Obama's second inauguration not as thrilling as before

WASHINGTON (AP) - Four years and one re-election after Barack Obama became America's first black president, some of the thrill is gone.
Yes, the inauguration of a U.S. president is still a big deal. But the ceremony that Washington will stage in a few weeks won't be the heady, historic affair it was in 2009, when nearly 2 million people flocked to the National Mall to see Obama take the oath of office. This time, District of Columbia officials expect between 600,000 and 800,000 people for Obama's public swearing-in on the steps of the Capitol on Monday, Jan. 21.
"There certainly will not be the sort of exultation you saw four years ago," said Mike Cornfield, a George Washington University political science professor. One reason why, Cornfield said, is it simply lacks the dramatic transfer of power from one president to the next.
"This is not a change that commands people's interest automatically," Cornfield said. "It's a confirmation of power."
Even Obama acknowledges he's already, shall we say, a little washed-up the second time around.
"I think that a lot of folks feel that, 'Well, he's now president. He's a little grayer. He's a little older. It's not quite as new as it was,'" the president often told supporters while campaigning for re-election.
His inaugural committee has scaled back to three days of festivities, instead of four. Some changes are on account of the slowly recovering economy and a desire by planners to ease the security burden on law enforcement.
But they also reflect a realization that the thrill for Obama's second inauguration burns a little weaker. There are only two official inaugural balls this year, both at the Washington Convention Center, rather than 10 official balls at multiple locations around town. There will be a parade, but it's expected to be smaller too; about 130 groups and 15,000 people marched down Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House in 2009.
Two weeks before the big day, plenty of hotel rooms still haven't been booked. Four years ago, some hotels sold out months in advance.
Obama will be sworn in first on Jan. 20, the date set by the Constitution, but it will be done in private since the day falls on a Sunday. His public swearing-in the next day also falls on the federal holiday honoring civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., branding the occasion with another layer of historical significance, especially for African-Americans.
Four years ago, Obama was what the country craved. He was a fresh political face who, with his promise to conduct Washington's business differently, offered people a reason to hope for change. But those people have now watched him on the job for four years, and are mindful that he didn't keep this town from becoming ever more divided along its partisan fault lines.
Some people would say, disappointingly, that Obama turned out to be just another politician. And how could he one-up the history he's already made?
Of course, lessened interest in the second inauguration of a two-term president such as Obama also could be a natural function of America's political process, said Daniel Klinghard, associate professor of political science at the College of the Holy Cross.
"When it's your first (inauguration), you're new and people are only seeing the potential in you," Klinghard said. "By the time the second one rolls around they're used to your voice, they're used to you saying certain kinds of things."
One group for whom the Obama thrill remains strong is African-Americans, who overwhelmingly wanted him to have four more years in the White House. More than nine in 10 blacks voted to re-elect Obama, according to surveys of voters as they left their polling places in November.
Hilary O. Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington office, said he has fielded hundreds of telephone calls and emails since the Nov. 6 election from chapter officials in South Carolina, Florida, New York, Maine, California and Washington state, all wanting tickets for their members. Chapters from Richmond, Va., and Jackson, Miss., among others, are bringing groups to Washington for the festivities, he said.
"There's still a great deal of excitement within the African-American community about the second term of the first African-American president of the United States," Shelton said.
Victoria Wimberley, owner of an Atlanta-based event planning business, brought four busloads of people to Washington for the 2009 inauguration. She's coming again, though with two fewer buses, which she blamed on the high price for accommodations - not any lack of excitement for Obama.
Wimberley said she feels "the same level of joy, happiness, excitement and celebration" for Obama's second swearing-in among the people she comes into contact with. "Because now he can really go to work," she said, explaining her view that another term should free him to govern without fear of any political repercussions.
Some of those who wanted a seat on one of Wimberley's buses weren't as sure Obama would win in November as they were that he would win in 2008. As a result, they held off on booking hotel rooms. Then came Thanksgiving, preparing for Christmas and concerns about whether Obama and congressional Republicans would strike a deal to stop mandatory tax increases and spending cuts known as the "fiscal cliff" from taking effect with the new year. Fitful negotiations went down to the wire, with Congress sending Obama a bill late on New Year's Day.
When people did get around to pricing hotel rooms "they just couldn't afford them," Wimberley said. Many hotels are charging hundreds of dollars a night for a room and requiring guests to stay at least three nights or four nights. Cost has been "the major conversation for lots and lots and lots of people," Wimberley said.
