Time to act, Obama declares, taking oath 2nd time
»Play Video
WASHINGTON (AP) - Turning the page on years of war and recession, President Barack Obama summoned a divided nation Monday to act with "passion and dedication" to broaden equality and prosperity at home, nurture democracy around the world and combat global warming as he embarked on a second term before a vast and cheering crowd that spilled down the historic National Mall.
"America's possibilities are limitless, for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands," the 44th president declared in a second inaugural address that broke new ground by assigning gay rights a prominent place in the wider struggle for equality for all.
In a unity plea to politicians and the nation at large, he called for "collective action" to confront challenges and said, "Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time - but it does require us to act in our time."
Elected four years ago as America's first black president, Obama spoke from specially constructed flag-bedecked stands outside the Capitol after reciting oath of office that all presidents have uttered since the nation's founding.
The events highlighted a day replete with all the fanfare that a security-minded capital could muster - from white-gloved Marine trumpeters who heralded the arrival of dignitaries on the inaugural stands to the mid-winter orange flowers that graced the tables at a traditional lunch with lawmakers inside the Capitol.
The weather was relatively warm, in the mid-40s, and while the crowd was not as large as on Inauguration Day four years ago, it was estimated at up to 1 million.
Big enough that he turned around as he was leaving the inaugural stands to savor the view one final time.
"I'm not going to see this again," said the man whose political career has been meteoric - from the Illinois Legislature to the U.S. Senate and the White House before marking his 48th birthday.
On a day of renewal for democracy, everyone seemed to have an opinion, and many seemed eager to share it.
"I'm just thankful that we've got another four years of democracy that everyone can grow in," said Wilbur Cole, 52, a postman from suburban Memphis, Tenn., who spent part of the day visiting the civil rights museum there at the site where the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968.
The inauguration this year shared the day with King's birthday holiday, and the president used a Bible that had belonged to the civil rights leader for the swearing-in, along with a second one that been Abraham Lincoln's. The president also paused inside the Capitol Rotunda to gaze at a dark bronze statue of King.
Others watching at a distance were less upbeat than Cole. Frank Pinto, 62, and an unemployed construction contractor, took in the inaugural events on television at a bar in Hartford, Conn. He said because of the president's policies, "My grandkids will be in debt and their kids will be in debt."
The tone was less overtly political in the nation's capital, where bipartisanship was on the menu in the speechmaking and at the congressional lunch.
"Congratulations and Godspeed," House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, said to Obama and Vice President Joe Biden as he presented them with flags that had flown atop the Capitol.
Outside, the Inaugural Parade took shape, a reflection of American musicality and diversity that featured military units, bands, floats, the Chinese American Community Center Folk Dance Troupe from Hockessin, Del., and the Isiserettes Drill & Drum Corps from Des Moines, Iowa.
The crowds were several rows deep along parts of the route, and security was intense. More than a dozen vehicles flanked the president's limousine as it rolled down Pennsylvania Avenue, and several agents walked alongside on foot.
As recent predecessors have, the president emerged from his car and walked several blocks on foot. His wife, Michelle, was with him, and the two held hands while acknowledging the cheers from well-wishers during two separate strolls along the route.
A short time later, accompanied by their children and the vice president and his family, the first couple settled in to view the parade from a reviewing stand built in front of the White House.
A pair of nighttime inaugural balls completed the official proceedings, with a guest line running into the tens of thousands.
In his brief, 18-minute speech, Obama did not dwell on the most pressing challenges of the past four years. He barely mentioned the struggle to reduce the federal deficit, a fight that has occupied much of his and Congress' time and promises the same in months to come.
He spoke up for the poor - "Our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it" - and for those on the next-higher rung - "We believe that America's prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class." The second reference echoed his calls from the presidential campaign that catapulted him to re-election
"A decade of war is now ending. An economic recovery has begun," said the president who presided over the end to the U.S. combat role in Iraq, set a timetable for doing the same in Afghanistan and took office when the worst recession in decades was still deepening.
"We will support democracy from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to the Middle East, because our interests and our conscience compel us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom," he said in a relatively brief reference to foreign policy.
The former community organizer made it clear he views government as an engine of progress. While that was far from surprising for a Democrat, his emphasis on the need to combat global climate change was unexpected, as was his firm new declaration of support for full gay rights.
In a jab at climate-change doubters, he said, "Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms." He said America must lead in the transition to sustainable energy resources.
He likened the struggle for gay rights to earlier crusades for women's suffrage and racial equality.
