all think he is doing good. We are military over 20 years and we personally know of a few that have orders for that area in the next few months.
 @Robinsnest My thoughts exactly! They just sent a unit from Ft. Lewis this week.
Also, if that many Troops are coming home, does that mean they will just be doing their military thing here in the US or will they be discharged into the "no-jobs" civilian life?
@Robinsnest So, you want to just leave them there till they get killed? I'm glad to see the troops come home, out of harm's way. But that's just me.
 @factchekr  Did I say I wanted them to be left there??? I asked a question of what they will face when they come home. My husband deploys and I worry every time he is gone and I worry every time friends of ours are deployed as well. I also worry when they come home and find it so hard to find a job when they are discharged. One thing many don't understand is that the US will ALWAYS have Troops in places that civilians don't think we are in.
We will never change the will or opinion of the people in Afghanistan. They have a culture and a mind set for over a thousand years. It is bankrupting us being over there. I don't see any gain for us. I am sad that American lives have been lost over there. And yes as soon as we leave the vacuum will be filled by some extremist group. Nothing we can do about it.
Just in time to move them to Korea.
 ... or OUR southern border to keep the drugs out.
 @K. Coleman As well as the 40K+ Iranian operatives in South and Central America.
Let's bring them home, but remember to help in the stabilizing of the country. In not doing so in the past, we had left ourselves open to condemnation from the youth of Afghanistan who were too young (or not born yet) to remember our aid to them in the 1980's. Look where it led us. We need to draw out our troops, yes, but we need to help them stabilize their war-ridden country. Building schools will go a long way, I think.Â
@CaliGirl@Heart  Thats a great thought and I agree with you in principle but the reality is that the people of Afghanistan dont want us there and they dont want to change. If we build schools, only the boys can go there and with us gone, they will return to teaching Islamic extremism. We chould have firebombed the whole country when this first started. We could have planted and built what we wanted.
 @CaliGirl@Heart It would take 5 generations and the will to want to change to make any impact in Afghanistan and  they don't want to change. So I don't see it.
That's about half the U.S. forces currently serving there, and marks the next phase in the administration's plans to formally finish the war by the end of 2014.
Â
How do you just "finish the War"????? This proves that they don't even look at it as a War at all. Our poor Men and Women of the military are over their loosing their lives for what??? The Afghan people hate us and would kill us every chance they had,so why are we there??? Leave them to fight their own religious wars that they've been fighting for thousands of years. GET ALL OF THEM OUT OF THERE NOT JUST HALF OF THEM !
Glad to see our people coming home, do not like the idea of leaving half of them there without a back up.