Yes, the inauguration of a U.S. president is still a big deal. But the ceremony that Washington will stage in a few weeks won't be the heady, historic affair it was in 2009, when nearly 2 million people flocked to the National Mall to see Obama take the oath of office. This time, District of Columbia officials expect between 600,000 and 800,000 people for Obama's public swearing-in on the steps of the Capitol on Monday, Jan. 21.
"There certainly will not be the sort of exultation you saw four years ago," said Mike Cornfield, a George Washington University political science professor. One reason why, Cornfield said, is it simply lacks the dramatic transfer of power from one president to the next.
"This is not a change that commands people's interest automatically," Cornfield said. "It's a confirmation of power."
Even Obama acknowledges he's already, shall we say, a little washed-up the second time around.
"I think that a lot of folks feel that, 'Well, he's now president. He's a little grayer. He's a little older. It's not quite as new as it was,'" the president often told supporters while campaigning for re-election.
His inaugural committee has scaled back to three days of festivities, instead of four. Some changes are on account of the slowly recovering economy and a desire by planners to ease the security burden on law enforcement.
But they also reflect a realization that the thrill for Obama's second inauguration burns a little weaker. There are only two official inaugural balls this year, both at the Washington Convention Center, rather than 10 official balls at multiple locations around town. There will be a parade, but it's expected to be smaller too; about 130 groups and 15,000 people marched down Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House in 2009.
Two weeks before the big day, plenty of hotel rooms still haven't been booked. Four years ago, some hotels sold out months in advance.
Obama will be sworn in first on Jan. 20, the date set by the Constitution, but it will be done in private since the day falls on a Sunday. His public swearing-in the next day also falls on the federal holiday honoring civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., branding the occasion with another layer of historical significance, especially for African-Americans.
Four years ago, Obama was what the country craved. He was a fresh political face who, with his promise to conduct Washington's business differently, offered people a reason to hope for change. But those people have now watched him on the job for four years, and are mindful that he didn't keep this town from becoming ever more divided along its partisan fault lines.
Some people would say, disappointingly, that Obama turned out to be just another politician. And how could he one-up the history he's already made?
Of course, lessened interest in the second inauguration of a two-term president such as Obama also could be a natural function of America's political process, said Daniel Klinghard, associate professor of political science at the College of the Holy Cross.
"When it's your first (inauguration), you're new and people are only seeing the potential in you," Klinghard said. "By the time the second one rolls around they're used to your voice, they're used to you saying certain kinds of things."
One group for whom the Obama thrill remains strong is African-Americans, who overwhelmingly wanted him to have four more years in the White House. More than nine in 10 blacks voted to re-elect Obama, according to surveys of voters as they left their polling places in November.
Hilary O. Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington office, said he has fielded hundreds of telephone calls and emails since the Nov. 6 election from chapter officials in South Carolina, Florida, New York, Maine, California and Washington state, all wanting tickets for their members. Chapters from Richmond, Va., and Jackson, Miss., among others, are bringing groups to Washington for the festivities, he said.
"There's still a great deal of excitement within the African-American community about the second term of the first African-American president of the United States," Shelton said.
Victoria Wimberley, owner of an Atlanta-based event planning business, brought four busloads of people to Washington for the 2009 inauguration. She's coming again, though with two fewer buses, which she blamed on the high price for accommodations - not any lack of excitement for Obama.
Wimberley said she feels "the same level of joy, happiness, excitement and celebration" for Obama's second swearing-in among the people she comes into contact with. "Because now he can really go to work," she said, explaining her view that another term should free him to govern without fear of any political repercussions.
Some of those who wanted a seat on one of Wimberley's buses weren't as sure Obama would win in November as they were that he would win in 2008. As a result, they held off on booking hotel rooms. Then came Thanksgiving, preparing for Christmas and concerns about whether Obama and congressional Republicans would strike a deal to stop mandatory tax increases and spending cuts known as the "fiscal cliff" from taking effect with the new year. Fitful negotiations went down to the wire, with Congress sending Obama a bill late on New Year's Day.
When people did get around to pricing hotel rooms "they just couldn't afford them," Wimberley said. Many hotels are charging hundreds of dollars a night for a room and requiring guests to stay at least three nights or four nights. Cost has been "the major conversation for lots and lots and lots of people," Wimberley said.
Bring on BB King to sing "The Thrill Is Gone"!