"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law - for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well," said the president, who waited until his campaign for re-election last year to announce his support for gay marriage.
His speech hinted only barely at issues likely to spark opposition from Republicans who hold power in the House.
He defended Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security as programs that "do not make us a nation of takers; they free is to take the risks that made this country great."
He referred briefly to making "the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit," a rhetorical bow to a looming debate in which Republicans are seeking spending cuts in health care programs to slow the rise in a $16.4 trillion national debt.
He also cited a need for legislation to ease access to voting, an issue of particular concern to minority groups, and to immigration reform and gun-control legislation that he is expected to go into at length in his State of the Union speech on Feb. 12.
But his speech was less a list of legislative proposals than a plea for tackling challenges.
"We must act, knowing that our work will be imperfect," he said, and today's "victories will only be partial."
There was some official business conducted during the day.
Moments after being sworn in, the president signed nomination papers for four new appointees to his Cabinet, Sen. John Kerry for secretary of state, White House chief of staff Jacob Lew to be treasury secretary, former Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel for defense secretary and White House adviser John Brennan to head the CIA.
___
Associated Press writers Larry Margasak, Darlene Superville, Donna Cassata, Alan Fram, Andrew Taylor, Stephen Ohlemacher, Jim Kuhnhenn, Julie Pace, Tom Ritchie and Tracy Brown, in Washington; Adrian Santz in Memphis, Tenn., and Stephen Singer in Hartford, Conn., contributed to this story.
"America's possibilities are limitless, for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands," the 44th president declared in a second inaugural address that broke new ground by assigning gay rights a prominent place in the wider struggle for equality for all.
In a unity plea to politicians and the nation at large, he called for "collective action" to confront challenges and said, "Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time - but it does require us to act in our time."
Elected four years ago as America's first black president, Obama spoke from specially constructed flag-bedecked stands outside the Capitol after reciting oath of office that all presidents have uttered since the nation's founding.
The events highlighted a day replete with all the fanfare that a security-minded capital could muster - from white-gloved Marine trumpeters who heralded the arrival of dignitaries on the inaugural stands to the mid-winter orange flowers that graced the tables at a traditional lunch with lawmakers inside the Capitol.
The weather was relatively warm, in the mid-40s, and while the crowd was not as large as on Inauguration Day four years ago, it was estimated at up to 1 million.
Big enough that he turned around as he was leaving the inaugural stands to savor the view one final time.
"I'm not going to see this again," said the man whose political career has been meteoric - from the Illinois Legislature to the U.S. Senate and the White House before marking his 48th birthday.
On a day of renewal for democracy, everyone seemed to have an opinion, and many seemed eager to share it.
"I'm just thankful that we've got another four years of democracy that everyone can grow in," said Wilbur Cole, 52, a postman from suburban Memphis, Tenn., who spent part of the day visiting the civil rights museum there at the site where the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968.
The inauguration this year shared the day with King's birthday holiday, and the president used a Bible that had belonged to the civil rights leader for the swearing-in, along with a second one that been Abraham Lincoln's. The president also paused inside the Capitol Rotunda to gaze at a dark bronze statue of King.
Others watching at a distance were less upbeat than Cole. Frank Pinto, 62, and an unemployed construction contractor, took in the inaugural events on television at a bar in Hartford, Conn. He said because of the president's policies, "My grandkids will be in debt and their kids will be in debt."
The tone was less overtly political in the nation's capital, where bipartisanship was on the menu in the speechmaking and at the congressional lunch.
"Congratulations and Godspeed," House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, said to Obama and Vice President Joe Biden as he presented them with flags that had flown atop the Capitol.
Outside, the Inaugural Parade took shape, a reflection of American musicality and diversity that featured military units, bands, floats, the Chinese American Community Center Folk Dance Troupe from Hockessin, Del., and the Isiserettes Drill & Drum Corps from Des Moines, Iowa.
The crowds were several rows deep along parts of the route, and security was intense. More than a dozen vehicles flanked the president's limousine as it rolled down Pennsylvania Avenue, and several agents walked alongside on foot.
As recent predecessors have, the president emerged from his car and walked several blocks on foot. His wife, Michelle, was with him, and the two held hands while acknowledging the cheers from well-wishers during two separate strolls along the route.
A short time later, accompanied by their children and the vice president and his family, the first couple settled in to view the parade from a reviewing stand built in front of the White House.
A pair of nighttime inaugural balls completed the official proceedings, with a guest line running into the tens of thousands.
In his brief, 18-minute speech, Obama did not dwell on the most pressing challenges of the past four years. He barely mentioned the struggle to reduce the federal deficit, a fight that has occupied much of his and Congress' time and promises the same in months to come.
He spoke up for the poor - "Our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it" - and for those on the next-higher rung - "We believe that America's prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class." The second reference echoed his calls from the presidential campaign that catapulted him to re-election
"A decade of war is now ending. An economic recovery has begun," said the president who presided over the end to the U.S. combat role in Iraq, set a timetable for doing the same in Afghanistan and took office when the worst recession in decades was still deepening.
"We will support democracy from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to the Middle East, because our interests and our conscience compel us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom," he said in a relatively brief reference to foreign policy.
The former community organizer made it clear he views government as an engine of progress. While that was far from surprising for a Democrat, his emphasis on the need to combat global climate change was unexpected, as was his firm new declaration of support for full gay rights.
In a jab at climate-change doubters, he said, "Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms." He said America must lead in the transition to sustainable energy resources.
He likened the struggle for gay rights to earlier crusades for women's suffrage and racial equality.
"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law - for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well," said the president, who waited until his campaign for re-election last year to announce his support for gay marriage.
His speech hinted only barely at issues likely to spark opposition from Republicans who hold power in the House.
He defended Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security as programs that "do not make us a nation of takers; they free is to take the risks that made this country great."
He referred briefly to making "the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit," a rhetorical bow to a looming debate in which Republicans are seeking spending cuts in health care programs to slow the rise in a $16.4 trillion national debt.
He also cited a need for legislation to ease access to voting, an issue of particular concern to minority groups, and to immigration reform and gun-control legislation that he is expected to go into at length in his State of the Union speech on Feb. 12.
But his speech was less a list of legislative proposals than a plea for tackling challenges.
"We must act, knowing that our work will be imperfect," he said, and today's "victories will only be partial."
There was some official business conducted during the day.
Moments after being sworn in, the president signed nomination papers for four new appointees to his Cabinet, Sen. John Kerry for secretary of state, White House chief of staff Jacob Lew to be treasury secretary, former Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel for defense secretary and White House adviser John Brennan to head the CIA.
___
Associated Press writers Larry Margasak, Darlene Superville, Donna Cassata, Alan Fram, Andrew Taylor, Stephen Ohlemacher, Jim Kuhnhenn, Julie Pace, Tom Ritchie and Tracy Brown, in Washington; Adrian Santz in Memphis, Tenn., and Stephen Singer in Hartford, Conn., contributed to this story.
its funny you didnt hear a peep out of republicans about the dept, while g.w.bush spent the nations trillions on
corporate welfare,shady defense contracts and needless wars. when democrats get into the majority they squeel like starving pigs,just because democrats help out the old and disadvantaged.all the while pretending that they have god on their side and are more patriotic,i can thank the god almighty that we have 4 more years of obama!
 @David Janssen Just because you chose not to notice it doesn't mean the republicans didn't scream. There were a lot of us independents and conservatives as well screaming about his spending, etc. What we have here is selective observation. You chose to only notice what you wanted to notice. Whats even more interesting is I bet all the things that obama has done are probably just fine with you simply because its obama. Never mind he has done some of the exact same things as Bush, even the same things that people like you complain about Bush doing but not a word when obama does it. Did you scream when he reupped the patriot act and even expanded some sections? I see below you talk of the republicans wanting to do away with the safety net. Thats a talking point straight out of the liberal book of lies. Even just this morning Paul Ryan was explaining that very thing. It appears that liberals have a problem with understanding the difference between reform and "doing away with". Currently entitlements are either already in a deficit or going bankrupt. Before long there won't be any entitlement programs because they will be completely unable to pay anything. So the republicans want to reform them to save them and that is somehow bad but you want them  to go on their current path and implode. Which is better?
@David Janssen I'm not a Republican but I am a conservative and I was appalled at GW Bush's spending. I have not seen the Democrats helping the old and the disadvantaged. I have more friends and family out of work today than under Bush's rule. They need jobs! How about we stop dividing by party and come together as Americans to help the poor and disadvantaged. I'm tired of the finger pointing. Back to building my business so that I can hire more people to help them out of the hole they have been pushed in during the last couple of years.
@jellyfish i am in agreement that the partisan bickering isnt good for america,but jobs are being created and the economy is on the mend.regarding entitlement reform, it seems to me that the republicans would like to do away with the safety net i.e. social security-medicaid-medicare-welfare-hud-.until republicans should quit trying to throw the baby out with the bathwater or they will continue to lose elections.i am not saying the democrats are perfect,there should be a more concerted effort to get along and build america i do agree with you on that.