There's nothing to get excited about. All we are going to get is 4 years of the same thing and I think the American people are just tired of taking it on the chin. I realize there are those who will benefit by him being reelected and so I'm sure they are excited, but the rest of us have to pay for it so that isn't anything great. They can make all of the excuses they want, but the bottom line is we have the same disfunctional government for the next 4 years that we had before the election. Given all the money the politicians blew through last month entertaining themselves it only seems fitting to cut back on a few of the "festivities". And whereas they can all go back to work now that they kept their careers in tact I hope they manage to get something done before it's time to hit the campaign trail again.
"There's still a great deal of excitement within the African-American community about the second term of the first African-American president of the United States,"
Â
Perhaps the excitement is about the un-employment rate for African Americans averaged 8.6% 2006-2007. Total African American unemployment is currently at 15.8 percent and has been hovering around 16 percent for three years now. All the other major employment health indicators are down as well. For instance, the employment-to-population ratio is down to 51 percent from 60 percent in 2001. Nearly half of all African Americans arenât working.
Â
http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/us-unemployment-now-down-to-where-african-american-unemployment-was-pre-recession/
 @al_wa Thats what the RACIST blacks get for voting for him.
"...explaining her view that another term should free him to govern without fear of any political repercussions.'
Â
Yes, Boehner and company should get right on that "Enabling Act" legislation. Chop, chop.
I failed to be thrilled the first time around. Â What's wrong with me?
Imagine that....
headline "Â Obumblers second inauguration not as thrilling as before"Â To those of us that have Obumbler figured as a phony empty suit weren't to thrilled with the first inauguration.
@lmdk2  The only empty suit is Boehner. Good guy, moderate, but has no power. White House finally figured out that negotiating with him was a complete waste of time. The GOP House has split along the old Union/Confederate state lines. The next four years is going to be fun to watch because the GOP is simply crumbling.Â
 @lakeview Laughing? I will be laughing at YOU. He's going to make the RICH pay, so we dont have to?
Heard the latest? Everybody is going to pay a lot more in taxes. Unless you are one of those 47% that leach off the public tit, and dont pay taxes. Serves you people right for voting for the village idiot. Or maybe the village idiot is he who voted to screw themselves.
@Nuclearian You are one of those huh? I.e. you donât know what the heck that you are even posting about but you do an extreme amount of assuming and you should already know what that makes out of only you and what you obviously are. By the way. The policies and last budget of âfool me onceâ shrub, âdeficits donât matterâ and âitâs Hoover timeâ darth, and âgive me a lot of money but donât ask me where it is goingâ paulson carried well into most of â09 and even longer. So you might want to check about everything out that you continue to just lie and lie some more about. If your children are in trouble it is obviously your fault and only your fault. You might want to try getting up to date and up to speed on a lot of things here.
 @flyskiwindsurf  @Nuclearian Silly boy. But the unemployment rate is worse under your "Fuhrer" than any other President since Bozo Carter.
And if YOU are doing well, you are either one of the people living on the government "teat", or you own an abortion clinic, and are doing your part to achieve der Fuhrer goal of exterminating our children.
@Nuclearian (cont from above) âsince Democrat John F. Kennedy took office in January 1961, non-government payrolls in the U.S. swelled by almost 42 million jobs under Democrats, compared with 24 million for Republican presidents, according to Labor Department figures. Democrats hold the edge though they occupied the Oval Office for 23 years since Kennedyâs inauguration, compared with 28 for the Republicans. Through April, Democratic presidents accounted for an average of 150,000 additional private-sector paychecks per month over that period, more than double the 71,000 average for Republicans.â- May 7, 2012
@Nuclearian bwahahahaâ¦.. Wow. You really do keep up to date donât you. Additionally you know absolutely nothing about most of what you are posting: 1) I am doing extremely well thank you very much; and 2) in order to try to educate you at least a little bit (cont below)
 @flyskiwindsurf  @Nuclearian Nah. Its YOUR Fuhrer Obamination.
At least my middle class butt got ahead financially under Bush. Now the POOR, which THIS village idiot claims to support, is going to get financially raped.
But I guess when he financially screws you, you will still blame the Republicans. If you people ever realize that you have it better under the Republicans then maybe people will actually start thinking that schools actually TEACH something..
@Nuclearian ummmmâ¦â¦ Your so called âvillage idiotâ obviously is/was shrub. Obviously.
 @lmdk2 only empty suits run for or win elections anymore that is the way corporate America wants it -- for both parties
Â
 @lmdk2 I'm sure the 8 years of the village idiot preceding him was your nirvana.