Thank God Obama was voted in and not that idiot Romney.
According to Newsweek, Obama is God.Â
Time to go sit in a corner, put a sock in it and do no harm for the next four years. Then maybe, just maybe someone will be able to repair the damage from your first four years. One can always hope !!
One can only hope, but not this guy. After all Newsweek declared him "god-like". Our country is in deep doo doo. This is not sore loser talk, this is I am sickened to know that our wonderful country is being castrated by this Progresive Socialist and Mrs. Socialist.
time to act? why didnt you the first time round
@brad He meant that Americans need to act, not him, he's above us all on that.
4 more years of spend spend spend. Everybody get your hand out and get whats left before it is gone. Maybe he will make his party that controls the senate to pass a budget? I don't think so because then the world will see how bad it really is.Â
He barely mentioned the struggle to reduce the federal deficit.....
Of course, why mention what you quadrupled since you took office.
Four more years of the same will mean a 23 TRILLION debt when you leave
(....kinda strange when Republicans are "red", Dems are "blue"....but it IS the DEms who put us into the red so deep).
 @Sydthepiper the Federal deficit was over 1.2 trillion before Obama took office. It is not over 4 trillion, and as a matter of fact it is lower than 1.2 trillion. So please get your facts straight instead of repeating lies like a ignorant parrot.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/business/federal-deficit-for-2012-fiscal-year-falls-to-1-1-trillion.html?_r=0.......
Â
Facts matter. The last four years we have seen ignorant Americans attack our President over and over again with lies. There is so much true stuff we can attack President Obama for, so why resort to lies?? How about attacking his drone policy? Or the continuation of many of the Bush Policies? How about the fact that nobody is our congress, or executive branch has done enough of the jobs crisis... Â These real issues should be front page news but instead all we hear about is the deficits and national debt republicans built and blamed on the democrats. Of course the democrats didn't stop the "out of control spending" by republicans either. What the hell do you expect when you start two wars, cut taxes, and implement numerous expenses that are not paid for? Democrats and Republicans are puppets of the huge corporate interests. Repeating bs spin is a waste of time and does nothing to help solve our problems.
 @Bob42263  @Sydthepiper Well woohoo! So our government is only spending 1.2 TRILLION PER YEAR more than it takes in. Well lets all just break out the booze and party. Lets look at a few links to expand the picture a bit:
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_deficit_chart.html
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1997_2017USb_H0f
There are lots of things to look at on the site.Â
Facts are important and so is which ones or how many you present in a discussion. Obama's spending is wildly out of control, much worse that Bush. If Bush's spending was bad, and it was, obama's is far worse. What is interesting is that while the liberals are happy to trash Bush over his spending, which as I said, was bad, they totally ignore obama's. Why is that? Oh yes its because he's liberal and must therefore be perfect. Well the facts prove otherwise.
 @Bob42263 ...well then, "if" I am a liar, then I should consider switching careers and become a politician.
Deception, beguilement, deceit, bluff, mystification and subterfuge are acts to propagate beliefs that are not true, or not the whole truth (as in half-truths or omission). Deception can involve dissimulation, propaganda, and sleight of hand, as well as distraction, camouflage, or concealment
Â
Â
So he wants to nurture democracy around the world, all the while destroying that very concept here at home. Amazing! And if he bypasses enough constitutional laws, maybe he can be our first Caesar.Â
Waaaaaa, you're just being a sore loser!
This comment has been deleted
 @clem77  @snow I think you are the one with the big floppy feet if you believe Obama
Time to act mr. obama was 4 years ago, what heck have you been doing. I'll tell you, absolutely nothing to help put this country on the right path.
Cut back on all your high dollar family vacationsÂ
And lead the nation out of recession already.
Can you imagine how much pressure this nation would be under to change its top down mentality if even half of the people on this board realized they were being played? Â if only half realized that where they get their information is controlled by people who don't want their tax rates to go up from the historically low to somewhere on the lower end of the historical low average (READ: we have a deficit and they are STILL paying record low tax rates) and they are being kept oppressed by 100% irrational fear? Â Wow. Â If only the paranoia could be harnessed and redirected toward the actual problem. Â Imagine. Â
 @seattleways Not quite sure what you are saying. We are borrowing future growth to spend no to prop up failed companies and paper over bad policies. With a trillion in borrowing going toward current GDP, the number you see is 1/15th, or about 6% too high, and that's borrowed from our children's economic activity. If we want all the services and goodies to get handed out, we need to jack up taxes to pay for them. Or else we need to cut spending. It's the deficit that bad, long term, not the spending per se (though I'd like to see that go down, too).
This comment has been deleted
 @the unvarnished truth  @seattleways Property taxes have nothing to do with DC. Social Security taxes were raised under Reagan.  Taxes as a % of GDP are at a very low level, wages of most people are lower than they were before Reagan(with inflation) Wages and benefits are a lot lower than they were before Reagan. State and local taxes have gone up because taxes on the wealthy and corporations have gone down. Basically since Reagan, taxes on the wealthy and corporations are way down, while the working class has picked up the slack. So working class people have a much higher share of the tax burden, thanks to Reaganomics..... facts matter
I hate to be catty but if you look at the First Lady's outfit in the right light, it looks like Darth Vader before he puts his helmet thing on.
Â
Don't hate me because you see it now that I mention it.
 @Getov Mylon That is too funny,Â
@Getov Mylon You are a very very sad individual..
 @clem77  @Getov I apologize. I didn't realize that the Left was so touchy about outerwear.Â
 @Getov Mylon HOW IMPORTANT IS HER FREAKING DRESS? seriously? really?
 @Ray Ruserious  @Getov Mylon Consider how much trash-talking the legacy-media did about Ann Romney's clothing choices, it is a legit topic. I don't like her for her policy choices (not formal political policy, which is HIS bag, which I also disagree with) and habit of pushing a "do as I say, not as I do" sorts of things,like telling people to eat healthy then pig out with a 3000-calorie lunch.
 @RN1  @Ray Ruserious I also recall some hoopla about the wardrobe purchases of a certain VP candidate 4 years ago. That was different as well.
Â
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/us/politics/23palin.html?_r=0
Â
Money shot quote from the NYTimes/Pravda:
Â
"Sarah Palinâs wardrobe joined the ranks of symbolic political excess on Wednesday..."
Â
Fast forward 4+ years to this Valentine to excess;
Â
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/us/first-lady-and-fashion-are-no-longer-so-combustible.html
Â
"Embracing expensive designer clothes â and a lot of them â has not been a problem for Michelle Obama..." NO accusations of excess just fawning and fulsomeness about her fashion choices.
Â
Wonder what the delta was?
This comment has been deleted
 @the unvarnished truth  @Ray Ruserious I realize you believe yourself delightfully clever when using nicknames for the President of the United States, such as "Odumbo"... of course it's just another "product" pumped off to the propagandized by the far right hate for lunch bunch. Far left... Far right... I've little use for either of you. Extremists all... and one as bad as the other
 @Getov Mylon Actually its very close to some of the outfits worn by the Romulans in Star Trek the Next Generation.Â
 @SeattleJoe I  believe the Romulans wore the belt diagonally... but I quibble.Â
 @TruthinAdverts  @SeattleJoe No trouble.
 @Getov Mylon  @SeattleJoe but you tribble...
 @Getov Mylon The First Lady looked beautiful and elegant today. Just because all your taste is in your mouth, don't expect the rest of us to agree with you.
@justmyopinion @Getov Mylon .....that "taste" is because we throw up a little in our mouths whenever we see this couple, who are so utterly out of touch w/ reality.
 @justmyopinion The First Lady looked fine. It's that Ugly Flying Wedge shaped thing she is wearing in the top photo that's a travesty. Although, I do like those $500 gloves she's wearing. That really is some fine looking leather.
 @Getov Mylon The reason they are not currently listed in the catalog, according to J. Crew's spokesperson is because the First Lady purchased them sometime ago and this is not the first time she has worn them. J. Crew also says they will not be bringing them back, so I guess you won't be getting a pair.
 @justmyopinion That is a fine grade of calfskin. And in the designer world, $500 is apparently cheap!
Â
http://usa.hermes.com/woman/accessories/gloves.html
 @justmyopinion No, those aren't $40 gloves. Maybe $500 is high but curious they aren't listed in the J. Crew online catalog,eh?
 @Getov Mylon $500 gloves? Showing your ignorance there, aren't you? Her gloves came from J. Crew and probably cost $35 or $40. You could probably afford a pair yourself.
 @Getov Mylon  It's a sad mind that it's in that place, that goes there.  No hate.  Just sadness.  Poor thing. Â
Many years ago, Nancy Reagan was excoriated mercilessly in the press for her love of designer outfits that were loaned by famous designers.
Â
You failed to notice that I did not mock the First Lady but rather her outfit.
Â
Of course, now it's different. Yeah, that will be the motto for this administration. We carped about those other guys and now that we do the same and worse...."Now...It's Different!" (TM) by Mylon Inc.
 @Getov Mylon I also note the press mocked Ann Romney for her clothing choices, sayign she's out of touch for wearing a thousand-dollar shirt. Then, not a peep when the THIS first lady strolls out in a $10k outfit.
Â
The media must think if one standard is good, two must be better.
 @Getov Mylon I seem to recall Mrs Reagan was mocked for her attempts to get her husband, the sitting president, to make decisions based off the horoscope. I always considered that a tad more tenuous than what she wore to Sunday brunch.Â
For the unfortunate few that stumble on this comment thread: Â a) they are saying things to get a reaction out of you, and (most importantly) b) they speak for a minority opinion. Â
Â
To the latter point. Â These people who comment about Odumbo and fascism and blah blah blah blah, they have a myriad of issues not at all related to the President. Â
Â
They are people glued to NewsMax, FOX News, Rush, etc. Â They have been told to not trust the government and most especially that Barack Hussein guy. Â They speak for a minority. Â I repeat, they are a MINORITY. Â Otherwise known as a fringe. Â They advocate for issues supported by a small percentage of America. Â Sure, debt reduction is very popular, on both sides, and they'll say that they are concerned about the future and their children's future. Â But they won't talk about corporate handouts, just handouts to the poor/elderly, they talk about tax reform but not corporate or high income, just that all the poor/elderly/retired/veterans should contribute. Â They talk about regulations being bad, but they'll never talk about regulations on the banking industry or wall street.Â
Â
It is in forums like these where they thrive. Â They are hypnotic with their end of the world, grab your guns to fight against the tyrannical government, type of mentality. Â
Â
But guess what? Â Obama: 55% approval. Â They're right wing fringe views: Â Uh, 15%. Â If they are lucky to frame the poll question inaccurately. Â
Â
Congrats Obama!
 @seattleways The majority you speak of is 50.6% to 47.8% in the last election, 47.8%  is not a fringe.Â
 @seattleways Corporate handouts? Indeed I do talk about it. All the time. I have news for you. The President's friends and donors are some of the largest recipients.
Â
That... would... be... different. Of course.
Â
Â
 @Getov Mylon  Nope, it should be EQUAL.  I don't bow to Obama like the Right tends to think left folks do.  So sad. Â
Â
He's guilty like the rest. Â But he certainly is not in the same company. Â Do tell me you understand this Getoff?
 @the unvarnished truth  @seattleways You came to the conclusion he was a hypocrite on your own time. All I suggested is that there exists a double standard. I am happy to entertain the hypocrisies of the GOP so feel free to point them out as well. I mean, the press sure won't....Â
@Getov Mylon @seattleways Alas Woe is me....Thou doest have a sense of humor...Bravo O Misguided Fair Maiden...
 @seattleways Friends have gotten hundreds of millions, no BILLIONS of your money for phony "green" companies. Jon Corzine, bundler and confidante of Obama, is getting a "Get Out Of Jail Free" card after the crime of the millenia, stealing $1.6 billion in customer accounts to cover speculation losses on bond prices at MF Global. GE is headed by another ally of the President. Guess what GE's tax bill was in 2010? Hint: I paid more taxes in my first paycheck of the year than GE.Â
Â
Regulations? They can be good or bad. Too bad that a lot of regulation is written to benefit large corporations that can afford to comply while squeezing out any competition by smaller ones that can't afford it. Have you ever actually READ any of those regulations concerning banking? I have. I have a college degree and everything and I have NO idea what they say because plain English to these people is like water on the Wicked Witch, apparently.
Â
Â
Finally, the debt issue IS like a ticking time bomb. We get away with it now because of the historically low interest rates. Would those interest rates ascend upward, we are in a whole lotta of sheep dip. Or inflation can be a back door tax on the poor and middle-class. Â Take your pick.
Â
Sincerely,Â
Getov Mylon,
Honorary President of the Fiscally Conservative Socially Moderate Humorous Wing of the Republican Party
Â
Oh and they'll talk about cutting government fat. Â But they'll never talk about cutting the defense department. Â
Â
If it weren't so serious and it weren't so sad, I'd mock these people. Â But they should be pitied. Â Grownups need to handle the problem. Â Let the radicals flourish in these comment threads. Â